Computer evolves to generate baroque music! 

Bach was the first Jazz musician!

100th like

Dead meme.

Charlie BT NO ONE AAAAAASKED (no one asked)

jazz is just less polished classical

real men listen to exe files!

Genatari Kralc nah, .png is the stuff

Michcode No, .gif is the beAst

Dudes.. can we just agree on one thing... .html is the best to listen to...

Ben Wager nah fam, PowerPoint Projects sound way better.

I guess it would also work better if all the pieces were transposed to the same key.

i wanna hear the product of someone using this kind of A.I. learning with a shit ton of baroque music as training material just training indefinitely and playing the most recent example every time an example ends. like imagine sitting in a bar where the music is just a learning computer with tens of thousands of hours training

openai.com/blog/musenet/

me and the boys with gaming pcs: OH YEAH

True dude

It gets worse everyday

YES.

No, in 0 minutes of training AI put some random notes

Nathanael Valera that’s the point

12:02 That might be because you transposed the songs: it learned that it's okay to transpose music midsong?

18:02 It actually started to sound like baroque music! It had same kind of progressions that was used at the time, style and scale. What it lacked was the human touch, so it has no coherent structure, repeats or meaningful progressions. Frankly I doubt computers will be able to produce esthetic music, but it can be an aide for a composer to find licks and/or inspiration, new out of the box-sounding progressions: your last bit already did some cool and fun stuff, imagine it trained longer with better hardware. Often musicians put recorder on and start playing stuff, and listening it again later. What might have sound relevant while playing might sound passe while revisiting the idea, but often stuff you didn't even notice while playing might be stuff that makes you scream "Woah, what the frack was that!". That's the kind of thing I mean with licks and inspiration. What I'm proposing even in the near future is the same approach that FoldIt has: let the computer do the mindless droning, but add human intuition in the mix, which makes all the difference compared to pure computer algorithms. This could also be gamificated quite easily: let your computer run software that learns music, locate and pinpoint cool things where it does it, you might get your musical idea featured in a song that someone/something compiles together as a coherent song. There is definetely future in these applications...

IT-kone i

lol it said fuck bach and picked up coltrane

Maybe it was asked "Do you like Jaazz?" and the neural network was like "oh boy do I!!?!?"

Liam White I kinda want to see this now

Sam Brownlow , wouldn't wanna taste it, though.

Liam White (png of orange comes out) THE FUCK

or just feed it apples yum

well, a computer would certainly do better than human on this. Try feeding somebody an orange (through their ears) and see what comes out on the other end.

first

@@yaaasKerchow Secound

I'm quite sure that's overfitted part, it sounds so familiar

@@Henrix1998 it might also just sound familiar because it’s using musical cliches even if it’s not a complete match to the data

Ling ling fans everywhere !!!

Wut du yu meen dere ar onely 30 a day *Emoji spam*

Except it's on piano

Geronimo Silva No, it practised 69 hours a day

Erase it is 24 hours

Yaeh yaeh??

You are robot

Oi, you got your Computer Chord Generating License mate?

GoobNoob i need to see your aussie licence before you can talk like that

@@handlotion8244 My internet speed is 8Mb upload and 3Mb download. How's that.

I think what he meant is to give the network pieces that has the same key signature to have little variance(those wonky off key parts)

Yeah he needs to give it beginners information and acouple of rules.... Its amazing how all it can organize the information, like a childs brain.

Aetherwrought Music you’re right,

i have no idea what this conversation is, sounds cool

Cell0 you should know this basic music theory, seeing as your name is literally "Cell0"...

1IK9 I was thinking of the same thing

Can YOU?

A robot isn't learning how to do anything, it's just simply learning how to procedurally generate a randomized** set of notes based on certain conditions we've programmed it to follow, combined with some poking and prodding in the mean time to make sure it's going in the right direction. (** It really is randomized, it's just a very narrow range of randomization which we humans interpret as music syntax.) Therefore, the difference between a robot and myself is that, although both of us can't write a symphony RIGHT NOW, I can create one from scratch on my own, without having anyone else tell me what to do. A robot can't do that, and thus requires outside help to do anything. "But, if you read a book on 'How to write a symphony', how is that any different from a robot being told to read the same book?" The difference between humans and robots is acting spontaneously. True, both humans and robots require some kind of outside information in order to do something... but I as a human would be able to act outside of that information. Like, if both myself and a robot were taught baroque music, the robot would simply create various iterations of "baroque music" and not go outside of that. But I could take "baroque music" and warp it into some new form of music type, like rock n roll, or jazz, or any other music type that WASN'T taught to me. And as far as I'm concerned, a robot could never do anything outside of what it was programmed to do. It will ALWAYS have some kind of limitation. Now those limitations might bring it close to emulating human 99%, but it'll never EVER be 100%.

김재광Jae-kwang Kim add to the fact that humans discovered science, music, arts. A robot can only practice them to a certain extent. We figured out things on observations and thoughts, something a robot can't do just yet.

Exactly; robots can only do what we tell them to do. They don't know how to disobey our orders yet, and I argue that they probably never will.

daniel10alien When parents attend a band concert 😂

They might but probably not because it can be so difficult to hear

daniel10alien pop music, amirite?

Ziffy's Theorem penis

daniel10alien or in an elevator

LOL

Andrew Scott lol it actually sounds like it

And 0 minutes sounds like ragtime to me

Turns out jazz sounds the same as random notes strung together by a computer... hmm

@@paultan5419 guess you don't know anything about jazz huh...

​@@ScarrCrow Im just taking the piss out of it, not a fan of jazz.

Inspired comment! Hope someone picks up on this

Great idea!

Christian Gingras Holy fuck you're smart...

Ehhh, I don't think it'll make much of a difference in this case. If anything, I'd suggest he tries other type of music. Baroque, and especially Bach's baroque, tends to rely a lot on counterpoint, which in oversimplifying terms means that the melody raises from the chaos between the two ends of the sound spectrum and pretty much juggles back and forth. THAT I'd bet is the main reason why it sounds so damn chaotic in this video. I'd recommend he uses more modern (and quite frankly: bland) piano music where the melody is carried by using the right hand, and the usual chords on the left as structure so as to add depth, and that he makes the program process them individually for each hand.

Christian Gingras Sounds like one ought to come up with a scripting language based on musical notation (in its entirety) and convert the training files to that format straight from midi. Representing the input music properly and allowing the bot to do the same ought to enhance the process quite a bit. If you represent it right it'll pick up the patterns right. Still only as clever as the programmer by the looks of things ;)

Sounds good

@@soultech674 i agree

We need him to see this

I might make a website that does something like that

And then we gonna get AI gangsta-rapper, no thanx.

How is it ever meant to use a metronome? Take FSB's advice, and be more grateful for what it gives you. Put me on the subreddit R/Wooosh, I wont care. You are a spoiled, ungrateful brat either way.

😤😠😤😡😠🤬😡😤😠🤬😠🤬😡😤😠🤬😤😠😡😤😡😤🤬😠😤😡😤😠😤😠😤😡😠😡😤🤬😠😤😡😠🤬😤😡😠🤬😡😤😤😡😠🤬

Paul Boleche - and they say it can’t think? 🤔 💭

Thelonious Sphere Monk .. do i have to say more -This NN-AI makes TS Monk replicates :p

Lol

NU-UH! IM A PERSON!

But can it learn how to make pancakes?

Niko I'm actually relieved to see he included that bit of humour because it show he understands the dangers and risks of artificial intelligence.

oH HECKER YES ANOTHER PERSON WHO HEADCANONS NIKO AS A GIRL

IM A MONTH LATE BUT THE HECKEREST OF YESSES

Biodigital jazz man!

Y A L I K E J A Z Z ?

"Acquired taste: Something [people] only ever say about [things] that [are] terrible."

Ariel Rozen Basically, the original was: "Something people only ever say about food that is terrible."

Ariel Rozen to change it so it fits more cuz we’re not talking about food

In theory, in an infinite amount of time, everything, even the impossible, will occur

It's like the old saying: Give a chimpanzee a typewriter and eventually it'll write Shakespeare.

Jaden Venable if you observe a particle for an infinite amount of time, you will never learn its exact position and velocity. Impossible things can't happen.

Bangbang Liu Not with that attitude.

Despacito 2.0

Or is it?

NCS: we have NCS in NCS

What's Unity?

Giradox the desktop environment, basically the interface

unity is a creation program

WAIT THERES CUBES I DIDNT NOTICE DAT AAA

EncyEx, in this context Unity is the Ubuntu Desktop Environment

:D he should

also powerful CPU+GPU :D (i personally have an I7 6700k gtx980)

Yes! He could use distributed computing.

Oh wow, I don't know why I hadn't thought about that! All I'd really have to do is give you the ~18 MB "re-formatted" text file (the one that goes "Yaeh Yaeh Yaeh Yaeh"), and all you have to do is get Karpathy's LSTM code working. (github.com/karpathy/char-rnn) (That might actually not be so easy, because it took me a few days to get Linux and Torch working before I could run it.) But then I just send you my text file, you train the LSTM for a few days straight, get a decent output sample, send it back to me, and I convert it back into music! Of course, I could also give you guys everything, including the MIDI-to-text conversion programs, but I think at that point I'd need to make a tutorial video.

You should do an Step-by-step on how to do this ourselves! I wanna let this thing train for days/weeks and see what it can do.

loss per note = d e l t a

@@dead.9628 No shit. But he didn't mention how he decided if a note was "right" "wrong", and how "wrong" that note was. Was it simply based on distance from the "correct" note? Or did also take into account things like whether the note fit into the harmony of that section?

@@heinzguderian9980 It's probably based on simple math/physics. I only did very little research in this, but I know that a "perfect 5" such as C+G or D+A, the frequency of the higher note is 1.5x times the lower note. For the same note, the one on the higher octave is 2x the frequency of the one below it. And many of those harmonious combinations that are pleasing to ears have some "good looking" numbers and easy fractions and stuff, such as 1.33x, 1.2x. He probably based his program on these. Or it could be even simpler - just tell it to learn from the frequency difference in those classical music.

@therainman777 You may be right, but you''re still a major fuckhead. Two out of four lines dedicated to insulting a dude who guessed his best to explain something (much like you did) speaks volumes as to how antisocial you are. I sincerely hope you get your head out of your ass.

​@therainman777 ​ You talked as if I don't understand the basics of AI, but I do. I think you are right in this case, but the frequency differences I described could also be used as a viable evaluation metric to train an composing algorithm, if your inputs are completely random rather than bits and pieces of already established classical music. I'm sorry I jumped to conclusions, but there is no need to call it nonsensical and dumb, because it's the fundamental of acoustics.

Both hands slap cheeks.

what is music without order tho

Gabrol chaos theory to midi conversion

music is music. the typing on my keyboard is music. despite the fact it isn't in order. just cause it doesn't sound good doesn't mean its not in order

I agree, music is a unit of notes :)

Max Delay yes, but you would have to do ALOT of times

Yeah It would be interesting if you could come up with a library of good a bad music to train it off, it may push the network... The only issue is that doesn't exist/... XD

George A it may be unconventional or slow, but if he makes a tutorial and allows other people to generate the music it may be possible. Say you generate a 20 second midi clip and rate it from a scale from 1 to 10, we then upload that to a shared location and other users can download those files to use as training data

nah basically compressing random music into one pattern

Perhaps like George A said, a training set of good and bad songs, (specifically noted), maybe bad would be considered you recording yourself mashing random keys.

Mozart was more talented than Bach. Mozart started writing fugues at 12. Bach didn't even write his first composition at 20. MOZART'S FUGUES (number inside brackets indicate the age he wrote them) Missa solemnis in C minor "Waisenhausmesse" KV 139 Gloria (12): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-vnxH8M31F3g.html Missa solemnis in C minor "Waisenhausmesse" KV 139 Credo (12): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-vnxH8M31F3g.html Mass in C major "Dominicus Messe" K66 Gloria (13): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-rlQJ2bgK3RQ.html Mass in C major "Dominicus Messe" K66 Credo (13): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-rlQJ2bgK3RQ.html Miserere in A minor, [4-part contrapuntal study] K.85 (14) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-_PxqQOUn1v0.html KV125 - Pignus Futuræ Gloriæ (16): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dQ77xyyffjA.html Missa in honorem Sanctissimae Trinitatis in C major KV 167 Gloria (17): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-X9T_URjVl5I.html Missa in honorem Sanctissimae Trinitatis in C major KV 167 Credo (17): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-YvCnr15hh78.html Missa in honorem Sanctissimae Trinitatis in C major KV 167 Agnus Dei* (17): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-g2teM5WckzA.html String Quartet No. 8 in F major K. 168 (17): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-3JDrlCG-y_E.html String Quartet No. 14 in D minor K. 173 (17): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-q5MVDsqIqCY.html Litaniae de venerabili altaris sacramento K243 [double fugue] : VIII Pignus (19): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-U-PDJozhBLI.html Misericordias Domini in D minor K.222* (19): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-lEBYufTXJQk.html Missa Longa in C K262 Gloria (19): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yCDFfN7g_Bk.html Missa Longa in C K262 Credo (19): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yCDFfN7g_Bk.html Vesperae solennes de confessore in C, K.339 - 4. Laudate pueri Dominum (24): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-c3rDwFFQ6bQ.html Missa solemnis in C, K.337 - 5. Benedictus (26): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ghAa3BJ4b5I.html Praeludium and Fugue KV 394 (26): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-m9vVu8rNON4.html Suite in C K.399 - I. Overture K399 (26): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-UHgs7-u7wGQ.html Sonata for Keyboard and Violin No. 29 in A Major, K. 402: II. Fuga (26): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-mMe4MCsH2WY.html Trio (Fuga a 3) in G Major, K. 443 (27): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-UtLOtTDk848.html Fugue In G Minor KV 401 (27): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-tXpV-gpgkQw.html Fugue In E Flat Major KV 153 (27): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-_2rpWr3etWo.html Fugue In G Minor KV 154 (27): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-2t42ZCeLxlk.html Grosse Messe in C minor KV 427 Jesu Christe - Cum Sancto Spiritu [double fugue] (27): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-97Twh_q8lQs.html Grosse Messe in C minor KV 427 Sanctus - Osanna [double fugue] (27): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-97Twh_q8lQs.html Adagio and Fugue for String Orchestra in C Minor, K. 546 (32): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-PFXF0Aysh4w.html Fantasia for mechanical organ in F minor K594 (34): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Qka_HMc2ajc.html Fantasia for mechanical organ in F minor K608 (35): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Jkh8Re4JUCw.html Overture to Die Zauberflote K620: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-c2TGbfzTx2A.html Der, welcher wandert diese StraBe voll Beschwerden (35): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-kB56nw1zx-o.html Requiem in D minor K626 Kyrie [arguably the greatest double choral fugue not written by Bach] (35) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-8ybTabIfLgY.html Requiem in D minor K626 Domine Jesu (35): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-i4DyyUvZws4.html there's more + tons of classical counterpoint in string quartets, quintets, symphonies, concertos + tons of choral, vocal, instrumental canons and canonic minuets Magnificent Counterpoint in the Finale of Mozart's Jupiter Symphony: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-YTxYykhQZbI.html The Ingenious Fugal Finale of Mozart's G Major Quartet, K. 387: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-uoXDHOyfJ-k.html The Incredible Finale of Mozart's K. 590 Quartet in F Major: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-nkbdUjjfRTQ.html Invertible Counterpoint in the Finale of Mozart's D Major String Quintet, K. 593: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-IQbxsGtyc2g.html Mozart: Canon for four voices, in C major, Anh. 191, K 562c: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-YC9bKfzXC18.html *Beethoven wrote his 9th symohony choral parts from studying these two choral works of Mozart

What

@phonetheanimator That wasn't a woosh. He was also making a reference to the movie.

@@2009xellos jesus. thanks Bach wiki

@@pseunition6038 he wooooosh the woooooosh

Sebastian Lacki 3

Ikr, too funny!

my favorite part too lol

Yes I know, it's amazing how far we've come in just 20 years.

A lot of algorithms are at least n squared in complexity. 30,000 squared is quite a big number.

So wrong @MrAlen61 it's not that substantial, it is a lot though

240p

u better not play trash

ChaseDoes Music and Gaming Me: yo pass the aux cord Friend: u better not Fail to generate baroque music Me: \('_ ) \|_| 🎹 |

ChaseDoes Music and Gaming *_0 minutes of training_*

solve this captcha 1st

If it ain't baroque, don't fix it! I'll show myself out.

+ElQuark0 but you say it 'ba-rock' not 'ba-roke'

Why?

+Charis Cat Nope, it is actually pronounced ba-roke.

Jim Daniel Hoxworth because he created an alcoholic pianist

*It's free real estate*

Ah the beautiful sound of free form jazz

*Now you need to listen free form jazz*

Why backticks not apostrophes

@Sith'ari Azithoth Hah, taste is different. Don't act like your opinion makes a funny or quirky.

Holy shit I thought I was the only one. Thank you!

Yeah Id prefer just midi music scrolling i found it hard to concentrate

OK Radiohead.

That was absolutely beautiful

NoogahOogah But, why not? I like varying genres of music, but most music I like has similar qualities. I have often wondered what could happen if you could fuse these varying styles into a cohesive creation.

(I has no knowledge, thiz iz puuure intuishon) Well, machine learning can be quite similar to a child. If we give a child two book variants, say... Mathematics and (only one). The child can't learn something solid with those two books alone. Of course, they learned a thing or two, but the data they processed in their brain is inconsistent, thus their processes *might* create an error or two. Now back to stupid mode :D:D:D:D:D WEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeeeeEEEEEEeeEeEeEee

Tiberion Jraxiosn lol

In the world of computer science, anything goes!

BuckeyeStorms Mixing genres is great, but if you think about it, you can't really mix genres until you understand how they work separately. This program didn't create something that sounded like Bach and Mozart together - it created something that sounded really confused, and not like Bach or Mozart.

But how will you get the computer to think up/generate vocal sound?

@@KaRaMaNisKaRaMan You wouldn't insert the actual songs, you'd take a transcription as a digital file. What I believe Mathieu is saying, he's making a jab at how incredibly simple most pop songs from a musical standpoint. They're pleasing to the ear, but they're all quite similar and simple.

Delysid '47 what vocals? There’s words in those?!?!?

Brian Hamel they're pleasing to the ear (of non classically trained musicians) I get so bored listening I V VI IV over and over again. It's why I can't listen to Canon in D, it was the original four chord song.

It would just repeat itself over and over again. Pretty accurate

Terminator *I can’t remember*

...yeet

I'll be Bach

(terminator whips out a portable keyboard.) terminator: you will listen to my music NOW! human: oh god make it stop ! 7 hours later human commits suicide. terminator: at least let me finish.... (continues playing)

As1052 Major and moron, nice 😀

That would be a _major,_ or _minor_ improvement!

It did learn key centers and modulation between keys believe it or not. So it really does not seem to matter what key a piece of music is in

David Cope pioneered computer generated music and used this exact technique: His computer program was able to generate Mozart replicas that people found indistinguishable. I think that was some 10 years ago or so.

This effect was even more pronounced for the day-long Mozart-Bach pieces. Definitely felt almost great at times, and then the machine falls off a cliff and stares at it's, I dunno, what's a computers navel? It just kind of rambles and then picks up on something interesting before slumping again.

oof

computers taking over the world confirmed now.

Peter Hammel its hopefully got at least 8

It make me feel a littel OLD... It is was yesterday!

When I remember I was born in previous millennium... ;________;

Maffoo Funny, the circled 1997 files were uploaded the day before I was born

I mean, I'm like three years older then the guy in the video and my coding abilities are nowhere near xD Less old I'm feeling and more inadequate :P Goes to show age isn't an excuse. Now to go learn PHP:)

I was nearly done with school by then.

Casey Koons or with jazz maybe that way he'd actually get some Bach

The voice would mess that up big time.

caleb kirschbaum instrumental

A lot of midi files don't have any instrument for voice

You'd just end up with Pachelbel's Canon on repeat forever.

Randomly generated boss music; that would be cool

That's my thought too. I know that Antichamber has procedurally generated music (I've never heard anything loop or any sequence of notes get reused, except the opening sounds), with tons of pads and other ambient/atmospheric sounds, but it's not remotely like this. It'd be cool to see a game have intelligently generated music like this.

Said game would be one heck of a CPU hog

I once generated music on a Commodore 64 by counting up from 0-255 and down from 255-0 at the same time, logical ANDed the numbers together, and sent the result to the sound chip as pitch. The result was surprisingly pleasant. I tried with other logical operators, but none sounded as good. IIRC, OR and NOR sounded really scary.

VitaliiDaGamer right now the system out puts 1 hour of music for 1 hour of time does it not?

"have more computers without having more computers" Uhhh... What?

There is something like that for rendering Videos and Animations online, actually, I think it's called a renderfarm.

Tobias1198 are you talking about a bot net?

Yes, but something more like folding@home.

Already exists, look into distribution computing. You basically create a massive WAN where people can donate processing power of idling computers (think of it as a botnet)

are you an alternate me?

I'm calling the police

The sad thing is that i knew what this was immediately...

He actually explained loss with the Loss meme in a later video.

FUCK YOU that was so bad

Matthew Ferrie humans get creative the same way actually

Matthew Ferrie Pseudo-randomness but yeah.

random does not exist in computation

except... there is literally random in computation. Give it a look up. EDIT: Some works on the decay of a radioactive element, which is random. Some work off of the input of someone (I believe linux does this)

And human creativity results from using examples from other humans, as well as some randomness.

Making error can bring some good thing too

Give it a electric guitar sound and it DJENTS!

RealistikDash D U B S T E P

RealistikDash I like some dubstep but that was a good one

How about "artificial baroque"

And "computer rap"

Who is they

@@IsomerSoma AB

Or "fail music theory music"

Mr. Miner Mike That number is an urban legend.

Whatever it is, it''s a lot more than 2.

Well I did the maths some times back and I don't really remember but I think 10.000 hours was like 4/5 hours a day every day for 10 years, seems like what you would need.

Mr. Miner Mike tho that's kinda bullshit

i mastered violin by just playing it 2 to 3 hours a day in a month, i can play any classical music at the first attempt most of the time by just reading a signature while im on it and do most techniques with barely 90 hours of training, 1% of what you claim

Wow what a great idea

I completely agree

🤔

Siri is the worst virtual assistant in mass produced devices know to man that is a default virtual assistant. Google Assistant, then Microsoft Cortana, and finally Amazon Alexa are all better. And Samsung Bixby is probably better too but the English version isn't out yet.

Peter Njeim You've got quite the something to say for a person who misspelled _known_ as "know", didn't use a comma before a coordinating conjunction, and edited your comment so that you could leave those two mistakes there.

Peter Njeim You know what? I come back to this comment I made and realize this: the spelling, grammar, etc mistakes don't matter. What actually matters to me is that you didn't back up your argument with any claims or facts _at all_, and, as a matter of fact, although I respect others' opinions, they typically don't back up their claims, either. That's this huge problem I see: they say that something is just their "opinion", but, in reality, they have no reason to believe what they do, at least no reason stated within their comment. I also wanted to make you aware that typos and misspellings are the same, except typos apply only to, as the name would suggest, typing. (This isn't part of the argument, but I wanted to point it out in the same way that people point out spinach in others' mouths, and "Grammar Nazis" point out grammar mistakes in others' writing, just because I'm particularly annoyed by you.)

I tried it and Siri said 'Writing your note... New Note: A Bach piece'

Can't Siri use previous training?

Erik Ryde I am feeling the exact same way.

Erik Ryde same

Oh yes

HA! Mechanisation come for everybody!

It is cool as fuck! Imagine being able to jam with an AI-companion that knows you and how you play?