Congresswoman Won't Let Mark Zuckerberg WEASAL His Way Out Of Her Question About Tracking People! 

alll data server save face buk after leekk problam

The government is up to get all us

@@luiscarvajal6557 Yes, they -really- are. Check out how in some Chinese cities (if not all of China?) they're tracking people through technologies and if they're not "obedient" - by what they do, or say - they're not allowed to get bank credit (and God knows what else). Coming to a neighborhood near you! :/

The complicated truth about China's social credit system, "[..] the country's network of 170 million CCTV cameras" @ www.wired.co.uk/article/china-social-credit-system-explained ^^ 170 *MILLION CAMERAS* P.S. www.cnbc.com/2019/07/26/china-social-credit-system-still-in-testing-phase-amid-trials.html

Might be better than big leftist corporations who live in Silicon Valley and have a huge disconnect in their brains

Yes lol

your parents dont need an explanation they just want you to stop that minute fucking tard

RAPHA why’d you copy that guy’s comment? Like, word for word.

@@dudedude869 Who cares what they want when I'm in the middle of playing Smite and Can't pause it! Quit being a square Mommas Girl.

Hahah

*Woman

No. The weasel is a silly little dish

@Ave Republic! it doesn't look like she knows anything

That would be a fair poi t if you believed zuckerberg was honest

Mark definitely had loads of help and may not know but he knows way more than the Congresswoman.

Ave Republic! Lol Facebook was created by Mark and a couple of his friends in college or something. Who th would be able to pay “hundreds of programmers” when they’re just making something for fun with a couple of friends

Apparently she does. His shady ass, can't answer a question, without deflection!! Libtard, little bastard!!

lol

LOL! Haha

It's funny in the courts how they want the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. But, when you try to explain "the whole truth" you get a partial demon bitch demanding a Yes or No reply!

@@savagelifenutrition9485 Stupid comment. That is why there are 2 sides asking questions.

@@savagelifenutrition9485 name checks out lmao

angelo moncada Hey dumbass, they criticizing the woman the Berg

@Zeus 1455 god damn are you salty chill its a fucking youtube video

For real this woman trying use the yes or no statement on him. It's total one sided if he says yes its automatically seen as negative, if he says no its lying. I believe yes, or no is never a finite answer, there are different variables in the topic.

On a another note majority of these people are not in the times themselves. For example the one congressman didn't know facebook makes money off ad revenue. I know age brings wisdom, but I know majority of a highschool class would have greater knowledge, about the topic.

Tai Guy h

goduskychris Chris Godusky well dont use facebook then

Just because he’s an alien doesn’t mean he has to be the bad guy, goddam it.

You know him? Except seeing him in public?

goduskychris Chris Godusky / You’re such an idiot, in the terms and conditions it says that you allow Facebook to collect data for them to further improve the service. Idiots like you skip through all the terms and conditions, you press accept (so you are accepting the fact they can collect data) and then you complain about it. You are the one that accepted. some people are so stupid

So it should be. If it’s painful to watch, then you must be detached from reality. She is very literate, to anyone with common sense. To acknowledge Zuckerbergs pain is taking away the reality of the truth. Who does that? If you don’t use Facebook they can track you and so can any other developer and that’s fine? There’s rules and regulations to be adhered to and they have clearly been broken time and time again, but yet that’s ok? To understand the terms and conditions set by Facebook is like understanding politics and law, they are completely different languages. It also implys that everybody has the mental capacity to understand them. In essence before you even start, you are not bound by the tc’s of FB. FB is working by the same rule the US government does and that is the fact There is no right to privacy.

I wouldve yelled at her, seeing that shes interrupting him every time makes me soooo angry

She’s trying to get a complex pint across in 4 minutes he’s trying to take long time to answer so she can’t get her point across that’s why She interrupting

Receiving a tastes of his own medicine. This is what Zuckerberg and his group have done consistently to the general public for years. What she should of done is slapped his face backwards ... why, the damage had already ready been done... He has billions in his back pocket through corruption, who wants to carry on listening to absolute lies. Remember this is a thieving and lying scumbag your talking about who has a track record of consistently lying to the American people and any other persons for that matter.

damm rude n stupid

She was asking yes or no questions. If genuinely wanted to provide an explanation, he could have said, "yes, _______" or "no, _________". He wasn't trying to answer, he was trying to circumvent the questions. But all of the questioning leads to a fairly moot point in this world anyway, the government is most likely already tracking all of our online movements and locations.

Fuck yea u right

Ikr she's very annoying

He gave money to her

I agree with that xD

Evasiveness is not becoming.

Professor Teddie Bear This comment has me dying lmaoooo. Like dang can he get 10 seconds to answer anything 🤣🤣🤣

Yes or no ...congresswoman i really wanna give you a long fucking story and drag out the clock because i know you all have limited time like a couple minutes Yes or no ...congresswoman i really wanna give you a lo Yes or no

Shivanth M you’re grammar is on point!

Thats google not Facebook

@@mrhenden2817 lol and that "you're" kills it too, shouldn't it be "your"?

Marek Fiala it was sarcasm lmao

@@mrhenden2817 oh, in that case i'm sorry for my misinterpretation :)

i know...i know.

we can laugh and cry at the same time to that..

I know right

Yuh im american and i agree with that like wtf the amount of hypocrisy

Hahahah ahaha what a fucking joke

Video started and she started about people don`t like XD Good job America!

More like ask to see the CEO.

So would i if the service sucked

dxsired timx_s Lmao ikr

And I bet you don't know anything about customer service.

Lol. I hate those people.

Haha

5:40

The happiness of relief.💆‍♂️💆‍♂️

He smiled bcs she was done with her arguments lol

REAL SPIRIT DYNAMICS people do that everywhere though. When people want to show you they are right and don’t give you a chance to explain yourself.

REAL SPIRIT DYNAMICS because she is a pushy bitch.

Okay and... I dont have a problem with that

Well she does have a D next to her name.

Mainly because she is asking for a yes or no answer instead of him dancing around the in circles. When someone starts with "well you have to understand" You know there will be no answer.

You forgot the " congress woman " at the begening

hahahahahahahhahah :v wtf man! :D :V hahahah 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Let him fkn finish a sentence

@@Monsternutz @crazy poutine 😂 I'm dead

😂😂😂😂

I wish there was a superlike button for comments

You cant take my property bitch 😂

YCaptain Aaryan you want my property, YOU CANT HAVE IT 😂

I wanna like this twice

I love you

these ppl doesnt know how anything works the government should stay at their own business

She asks the most dumb ques ive ever heard

@@WR-me2ts she asked relevant questions, that's the reason for the upload of this video.

ladee qesten gud data save no save sukarbar no answer alll data server seve not gud sir

She knew enough to demonstrate how he's lying through is teeth..;)

He deserves it !!!

Jun Sen Ngooi 🤣🤣

hehehhehe

Exactly

lmao that's what she would be if she was a teacher

It’s a yes or no question you fucktard. You’re not supposed to give them time to think of a way to lie around it.

Thing is Snowden exposed what our government is capable of. He profits. Worth billions because zuckerturd is farming and spying on us for profit.! Try just try turning that shit off inside of Facebook . They (Facebook) just turn it back on.

True, I'm not sure what is worse. I expect my government not to spy on me unless I'm suspected of a crime and they not only have reasonable grounds for suspicion but that this is also documented for future accountability. The fact that our respective governments continue to spy on us, serves only to highlight the ridiculous hypocrisy inherent in this case. It's like when your dad tells you "not to fucking swear in front of grandma" in front of grandma. It's like puritanical priests preaching chastity and hearing confessions of others, all the while abusing children. Whilst I'm an atheist Matthew 7:3 provides a poetic summary: "And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?"

She didn't let him answer because she wasn't interested in the answer, all she wanted was a simple "yes" so she could take the info out of context and paint him into a villain.

"their"

Their*

THEIR. sorry, I hate people who spell wrong, can't help it (:

Will Reese We know it’s a joke ok

As soon as you do that we are done!

i see what you did there

...And Tony Stark, who of course, is a national treasure!

@@idunno1300 no.....just no

I don't get it..

@@yoyoman_blue6485 Watch Iron Man 2

robot smile

Astral Bex Getting interrupted over and over would make me smile when they get interrupted by someone else

Thanks bro

@@TmanTheTdog It shows how he's aware _exactly_ of what he's doing...

Another potterhead lol

I think its more like dora lol

Harry potter that's a point for gryfindor- professor Snape

Can’t tell if this is ironic or completely serious

Everytime he *attempts* to explain something.

It was so annoying. I hate how they want him to answer yes or no, but he can’t do that because he knows that they’re trying to manipulate it into something it’s not to prove their point because they don’t have any idea how it works

Brendan! I think you’re missing the point. She has a limited amount of time has to have all those questions answered so she needs have direct and short answer so she get them all answered. You see when she’s interrupted and told her times up.

@newagetyson newage not all questions are yes or no

Thats not the problem. He just wasnt man enough to do the same to her.

Stolen

Why Are You Typing Like This

Azerty Qwerty LITTTT

@Azerty Qwerty if you only give about American people and don't give a fuck if someone on the orther side of the world is suffering you are now the worst and dumbest person i met.

there are fetishes you know

@@bonnewagenaar1546 it's okay. Many Americans think they are the most important thing and the world only around them. Let them have their dream and still cant name the bordered countries or where north korea is. On the other hand he mightve been jokin. It doesnt matter his comment was stupid and unnecessary.

Yea I laughted at that so much :DD (From Czechia/Czech republic)

She didn't let him reply completely because he was Lying constantly

Rachel Sommers no he wasnt

Rachel Sommers no

Rachel Sommers that's weird cause last time I checked he was the genius

Schmuck-A-berg was trying to get a Lie in every now and then, But it took him too long to come up with a Plausible Lie because the ridiculously shaped object connected to his neck, only contains Fried Potato 🥔 Chips 🍟 , and No real CPUs or Processors 😀 😆 😂 Schmuck-A-turd being labeled a " genius " by you , still doesn't make him an adept Convincing Liar

yes or no

I think normeme is stating that the congresswomen won’t acknowledge his points. I agree as I too find it annoying

Except facebook is not some innocent bystander protecting people. This is a really shitty comment. It makes it seem like the users of facebook are the true criminals, since in your metaphor they would take the role of the person with the metal rod.

@@jesper10201 With all due respect I think you are taking it a little too far

Saying it was a shitty metaphor isn't too far. Even if you consider that i dared used the awful cuss word "Shitty".

There's usually a significant amount of question-begging involved in those, but this congress member's questions are rather direct.

Ted not really that’s an answer that needs explanation or the Congresswomen could twist his words

I bet she's a feminist.

the Lone Wolf She has 4 minutes to get answers from him. She wanted answers. He gave bullshit in return so he didn’t have to answer anything in those 4 minutes

@@poolsoup6650 She didn't even let him speak for more than 5 seconds...

the Lone Wolf she’s from California lol

just monika I’m not supporting either side here. He’s a smart man. Watch the rest of the interview. He’s never going to give an answer, and she won’t let him. They’re both terrible Edit: I now realize I didn’t make it clear in that post, but I meant to say this earlier also

This is hilarious

How does this have so little likes?! So fucking funny

-Umm yes ? -THROW HIM INTO JAIL

U need more likes btw

hahahaha GOLD :D

😁😂 same here

hahahaa LOL Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh so true!

Yea these 4 miniutes of my life are gone now... I'm so sad

Yupp

Exodus BLUE I don’t think any of you idiots had any brain cells to begin with.. 🤦🏽‍♂️ Lord why are people such idiots.. congress should just let them scoop all your pvt data..

NICE! A new one for me.

Yue Miking exactly...the context is crucial

Fuck that bitch

Why?

@@Blaze6485 Cause he is a loser and a sad excuse of a human being

Nick Betruger why so rude

idk why nobody liked this, I loled

Hahahaha

Wow , you need more likes ! :3

R Martin: awe, how cute, the millenial wants his FB hero to be strong and defiant but in the end he’s just a snowflake like you...

Man, that is gold!!!!! I laughed my ass off!!!

😂😂😂😂😂

I laughed so hard about this hahaha wtf

I fucking lold!!!

😂

Savage x'))

No she's not ur right

Her job is to question, she did her job correctly, she's not trying to prove he's a criminal she's trying to start a dialogue outside of the event that educates her and gets her informed so that she can vote appropriately on any laws that come down the line. That's their job, you just don't understand it... This is not a court room buddy, it's Congress.

ryan K she didnt even let mark answer any question lol

ryan K the purpose of a question is to receive an answer. she would not let him answer- she was acting like a question posed as an open one was actually a closed one.

ryan K lmao how did she do her job well? All she did was ask questions but she failed to collect any answers by not letting mark to answer and when he was going to answer she kept interrupting. This isn’t a court case

YES OR NO. ANSWER YES OR NO

Woman: *asks question Zucc:Well we actual- Woman: correct?

👍

Yea baria hai bhai....

Gofan 69 hahahahaha

FIERCE BATTLE OF GETTING A DAMNED ANSWER FROM MARK I MEAN JACOB

Am dying!

Its not the time for him to explain his actions, or give his reasoning. This was a designated 4 minutes to answer yes or no questions that will be elaborated on earlier. Get a clue

Making pressure on him to not answer his question. It was not a question which should be answered to begin with. She is forcing him to answers as she desires to.

Hevin Amber oh god you're dumb, he cannot lie on live tv, there are smart people unlike you watching.

womensplaining

Hevin Amber It's because he's not stupid. She is trying to push an agenda, and these answers are more than just yes or no. If I asked you, " Have you ever cheated on a test yes or no." Let's say one time you glanced and saw one answer from someone else. Still cheating tho right? But it makes it seem worse than it is. That's why they are asking yes or no answers. I'm not even on his side, cause I don't know the full story. But I understand why he is speaking this way

Paramvir Atwal WOAH WOAH WOAH just a bit too far

I will marry her.

he's probably MR. Castorared by now

@@brettosborne6250 that was a valiant effort.

Or Mes Castor

Actually, Zuckerberg was trying to give long responses to a question that just needed a Yes or No response. Some people will try and dance around the question, but you have to stay on them and ask them Yes or No.

well it happens when question doesnt make any sense.

Marcus Melton Those questions did not need a yes or no response. The people asking the questions are very aware that it’s more complicated than yes or no but they want a yes so that they can manipulate it into how they want. Answering yes for those questions would just be digging Facebook’s grave. It’s not fair that he doesn’t get time to explain how it actually works.

She was probably in her period

Robots dont have patience

HE is the annoying one because he wont answer the frigging question STRAIGHT UP and honestly!

This is a stupid thing to say.. she was making really good points and wanting to get the truth? how is that annoying?

@@darkprettylikebriamileslup7239 if you dont like facebook dont use it. these are not yes and no question which thus take things out of context.

Catt Kitty A two party political system where the winner wins it all is doomed to fail, definitely in the 21st century.

Catt Kitty, then you must really hate Ka’mala Harris!

Agreed

sure your mama hillary more suitable .. LOL

Firas Francis what does this have to do with Hillary

You can't give him the time to calculate

@@drewthompson3195 exactly he should just say the truth wtf is hard about fhat lol defending this scumbag shows your IQ.

Stillmagic its way out of context its sounds bad but if they let him explain its not even that bad

Mruga oczami średnio co 3 sekundy-normalny człowiek jak ja 2 razy na minutę

+ Life Hacks This seems to be a common tactic in Royal Commission type scenarios. The speaker has some agenda they want to push so they ask loaded questions that cannot be answered yes or no and then when the victim tries to explain they demand yes or no. To the uneducated outsider it then seems like the victim is trying to avoid answering. Pretty devious tactic and should be immediately squashed by whomever is running the commission.

Yes, they were. Her first question was. "You are collecting personal information on people who do not even have Facebook accounts, isn't that right?" How is that not a question that just needs a Yes or No response? It's either yes we do or no we don't. It doesn't need an entire background of what you do as a company. Either you do it or you don't.

@@sucram1015 yes but if he responded with a yes she would have cut him off to prevent him from explaining why. For example if i were to perform CPR on someone and did chest compression's but i refused to give the victim breaths because he/she was bleeding from the mouth and giving the victim breaths would cause infection. Do you not think it would be wrong to hold me accountable for the person dying and ask me "did you give him/her breaths" and i said "no" that would make me sound like a horrible person when in reality i was concerned about my own health and safety because the victim could have had HIV or another blood born disease. Do you see how cutting off people and giving them yes or no questions with no explanation makes them look bad when in fact they are not. Explaining things change the situation completely remember that.

@@sucram1015 Problem about saying no is that the congress would not be satisfied and would start to manipulate the same question with the same meaning to get their desired answer. Just go to 2:42 when he answered yes. She totally manipulated the answer for the whole questioning. Did not even listen to the following explaination. What he is trying to do is to explain the situation in detail so that it wont be manipulated in any other way.

Why? She is doing a good job, Mark is stealing data he shoud be beaten and thrown in jail

I am face palming at your comment

​@@user-uz2le3tn8g She's not doing a great Job because she does not know about Data, Programing, AI, Machine Learning, User-Driven Application, and does not know what question to ask. For example she's asking if Facebook collect data from what people are searching? How do you think the search are so efficient on Google and Facebook? It's all about Data Mining and Machine learning. Developed AI can learn about keywords and the result that users are clicking when using those keywords. The more data you give to train an AI, the better will be the output. So Facebook need to collect as much data as possible to create better service and become more competitive on the Market. But wether or not Facebook is going to misused those data is the is where the Questions should be aiming at. By asking for a Yes or No, she's trying to making people think that if he admitted YES then that means he should not collect their search data anymore. And later you would search for something rare and struggle the whole day without finding it. She's using that technique because she knows that IQ average of USA is 98, like most of big countries like France, Spain, etc. Hong Kong is 108. That mean even if people like us have an IQ 120-140 or more, and we could understand the difference between "Collecting Data" and "Misusing Data", most people living in the US are under the world IQ average, where you are considered as a normal people in term of intelligence. However the next Congressman did a Good Job by asking pertinent questions. I'm not defending Facebook on the data misused, but you can prove anything by have a YES for an irrelevant question. But if you do some searches about Data mining, Machine Learning for search, User-Driven or Consumer-Driven Application, than you will understand better why they need to collect those Data.

UmWut Well, you are not morally allowed to avoid answering some pertinent question while being brought to the senate, is it? It makes you look like an immature person, especially if you hide information so blutantly about your company while facing justice.

UmWut He is allowed to speak but he is not morally allowed to avoid answering some plausible questions.

UmWut The word doesn’t have anything that can possibly weaken my statement regarding his behaviour. Every person is influenced by a distinct veil of moralty when it comes to one’s being and the extenct to which the word covers the perception of another being when related to how someone comes to their defance in order to protect something, in this case Zuckerberg’s company. It is only natural to say that a person brought to face the justice is also face to face with their own moralty. So can you shed more light upon the belief that my word shouldn’t have been used in that sentence since I can’t quite understand your reasoning?

UmWut Moralty doesn’t mean just what is right and what is wrong. Moralty is a a set of beliefs which defines the truth of everyone’s beliefs. And of course it has to do with moralty when you have to defend your company because he had to prove his truth and the values of the company he represents. I am afraid I can’t find consistency within your argumentation, hence I don’t wish to polarise the discussion any further. It is more than obvious that your perception about the word “morals” is somewhat limited. As of the content of my opinion, you clearly have no plausible reason and no clarity which makes me think you didn’t understand exaclty the core elements of my judgement.

Speech - 100

It's the haircut and suit etc... trying to make him look more distinguishable and relevant to the adult world.

Unless he hasn't slelt in a week he looks like a man in his 50s not 30s

Robots don't age, they just need new updates

So...now he looks around 20?

Its not his suit its the suitcases under them eyes lol

Epicdemic To me, she's mentioning that Facebook is manipulating and is "spying" on its users but I can guarantee she has taken advantage of Facebook's platform for popularity reasons. It was not her questions that got me annoyed but the way she asked them and tried to be overpowering; she needs attention.

Ah an idiot who thinks that a social media platform is the biggest spyware on Earth you must not have heard of intelligence agencies.

Being articulate doesn’t mean you are rude. I can’t understand how you think she was rude.

@@goddessofthedivine2871 she didn't let him talk, she wanted him to say something specifically instead of telling her the facts because she wasn't asking for the answer but wanted him to say something that's not completely true

She was presenting some facts he was constantly denying. She just wanted him to say the truth and not beat around the bush in an immature manner by distorting the perception of the questions.

@@goddessofthedivine2871 She took the facts out from context in order to make mark look bad. The answer mark was trying to give was "yes facebook will track you by using cookies, IF you allow facebook to do so" she only wanted Mark to say "yes" without further explenation. This would have made Mark look bad so obviously he tried to give context to the question. Its called political agenda.

@Himanshu Chowdhury so does facebook not track people then?

Epicdemic yes but she hardly let him speak

If he wouldnt have been trying to weasle around her questions like a greases pig she wouldn't have gotten frustrated. He is there to reveal information.

John Lacy wtf u on she was asking for an answer and he was trying to give the answer but she was being a fucking bitch and intrupting him

park jimins jams He was trying to give soft non committal bullshit answers, and she wasn't having it. What are you on, that you would defend a parasite who won't own up to his shady shit?

John Lacy if your going to ask someone a question you are asking for an answer and it doesn't matter if he was going to be wrong and might have said something unrelevent she still did the wrong thing