Тёмный

Copenhagen vs Everett, and ER=EPR 

mrtp
Подписаться 15 тыс.
Просмотров 5 тыс.
50% 1

Leonard Susskind's lecture on Copenhagen vs Everrett, and ER=EPR given at University of California, Santa Barbara
Lecture date: May 05, 2016

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

21 апр 2018

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 17   
@FarFromEquilibrium
@FarFromEquilibrium 6 лет назад
Susskind lectures and the never ending battle with sound quality....
@kwijung
@kwijung 6 лет назад
Thanks for uploading this
@gaussianvector2093
@gaussianvector2093 2 года назад
Understanding abstract Topology can put intuition to very abstract concepts
@BabaBabelOm
@BabaBabelOm Год назад
The observer is both inside and outside the system. There is a potential self interaction within the observer, which is mind (non-colloquial mind; mind represents awareness and interaction), and is why we see two different modes of reality in observation and “non-observed” observation aka the wave particle duality of the double slit.
@brendawilliams8062
@brendawilliams8062 3 года назад
Thankyou.
@amyk6403
@amyk6403 4 года назад
Interested layperson here...I have a question....Following the reasoning Susskind presents in this lecture, is the GHZ Brane then analogous to the node between the two " boxes" in the double slit/wormhole idea?
@schmetterling4477
@schmetterling4477 Год назад
No. ;-)
@amyk6403
@amyk6403 Год назад
@@schmetterling4477 It's been so long since I asked that question I have no idea what I meant. 😉
@schmetterling4477
@schmetterling4477 Год назад
@@amyk6403 No. :-)
@frun
@frun 9 месяцев назад
​@@amyk6403You meant it's a common interior in both cases.
@amyk6403
@amyk6403 9 месяцев назад
@@frun Is it a common interior? I will have to watch it again to see if my question was ridiculous or not. 😉
@finn9000
@finn9000 Год назад
first watched this in middle school, now I'm in my Physics undergrad and still don't understand it lmao
@stefanbanev
@stefanbanev 4 года назад
the split of world at each observation is totally unnecessary consequence of Everett’s relative state. The wave-function of observer is a way more economical way then wave-function of “entire” universe since observer's observations are the only & only what effectively exists and accessible for observer to test, the only observer's state is available for observer to test/run any experiments. Thus, it makes no sense to talk about wave function of universe since universe is an emergent phenomenon derived from observer's states thus “entire universe” is an observer’s assumption to comply with observer believe for objectivity of reality. Such quantum system as an observer is a way less complex quantum system as entire universe. In some extent both can be considered as an approximate invariant. "entire universe" version assumes existence of objective reality while "observer version" makes no assumption about that at all.
@stefanbanev
@stefanbanev 4 года назад
@Breadstick Shrimpfry >" to observer independent phenomena at all" --- EXACTLY!!!! it's the point, there is no way to have an observer independent phenomena at all. Once you start to talk about "independent" you do make an assumption about "objective reality", it's not necessary to make, math works fine without such assumption. It does not preclude to believe in "objective reality" just do not add it to the math framework. Since only & only accessible information is the state of observer thus, Everett's "universal wavefunction" is in fact the "observer wave function".
@brendawilliams8062
@brendawilliams8062 3 года назад
All I see is that engineers have a program to satisfy triangles and as long as you don’t throw your dice on a straight line you are good to go with a computer
@schmetterling4477
@schmetterling4477 Год назад
You are correct but overthinking. A wave function is a property of the quantum mechanical ensemble. There can be no ensemble of universes. The universe is, by definition, a singleton. ;-)
@BabaBabelOm
@BabaBabelOm Год назад
Verbose and entangled but yes
Далее
надувательство чистой воды
00:28
ER=EPR but Entanglement is Not Enough | Leonard Susskind
1:00:45
The Quantum Origins of Gravity by Leonard Susskind
1:17:53
William Unruh - The view from GR
1:17:33
Просмотров 9 тыс.
Индуктивность и дроссель.
1:00
Полезные программы для Windows
0:56