Countries That Are Still Monarchies in 2020 

Pp

The countries with the same type of government for the longest time

I like your videos specially war videos

The Pope :D

Slowly on all of them, or maybe a video on each country, with focus on the monarch.

He can undo it any time, because THEY put that in the deal. They can also put him back as absolute monarch without his doing or consent. That's also in the deal.

The people of Bhutan are smart enough to understand that monarchy is the best political system

@@ageloshatzioanidis4553 based and empire-pilled

Because the king. Is too generous

Aye I like it because it's buddhiat

You too! I wanted to get the gold he was going to send me, but the service on Coruscant went down.

@@thesenate7948 same

@@thesenate7948 I am the Senate

Prince Charles used to be the prince of Nigeria

I’m ready to wooosh

She's a clever lady, so she's well aware that exercising that right would probably mean the end of the Danish monarchy.

She's probably having it as a last resort shall the country come in the hands of alt-right (or any kind of totalitarian) party and they bring a law so vile it would ruin it's minorities or something along the line. Other than that, there's no need to ever implement it. However, everything I know about Denmark tells me that's never going to happen, so everyone can be happy.

That is the same in the U.K. and the veto has never been used as she is the Queen by the Consent of the People only

Out of all the royal families I like the danish royal family the most

This is a power most constitutional monarchs have, including the monarchs of Norway, the Netherlands, Belgium and Spain. They are very rarely used, and are considered “reserve powers”. The king of Malaysia, who is usually a purely symbolic figure like his European counterparts, in a very rare event used his veto earlier this year to block a law that would have given the government massive and arbitrary extrajudicial powers under the pretext of “fighting the coronavirus”

Yeah, we've had a few cut backs recently. Cost of living and all that.... God Save The King 🤴

.

@@cmds5604 and a '.' to you too, sir

@@Oscar-vv6dn .

@@jmithab2190 .

@@fiem .

Millennium later queen Elizabeth II is

Viper TheLegend fr she is like 92 or something years older than queen victoria

no not actually she has about 10 years left max.

when we were kids we thought her mother would never die either but she has

@@mysteriousDSF She's planning on living until after Prince Charles passes away. She REALLY doesn't want him to be king.

Normie shit

Queen Elizabeth - chill out! I'm not gonna leave ur chase as much as soon.

I mean some people can reach 120 years of old tho

She is dead now LMAO

@@aliddetectivemc36 she’s not lol

Interesting so Sun Rise in Monarch and set in Monarch between everything is First Lady Waking up her Husband 🥴 lol

Malaysia have the longest living sultanate in the world call Kedah Sultanate or Old Kedah Sultanate

@@masfiqratul7559 ded 🙄🤣

🤯🤯🤯🤯

SUNDA EMPIRE KERATON AGUNG SEJAGAT KING OF THE KING KESULTANAN SELACO xD (Only Indonesian Know this)

@@ArtzSlebew omg I almost forgot about them what with all other things that's been going on right now

As an Indonesian I can confirm it's true. (I mean the uppermost post.)

All kings in Indonesia had been killed by its own leader such a pathetic

MOMarchy

Imagine the mom was a karen?

Sorry general, my mom said we cant launch the nukes on a school night

George Bush Sr. : I do not like broccoli. And I haven't liked it since I was a little kid and my mother made me eat it. And I'm President of the United States and I'm not going to eat any more broccoli. King of Eswatini: I'm king and my mother stills makes me eat it.

Rather that, than ruling it with my mother in law. :oD

yes, and there was a disposition regarding succession over there. If the prince never had sons it would become part of France. It came close to happen because Albert II got married later in life

Also, the Prince doesn’t just rule a country, he’s also running a business.

The Scandinavian monarchies are older than monaco's monarchy

@@Rasmusnilsenbie who said monaco!?

@@Rasmusnilsenbie hahaha he meant Morocco a country located in the maghreb region not Monaco hun

@@moroccanatlaslioness66 i read wrong

@@Rasmusnilsenbie You read right. He just misspelt and wrote Monaco instead of Morocco.

Avery the Cuban-American I see you everywhere lmao

We finns need desperately food so thats why odd decissions.

I see you everywhere

At this point, you're Justin Y of Geography videos now.

Majority of western people has lot of mongol bloodlines in them so that is true.

Yikes, the fate of all constitutional monarchies

In practice, yes. Just not on paper.

@George Nathanael no it isnt

The dutch « republic » was more like a duchy in all but in name. It was a crowned republic, same for Venice and other Italian « republics »

George Nathanael no the royal family has zero power

Sadly, yes. -a Dutchman

@@thombrawlstars8345 Yes it is in fact the kings ruled the republic as Statholdiers so although it was a republic the Dutch kings and nobles still ruled the republic. So basically it was a monarchy in disguise

Same in Belgium. We actually had such a scandal in 1990 when our king Boudewijn didn't want to sign a bill legalizing abortion. Our government declared him unfit for rule for one day, signed the bill themselves and declared him fit to rule again the day after.

@@Lttlemoi Actually, abortion was still illegal and punishable after this The law Boudewijn didn't want to sign (though he did ask the government Martens at the time to find a solution to pass the law without him signing it), just provided a few exceptions where abortion would no longer be punishable

Same in the Netherlands. The king can most likely use that executive power once. It's very unlikely that the Netherlands will be a monarchy for long after that.

MattyJ 1168 but in reality they can pass a law without her signing

@@Lttlemoi I remember reading about that when the abortion debate was going in my country (Portugal). It made you Belgians sound quite badass. "Just dismiss the king for 24h, then we take him back."

I love geography as well.

Are you monarchist?

The Kingdom Of North Korea

How would you know that? you only know where to get a good cheeseburger

Thanks for the fact, dear leader.

Best Korea(Totaly not a monarchy)

As long as y'all have oil, the kingdom is set (I'd like to say set in stone, but it's oil, so... #badjokes). Their main issue for me is totalitarism (either against criticism or due to islamic law) and maybe money laundry through Aramco and Newcastle United. But those things happen in other parts too

Agree even my beloved country oman doesn't have ksa economy but people are relatively happy with there monarchs and do trust them and our monarchs do deliver promises to assure the countries peace and prosperity In Arabia (GCC) tribes still exist in and to understand the structure of modern tribal community people will understand the connection between the crowds and there ruler's and how this connection do effect the government transparency in very effective way

Dracula

@@Yenlag please shut up

Is it Alan Walker in your profile

but Romania is a republic

Didn't the king have any... Kids, and of them, an eldest one?

Bruh moment.

Britain: *Laughs in 9 day queen*

Normie

Eyyy 9 Kings boiii

and rotating monarchs too.. only Malaysia practiced this system

They where always like a monarchy but it was called a stadholder which made a decision with the dukes of the other parts of the the Benelux

@Antoine Shelby In fact, in the 1600s the dutch Stadholder family was the most powerfull in the world.

​@@morocco_020fc7 technically no the stadholder was a gouvrement official that was limited while the main executive and legeslative power was still in the hands of the provinces but the stadholder would pull more power usually. The Orange family was originally chosen to give willem I a position in the gouvrement but ended up going in a inheritance way and he was supposed to be chosen by the estates-general only from 1741 was it declared that it would be inherited but the last chosen stadholde didn't inherit it from the original family after willem III died without an heir the Frisian stadholder was given the position and got renamed to Willem IV and after that we got attacked by revolutionary france so it looked and almost functioned as a monarchy but it wasn't so it's a yes but actually no case

It all depends on the culture. If something works in one country one can't assume it should apply for most others as that will likely go wrong. Every case is different.

They just added useless ceremonial things to already extant position of Stadholder. Which is not progress at all. Focus on ceremonies and symbols is a sign of primitive understanding of the world. The Dutch would never devolve into that themselves, it was Napoleon and later reactionary European trends after Napoleonic wars which transformed Netherlands into a monarchy

I believe the current Heiress to the Crown of Romania is reasonably popular, perhaps much more so than King Michael was, so I think a lot of the increase, and it seems to be still increasing, is her touch.

that is bad news for sure

@@Apis4 idt Michael's daughters are more popular than he was.

Let Romania get its king Back!

@@mihailupu5107 Michael wasn't very popular with everyone, Margareta seems to appeal to more than just Monarchists, so the Heiress Apparent, though not sure if she inherited the "Keeper of the Crown" title of her Father, seems to be a popular woman with Monarchists, and even many who certainly weren't when Michael was alive. She's got no children however, iirc, and her sisters oldest, and former third in line after his mother, and Aunt doesn't seem to be everyone's cup of tea, and was removed from succession for his playboy antics and fathering an illegitimate child on a visit to Romania from studying abroad. So I suspect unless any action happens to make Margareta more recognised as the Queen of Romania, it possibly won't happen even with the popularity of the monarchy now. Her sister Elena, her Heir to the crown, isn't as popular, nor are her younger sisters Sophie and Marie. So any momentum to towards even a partial reinstatement of some recognition for the Romanian royals will probably need to be on the basis of Margareta's popularity.

You dont vote for the monarch either whats your point

@@arran8687 That a none political head of state can have an easier time uniting people than a political one. So it is easier for say, the Danish Queen to speak to her people in a way that unite,. than it is for a US president... (no matter who he or she is) Also having a none political head of state help since he or she deal with all the ceremonial stuff. Banquets at state visits, accepting ambassadors and a lot more. Allowing the political head of government to focus on actually running the state.

@@arran8687 not every country is democratic

@@thomasbaagaard Well, in Greece we have a president that has exactly zero responsibilities and she has the role of the queen of England. The president elected by the Parliament for 5 years and is there merely for speeches and for ceremonies. And the president is *not* a queen/king, but also not like the US president.

Facts

-Jamahiriya

How does a country that uses the system of POLAND-LITHUANIA work? Simple. Their only goal is into space.

@@osgamer4811 and finding an black hole.

Something between elective parliamentary monarchy and crowned republic. Only for a few years before it's final partition the May 3rd 1791 Constitution changed it to a hereditary monarchy.

Ironically, Poland has had a king since 2016; none other than Jesus Christ!

Ahhh cromwell the so called lord protector or most likely a douche 😆but its charles 1 too that's so ambitious and hungry for power since the scots took over the throne after the great Tudors the monarchy was messed up

That is why English people still have an irrational fear of monarchy ending, as if that would automatically turn them into a dictatorship or something (many Scots and Welsh really don't share this opinion, if you ask some number of them, you'll see). Someone should tell them 4 centuries have passed 😆

@@KateeAngel No we don't lol, many of us just like the idea that our monarchy is incredibly old and still around, and see the monarchy as something that represents our history and traditions, though if the monarch decided to try and interfere with how the country is run I assure you we all be very quick too turn on her and decide to become a republic.

@@pipercharms7374 Honestly if boris does something crazy then I am very supportive of the queen taking actions

@@KateeAngel it is the same in NI.

Hope the best for you

U can suggest that in the Discord server also

ya

@CharlyTDM07 Gambia isn't almost landlocked

@CharlyTDM07 israel is at the mediterranean??!!

@@trollinape2697 Not even Israel, it's size itself is small

Yes.. I think Nigeria is one of those states.. I understand they have an Emir and a Sultan in the north and a king/chief in the south.

@@abdulrahmanabdulaziz8742 south africa also has a zulu king.

@@abdulrahmanabdulaziz8742 There is a king in the Ashanti region of Ghana too

@@abdulrahmanabdulaziz8742 Yes Nigeria is, but they have multiple emirs and Emirates in the north and multiple kings(or what they call their kings) in the rest of the country, with different kingdoms in different states.

@@user-uf4lf2bp8t must Africa chief king call themself a king

Greetings to Malaysia from Saudi Arabia 🇲🇾 ❤️ 🇸🇦

@@fab8490 yup....europe destroyed many things....history,culture and many more....that why some history is missing.😔

@@fab8490 yup all around the world culture is missing due to colonial era👍🏼....alhamdulillah jumpa org malaysia yg tak sembah org putih😂

@@the_struggler963 🇬🇧

Neighbouring Singapore might be said to have originated from a monarchy I guess? Since the island nation was originally a peripheral part of the _Johor_ kingdom (now a state in Malaysia, with the monarchy retained) until it was rented out to the British under colonialism, who saw the island's potential as a maritime trade port due to its strategic location, & expanded the island's human settlement significantly into a city-state

it's similar here in KSA

Hahahaha

Singapore may have invaded the western half

Malaysia have been Invaded by Indonesia

Republic of West Malaysia Just joking 😂

@@danieloktovian9523 lol invaded by indon?? trololo.. cannot even control their own haze

Well it was still a monarchy before it only didn't have it's own monarch. The Swedish King was also King of Norway. They decided to split so Norway chose a Danish prince as the new King. He however wanted the people to take a vote wether they wanted him or a republic. So basically they voted to retain the monarchy with their own King.

I think it funny and even more unique how (I think) Romania abolished their monarchy then later voted their old king as president.

@@nathanaelsadgrove really? I never found who was this royal that became president. I know in Bulgaria SImeon II, their last Tsar, was prime minister between 2001-05

@@otaviofrn_adv Sorry, I can't seem to find it. Might have got confused with Bulgaria or read something that was inaccurate.

Yes2....

He's also one of the two currently living country leader reigning during WW2, the other being the 14th Dalai Lama.

If he was popular enough to get a majority to become prime minister, why did he not become Tsar again?

Raven Knight Vincent The Romanian king had a big role too but he died in 2017

@@samwilkinson2534 I don't think his term was that popular by the end. That seemed to end his chances of being a Tsar ever again

Well he was just a boy when he became King/Tsar.

Who would be crowned?

It all depends on the culture. If something works in one country one can't assume it should apply for most others as that will likely go wrong. Every case is different.

Josef Jugashvili the First, Last Tsar of Georgia.

Liberado Por Patriotas Currently the claim to the Georgian throne is split between two men, George Bagrationi and Nuzgar Bagrationi. However, their claims are united in George’s son (also named George), as he is also the son of Nuzgar’s eldest daughter

@@LordDim1 Why do they have claims?

France's President is also Prince of Andorra but he loses the title once he is no more President.

These are tribal kingdoms under French protection, the same exist in Africa in the hinterlands of several former British colonies

@@towaritch Fun fact: The president is also the only Canon of the Lateran Archibasilica in Rome. Each year, on December 13, a prayer is celebrated in honor of France.

@@TheLocalLt But the lavelua have a real power on the island of Wallis and Futuna

@@nicopacabana6611 What an irony since the French Republic murdered its former Catholic king in 1793

And now it’s a military dictatorship under the monarchy

Sabah dan Sarawak tidak ada sultan yah?

@@rrrr-zz7xr tidak. Sabah dan Sarawak tiada sultan

@@rrrr-zz7xr Saabah Sarawak Melaka dan Penang xde sultan...hanya guna yg dipertua... Negeri2 ni agong yg pegang

Well it used to belong to Brunei so they did have a Sultan before being part of Malaysia, and Part Of Sabah used to belong to The sulu kingdom

@@aniqwazeef3724 yah. Brunei sold the land.

"how do you define success. Just because a country has lot's of land and wealth doesn't mean the people are happy. How would you feel as a peasant in Britain(by far the vast majority) when they controlled a lot of the world but were under absolute control of the monarchy. You were legally and socially below the noblemen and royals just because of who your parents were. And even by your definition of successful you are still wrong. All those places you mentioned as being ultra successful aren't around today in the same form. In fact, the most successful countries ever are republics. USA, China, Japan. 2 of which lost their monarchies and immediately became more successful. Japan specifically skyrocketed into form as an economic powerhouse right after their country had been destroyed in WW2. I agree that if someone extremely intelligent and kindhearted were to be born into full power over a country they could do wonders, but for every one of those monarchs their are 10x worse ones that are 10x more common. Stop this ancient concept of being born into absolute power. There's a reason they never last. They harm the majority of people and the many will eventually always win against the few. Stop spreading false fucking information that ropes people into having an ancient mindset." is what i wrote when i glimpsed at your comment but upon closer inspection you never praised monarchies at all and i'm just stupid lmao. my bad

@@golddmane I appreciate that you caught yourself there, kudos for posting it anyway then admitting the mistake. I will beg your indulgence in answering a few points though: "how do you define success" Historically by longevity, wealth, power, prevalence, any or all. In modern times 8 of the top ten countries in the Economist Intelligence Unit's "Where to be born rankings" are monarchies... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Where-to-be-born_Index#2013_rankings ... and they're not doing badly in terms of purchasing power parity per capita either... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_%28PPP%29_per_capita "How would you feel as a peasant in Britain(by far the vast majority) when they controlled a lot of the world but were under absolute control of the monarchy." Great Britain didn't have a large empire and an absolute monarch at the same time, England's monarchy has been limited since Magna Carta in 1215 and Great Britain's monarchy was further curtailed by the Glorious Revolution of 1688. There was no British Empire prior to the Scottish 1707 Union with England Act. Also I think if you took comparable monarchies and republics from history, say for instance the Novgorod Republic against Muscovy at the same period, I don't think you'll find vast differences in living standards, though I'm happy to be corrected on this. "In fact, the most successful countries ever are republics. USA, China, Japan." The USA I'll grant you, though I think the point is arguable. China has been the world's most advanced and powerful nation through much of it's history, but it was always a monarchy during it's times at the top. I don't consider China to be at the top currently, but even if you do, Xi Jinping maintains a stranglehold on the country that would embarrass most historical despots. Japan is not and has never been a republic. The Japanese monarchy is said to be the oldest continuous hereditary monarchy in the world, and since it traces it's lineage back to the sun goddess Amaterasu, who are we to argue? Between 1853 and 1895 Japan went from a feudal agricultural economy to an industrialised great power all by themselves, after WW2 they had a lot more help, they were a monarchy throughout. "There's a reason they never last." Just a few quick examples for comparison... Egyptian Monarchy 3250BC - 314 AD 3564 years Japanese Monarchy 660 BC - Present 2680 years Roman Monarchy 27 BC - 1453 AD 1480 years French Monarchy 843 AD - 1870 AD 1027 years Russian Monarchy 862 AD - 1917 AD 1155 years Norwegian Monarchy 885 AD - Present 1135 years English Monarchy 886 AD - Present 1134 years Danish Monarchy 935 AD - Present 1085 years Swedish Monarchy 970 AD - Present 1050 years Thai Monarchy 1238AD - Present 782 years Classical Athens 508 BC - 322 BC 186 years Roman Republic 509 BC - 27 BC 482 years Carthage 308 BC - 146 BC 166 years Republic of San Marino 301 AD - Present 1719 years Republic of Venice 697 AD - 1797AD 1100 years Republic of Ancona 1100AD - 1532AD 432 years Republic of Genoa 1100AD - 1797AD 697 years Republic of Noli 1192AD - 1797AD 605 years Republic of Ragusa 1358AD - 1808AD 450 years Icelandic Commonwealth 930 AD - 1262AD 332 years Republic Of Florence 1115AD - 1537AD 422 years Novgorod Republic 1136AD - 1478AD 342 years Dutch Republic 1581AD - 1795AD 214 years Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth 1569AD - 1795AD 226 years French Republic 1792-1804, 1848-1852, 1871-1940, 1946-1958, 1958 - Present United States of America 1776 AD - Present 244 years Most current republics are less than a century old.

@@golddmane China wasn't a republic

@@golddmane England got a constitutional monarchy long ago sorry for the bad english

In Gabon too it's the same family, the Bongos, who is at the head of the country since independence, one can call that hereditary Presidency

Dud you mean Hunger Sudan?

Mate, do you know some good Japanese history/geography channels? I'm into learning the language but I can't seem to find them!

@@darklibertario5001 search "Geography now Japan"

Long live the Emperor!

天皇陛下万歳!!!

Konnichiwa Anmi San

And the background music is a little to hype for my adhd brain, maybe I'll try again when I'm less tired.

TheElectrixPunch BG The disputed heir to the russian throne does as well. Also, the legitimist heir to France does as well

@@welcometotheinternet574 The "Legitimate" heir to the French throne, is the Duke of Paris, who lives, you guessed it, in Paris. The Bonapartes rescinded any claims to the French Crown, and whilst the Bourbon monarchy of Spain, press their claim, they gave it up, in writing, in multiple copies, almost four hundred years ago. So NO, the Heir Apparent to the Crown of France, lives in FRANCE.

Apis4 When did the Bonapartes rescind any claim to the French Crown? They have 2 claims over a succession dispute for Christ sake

King Simeon of Bulgaria and his Queen do live in Bulgaria and he was elected Prime Minister for awhile.

Surely he was a king not a tsar?

Δεν ήξερα ότι ζούσε ακόμα

εύχομαι ότι κάποια μέρα ο βασιλιάς μας θα επιστρέψει και θα επαναφέρει την μοναρχία.

I was in London in summer of 1977 at Harrods purchasing something to wear to a function relating to the Queen's Silver Jubilee, when I rounded a corner and came face to face with the King of the Hellenes. I bowed my head and said, "Your Majesty." He was at first taken a back trying to remember if I was someone he knew (I suppose). He immediately smiled his characteristic grin and asked my name. I told him and after a few pleasantries we departed. That evening at the function at Claridges given by the late Duke of Westminster, I was again reintroduced to the King and his beautiful wife, Queen Anne Marie. He explained we had met briefly earlier at Harrods. She, too, was very nice and down- to- Earth., I was always hoping he would be able to return to his throne.

"Greek king" more like byzantine emperor

Why isn't he reinstated as a figurehead?

This channel is a joke

Brazil biggest mistake was becoming a republic

YES

Up

Me too!

Ave Império！

Afaik it habits own king.

That's the point

Not Cows of UK

So are rwanda and Mozambique

It’s Tonga time

Exactomento

Exactly, Emir is a fancy way of saying Prince.

Wasn't the King of Bahrain an emir? Why don't they all just declare themselves Kings like the Emir of Bahrain?

@@charlesschap3735 Emir rules only some tribes in small peice of land unlike the king that rules many tribes and a large place ; the sultan rules people from different ethnicities and races in a very large portion of land ; a caliph is the political head of the religion his job is to keep the law of the religion but he doesn't have the land on his name and like the last three.

Simple explanation: Emir-Prince Sultan-Islamic King Caliph-Islamic Leader

Because they had noble monarchy in which nobility democraticly elected a king and cooperated with him to rule commonwealth and after king died they elected another king

@@ermin2248yeah I know, I just mean it's uniqe and it's the first time I see something like that

A szlachcic on the croft is the wojwod's equal!

Well you see rhere are 3 types of governments: monarchies, republics and Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealths

It's was very special for it's time. An elective monarchy

To what? Charles?

Lol 😂

Already surrender and living on small island

@@bestclips4525 No Surrender🇬🇧

But why didn't he become Tsar again (Restoration I mean)

@@aaronpenaperalta he was exaggerating a bit when he said succeeded, the monarchist movement is much more powerful in the Balkans than anywhere else, but it wasn't enough to get a proper restoration

Thats what he said? It isnt an election (by the people), but that second point of 7.

Im so triggered.

*triggered Malaysian voice*

*TRUE.*

And hold some executive power

@@oce2u only in their states. AGONG does not have executive power. YDP does not have the power to appeal to any laws, policies, governance, etc... He just merely the figurehead of Malaysia.

No we do not. She should abdicate ASAP and disolve the institution.

Kevin Bosnjak oh get off your moralistic self-righteous. It would have to be done and would only be done by referendum, a referendum you would lose

The fact is that by us keeping the institution of the monarchy, we are forced to live in a constant constitutional crisis, that makes our realm vulnerable to fascist and/or undemocratic movements. The Greeks understood that the key to any strong democracy was a firm and undebatable constitution. So when the constitution tells us that we live in a monarchy, and the Monarch chooses the government, we are forced to ignore that constitution, to live in a democracy. And when the constitution tells us that we are an Evangelical Lutheran nation, we are forced to ignore the constitution in order to remain a secular society. And when the constitution says that all diplomacy is to be carried out by the king, we are once more forced to ignore it in order to remain a functional modern nation-state. This makes our constitution weak, as it is constantly and openly ignored. What then else may be ignored? The right to habeas corpus? The right to remain silent? The right to assemble? Indeed, none of these are truly protected as long as the constitution cannot and does not reflect reality, and therefore the royal family and the institution of monarchy is a real, measurable and imminent danger to a free democratic society. So what side are you on, friend? Will you stand with king or country?

GormTheElder The power of the crown in Denmark hasn’t absolute power, just look at the Easter Crisis (1920). The role of Danish monarch is two folded. One) ceremonial duties, open museums, school etc. and on a personal note, it would say the monarchy is as most a part of Denmarks culture, then anything else. Second) ratifying laws. Though any king or queen doesn’t want a full on revolution. So there don’t reject any laws. (Weird that you talk against the danish monarchy, since you use the “Earl of Jelling” and the first recognize “king of Denmark” as your name. [danish: Gorm den Gamle. English: Gorm the Elder]

@@Thediscountanimator Indeed, this is what I stated; they don't have absolute power, because we are forced to ignore our constitution, the very form of which formed the basis for the easter crisis. It is of little consequence how much of a cultural institution the monarchy has become, when it forces us to live in a fundementally weaker and more unstable state; would slavery being a cultural institution be a reason to keep it around? To barbarians, perhaps! I say we take inspriration from the most civilized societies of Western History such as the Athenians, who understood that law, not custom ought rule a people, and adjust our constitution accordingly - Either to strip the monarch of all formal power, embrace actual monarchy or to abolish the house of knaves who robbed and raped your ancestors to achieve their wealth. Whichever you prefer, something ought be done, for the current order is inherently weak.

Only nimalaysia di dunia n asiani umpama maharaja jepunni cume one. we kite maharaja mega,agong.

congrats you stole the top comment

@@supremeastro5300 I wouldn't say stole, more like borrowed, painted and said it was his

It’s the internet nothing is original

Hey he's lonely had to wait 50 years, no biggie!

Not so interesting since the monarchy got shut off by the Spanish republicans , so when Franco took control he wanted to repair spain from the civil war , and his death just caused a power vacuum. I mean france after Napoleon got exiled . its monarchy restored for a while,

@@deandre2680 not exactly. He named himself as regent.

@@deandre2680 Well, yes, but its different I guess. Spain had no monarchy for about 42 years I think, haven't counted them, and then we voted for it to get back.

Glad they are back

@@deandre2680 he stayed for more than 3 decades. He had more than enough time to restore the country twice. He likely embezzeled money to set his family off during that period. That's a guy that if ressurection was actually possible, I would have him ressurected just to kill again

Abel...those powers are only theoretical.

@@feynman6625 no they're not. A law is worth nothing if it doesn't have the king's signature. Plus, no if you know anything about spanish history, you will rememberers 23-F, when the king stoped a military cue.

If only that were the case lol

Sou brasileiro, e olha: só tenho certeza que ele é português quando ele fala o nome das cidades portuguesas, porque aí o sotaque aparece. Quem é novato acha que ele é de algum país anglófono

Yeah but the people couldn't really do anything since she's immortal anyway

@@maximilianbeyer5642 true that

It's generally a feature of modern constitutional monarchies that the head of state exercises much less power than they theoretically have, whereas the reverse is usually true for elected presidents. Public perception of legitimacy has much more impact on how much power people can wield than what might be written in a constitution.

That's true of a lot of elected leaders too.

I'm not sure with the terrible elected officials we have now, I'm sure some people would be quite refreshed by royal intervention rather than the endless chain of ineffective demagogues we've had for the last 30 years. The only 'uprising' I could see resulting would be more like a top-down resistance by the parliament who would do anything to retain the scheme that they've grown used to running, afterall what is democracy but five wolves and a sheep deciding what to have for lunch?

Is There Monarchist Party In Egypt????

What if they had a military dictator king

agreed！

Mohammed Shaker jj

They need a Pharao xD Bring back a Ramses

Thanks!

?

??????

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Y3Ihmp0-cps.html

So u mean the future British empire

@@rohitdua5033 why??

Borneo is on there, It's dark green which makes it almost blend in with the sea

Ikr Borneo part of Malaysia no longer have any King now, but Malaya part of Malaysia does have King/Sultan on almost every state...

Fun fact: The Borneo part (Sarawak) also used to have kings, Caucasian kings. The Brookes White Rajahs. Pretty good rulers too.