Countries That MAYBE Shouldn't Exist 

North Macedonia.

France

Spain

Except for Malta, if it even counts as one, I think all European small states must go. Switzerland can be divided although the 3 that would benefit have lost key wars. Austria should with Germany but that has been and undone by WW2. Heck history helps keep it going :)

The US

All Balkan countries je Timor Leste 🇹🇱

​@@osheridan The only true correct statement about the balkans ever.

@@osheridan Holy shit, you rival Ipocritus in wiseness.

As a Balkan person I can confirm

​@@osheridanno. The Balkan peninsula belongs to the almighty paraguyay🇵🇾🇵🇾

As a fellow Belgian I agree. But I genuinely hope we will remain united. We are already so small, why should we be any smaller? Also, I just wouldn't like to live in an independent Flanders. Many Flemish nationalists are really racist and backwards in their thinking (although I know a few who are not). Are you Flemish, Walloon or East Belgian (German) by the way?

As a fellow Belgian, I would love to see our country split up.

United in what ? Economy ? Army ? Culture ? Language ? Gastronomy ? Bruxelles ?

As a belgian citizen i want unite wallons with brussel, be cause wa are french speakers and brussel and wallons will be the belgium

Sounds good. No more blanco cheques to fund all those stupid policies.

I'm pretty sure the Russian minority is against it

To be fair, Bessarabia has been a historical region that’s culturally unique.

​@@ferretyluvbadass🇸🇦

@@Scbalq Wrong Arabia. Bessarabia is that area that’s now Moldova and that part that’s owned by Ukraine under it. It’s the area between the Dniester and Prut rivers. It’s named after the Romanian Basarab Dynasty.

@@ferretyluv chill bro I was just trying to make a stupid word game ☠️

Rare British W.

Let Uruguay be whatever they want at this point - sincerely, a Brazilian

Makes sense. It's the kind of compromises that international politics is all about. And I'm sure that locals appreciate that they can decide their own future instead of being run by their neighbors.

I see a mountain!

Could you imagine if the quality Uruguayan football players were added into the Brazil or Argentine teams?

Andorra also has its whole own league

@@core_russell3869FOR THE WHOLE 90k POPULATION

The European microstates are amazing why would anyone want them gone

My condolences. I will🙏to you and for you.

btw, for the English speakers, that translates to Andorra Football Club

Some part of Pakistan should belong to Afghanistan.

@@ironheart5830 I think Afghanistan has bigger issues to solve

@@user-ml1vz4vq7j Pakistan really afraid of Pashto nationalism.

basicaly most african countries except theyre not so nationalistic..

Less than 70? 1947 was 76 years ago.

Cool

it's still temporary cuz whenever ww3 happens one will take over the other

As far as I know, a lot of Koreans would theoretically like the countries to be united again, but realize it won't be practical for a long time. South Korea consider all North Koreans as citizens of South Korea so any North Korean that goes manages to get to the South have full the South Korean citizenship rights. North Korea constantly propagandizes about unification - but under North Korean rule which obviously isn't acceptable to South Korea. The war is not technically over, no peace treaty has been signed, just a ceasefire.

​@@Spacemongerrnaaa. they are totally different cultures Today

Thank you USA

Yo u are wrong brother! Why should we unite again and again and again? U think this time we will be safe? NO WE ARE NOT SAFE WITH ROMANIA WE ARE SAFE ON OUR ON. And I don't like Russia

@@Bogdan122-ch1gt I dont know what you mean with "safe on our own" when our army is smaller than the police of your average state in the region and Russia is openly hostile (occupies the eastern part of Moldova, literally showed maps involving the invasion of Moldova on international TV in the early stages of Ukraines invasion, financing coup attempts, etc). Did we manage it on our own in the 90's when Russia invaded us and took part of our country? No. Meanwhile Romania has extremely powerful friends (strategic partnership with Washington, NATO member and EU member, good friend of Poland and Turkey) and a fastly growing medium sized army which includes modern fighterjets, HIMARS and Patriot missiles. Not to mention Romania literally fought a world war for us (my maramureșean ancestors all fought on the eastern front for Bessarabia, at Stalingrad and Crimea). Nobody even remotely cares about Moldova like Romania does. The fact Moldova could join the EU and NATO tomorrow by uniting with Romania but doesnt is some of the most serious forms of self sabotage in history.

Im not sure if they would unite cause the culture is actually very different

@@languageseureka how so? Whats so different. Because I am half bessarabian half maramureșean and have seen no notable cultural differences whatsoever.

​@@AntoniuDraculeaas a Romanian this shouldn't even be a problem

Belize disagrees

@@reddykilowatt a good percentage of Belizeans speak spanish, and well maybe their history is a bit different, but still a union could be the best for all of us

Only if Bukele leads the union.

We must reunite the First Mexican Empire, brothers

Yet it was the egos of local elites that split up Central America.

Disagree, Vatikan might not be a Nation or a State, but its also not Part of Italy, it has a different sovereignty level (inter-/supranational) and international legal status

​@@danielrodel1334Yeah the Vatican is the only micro-state of Europe that makes sense, and this is coming from someone who's very against religions.

Catalonia should be independent and merge with Andorra. No more European micro states.

@@eduardog3000 Andorra should annex Catalonia

Bro, everyone forgetting about Liechtenstein

True. We just let them exist.

Yeah, but South Africa doesn't want either one of them anymore. That and the fact that South Africa itself is still threatening to dissolve as a nation really kills any chance of expansion.

@@DTD110865 I doubt South Africa will stop existing as a South African myself. People look at an ethnic map and assume we all just hate each other over here when that's not the case. I just came back from the store right now and the outside world is much more different from what the internet tries to portray the country as. There were two women who were friends speaking to each other in their own respective language Sotho and Zulu and they understood each other's languages. A group of 4 guys in front of me at the line 2 of them were white and 2 of them where black all came back from skateboarding to buy something to drink and having fun. It's not really the case from my day to day experience to think that people here just hate each other. It's mostly just the media and politicians who try to stoke artificial differences for their own benefit. On the question of Lesotho and eSwatini, our government doesn't want to absorb them. They kinda just let them exist and they're fine with that. An invasion is far from likely too as we wouldn't gain anything economically aside from just water from Lesotho. Plus they would be a burden on local tax payers. If both countries were incorporated they would be the poorest provinces and some of the least populated. From a cultural point of view yes it does make sense to incorporate them as there are more Sotho here than in Lesotho and more Swati here than eSwatini and both groups speak languages that are mutually intelligible with most of our languages as well. It's also important to add that Botswana, Namibia and Zimbabwe as well have similar peoples as ours. But any effort for unification would have to wait cause we have our own problems right now.

"is it for me?🥺" - Aliens

dont intteract with the bots@@mg45yeetz9

Countries and borders are man-made. Planets are not. Some people want to eliminate country borders.

The citizens of Micronesia and the Marshall Islands would never agree to being joined to the Solomon Islands or other poor island nations in their vicinity. They'd lose that special status with the U.S., which gives them the opportunity to become U.S. citizens incredibly easily. It's like a special fast-track process that only they get. That's a golden ticket out. Citizens in those countries don't want to lose their golden tickets if they can help it.

Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, and Palau are in free association with the US, which makes them arguably the 'most dependent', or 'least sovereign' countries in the world among all UN member states. They should have been definitely included in this video.

Much more likely the the 3 US associated states would join the US with Guam and Northern Marianas as a future state than to ever merge with another country - especially the Solomon Islands.

@@szbszig New Zealand also has 2 Free Association States who chose the other option they have, more sovereignty without secession like a modern Vassal State of sorts. I understand they may choose to rejoin The USA at any time as Territories correct me if I'm wrong!

@@sordman2 i thought Guam & Northern Mariana Islands would form 1 State of Mariana Islands but damn, do you see them 3 Nations ever choosing to rejoin The US? I believe they can at any time.

Because it's a river. You wouldn't say "seine" or "Volga" you'd say "the Volga" etc

@@London.Uncovered In reference to the river itself sure you'd use that nomenclature however, not the name of the country itself. We'll use the two examples you put forth, you wouldn't say the Seine in the France or the Volga in the Russia now would you? However, in this nations case it would be The Gambia (the river) in The Gambia (the nation) it doesn't quite make sense now does it? That is why I was questioning why not drop the "The" from the country name and just refer to it as the Republic of Gambia (or Gambia in the shorthand) rather what it is currently called the Republic of The Gambia (or Gambia in the shorthand) the "The" in the country name is superfluous, seems other people understood my meaning tho it appeared to fly over your head.

@@HypnoticChronic1 the gambia country literally the gambia river. A lot of country's have "the" prefixes, eg The Netherlands. It is not correct in english to just say "netherlands". Same with how in the western world Ukraine is historically called "the Ukraine", becuause "Ukraine" in most slavic languages means "borderland", so "the borderland". "The Sudan" is the official name for sudan - now that's a little less known because sudan in arabic literally just means "black", and "the black" obviously doesn't make any sense unless its just talking about the people of sudan, who are black. Then there's "The Lebanon", because the Lebanon is a mountain chain after which the country gets its name. In the case of lebanon and ukraine these aren't that well used anymore though. In French as well you have "La France" ("The France") etc etc,

@@London.Uncovered Notice how many of those countries that do use the "the" prefix are plural in name and not singular in their official titles? The United States of America, The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, The Kingdom of the Netherlands etc. versus the "the" just being additive in the titles so its grammatically correct when its singular, the Republic of Singapore, the Argentine Republic, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia etc. while conversely we still use the "the" in the shorthand in regards to the plural nations the US, the UK, the Netherlands etc. but we do not use it in the shorthand for the singulars, Singapore, Argentina, Saudi Arabia etc. why? Because its redundant and unnecessary, Gambia works just as well grammatically in English (which is their official language) as The Gambia and the only reason its even there in the first place is due to the name being a holdover from Portuguese and the Brits just kept it. Suffice to say it need not be there and would still work in a functional sentence for example "have you seen what happened in Gambia?" see still works perfectly fine without the "the" that is the main crux of my argument.

They speak the same language. The only difference is a handful of terms used in Wallonia but not in France. The differences between standard French and Quebec French are much bigger.

@@BamBamGT1 No, just no ? Flanders and french in Wallonia is different.

Nah, not more unlikely. We really don't want to go with France, i would not mind being the first EU federal state, or being independent, but really the french are not people we want to unite with. But, hé, i like Belgium. I like this difference that force us to compromise, discuss, that make us so much more resilient to crisis (we can litterally survive without governement lol). And i say that as a Brabantian, the only waloon who pay more taxe than they receive. And i kinda love vlaams people, they are just good people.

@@gameknightjek2640 As a Luxembourger, I hope Belgium won't split-up.

All the 🌎 too.

Thanks!

I ❤ only Allah.

Great idea!

Albania wasn't mean to have Nothern Epirus

Good idea. Let's start with Russia and Crimea.

@@General.Knowledge that's gonna be controversial as fuck, so prepare for a lot of hate comments if you'll proceed with that idea.

Poland with Prussia

Thanks! I think so, yeah :)

The relationship between Thailand and Laos is like that of Switzerland and Germany. There used to be another country, Lanna, in northern Thailand, and Central Thailand was called Siam. Siam took over Lanna and part of Laos. The Lao, Central Thai, and northern Thai languages are all similar to each other.

Why should SA divide itself??😭

belgian here, nah i wanna rejoin the dutch (allong with wallonians, i'm not doing it without em)

As another Belgian, I'd rather have no devisions or annexations

understandable @@TheLordsOfTheDucks

Leve België, vive la Belgique :)

so how many seats do the US have?

You will get riots about: UK-Ireland and Portugal-Spain so much can I tell you. Lmao

Of course the obvious one is to chop up America and share the bits out to make a larger Mexico and a much larger Canada.

@@simonmultiverse6349 No. How about annex Canada like the US tried to do in 1812?

UK-Ireland? HAHAHAHAHA! And Germany and Austria will not unify because of world wars.

@@KometVonHelvetienwould never happen But would make so much sense

Yeah local Dutch dialects lol These regions were also not united since Roman or Frankish times in any sense aside from belonging to the same political entities. Like the transition period from Rome to Frankish is especially weird to bring up as the Franks and their settlement are the reason half the country speaks Dutch. And they weren’t united in any way during the middle ages. The unity of the region comes with the Burgundians and Charles the Vth who creates the notion of the Low-Countries. And you can then say that some unity existed between Dutch and French speaking Belgium since the Unie van Atrecht (basically the Catholic-protestant split) and later as Austrian Habsburg possessions. However Flanders and the Netherlands are closely linked even during this period. Antwerp was a center of the Protestant reformation and one of the major Protestant cities. It isn’t until Antwerp is sacked and people flee north that Amsterdam becomes the leading Protestant stronghold. And on top of that the Flemish traders also brought a lot of wealth to the city, which until that point was actually the main Catholic city in Holland

@seanbaggen2656 You are quite right to say that talking about the Roman and Frankish empires (Carolingian as well as Merovingian) as the origins of Belgium proper is an exaggeration. During these periods the territories were part of the same whole, of course, but they were so decentralised and diverse that you can't really consider them to be united. I chose to mention them more to recall a part of history that is rarely mentioned but whose foundations enabled Belgium to emerge much later. Without the Romans and Germanic migration, we wouldn't have a Latinised south and a Germanised north, just Celts. Similarly, without the Frankish empires, there would have been no feudal system and therefore no county of Flanders or Hainaut or duke of Brabant or Burgundy. I completely agree that the Burgundians were the first to really create the concept of the Low-Contries and the first to really separate the region from France and the Holy Empire. In my opinion, the religious wars that followed the Protestant reformation are the source of the division between Belgium and the Netherlands, which would otherwise have remained united. However, religious and governmental differences gradually drove the 2 countries apart for almost 2 centuries before they once again unite in 1815. However, what many people tend to forget is that a country is not defined solely by its language. Just because a country doesn't have its own national language doesn't mean it shouldn't exist. Switzerland and Austria are no less legitimate countries than Belgium.

@@axome235 But without the Frankish migration the Netherlandds wouldn’t exist either Of course, but they are still “Dutch” or rather Nederlandse/Nederfrankische dialects. Just like how Austrians speak German. Just because the Netherlands is called the Netherlands doesn’t mean it has a monopoly on the term for the language. And in fact Flanders and the Netherlands share the language institute that decides on the language, so this is also reflected in reality

What matters is now not centuries ago... You don't live in the past ? Do you ? Or maybe you are 600 years old... When close neighbours speak the same language, share the same artists, watch mostly the same tv series, have a common litterature, spend their hollidays in the same places... A Liégeois is closer to Paris than a Brestois, Niçois or Basque is ! But if you are unhappy with that you can still ask for French to be banned from Belgium and replaced by Walloon or English.

If you use German reunification as a template, it makes sense. Because Germany reuniting, legally speaking, was the Republic of Germany taking control over what was the DDR. As in Korea, the government in the South would continue as is, and would take over the North. The government would stay exactly the same, Republic of Korea, only the DPRK would cease to exist. What we colloquially call "South Korea" wouldn't go anywhere, again this is legally speaking.

North Korea is bigger in size than South Korea lol

@@stevens1041 I don’t see a reason to assume that it would be South Korea taking the north.

@@johnka5407How about they actually have a functioning economy and aren’t a nation of peasants

@@sebe2255 Economy is important at war, but not everything. North Korea has other advantages. Also I hope that by 'a nation of peasants' you meant poor people.

Which one ?

@@lioneldemun6033 Most of the Dutch have a protestant background (apart from some provinces in the South that actually used to be part of Greater Belgium). The Dutch have a completely different food culture and fill in their traditions in a very different way (look for example at Sinterklaas, which is celebrated on a different day and in a different way). The French have an enormous country, so saying we are more like the French is like saying we are more like the Polish or the Danes. We might culturally resemble a bit more to the north of France, but then again we have different food cultures and different celebrations. Nevertheless, within the same country, the food we eat is very similar, the celebrations are similar and social conducts are more or less the same. I saw someone claiming that politically we vote differently, but if you separate all countries where the poorer regions vote more left and the richer regions vote more right, I think you can literally separate any country. The claim that our country has to split is spread by extreme right parties, but doesn't have enough support within the country itself.

In Europe as a whole, country borders are not cultural at all anymore and are just political. You can cross the border and only the infrastructure would change. Basicaly the same people and sometimes even the same language. As someone from Noord-Brabant I have way more in commom with people from Antwerpen or Leuven than with people from Leeuwarden or Groningen. So advocating for the erasure of a country for cultural reasons is dumb. The only thing that is broken about belgium is the national government.

it’s the waffles 😂

Before it was one countrie

If you think we're the only country in the world that does not have one and the same public transport service then boy you're in for a ride...

I would 100% vote to break up not out of hate for the Wallonië people but just because we have now really tried and absolutely failed obviously its not working out lets just stop this thing

@@reddykilowatt no, broodje américain !

"Also, technically you could also ask why does South Korea exist" Well, it works better for the Korean people than North Korea, so you've got to consider that.

@@DTD110865are North Koreans undeserving of respect?

@@koffibeen3818 The North Korean government is.

True

especially one beginning with 'U' somewhere in eastern Europe... I can't recall the name right now

@@walterbrunswick that nation your saying is literally built by their ethnic group

​@@KartingRulesdo you know what the name means and why it is called that?

No. Every country represents a sovereign state. Not all sovereign states are a nation state. These have completely different definitions.

Arab speaking countries are very different culturally, historically and even demographically.

Colonies are a different story.

Bruh i forgot that i even commented on this video😂

Depends, countries with big cultural differences between several groups are usually quite dysfunctional. So yeah being similar helps.

@@Rui301 That still doesn't mean that they're not a group. It's just not a group with identical cultural elements.

Singapore basically money

Brunei. I only discovered that Brunei is an independent country nine months ago.

@@missouriresole4726 Nah, Singapore split from Malaysia because of ethnic clashes. Brunei though, they just didn't want to join Malaysia I guess lol

it would have worked if they called it Gambegal instead. 😂

Has she written a song about it? (Please consider this an invitation for geographilic Swifties to draft some parodies. 😂)

Most Dutch I know actually don't mind a united Benelux as long as Brussels isn't the capital.

same in my case tho i do NOT accept the name benelux, it's stupid i suggest: English: Belgica/Netherlands Dutch: Nederland French: Belgique why? because they mean the same thing, look at the united kingdom of the netherland's french name. oh and i wouldn't want brussels to be the capital either@@lynxfresh5214

Mockingly called Franskiljons.

Also Brussels was full dutch speaking untill like 100 or even 50 years ago

In some ways that is similar to Northern Ireland.

Who are the common artists ? Singers ? Actors ? Writers ?

​@@jandron94JCVD

Singers: Stromae, Jaques Brel... Writers: Tom Lanoye, Herman Brusselmans, Saskia De Coster ... What are you trying to say man, small countries have cultures too yk

​@@jandron94Belgium is a united state at its core, no one really wants things to change. And if we would split then no way we'd let us be annexed by other countries after all the wars we've fought for our independence

Then they should start with making walloon madatory on all walloon schools.

Then make them dutch. Better governance will come.

@@RedRocketthefirst but then they have to be Dutch. Which isn’t as bad but they don’t even speak the same language.

@@Apple_Slices. then learn them the language. Most of them will gladly accept because of the business opportunities.

Flemings wouldn't want to be Dutch either. Belgium exists cuz we are a country with unique culture

Oh hell no. There are many protestant places too

@@RedRocketthefirst”Many” The Netherlands has more Catholics than the reverse

Agree 100%

H getting there, he getting there, I remember last year he had 500k

Thanks! It gets harder to gain more subscribers as you get closer to it. But hopefully one day we'll get there! :)

The Japanese, US, and Soviet imperial.

But they where apart of the Dutch before they rebelled?

@@wingslider yes exactly what I mean. The people were sick of being under another countries rule

The reason they rebelled was mostly over religion and being ignored politically (the French speaking part)

100%, ze zouden ons toch alleen als buitenbeentje zien

​@@Seba_ntnAs they should 😁

Anders zouden we onszelf elk jaar als oranje fluostiften moeten verkleden...

As a Dutch man, better yet a Hollander, I also distance myself from any resemblance to the Flemish.

this is double dutch to me@@Seba_ntn

The same guy who said (and lied) that the UK was better off without the EU...Very reliable person!

Like Catalonia or Scotland

@@pranawdhital Taiwan (the true China), for instance.

@@josueveguilla9069 Taiwan does exist

@@josueveguilla9069 why is it true China? Elaborate. You seem to imply some sort of deep knowledge of Chines history

@@TheManinBlack9054 Because the Kuomintang managed to recover any cultural and religious artifacts that were still left intact and took them to Taiwan. Remember Mao Zedong's so called "Cultural Revolution"?

I believe he cites the 30s due to this being when the Statute of Westminster went into effect, which granted a great deal of autonomy to the British dominions, South Africa included. Whether that counts as independence or not is a matter of interpretation.

@@CarpeVerpa thank you for your reply en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_of_South_Africa en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_African_Constitution_of_1961 I repeat what I wrote earlier - weather in the 30s the Statute of Westminster went into effect or not - countries of the Commonweath gained independence not all on one day Read up when each and every country actually gained freedom from the UK so the history put forward in this video is not the same history that went into effect in the real world

And apartheid didn't last very long : from 1948 until 1991, 43 years only

Belgi and Um*

YAY more bad roads!

Cyprus must unite with Greece

Only Ecuador and Panama shouldnt (royal audiences werent a political entity) but Venezuela and Colombia should exist. (Both were political entities before independence)

Skopje should be split between neighboring countries

@@GermanKettleCorn You mean north Macedonia?

@@HermitKing731 Yes

Sure dude

love the beer

Nope, only socialists, communists, and leftist journalists want unity. Think about it, Vlaams Belang and N-VA are the parties with the most votes in Flanders for a reason, while the Walloons vote for socialists and communists.

​@@RedRocketthefirst he's right though ☠️

Vroeger wou Wallonië onafhankelijkheid en tis ook nooit gebeurd, het zijn idd gwn de extreme partijen die dit willen maar onze politici gaan wss het nooit écht doen, opsplitsen

Liechtenstein is a country of ethnic germans. Just like Luxemburg. Austrians and Swiss germans are germans too, but they split with german identity solely because of politics and war. Ethnicity remains the same. "Swiss german" is just german. As a bavarian, i can understand it far better than Badisch for example. That just shows that you guys are just as german as we are.

Rep of Moldova don t have historical reasson. That is Romanian history and can t be taken apart from it.

Moldova existed as Moldavia wayy back in 1400, then it had wars with the Ottoman Empire and Poland. Moldavia almost won against the Ottomans but Hungarian Empire invaded Moldavia making Moldavia lose. It was occupied by the Ottomans for a long time until the Russian Empire came and kicked the Ottomans out of Moldavia but took Moldova as their territory. Moldavia then got independence in 1917 united with Wallachia making it Romania. Romania then got Transylvania after WW1. WW2 came and USSR annexed Moldova. Moldova then got independence from USSR in 1991, then Transnistrian war in 1993 which Moldova won. @@Vlad-yi6oo

@@TopinkaMoldova Moldavia and Moldova are different. One is a medieval state founded by romanians voievodes from Maramureș, the other one is a territory who was taken by Russian Empire in 1812 from Moldavia(future Romania). In 1918 when Russian Empire collapsed it gain independence and rejoin back to Moldavia (Romania). After that it was taken by URSS and tranformed in RSSM. After URSS collapsed it became Rep of Moldova and was about to rejoin back to Romania but it was stoped due to Transnistrian war only to be kept as buffer zone for Russia against NATO. Their histori is one with Romania not apart from it.

@@Vlad-yi6oo Moldova was kept as a buffer but It’s not just a buffer anymore, Dodon lost 2020 elections so Maia Saundu won meaning Moldova is a Russian enemy now (Like it always used to be). But Moldova is Moldavia, although there is a Romanian region called Moldavia, the important region of Moldavia always used to be Moldova (capital etc.). Even if Moldavia isn’t viewed to be the same as Moldova in your eyes, it is in mine. Moldova has drifted away from Romania trough the years, both have different enemies and history.

@@TopinkaMoldova Moldavia is Romania. If Moldova claim to be Moldavia then is Romania. Maia Sandu explain to you that moldovans are romanians. All the moldovan culture and language is romanian. Moldavians never was others then romanians. These are soviet missleadings inflicted to romanians between Prut and Nister.

how?

@@tangledspoons1396 the republic of the congo is basically a tiny democratic republic of the congo

If you want to divide Bosnia again in Srpska and a Bosniak-Croat state...

As a Bosnian I agree, but only if Germany annexes us. Saves time waiting for a working/travel permit. Papa?

Thanks!

@@General.Knowledge de nada

One of the funniest UN moments ever

As a Moldovan u suck tbh. Our history is pretty big on our own.

Short answer. Stalin

@@Vlad-yi6oo Moldova was part of Russia under the Empire, Stalin was not the first to get ahold of it, although he did create an SSR from it.

@@doncorleone1553 yes it was. But Stalin make sure to became a border country between west and east and live a miserable life.

Preach brother!

That’s ok - it’s only 1000 years since the great schism.. you can’t expect him to be up to date of these things.

But why can't your little school clubs just have one headquarters... Wouldn't that make more sense? Designate that whole "nation" to your hobby so there's more space for normal folk everywhere else in the west

@@Alex-zs7gw there was never one headquarters, that's what the Great Schism was all about.

@@timleber2257 yeah but now membership is at an all-time low, you'd think you'd combine so that it's not scrapped for good I'd rather it was scrapped but everyone has their own taste in hobbies

No it would not, South-Africa already has 12+ ethnic groups in its borders. Adding two more ethnic groups will only increase ethnic tensions.

Maybe South Africa should join them

@@JUAN_OLIVIER you're not adding 2 new ethnic groups tho. You're just adding a couple more Sotho and Swazi. South Africa already has more Sotho and Swazi people than Lesotho and Eswatini

​@JUAN_OLIVIER you're not adding any new ethnicities There are more Sothos in SA than there are in Lesotho.... same with Eswatini We are the same

My guy. We don't have ethnic tensions in South Africa. I live in an area with many Sotho people and we speak each others languages. From an economic standpoint we can't afford 2 million people for now.@@JUAN_OLIVIER