Covenants: The Next Bitcoin Soft Fork? (CTV, APO, VAULT, & More) 

That is indeed the tough reality, and I don't see much else that has as favorable a benefit/risk profile. Maybe something like Ark but that's still very early days.

I think recursive covenants are where things could get tricky, but non-recursive imo pose very little risk. Plus importantly it’s the receiver who defines subsequent spending rules (not the sender)

Thanks! A very good question - here is as good an example as I've found so far: x.com/reardencode/status/1740118411622175150?s=20

Welcome! Glad you’re enjoying it

Any scaling-related proposals you are a fan of?

@@IanMajor currently? no. I was and remain in favor of lightning. sorting out spam would be a far better use of dev time.

explain what vulnerabilities ?

@@teru797 They must be talking about inscriptions, not realizing that a high fee market is inevitable in bitcoin's future, and doesn't prevent bitcoin from being used for 'what it was designed for

vulnerabilities?

You must be a big blocker

@@tygyrlylly8079 I'm not allowed to reply the name of the vulnerability, YT censors me every time. But it is reported by the NIST for a month now. DYOR.