The problem with gambling is greed. Know when to pull your place bets down. Having a 40 to 50 roll doesn’t happen often. Awesome video! Keep them coming!!!’n
Your strategies are top notch and as explained so many times, with probability on your side and sound money management wins come more than the losses, I can attest to the fact it works.
Nice explanation of the difference between flat betting and regression then pressing. Love the mind set and this type of video has really helped me out.
After playing craps for over 12 years now and trying all these 100s of strategies in my table and in the casino and I realized that this is one of the best way to play with the right back roll one hit and play with the casino money but I only do it when I’m shooting. Very good video thank you 🙏.
Talking about risk, 3 bad come out rolls and you lost half of your bankroll. And 3 bad come out rolls are not rare. You should say too that You can go quick in profit as you can go very fast too in a huge hole. Love your videos.
Read all your comments, must say a lot of them missed or ignored the main point of this video. Great vid, will keep it on mind for trip to Vegas next week.
I play very simular to you, usually off on the come out. Like what you showed everyone. It is bewildering when I see a three point molly and only 1x's odds. As Daddy David says, " Never come on a craps table and we hate the pass line".
On a $15 table: $110 inside and buy the hard 4,10 for $5 each. First hit wins $35. Now I buy the 4,10 for $20 each. Second hit wins $35,40 Regress to $66 inside This has worked out well for both my wife and I last 10 craps sessions in Vegas. $25 table: $220 inside and buy 4,10 $10 each First hit wins $70 then buy 4,10 for $35 each. Win $70 regress to $110 inside. 2 questions. 1. Is it ok to just get hard way for $5 each or should I pick them up for $25. 2. If you had a good bank roll would you play $220 inside on a $15 table and regress after 1 hit or would you regress to $110 after 2 hits? Thanks 🙏🏼
Yes, Color up is doing something great with that series. Jeremy is showing the 3 point Molly because it is soppressata have the lowest house edge. Ie the "standard". He plays it vs Strategies that have "worse" House edges. It's great stuff.
I am not saying that your regression then pressing is bad, but if a 7 hits on the first $160 roll, you have to put another $160 at risk plus 4 or 5 wins on the regression rolls to get back to even. The odds of a 7 in the first roll would hit about every 7ish rolls so one may be ok. Any thoughts?
When demonstrating the 3 point Molly you seem to have thrown the original $5 back out onto the come line but thrown the 3, 4 and 5 times odds into the profit rack instead of returning it to your start up money.
On bubble craps, I like to play a $100 iron cross for 2 rolls pressing the 4, 9,& 10 1st roll then regress after 2nd roll to either $22 inside or a $37 cross depending on the profit. Half press from there.
The problem with the $160 across is the dreaded PSO or Come Out 7 when working. Sure, if you get by your first hit, you can play with profits. Yippie Aye Oh Kye Am, the freaking PSO puts you in a $160 hole. That's going to take 7 or 8 hits to make up. 3PM gets you to the breakeven point after two hits (never mind the number of rolls) and only exposes you to a maximum $75 risk.
I think the big problem with the 3PM is that you need repeaters for it to work which can be harder to hit then just any of the place bet numbers. One thing with the 3PM that I didn't see get addressed in the video is the fact that there is technically no limit to your maximum risk since you will be continuously feeding money when craps numbers roll on the come out or when you make a come bet. You're always having to put money from your rack back into play if you don't have 3 points when those numbers roll. The best case scenario is that it's eating into a profitable hand. The worst case scenario is that you're not in profit yet and now the hole is getting deeper and eating another roll of the hand to boot. Just kinda my 2 cents on it.
@@TokyoScarab Yeah, it sucks when that happens. No doubt. One plus is that the PSO doesn't wipe you out like it does the place better who bets inside or across. You basically just lose your odds there. Although it does avoid the initial exposure, once you get your two come numbers up with odds, and you seven out, you're still in for a rather large loss. Either strategy requires a sizeable bankroll. The more I play the game, and the more losses like this mount, the more I am gravitating to just playing the pass line and taking odds or the don't pass and laying them. I know just having one number is boring, but it does keep the volatility down.
Sure. But House edge is a singular calculation that casinos use to judge the amount of money they will make on each bet over an infinite amount of time. House edge has nothing to do with a player and the small amount of rolls a player will see
Awe thank you Jacob !! Thanks so much for all the nice comments . We love our simple life and just want to share with people all the ways they can save themselves money and live simply ❤️
What are your thoughts on the Casino Quest strategy called ultimate squeeze play? For example, $15 table, go $110 inside, first hit drop a $5 to the dealer and put $20 on the 4 and 10, next hit go to $96 across.
@@Cruising-and-Craps A bunch of dice dealers used to go gambling with our fellow degens after we signed the e.o (early out) at local casinos. The strategy I remember hitting the hardest was a buddy and mine's 6/8 power press. Started with 12 each. 1st hit drop 4 goto 30. 2nd hit drop 1 goto 66. 3rd hit drop 7 goto 150 or come down depending on your target amount. We hit Binions several times doing this for 2-3k, also lost quite a bit, but our strategy maximized our wins while keeping our losses small and quick. We never stuck around more than 10-15 minutes.
The point you were making is absolutely correct, but you’re not comparing apples to apples here because on your 96 across you were $21 up after one hit and could’ve taken everything down. You were $42 up after two hits and could’ve taken everything down and been in profit
Wrong answer. 160 first bet means you had 25 on the 4,5,9,10. A 25 place bet on the 9 pays you 7 dollars on every 5 for 35. You said you got 49 dollars that is 7x7... you only had 25 on the 9. Doesn't add up. ??
The 49 is for the 4 or 10. I may have made a mistake. I make a ton of videos, mistakes happen. But if your watching videos for mistakes that could be the wrong reason. I'm not going to go back and see if there "may" have been a mistake, because you are missing the point of the video and the possible mistake has little or nothing to do with it.
I need to laugh at your conclusions. On the first roll out you are saying how bad the 3 point molly is BUT if you had played your $160 strategy on that series of numbers you would have LOST around 270 dollars where the 3 point molly won $10!
This is an excellent video and have not seen it explained like this. Of course the PSO will kill you like it does with most every strat, and honestly it feels like it takes 2 hits to regress down to 64 without being negative, the concept makes sense.
On a $15 table, I like to start out with a $15 five and nine. Two hits, and I have $60 on the outside numbers. Then with every hit $5 horn high yo. On most rolls there will be back to back hardways or horn numbers. That's where I parlay and make my money at the casino. But it takes plenty of nerve to bet it and parlay it all. But the reality is, you are more likely to do that then have a long roll. Good luck everyone
I hate the Molly, because it is really a low roller grinder just want to play....not lose, not really win strategy.....Mostly I play on $25 tables in Cherokee
160 across and a 7 comes out, you are down 160. Too many variables to say if that is good or bad. Comes down to bank roll and what you willing to risk I guess.
I think the 10 paid him $49 dollars. So he put up 160 to make $49 in one roll. After that he takes all the money off and re bets the $44 dollars to start the big winning roll. So essentially he is up $5 when he starts the second bet
On a 10, isn't the odds 9:5 for place bets? We assume because a point was not established, he told the dealer to turn them on, because normally there are off when the Button is Off and you do not have a point yet. So if the line was on, then wouldn't that make a $25 bet then win only $45 on that first roll?
Come and pass plus Odds are nonsense. How does the odds bet work? It pays the true odds. So there is no advantage one way or the other. People will tell you it lowers the edge on the bet, that is NONSENSE! The bet has the same probability to win or lose no matter how much you play in odds. When you play pass/don't pass or come/don't come, you are playing the flat bets House edge. That's it. No way around it
So according to your logic , you'd rather make a bet giving an edge to the house than one where your flipping ? Taking odds spreads your initial pass line or come bet loss over a greater number of dollars , thereby decreasing the overall house edge . Taking odds is the only bet that makes any sense .
@michaelblankenau6598 decreasing the house edge is a fallacy. The bet at risk is still the line. If the Odds pay true they are in essence a break even prospect. No advantage either way. So you still have the flat bet, with its initial house edge. But it doesn't matter, think and play how you wish. I am just trying to keep people from falling for the Casinos "odds are the best bet trick".
@@wagermethis You don’t seem to understand . The house edge on a line or come bet is 1.4 % . The house edge on an odds bet is 0 % . If you’re not willing to take the best odds the casino has to offer then what exactly is the point of it all ? If I bet $ 10 on the pass line , the casino is charging a tax of 14 cents on that bet . If I now take $ 30 odds , I’m spreading my 14 cent tax over $ 40 . You seem to think paying a bigger tax on everything by placing the numbers is somehow better . Pretty basic math will show that you will always lose more in the long run . But hey … you do you .
@michaelblankenau6598 I understand completely. But the Odds you are so fond of have no value positive or negative in a house edge calculation. Believe that if you want. You will still win and lose the flat bet at the same edge. Now if your talking 1 bet, 1 time and never play again. Sure the Odds make sense. But if you use Odds on every line bet, you are gaining nothing.
As you know most people Dont win that much on a monster roll because they really dont understand what you are saying in this video, plus lack of confidence..
TRY ME bubble craps strat can easy scale up to $25 table. AC $2, YO $1, 4/10 $8 buy, 5/9 $10 buy, 6/8 $15 = $69 any 2 rolls pays for setup 22 inside + 4/10 HW $1 each Press/Collect playin with profit ;-)
You speak nonsense . You pretend like making bets that give up a bigger house edge are somehow better than bets that give up a lower edge . And your " proof " is rolling a few times where that works . That's called confirmation bias .
Regardless of how many hours of winning betting strategies everyone has watched online itt really is as simple as two things. 1)House odds of a particular bet that goes with the corresponding strategy and 2)Bankroll size relative tto players flat bet and table limit. Ive worked in casino starting as a dealer and finishing as a shift manager. The toughest players to beat were those playing the least house advantage game with bankrollls large enough to survive extended bad runs and high enough table limits to hit us hard when they caught a streak.
