Craziest Soviet Machines You Won't Believe Exist - Part 1 

only one like 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@wavevr who asked ok 🙄🙄

If the very first sentence was true, communism would have started the industrial revolution instead of freedom in the USA. Sorry,---it would not have happened with out the USA, and russia has been an impoverished citizenry while people in the USA flourished with their minds, and their freedom. "Be Amazed" at all the dysfunctional things a communist government makes,, (usual copies or given or taken.). We did it better when we were free to do so. Your programmers are going to be amazed all right.

This is bs garbage and hypocrisy advertising.

Very creative and interesting BUT way too many ads.....

Yes but pushing a button to destroy it 1000 miles away is more effective

i mean it's a little nuke there... i guess even one shot for one vehicle, it's pretty fine then...

@@shorray One shot, you say. There's a vehicle, based on this prototype and still being in use. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-6YZ_LdKMqcY.html

Yeah, I think sending one nuclear bomb 28 miles away every 5 minutes is more than ample as things like that go.

@@nickbrutanna9973 So Those Tank Operators were on a Suicide Mission? I mean 28 miles away is not exactly far? How do they propose to escape the Fallout of the Nuclear Explosion in vehicle that moves at a snail's pace?

Resourceful? To waste gobs, and gobs of money of unworkable and laughable "technologies" is resourceful? That's the problem, these kinds of governments look at their citizens as a "resource".

@@palomarjack4395 I suppose you think our own govt hasn't thrown away gobs of money on ridiculous things?

Considering the US government still exists, I’d say we’re not doing as badly.

@@arynrowland862 Considering the Russian Government still exist, I'd say they're not doing as badly.

@@arynrowland862 ah yes... you clearly don't make a difference between solviet union and Russia. Anyway, speaking of existence, have you noticed that the US are the most indebt country in the world? Where Russians are like ... on the 20th spot? Yeah.... America and resourceful simply cannot be used in the same sentence...

THE U.SS.R.AND THEN RUSSIA HAVE ALWAYS COME OUT WITH WAY AHEAD OF ITS THEIR TIME FAR FLUNG FUTURISTIC DESIGN CONCEPTS THAT ARE TOTALLY GROUNDBREAKING AND REVOLUTIONARY AND LEAVE THE REST OF THE WORLD IN AWE AND ENVY

If you don't build it, they will come!

Crazy things are built all over the world. Look at "crazy" Rides. Or Just visit a Lamborghini showroom.

Remember in the soviet flag you have a few building tools an in Russia what you think of is never a thought it is real from you yourself

@@brummbar5895 Have you ever seen a sickle, I have actually used it.

@@brummbar5895 ù

"Dimitri, fire a warning shot" "But sir, this is a nuclear weapon!" "Yeah yeah, just fire it, Dimitri"

Roflmao

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Hahahaaaaaa 😅

@@petro3366 🤣🤣🤣

thanks

Great work bro❤

That's what i was searching

Awesome!

I like the way that the narrative tries to conquer Swizterland then denies it!

It also couldn't hover

Also, 13 feet is 156 inches so.......... "inches above the water" :)

@@randomentity6553 And inches are not metric, so the normal world takes some table and tries converting that shit into normal units. And we need to buy your weird tools as well as the normal ones. Bloody expensive. Just saying. Being conservative is okay, but you can stretch it too far. These ancient units cause trouble, when you talk to people who went to normal schools (these scientific units exist for many many many years, now) and use normal units in daily life, just because EVERYBODY dropped those weird Emperor things. Except for you. Wake up! The world is larger than just your country. When will you finally discover they have passed you? Your units are out dated. Admit it. Tools like a seven thirteenth of an inch wrench? You still divide those inches in weird numbers. How about going decimal? For real, you all live in a museum!

Woow

Except it couldn't hover. It exploited an aviation phenomenon know as ground effect that occurs when a horizontal wing surface is flown over reasonably smooth ground surfaces.

it had a critical disadvantage which was it couldn't operate over medium waves which constrained it to the calm Caspian sea.

@@TeddyKrimsony Yes, but it was ingenious either way. Only if the designer were still alive during completion.

​@@TeddyKrimsony it can fly 5 meters above the sea.

@@KWCdiver It looks like the problem is in possibility to create stable "air bag" when waves are high enough. Air flow under ekranoplan will be dispersed by waves.

​@@LeopoldABthe project was not completed because the military no longer needed it, but they wanted to make a rescue one for civilian purposes, but it did not take root and funding was cut, Perestroika if you remember, otherwise it was already a flight of 14 m in height. That's the whole story.

I take that as an 3 mile long 🤨 one

Da comrade, in Soviet Russia big boom boom NEVER bad thing 👍

Blud thats longer than mine 😂

@@HA-gu1qk We are lucky they where !

"please, let me out, i wanna see my family" said soviet engineer

@@greenlevel22 my grandpa is soviet engineer in he is a happiest man on that planet even now in his 89 years old he going for a walk and whistling some oldschool melodies (fallout like music:)) making random people smile ,skies few times a week,plays with my kids and takes care of his garden in summer

the american being the one to say its too expensive is probably the most insane part of this comment lmao

@@madzak9847 just stop lol, it’s embarrassing

The saucer and ekronoplans are something good

@@laszlokocsi1825 also the flying tank sounds fun

That was just paperwork & relabeling.

Another one falling for propaganda lol

p

And by digging bunkers they burned excessive calories from all those burgers. 😃

Absolutely every last one of these designs it’s years ahead of its Self as a Yugoslavian kid mother Russia was always symbol of strength and in pride

Wouldn't the rocket exhaust total the Maz chassis? or at least set those big tires a fire?

@@GreatWhiteNorthAK Like the soviets GAF If exterminatus was on its way

@John Doe you don't know for sure unless you try

Stub lower wings on biplane crop dusters create vortexes which improve the dispersion of whatever is being applied below. That is why the Australian Transavia PL-12 Skyfarmer is a biplane.

From i've heard, in some places it was like a bus

I believe it has won it a record in the Guinness book.

It's crazy that Antonov made over 1,000 of these planes for almost 60 years.

Actually , the latest version came with a turboprop engine.

Yeah, socialism will bring even more innovation and genius.

Most of it stolen from the Brits, the Yanks and the Germans...

@@rescyou sure, and blood transfusions, reanimation and life support was taken from the Soviets. Sharing inventions or taking them by force is a good thing, were the USSR to not share this groundbreaking medicinal knowledge you would probably not exist.

@@rescyou plus, like 70%-90% of the mentioned designs are purely Soviet designed and manufactured. I mean sure, tanks are brit invented things, but everyone uses them. planes are american but everyone uses them because they've been shared. Sharing and developing each others designs are what makes humans progress faster.

@@mikeetoo96 good one, considered going pro? Not many good comedians.

UFO planes are already in use ,what you are thinking that things in air are really aliens👽 😏.............

There is a reason why UFO design doesn't work.

Right after the csar tank

@@swamivardana9911 I think it works with hidden technology. Our government has tech hidden that would advance humanity by several decades. Internal combustion engines have been around for 120 years. Think nobody ever made one that got 100 mpg? I do.

Umm no. Stupid idea sir.

Witch one

They always get crazy!

boom

@@CoolPea14 😎

@@risingelement Have you turned jelous or was since birth?

@@risingelement "The best army in the world" - you can only say after the US defeats an enemy of equal strength on its territory. Until now, the US has been at war with shepherds thousands of miles from its border LOL.

@@risingelement best military? Org best gay country?

True engineers who copied electric razors, irons and built the same Lada car from 1970 until It's collapse.

I'd be embarrassed if anything I made was comparable, and I'm not even an engineer.

hey duckweed shut your holes. go nit pick the media or something.

...goes well with showing Sean Connery in some bit of hollywood cold-war-movie-action ...😂

Star Wars is dumb.

Loo

OH SCHEIßE HANS GET MASCHINENGEWEHE

No, they didn't. Aircraft carriers were a thing long before Zveno project started.

Did you mean it had. In which case, you bet!

And the best were from Germany.

Cool. Thanks. Subscribed

Also has a lot of kunts that invade countries

and it's not like the US didn't have something similar :) Sikorsky CH-54 de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikorsky_CH-54

Then another question comes, which was made first?

@@Es-zw7ck in this case the russians were first: Mil Mi 10 - first flight June 15th 1960 Sikorsky CH-54 - first flight May 9th 1962

@@momokochama1844 Thanks fir the answer

@@Es-zw7ck wiki helps :)

Actually I'd say the US Akron-class was the first flying carriers

Zeppelins had attachable fighter planes so they were the first flying aircraft carriers.

how do it save fuel? if i drove a car and towed another wouldn't mine use twice as much fuel?

@@jibicusmaximus4827 it saves fuel _for the smaller craft._ Since they’re made to be small and light they dont have alot of fuel, but carrying them into battle allows them to save the fuel they would use to fly to and from the airfield. To use your towing example, if you towed another car then yes you’d use more fuel, but the other car wouldn’t use any. And if the other car was a racecar with a small and light fueltank, you could put it inside a semi-truck and since the Semi doesn’t need to worry about being light and nimble on a racetrack it can have much larger fuel tanks. Which means even tho it would use more fuel, then it wouldn’t have to stop to refuel on the way to and from the racetrack, while the racecar wouldn’t be able to make that trip on it’s own

@@ValentineC137 Perfect Analogy bud. I couldn't have said it better myself. The Zeppelin carried the single engine small fighter which on it's own wouldn't have the range for Atlantic Missions were made possible by making it a parasite craft. Your drag race car being hauled by trailer to the track is perfect 1:1 analogy.

Actually, theese subs (Typhoons) never had nuclear reactor incidents on them AND had a steam room and small basin with a gym. So they are the most healty atomic subs in the wold! )

@@user-nq7xu6gz7n 🤣

@@user-nq7xu6gz7n same difference compadre.. lmao

Agreed 🤣🤣🤣

@@ZaChYmO If you want to use some word, learn it, It is Tovarish. compadre... You speak only Amerikanish, I bet...

Great noticing powers…

Stalin's pipe organ.

Whoo-whoo-whooo-whooo

@@boomstick4054 1890

Soviet power is the music and tanks

I'm from Russia, I was born there. I was very little when my family moved to the US in 2003. I have been lucky enough to visit many countries, it interesting to see how the countries of the Soviet Union changed once it fell apart. My parents told me how bad the mafia was, and even how corrupt the cops were. This is why I think that so many Russians support Putin, he saved Russia. He took control and got rid of corruption and the mafia.

@@antongolovko1149 Well, corruption and mafia are still there, not as bad as in 90s though

@@TheUmbralPresence Agreed

@@TheUmbralPresence They're both state-run now, so I guess that's progress.

@@TheUmbralPresence Mafia is in the Pentagon and t in the White House now

These are drunk people making this crazy stuff

Well it IS humanity so... Not surprised.

hahaha

I mean yes but no

I know

This MAZ had an electric transmission: this is when ICE engine runs the electric generator and each axis has an electric engine.

@@Alexander-gh7kz Essentially its diesel-electric like modern trains are, and some hybrid Diesel cars and trucks out there. There different systems but what you describe is diesel engine runs a generator that in turn generates electricity to feed bunch of electric motors, the most common type is the one that uses electric engine aid for the diesel to remove the transmission, the electric motor acts like the transmission during low speeds for extra torque applications.

There are five evolution stages. The 7907 is the true FINAL FORM!!!!!

Dude, seeing how HOT Russian women can be is all it takes to make me glad that the Cold War never went nuclear. As someone who's sick of the world and sick of humanity and all its bullshit, it's hard to find reasons to be proud of humanity, or to even like it...

​@@Raz.C They are hot, but hard. We have no crocs or rattlers here, so humans just took the niche, lol. Russian life kinda nibbles on your personality with time. As for feeling humansick, I find it rational to admire certain exceptional folks, while keeping armed neutrality with the rest of our species, hot chicks or whatever. If they need help, help. If they want to harm, retaliate, I guess, "do thy neighbor no harm FIRST" is my motto.

@Danglin' Bolas Hey I love your comment. I think I am an advocate for the "tit for tat" way to social coexistence as well. Have you read about Axelrod's tournament?

@@tacitozetticci9308 Well, now I have. Living in an age of Google sure is good. I find it kinda obvious that "defectionist" strategy impacts the whole system at long term. I mean, come on, even I figured that much. Good to know bigbrains did confirm my thoughts with an experiment. Of course, human society is incomparably more complicated than that, but "tit for tat" could be a good basis for modern day philosophy. Can't avoid the problem of conflict escalation, though. Knowing humans, I was thinking of something more like a nuclear parity between superpowers, achieved through small arms regulations. You can bribe a judge, but you can't bribe a bullet. Not gonna work anyway, but hey, just let me dream of my gunpowder-smelling utopia :D

@@danglinbolas5547 Of course we need to be careful because if we apply it universally, huge tits will produce huge tats (yeah I'm kinda dumb) Jokes aside, what I mean is: tit for tat works wonders for small adjustments as a tool for mutual education within societies. But it becomes pointless and deleterious when instead of slight for slight, we trade tragedy for tragedy. That's not the point of it.

Doesn't stop US from developing biological weapons though 😢

Happy Birthday!!🎉🥳🕯️

Happy birthday 🎂🎂

@@davidkuzur5186 Thanks!

@@fostergameiro8246 Thanks!

Belated birthday wishes

Not when the front and rear screws move in opposite directions, as they do.

@Raf Vnetu Watch the video. Both sides have 2 screws, one moving clockwise and the other moving anti-clockwise.

It can move sidways if the driver wanted to. There are tons of vehicles made with screws like that.

They’re threaded in the opposite direction as well though which is why that works

USSR scary... 😦

Why they so angry with me 🥺

товагищ Бегия?

Только и остаётся, что старые времена вспоминать...

Fuckin RU-vid wont let me translate..

@Russia ... is the best at bullsh!tting and terrorising the others around.

@Comrade oh boy, another slavaboo.

@@e.s.6275- best at bullshitting What exactly? -terroristing others Everyone In the USSR as well as the puppet states had a good life. Terrorism was basically nonexistent as the Gov't knew a lot about every citizen and wouldn't allow terrorism to happen.

@Comrade then why do you have comrade in your name with a ushanka cheems? I've never seen anyone really slavic have that pfp.

@@canadianradiochemist4465 well I meant the state level, not individuals' level. USSR continuously terrorised its neighbors, as well as own population. What you had in mind was probably the period of 15-20 final years of USSR's existence, when it was something resembling a real socialism. However, let me remind you, USSR existed for about 70 years, and most of them were veeery far from a "good life". Any extent of "good life" was limited time wise to approx. Brezhnev's ruling period, and only to those loyal to the regime (and to those unloyal, there were prisons and psychiatric clinics). Tell about a "good life" to those multiple millions who perished during state invoked famines, mass deportations, red terror, mass killings, war crimes towards civil population, literally countless innocent victims of GULag, etc. Also, tell about a "good life" to those many millions of peasants, who were effectively slaves, had no ID, no right of free moving, no real payment for their hard work, all the way until the end of 1960'ies. Speaking about bullsh*tting, I meant state propaganda, again both inside and outside the country. Blatant, sheer, boundless. Nazis and Goebbels didn't invent state propaganda; they only borrowed it from the red comrades, just like concentration camps and other attributes. These regimes were like twin brothers. However, the big Nuremberg Trial is still to happen against the reds. Anyway.... I listed a few largest aspects, but the subject is very wide, and impossible to cover well in a comments format.

Comparing budgets in Federal Reserve currency is a big mistake... A plane bolt in Russia costs the equivalent of 1 dollar, the same bol in the US counts 99 dollars... The Russian factory produces 100,000 bolts a day and is worth $100,000, the US factory produces 100,000 a day and is worth $10,000,000

@@marc0martim The babiest description of economy I've heard )))

Unfortunately we also have a lot of thieves and assholes.

I wonder if the Russian invasion (this last week of February 2022) has captured the museum yet.

@@johnnycreighton29 judging by the location he described, probably not as it would be dead in the middle of Ukraine

I also spent 36 hours in the Chernobyl Exclusion zone. I can not understand why any military would seek to occupy this area. There is no infrastructure there beyond a $1.9 billion sarcophagus. No power plants, no airport, no major road, just a bunch of nuclear dust that stays on the ground until you stir it up.

Ukraine specialised in rocket building during the USSR times, and was also leading producers after 1991. I guess much of the Russian space program (and military) relied on Ukrainian expertise prior to 2014?

@@lasseenevoldsen2021 It seems to me as though the Ukrainians may have been the primary ones to thank for a majority of the USSR's military technology & production.

a shitty one

All these failed mega projects brought the union to its downfall. What a waste of time and money.

@@bar95900 you cannot taste success if you haven't tasted failure. So, a failure makes a man perfect. Every major project has to be failed in its early attempts, because of those failures we learn.

@@akshayr.madrid3923 didn’t most projects get dropped?

So... In light of Ukraine... Are you still a Russian fanboy

Come drop by, we can show you some incredible stuff of a lost civilization.

@@alexanderpafatnov1044 oh i will, i gotta go through college n stuff, once im able to visit id love to explore and meet real true russian people, who can not only help me master their cool language but learn more about their culture and history, and then eventually the history of soviet relics

Think again now.

@@slybesker still wanna go to russia? xD

@@slybesker Even if i think a Billion times My thoughts will still be the same but why is that cause Soviet Union & Russia is not the same FULLSTOP

@Judy 21 y.o - check my vidéó On 14 November 1910, Eugene Burton Ely's first experimental take-off of a Curtiss Pusher airplane from the deck of a United States Navy ship. And 18 January 1911, Ely landed his Curtiss Pusher airplane on a platform on the armored cruiser USS Pennsylvania anchored in San Francisco Bay. So no. The Aircraft Carrier concept first existed in USA. They were performing carrier Flight Ops since 1910.

@Judy 21 y.o - check my vidéó Also, the Soviet Union was nothing good. I lived in Rostov-on-Don. We needed Capitalist Reforms much earlier. Communism starved over 30 million people. And the Gulags killed many more. Life was miserable under an oppressive dictatorship.

@@hillarysemails1615 Не пизди!

Same 🤣ROFL🤣

Same😂teehee😂

U mean party poopers lol

LMAO LOLOL

Sarcasm is an inferior form of whit, not a pretty look. I won't be subscribing.

Nice to hear from a guy who actually have experience with this! But how about the missiles? If you fire a huge missile from these transporter, wouldn't it incinerate the entire vehicle and the personel? Would it even be possible to launch big missiles from a Maz?

Thank you so much Corrie - that really means a lot

@@BeAmazed awe, your reply means a lot too and made my day. Thank you so much 😊😎

👏🥲

@@BeAmazed hello there mate

Are you an alcohaulic?

@@Ndlanding I'm a workahaulic

I guess that if you'll be able to nuke a couple of armies and a city they will give you a new one.

Bugger me! An engineering Marvel! Presumably starring Iron Man, but not The Incredible Hulk, though possibly Bruce Banner.

Initially hydraulics were considered, but to counter recoil force, the system itself would require flexible tubing made out of materials, which did not exist at the time. Amount of force which was produced by recoil was so great that any hydraulic system would have exploded after first shot. Muzzle breaks were also installed, however, as calculations have shown, it showed signs of damage after first shot and was ripped out after 3rd, resulting in exploded barrel.

The only prototype was built and tested in Caspian sea, not in the ocean. The tests revealed the major design flaw: the ekranoplan cannot operate in the high waves. Therefore, it’s not suitable for oceans where NATO air carriers operate.

Actually they could be picked up by radar. Almost any ship in the 1960s US Navy or Coast Guard could have gotten a radar signature off the ekranoplan. SONAR would lose once it got up to speed and lifted from the water. US naval radar has and will always be a two fold set up of aerial radar and surface radar to pick up air craftbas well as surface vessels and in the 1960s was good enough to pick up small craft such as fishing vessels and lobster boats.

@@JosephDawson1986 It was meaning DEW RADARS. DEW RADARS would not pick up them and neither would ship RADARS unless were they very close. Even at today ship RADARS haved troubles to detectioned a surfaced submarine unless it is being very close or they haved a E-2 like aircrafts to search. And Soviets Union thought of them for invasions and to bring ined troops fast. And ined the 60s the RADARS were not THAT great nether. But what were the US military afraid of was POTENTIALS of thosed things. They were being a unknown quantity at then and militaries did not know what they could acshully do and if could they be detectioned as did they race ined at a target to then let a bunch of spetsnaz troops to land and stuff as that. The Soviets union thought of them as for invasions and not ship attacking until did they get the idea of making them to shoot cruised missiles at air crafts carriers. They could not acshully but US military did not know it that.

@@jacobsparry8525 the reason they have a hard time picking up surfaced sbs is because most subs are covered in sonar and radar absorbing paint or rubber tiles.

@@JosephDawson1986 I do not thinked so dude. Submarines do haved anechoic coating on to them for sounds suppression but not for RADAR absorbing. And the reason are they hard to see is becaused they are very low onto the horizon and unless do they haved air born RADAR as the E-2 then are they limited to the horizon from at the height of theirs RADAR antennas.