I always say the sign of a good review, is that the reviewers explain the game clearly enough that you might equipped well enough to disagree with their assessment. I think that very much fits with the categories you choose, so it's never about simple 'good or bad', and as such the insight is much better. For this review, both of you see it as an 'ok' game, but did a really good job at describing how it might be fantastic for others (or perhaps less than ok for a different set of gamers).
You really make me questioning myself this time 😄 I’m so used to share almost all the same thoughts on a game with you 😄I‘ve only had the chance to play it once (2p), but it is on my wishlist since then 😊 I usually prefer heavier games, so now I‘m wondering if I had a day where my brain was already dozing off, the cute factor got me or the very chill „we‘re not gonna go to annoy each other“ part hit it home for me or - complimented the other two factors 😂 I have to admit, that‘s one of the things we sometimes have different preferences, but that’s totally fine - and thanx to your awesome style of reviewing games, I can always take that factor into consideration! Keep up the fantastic work!
Hey there BGH! I’m the marketing/pr manager of a sports board game, but not really a sports game 😅 and I’d love to chat with you all about it. Can you let me know an email I can reach out to you all? Thanks!