Brandon Lilly got butt hurt as fuck over this video. He went on record to say that he couldn't even squat 600 pounds raw after he took his gear off and left westside.
You do realize that he got kicked out of WSBB for stealing and selling fake roids? Even though Louie and him have reconciled I'm disappointed he would still continue to bash Westside.
In my opinion west side is the meat head douche bag old way of training, lot of short cuts with form and looking to game the game.. there is a funny ass video showing their guy squat next to Olympic lifters and it’s hilarious
@@sabertoothwallaby2937 Well, they have world records in small federations with not so many lifters, multi-ply is almost dead so a multi-ply world record is nowhere near as impressive as an ipf world record, but Westside likes to ignore this in order to boast about how great they are.
We can sit here and debate or critique Westside technique all day, the truth is that there is something about THAT gym, that attitude, that atmosphere that is just different and savage compared to perhaps any other in this country. I don't think Westside method is for everyone, especially not raw lifters. However, I think anyone who trains at Westside or follows Westside philosophy will absolutely improve in whatever they are doing. That's really the key Westside brings to the table, and that is backed up by testimony from everyone who ever trained there, even if they didn't subscribe to everything Louie said. Mark Bell, Dave Tate, Wenning, Efferding, JM Blakely, and many other greatly respected coaches and powerlifters all agree about one thing when it comes to Westside... it brings out the absolute BEST in you, and the atmosphere pushes you beyond what you thought possible. There have been many guys who trained there who took the principles they acquired and became very successful coaches or businessmen in their own right. I named a few of those guys above. There's MORE to Westside than the method. That's the real truth of it.
That was really interesting. It felt more like 15 minutes to me - that's what I like in your videos. The info is put together in a very approachable way.
spot on chad!!! I'm a raw squatter but I use box squats as an accessory. free squatting is no issue I'm told I squat too deep lol but box squats for me are to really hit hips and abductors. love the content man
I think conjugate training can absolutely work for raw lifters provided you do the exercises that promote raw lifting. I don't know how much training Louie ever did with raw competitor other than with that SHW who was removed from membership due to not being able to be there enough - but the guy wasn't there long enough to see what he could do under that system and was already strong when he got there. I am friends with a guy who trained there and he has told me that just because the day calls for ME or DE does not mean it always ends up that way. If you're beat up, ME is not gonna happen. There's a lot of rehab work going on as well. Lots of people critique based on what info is out there, but remember, its only a template or guide. Louie isn't dumb. If he was gonna train raw competitors, it certainly would be different exercises and minor changes in percentages, sets, reps, etc, but the methods and theory would remain the same.
Love Louie and I do ''conjugate'' my way and they work. But I never run westside system because I compete raw. Id run a 6 weeks cycle peak program for meet, but Id never done westside peak cycle, like most people say raw lifters need to get used to the movement. Like what Ed Coan say stick to what ever works! Great video guys! (Y)
Well, first of all, this did seem like a rather neutral video and not just a long rant of westside bashing, so I really do appreciate that. Now, I won't go into the details of everything but just say some general stuff because referring to it all would take forever. On thing is the definition of westside. I can't very well know all the sources but to my understanding Louie has always talked about individuality in choice of exercises as well as individual weaknesses and so on. And while they rather largely use the same template, some guys at Westside, like some bench only guys, have strayed away from that template. What I am trying to say is that Westside in itself is done in a way that worked for the guys there rather similarly most of the time BUT imo it is still Westside, if some changes are made because making those changes is in the nature of the programme. It's not just something that you should blindly follow but rather constantly think about. Now I myself am not a world class lifter. I would say that at my best (before my recent injury) I was fairly strong on a national level, competing in the middleweights as a natty, junior RAW lifter. So I am certainly not among the best by any means but it's safe to say that I've been around the block and tried some things. In terms of hypertrophy, once I started using the concurrent method, I (over a few years) really blew up in strength and size compared to where I was before. Until my injury I also made rather steady improvements every year. If I compared myself to my usual competitors of the same height, I was definitely more muscular, most of the time. That's not to say anything about the importance of that fact, in the end strength is king in powerlifting, but in my own case, Westside was awesome for hypertrophy. I also noticed that the focus on the posterior chain was a godsend for me, as my lifts always improved better the more I hit that chain. I had a phase for 3 months where I listened to all the anti Westside articles and tried to switch my focus to quad training, front squats, high bar squats, close stance and all that (mind you, I don't squat very wide in competition as well, just because my mobility isn't well enough for that, so the movements should have been better in terms of specificity) with the same template and what happened? My squat dropped 10-20%, as did my deadlift. It was a disaster. Now I am not saying that this is how it is for everyone but for me, obviously, sticking to Louie's ideas worked better. Same goes for the deadlift. I used deadlift variations, sometimes 20% of my ME days to sometimes 50% or so of my ME days, but never used my comp style deadlift in training. And still, it is my strongest lift by far, making up roughly 40% of my total. So obviously, all this worked for me. I have switched to another system only once since 2012. I did so while I was in a weaker phase, just having finished a cut that went worse than it should have. Anyway, it felt good for about one and a half weeks, which is when the high frequency and high volume at complex barbell movements (the comp lifts) really took their toll. I had beat up wrists, elbows and knees, as well as a constantly cramped up QL muscle but most importantly, I injured my right glute, which kicked me out of the circuit for a year. This took its toll mentally, resulting in me losing the will to lift for quite a while and not getting back to my personal best since. I am just now in the process of really getting back up and reclaiming that drive to get to the top. As for the bench, I did manage to reach about the same strength or a bit more than that for a time, training with the same high frequency programme but bench only, but my technique went to shit, despite all that specific preparation that supposedly should have helped me. Now there are aspects of "westside" that work for a lot of people but not for me. I really struggled improving my bench despite getting really strong triceps (and always having had very strong shoulders). The reason was, simply, that my chest lacked. But "westside" is not just training your arms. It's training your weaknesses, which for most people means working their arms. I've trained a couple of people in my home gym over the years and I am the only one that lacked in the chest department. Everyone else lacked lockout and arm strength. So for them that was great. For me the weakness was just different and when I made the switch to more focus on my weaknesses, my bench went up by 15% in 2 months. So was the system the problem? No, it was just the way I used the system. I also have found that I made better progress not just maxing out but rather choosing max effort volume according to Prilepin's chart, i.e. I made smaller jumps in weight in order to have more heavy singles, doubles or triples (4-10 total reps in the 90% range). However, this may have led to my tendency to peak and burn out, then peak and burn out again. But I have always had that tendency, so who knows? I know that I am mostly rambling here and this is taking way too long to type out, so let me just conclude: - I see your arguments and I appreciate the effort to spell things out and reason - despite that, most of what Louie prescribes has worked so much better for me than anything else I ever did - I disagree with your definition of "Westside" (which I am unsure whether to even use as a term bc as far as I remember they only ever speak of the conjugate or concurrent method themselves) - building on that, one of THE corner stones of this system is individuality, subtle changes to cater to the one's personal needs and weakness analysis and work on those weaknesses. Having said that, I don't think that the rules of "Westside" can be set in stone as they are always treated to be - and building on that, I have made some minor changes for myself but feel certain that those don't change the nature of the system - finally I have never been seriously injured until I strayed away from the system So all in all: it just works for me. I can't speak for anyone else, really, but for me it was the best thing since sliced bread. But if other things work better for others, then they should do that. Just don't write this system off as being "just for equipped lifters" or "just for juice heads".
Westside barbell system is best!! Have training 35 years, last 25 with Westside. It's about have to change moves, stretching, and i make body moves, witch are not part of Westside. Best system, thank's Louie!!
Things are constantly changing at Westside, over the last year I have seen more 5x5 and 6x6s on dynamic effort lower day done on the mens side than I have seen of the old 8x2 speed squats. Same on bench, tons more volume and things are constantly changing. I coach mostly raw lifters and I agree we need a ton more raw volume free squat work. I took some stuff from Jesse Norris' program and added it to what I was taught at Westside years ago and that's how we do things now.. We add in extra days after the main days all the time (mostly a front squat day). So do I program "Westside"..I guess not.Maybe your doctor friend trained WS wrong when he tried it. Ask Chuck V is there is sandbagging at Westside lol
The original westside template which is STILL VERY HEAVILY advocated by westside lifters, does say that in westside, you're doing max or dynamic effort every week. and for speed squats, 1-2x7-10 is still utilized as the main speed rep/set range for lifters at westside barbell club. So your variations of the westside barbell program may be very effective, its still certainly not westside. Also no one in this whole video said that lifters at westside barbell club were/ are sandbagging. And yes, raw lifters do indeed need more volume, which you noted, but that's not westside. Also you've seen more volume being done by westside lifters because they're lifting raw more, which is the ENTIRE point of this video, to show that traditional westside is not for raw lifters.
FWIW, Louie says clearly here that his lifters use 75%-85% on speed squat day for an average of 25 lifts. With bands, this will be 50%-60% in bar weight and 25% in band tension. This has always been the case. His speed squat "load" has always been 75%-85% with bands.
Conjugate is the only way I'll train. People go way overboard with specificity. If you make your normal training harder then what you have to do in competition, it's hard to lose. Period. I definitely gained strength fastest using a juggernaut type program. But I also gained nagging injuries, and mental fatigue to the point where I took a year off just because I couldn't stand training anymore. Linear periodization took the joy out of training for me. Conjugate allows to me to have fun with something different every single week. I'd rather gain strength slower over time and enjoy the process.
@@mac5917 Which over time leads to stagnation and injuries because the body has already become adapted to that specific stressor and needs a new one. It's basically like continuing to hammer wood after a nail is already in it. The nail (stressor) has already done it's job, the wood (body) needs another nail. If you keep hammering the same nail, the wood is eventually going to break. If pure specificity was the answer, then all we would need to do is squat, bench, and deadlift. Clearly that is not the case. Furthermore, if linear periodization was the answer, then we would all be inhumanly strong. Again, clearly false. Progress is slow, and it's not linear at all, so why would we use a linear system to progress?
excellent discussion. i'd be interested to see your guys thoughts on a non-westside concurrent training system vs more of a block style periodization which seems to be more in line with the things i've seen on the JTS site
+The Strength Doc Thanks. In brief, the concurrent part is going to be where it falls down, so at phase potentiation it will be lacking, but keep in mind that is one of the lowest ranking principles so you could still have a very effective program.
Juggernaut Training Systems thanks for the response! i was expecting that to be the answer just didn't want to make any assumptions without hearing from you
Would you consider making a video regarding GPP in the context of general strength training or powerlifting? I'd love to see that, because there's a lot of differing opinions on the matter; most recommend sled work, which you suggest is suboptimal yet some recommend pushups, pullups, battle rope and shooting hoops as part of their GPP. It's very confussing. Your content is amazing as always! Thank you
This is gonna be an awesome series. I think u both did a good job stating the pros and cons of westside. I didn't see this being negative at all. This series can be helpful to a lot of ppl. Great idea and great video.
ME day is more so just to teach how to properly strain. And they also for DE they use 60% bar weight plus 20-30% band or chain tension. And they recommend just using 70-75-80% straight up weight if you don’t have access to that specialty stuff :)
+Tobias Ommer ...raw = lifter lift weight...geared = test elastic strength of fabric not lifter..critique clearly shows that the westside method is oriented towards geared lifters and will not suit raw...n yes it is a grt critique and i dont understand how your point makes it a poor one
+j.p. leahy because "supplements" means juice, not gear. at least "supplements" has been used to describe steroids by everyone else for years and years, so I dont think chad meant anything else
j.p. leahy There's no reason to get all condescending. You're getting at using equipment, which is an entirely different thing that Chad talked about but that I am certain he didn't mean when he talked about supplements. Whether you are insinuating that I am using powerlifting gear or illegal substances: I do neither. That assumption is ridiculous.
Yeah! I'm really looking forward to this series! I've been waiting for something like this since Powerliftingtowin ended his series. From what I've seen here, your conclusions seem pretty similar to his. Looking forward for more!
26:15 what he says about Matt Wenning vs intermediate lifters is so accurate. In order to take a training philosofy like Westside's and twist it to suit yourself at 225 lbs natural & lifting raw, you need to really think your rotation of exercises and volume through. It will probably not even be "pure Westside" anymore even though that's where your program originated from.
Three knee surgeries (used box squats with chains and bands to recover), two shoulder surgeries( used bands/chains), tricep reattachment /ulnar nerve decompression(bands/chains)…used WestSide Barbell methodologies as therapeutic recovery. Most shall only hate on what the envy.
Really enjoyed this discussion, felt like I learnt a lot about programming and progression in general as well as gaining a greater understanding of Westside
Wow great video. You guys could have just said why you don't like it and it would have been like 10 minutes, but you gave real reasons why it isn't optimal which I really appreciate. Learned a lot thank you.
Dr. Israetel, THANK YOU for using the correct definition of GPP. I hate that the term GPP has essentially become synonymous with "physical fitness" and not as a part of a larger program leading into and supporting the goal of training.
I think you may be forgetting that at greater joint flexion the lifter is operating at way less than 90% with bands and chains. So there is a lot of work being done at 60 to 80% of every rep. It is far more complex than just attributing a percentage to a rep or set.
One thing that Louie Simmons continue to point to for effectiveness of the Westside method is the record board. He shows that his method produces many strong power lifters. Isn’t the proof in the pudding the results?
It would be, except those records are from sky high squats and soft locked benches and squats in the least competitive divisions that powerlifting has to offer.
Amazing video. I can't wait to see the rest of the videos in this series. I just finished a conjugate program, and Im so glad that you addressed the phasic structure of it (even though conjugate isn't necessarily westside). Im a relatively new lifter, and long-term success is my main goal, thanks for clearing that up!
@@borisrovchenko7747 Well planned conjugate training can fit anyone but the training done at Westside was most prevalent and got the most records with equipped powerlifting Although a lot of their training was raw and they were all obviously super strong People like Matt Wenning adapted Westside to his own version of conjugate after he left and took the world records at a Westside meet So he got stronger and broke world records after he LEFT Westside because he fine tuned his training and actually allowed deload weeks and emphasized recovery He also had world records in raw powerlifting So conjugate works for most anyone as long as you know how to plan it but the balls to the wall 100mph every day training with Westside works best if you're equipped You need to be an animal to hold 900lbs in your hands for a bench or 1200lbs in a squat even in a suit or shirt but with the assistance of the suits acting as a sort of "second muscle" and extra support they can get away with doing dynamic effort work that's too heavy and immense band tension that gets lighter at the bottom of the lift Raw lifters need to build more muscle and get in good volume and work capacity Westside did a lot of that but it needs to be tweaked and changed here and there to best fit someone who isn't a 300lb, world record holder, maniac, in prime 90s-00s Westside, and on steroids
I watched the video and learned something today. i don't know it all I train conjugated periodization, volume, bodybuilding. All of the above Do I follow a concrete Westside template, with speed work, pendulum waves, and so forth? No Tons of strongman guys I train and compete with use pieces of WSBB, but not the entire system The video was professionally done, and you both speak with class, sophistication, and eloquence. Keep up the good work
Westside is for advanced lifters with multiple years of hypertropy/strength training, that most is obvious. I find it to be an effective system and the dynamic effort days are based on a pendulum progressive wave based on current 1rm %'s depending on either deadlifts, squat or bench and/or variations. I find the percentages of progression of 6x3 and 3x1 (circamax reps) effective for max effort while getting in some work on form/technique. Also the template, I follow every 4th week is repetition method instead of max effort and also restoration is implemented as well to promote circulation/recovery/volumization. Also enjoy how you can target weak points, and add them into assistance work post max/dynamic effort to correct any issues/weak points. I lift raw and make some minor modifications overall very effective program adapted from prior Soviet/Bulgarian training principles. Westside is a excellent blend of Experience, Science and application integrated into one system. Long live Westside Barbell and the God Father of powerlifting Louie Simmons.
+Mikkel Jørgensen LOL I hope you are kidding? Read the links all the information you seek is there, as to Soviet/Bulgarian training principles. louiesimmons.com/max-effort-method/ louiesimmons.com/the-conjugate-method/
+Travis Stilwell Yes, that is true but when I say a few minor modifications of the westside program, I'm referring to the use of any gear or for example ultra wide stance squats, still wide though... the template, reps, sets, %'s etc. stay the same. Taking in account minor variations, it's still the westside protocol minus the gear and technical aspect of the lifts ie. slightly narrower squat/bench width grip.
+bigphatphuck phillycheesesteak I understand that but true west side doesn't have a 4th week for a repetition week. True west side your doing 3 week waves there is no 4 week. So it's a modified west side which in reality like the video says it's not actually west side it's just conjugate. But I agree with adding a week for reps in there, that would prob work pretty good
Chernyak and Jay Schroeder have stated (paraphrase) that "speed work recovers the body". I am sure that the dynamic effort day does develop a form of "explosiveness" but there's a strong chance that recovery has been enhanced as well. Oh and by the way I like your GPP analysis.
Great video. Well worth the time. As a raw lifter, it's good to hear about programs that don't fit my goals. Obviously Westside works for some people, but one size definitely doesn't fit everyone.
it is very interesting to me that most Westside lifters are small. At least, smaller in the regard to RAW lifters. Such limited range of motion and lack of volume truly does limit muscle growth, which is very critical to natural RAW lifters. Great video. The haters will come, but I find all the points in this video extremely accurate. Plus, as said in previous comments, Chad does currently have the strongest PL team with him right now. Results speak for themselves
Have you ever met Dave Hoff? Jason Coker? Matt Wenning? They're all really, really big. Not to mention that guy who broke the American deadlift record from Westside. Can't remember his name
+David Brockmeier Well, I said in comparison to RAW lifters. Yes, Hoff is big, but compare him to Chad, Ray Williams, Brandon Allen, Josh Morris, etc. My point was that RAW lifters have to put more emphasis on every body part, and not just work on hamstrings for squats, or triceps for bench, etc....it's like Chad said. geared lifters put more emphasis on seperate parts, like rear delts for bench, whilst raw lifters must do more triceps and shoulder press, giving them a much bigger overall look.
Here, I am not a hater but I am a very astute thinker. Why don't you point out these extremely accurate points and school me. But take note of them first, because most are bashing methods, that have nothing to do with the system. JTS and WSB are systems, methods are used in these systems, and can be changed. Methods do not define systems, except possibly in the minds of newbs, or someone selling a different system So I will be waiting for these "points" that show the JTS system will work better than the WSB system.
Chad has a stick up his ass about WSBB for reasons unknown. Since its popular to bash the system, he does it knowing it'll generate traffic for his site
Juggernaut Training Systems the success of westside, and it is successful, is the hyper competitive atmosphere. One Can argue about training techniques all day long but there is no argument that a super competitive atmosphere will produce champions. More gyms would do well to mimic the atmosphere rather than focusing on the particular training methods.
I feel that some of their criticisms are misplaced because the system is for equipped powerlifters and they bring up novice lifters and raw powerlifters which just isn't the way to go. It'd be like me critiquing Caltech for not having enough humanities degree programs when the college is specifically for people who want to be Engineers or Physicists.
That's the beautiful thing about body building and Power lifting ... there are a lot of different ways to get a result... and some work better for others that don't do Shit for some... I love west side... but I also listen sincerely when someone else who knows their Shit extensively and talks about the subject. Cheers and hails....
They don't know their shit extensively, at least when it comes to Westside Conjugate. For example, they complained that they didn't have good gains and volume when they only worked up to a max. They put MINIMAL effort into the MAX effort method, of course it didn't work; Louie follows Prilepin's guideline of 4-10 90%+ sets, and the people he's coached like Mark Bell and Laura Phelps also include a back off set of around 80% for either 2x5 or amrap for extra volume
@@CyberdarkHellKaiser I wasn't saying that they knew that specifically , more just that they had knowledge of the subject... Westside teaches Westside best...
Westside is for strength not bodybuilding. Do U really want to question their system on making powerlifting CHAMPIONS. I dont think ANYBODY can question their system to make a man as strong as he can possibly get. They have the strongest men on the PLANET. Mike is just trying to sell his book so of course he is gonna put everybody else down but I'm not familiar with this other guy. Mike, U can't question WESTSIDE until U can lift the weights they do and we both know that ain't happening
The way you guys are carrying on you wouldn't think that Westside has the strongest gym in the world. At 20:20 you're talking about how Westside is bad/suboptimal for women/smaller people, but they've got basically all of the women's records... The use of bands/accommodating resistance: What about the force posture strength curve? What about overspeed eccentrics? What about improving motor unit recruitment or reversal speed? 23:08 "if you're changing exercises every week you're eventually going to have exercises that have low transfer". They don't just throw in exercises at random just because they're different exercises. As far as I can tell they use about 3-4 different variations that target specific weaknesses, and also include different stances/grips, and different bars as part of that change. 24:00 Simmons says himself that they never do a standard deadlift. This guy doesn't seem to have done his homework. If it didn't work then why do they have so many deadlift records? 27:30 I'm sure everyone would really appreciate if you cite your sources on the claim that you're best off training one system at a time. 28.55 "if you want to be the best at any one thing..." are they not the best at strength?
I was doing 5x5 and 5x6 volume work, with more abbreviated routines, as a powerlifter in the early '90s. Long before 'Starting Strength' and the like. I got it from Brooks Kubik and it was the best way for me for building strength with hypertrophy. I can't say I agree with the 'lots of sets' view. I went from nothing to a 300lb bench with 2-3 workouts a week with only 6-8 sets for a movement per WEEK. With below average genetics. 'Basics, 'breviated and best' takes you a very long way. Also it's not like people weren't doing pin-presses, floor press etc and other exercises to assist lift training. This was knocking about long before Westside or 'scientific training'.
Great video. I wanted to say that there is more to accommodating resistance than assisting the top part of the lifts that need to be emphasized for the "shirt and suit elite". When one wants to use the barbell in let's say the bench press for "explosiveness" accommodating resistance eliminates that "deceleration" that takes place. Very valuable. In addition (not to be a name dropper) But Dragomir Cioroslan told me once (years ago) that a (any) routine designed to improve strength MUST satisfy 2 factors-Maximum Nervous system stimulus AND hypertrophy. He reiterated immediately- YOU MUST HAVE BOTH!
There is still a deceleration no matter bands or chains, if there wasn’t, the bar wouldn’t stop at the top of the lift, it would leave your hands. If looking for upper body explosiveness, for say a football lineman or shot putter, supine medball throw variations and pushups onto boxes will be much more useful.
I completely agree with you. But if I am not mistaken that's what Louie stated concerning the purpose of bands and chains . I do not doubt that "explosive push-ups" and med ball throws would be a "go to" for football lineman and/or shot putters .
Sled drags and box squats equal to? Answer hip explosion. Activate the ass . Helps powerlifters inn squats and Deadlifts. So they can use their whole body to use it to coordinate in the lift.
+Juggernaut Training Systems hell yeah! Im currently on my 3rd JuggerCube run, had tried it 2 times before to awesome results. Took a year off doing bodybuilding style workouts to build muscle and currently 2 months in on this one. Love your work Chad! After watching this Im rethinking the chest supported dumbell rows on bench day. But Ill definately look up another Juggernaut program afterwards. Theres a bunch of different styles of programs that people are taking at my gym from sheiko to bulgarian and rpe variations but none of them are making my sort of gains. Different training regiments must help people right? But Im getting older and I wana make sure my moves are towards efficiency rather then beating in the bush trying different programs. Thanks again I really appreciate the Juggernaut teams insight into strength
I’m so glad I found this video. I’m forever challenged on why I default to building volume - my 5sx5r with the same weight and building my 10 rep sets - but I’m reestablishing a base strength. There is only so many times I can gain incremental increases on a max rep without risking injury. I struggle to articulate why I train the way I do but you put it very simply. We must go through these phases. Thank you for the video!
Box squats are great if you use a higher box, and your regular squat stance putting your quads into it instead of sitting back so it's mostly hips. When I was in high school, I took George Frenn's squat routine and modified it for myself using a higher seat, reps around 8, and my regular squat stance for the box squat. I also did full front squats. I didn't see any reason to do singles in the high box like Frenn since I could do 8 reps in the box squat with more than my max single. Remember, box squats started with Frenn and Peanuts West before there were squat suits.
Louie said that the only people who train westside, train at westside. Not all the lifters from his gym are equipped either. But nothing wrong with a critique.
In a recent video I watched Louie talk about swapping speed day for a volume day when required and discussed 3 week waves of 5x5, as well as 6x6, 8x8 and even 10 x 10 if needed. He also discussed prioritising what’s needed and that could be wide grip bench for pecs or rollbacks etc for triceps. I think the volume is no different to say the Juggernaut method except one follows linear periodisation and the other doesn’t.
JaayProdiJaay I've done smolov last year (late august- November) it is insane. Squat went up 365 to 465 living up to the hype of adding 100lbs. The hard part was I was extremely sore but you still gotta squat. You have to be extremely mentally tough brotha
@@Re3iRtH hey! so this is a long program that's broken down into 5 cycles. so be patient and i'll post the links for spreadsheet and additional info 1) INTROPHASE: 2 weeks long, 3x/week, 65-90&. prepare you for base cycle 2)BASE PHASE: 4 weeks long, 4x/week, 70-85% for reps 3)SWITCHING PHASE: 2 weeks long, taking break from intensity , MONDAY negative squat (105-110%), WEDNESDAY power clean(, FRIDAY: box squat 12x2 60% 4)INTENSE PHASE: 4 weeks long, 3x/week, 65-95% 5)TAPER PHASE: squat 1 day (Monday or Tuesday) MAX OUT: Friday, Saturday or sunday
Please do cube method for strongman 💪🏻 although I assume covering the cube or 365 strong would be the same as the program is structured similarly. Also would love to see more strongman content from you guys!!
looks like training partial ranges of motion for partial lifts. Seems pretty counter intuitive for discerning athletes who are concerned with quality movements through full range of motion.
The guys at massthetics, made a conjuring program for raw lifters and its seems to be very well done. I see people getting a lot stronger, very fast on it. I think because of the low volume (more volume than westside, though) people aren't seeing great hypertrophy gains, but rather get really efficient with the muscle that they have. Great video, keep it up.
I have studied westside and visited there and also run it successfully as a raw lifter. Most of the information in this video is incorrect as there don't know westside.
There's a difference between general and specific physical preparednes, and they did both at Westside. The wide stance was used to recruit as much muscle mass as possible. The tricep focus on the bench was to prevent shoulder injuries and so on. They also did a lot of volume. This critique makes little sense.
Every time I try and construct a Westside type program with an appropriate stimulus on the secondary day, it pretty much comes out looking like a 4 day Texas Method.
I totally understand with what they’re saying but the problem with their negative critiques is, Louie Simmons’s methods has broken records that haven’t been broken to this day. If there was a better way to do things, how come no one’s doing it to the point where they’ll break Westside barbells records? That’s like critiquing Floyd Mayweathers undefeated boxing style. But what you guys say makes sense. But we need logistical illustrations. Logic, in this case, says that Louie’s system is better than the rest. Right Dave Hoff?
Most people are saying this is a "low blow" or talking shit about conjugate/westside. But he said many times that this is not about conjugate or congruent training its about "Westside" and simply stated his opinions towards westside and things he likes and does not agree with. We all know louie is great at what he does and what he does works for the people he trains.
I would love more of a critique on the conjugate methodology concept as opposed to what Louie Simmons is doing because many people come to the conclusion that things need to be modified so they definitely aren't doing exactly what Louie is, so in that case it's not Westside. When looking at different periodization models choosing to do a block/phasic system or training multiple qualities within the week can become confusing. For instance, I used to do what Charles Poliquin espoused with a phase of accumulation and then a phase of intensification but there wasn't enough discussion on how long those phases should be and he used a 3 rep bracket such as 3-5 reps, 6-8 reps, 2-4 reps, 8-10 reps but the problem is some of those can easily overlap poorly where the contrast seems to small. In your opinion is a conjugate system worth doing at all, or is block periodization always better if it's intelligently designed?
I've got to do a critique of Westside for my MSc program. It would be really helpful to know a couple of research papers you gentlemen used for this video.
1. their squat "records" are a bit high ;) 2. Just because some more genetically gifted people might be stronger than CWS it does not mean that their training system is better. 3. "Westside is stronger raw [...] PUT EQUIPMENT ON"....so you agree that westside is mainly for equipped lifters?
sled dragging are benefitial for recovery due to the joint decompensating effect i assume ....... + it strenghtens ligerments & tendon wich supports longevity in sport......
