My son was your age when he became interested in law. Today, he is a practicing attorney in Seattle. He found his niche and only practices in federal courts. Keep at it young man!
If you're thinking about protecting land rights in the private, Google: Ron Gibson, a constitutional lawyer with great knowledge in how to receive land patents, meaning lord, sole owner. Know the difference between US citizens versus US Nationals, sometimes called American state Nationals or state Nationals. The greatest right in the US CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE 1, section 10: no States may enter into ...; (6th Clause) make any bill of attainder ..., (2nd subject) "or law impairing the obligation of contract, ... Contracts done in deceit can be *repudiated* and made *null&void*. Everything we sign is a contract and no State can *impair the °legal° definitions* with in it, know the legal definitions & be as wise as the serpent.
Thank you for sharing your knowledge. I am a litigant in person with an upcoming trial in the family court. Your video has been very helpful to me in understanding the approach and practical aspects of cross-examination.
I would love to hear your cross examination tools and tips regarding medical professionals or expert testimony if you may have time. This is such a service your providing, thank you!!!
I'm in a different jurisdiction but these tips were still very helpful. I had my first ever go at cross last week (in a mock trial setting), and the issue I had was that I prepared well enough but I relied too much on questioning on the fly and ended up losing my train of thought.
A judge going out of his way to make an informative video for the purpose of helping shows this guy's true character. The last thing any judge was gonna do in my experiences is to help.
STOP @ 54.00 I'm not a robot.. I don't just reference the signal. I also reference all the vehicles and try to synchronize with everything in the most optimal manner with respect for safety. I do not drive from a standpoint of liability.. safety first.
i am on trial in Melbourne Australia and my matter is in its fourth year, regarding theft of motor vehicles. The prosecution has now claimed they are unable to find or locate the complaint, but still want to proceed. Is this allowed? In Melbourne you are found guilty, until you can prove you are innocent, and this is a 1 in 200 chance
If there's no witness no harm loss or injury no one with first hand knowledge that claims there car was stolen then what's the controversy the prosecution has not got firshand knowledge or suffered loss
I have a question, my neighbors outdoor parties last for 7 hrs (loud+music) until 2:30am, their noises audible through my residence, we cants sleep. Local ordinance is 85dB (whoever makes this law does not know how loud it sounds like). I want to sue in small claim court. Beside journal and measure noise inside my house. what would you advise me to do and what does a judge want to see as evidence in my case? What quality as good evidence? I can only measure inside my house. When i tried to measure at the property line, my neighbor blocked it. Can i measure on the patio instead so they can’t block it? Thank you so much. I am going to watch all of your videos to learn how to prove my case in court. Will let you know the results…
I enjoyed this session, i am an advocate in the RSA ; i need to purchase your practical hand book for legal practitioners , how do i get my hand in this book judge.
I enjoyed listening to this. I may have to appear in a military court as a witness next month, and this helps me understand some things that go in the lawyers mind. I'm hoping to get out of it, though.
Judge,. Since cross examination is limited by scope of direct testimony, can defense list prosecution's witness also as a defense witness, to open scope of testimony? Can the defense call opponents witness as their witness also?
