The clones were NOT slaves. Everything isn't about race or slavery or sexual identity or any of that cancel pig crap. It's a bad cartoon, made by an idiot, who has ruined Star wars a long with Kathleen Kennedy.
When I was a 14 year old lad I went with a group of friends to a guy named Stuart "loose bum" Rennie's house. While there someone asked his mother how Stuart got the moniker Loose Bum. She started laughing and told us the tale of how she sent him to boarding school 4 year prior, when Stuart Loose Bum was 15. While he was there he provoked a bunch of the other boys and they sneak attacked him, beat him up and crammed a glass bottle up his rear end. The boys then smashed the bottle with a swift hit to the abdoment with a baseball bat. The damage to Stuart Loose Bums colon and anus was so extensive that he lost the ability to control his bowel movements for quite some time. During that time his mother started calling him loose bum and his peers started following suit. Stuart "Loose Bum" Rennie died of a meth overdose 7 years ago. You can look up his obit. His son is now a fenti addict. 😮
The only thing I hate about the Zygerrian arc is that Jedi critics started saying Anakin was a slave to the Jedi or the Jedi Order just because the Queen suggested it.
In some ways from a certain point of view you could say he was. While he could have left the Jedi order anytime similar to how Ashoka did in season 5 of the clone wars. Anakin felt he couldn’t because he owed the Jedi so much
@@Salemchevy Yeah but that could literally be said about any Jedi Knight, at least. None of the Jedi are slaves to anyone. They’ve always been close allies with the Republic. Things only started shifting during the Clone Wars because Palpatine was really a Sith Lord named Darth Sidious.
The issue is they aren't critics. They're people who rejected the good vs evil dichotomy so much that they replaced it with another dichotomy and now just try to create excuses for hating the Jedi.
@@CollinMcLeanyou need an excuse for hating hypocrites who attempted to illegally take control of the republic after assassinating the leader because of religious differences at most
Always did wonder if this arc was a key arc that made anakin question things in the galaxy and if this moment of the war ever came up again in vaders mind during the empire
This is my third time posting this comment, so I hope it actually posts this time. A truly great victory for the Republic and their allies, they kicked the asses of those Zygerrian scum, saved a bunch of innocent people, and dealt a big blow to the CIS. And a prime example of the good and noble side of the Republic, shown off by those brave and heroic Jedi, Clones, and Officers in this battle, and one I use often to show why I and many others, both in and out of universe, still support it despite its flaws.
Probably the same thing that happened to every planet and people the Republic actually did a good job at saving during the Clone Wars, like Ryloth and Kashyyyk, they were subjugated, bt inspired by the good of the Republic, Jedi, and Clones that saved them, started fighting back and joined the Alliance to Restore the Republic.
If the Republic can committed ethnocide against the Mandalorians, why didn't they do the same to the Zygerrians? If there are species that deserved ethonocide or even genocide in Star Wars, it will be those such as the Zygerrians, the Hutts and the Pykes. Plus, neither the Republic or the Jedi seemed to have no problem with committing genocide against Sith back then.
I can never understand the need to adapt tie-in comics to animation with some necessary changes to boot. Sure, the likes of Bruce Timm, Paul Dini, and other DC Animated Universe staff did well on putting The Batman Adventures' "Mad Love" and "Holiday Special" on The New Batman Adventures, but still.
I fail to see how that was Republic naval brilliance. The battle was more or less decided by Anakin commandeering the turrets, otherwise the entire republic gunship wing would have been destroyed and possibly their escort fighters as well.
It's a good arc an made to draw in the audience but the finally battle doesn't make much sense especially that they wouldn't bring a massive warship (light cruiser in this case) into cqc against four light flak guns yet in intense naval battles they're hugging those vessels alongside enemies with even heavier antishipping cannons & far great numbers of LAA batteries ntm those ship based quad mounted guns would probably dish out even more damage those the facilities turrets. Even then where's the bombers when you need them since their pilots have proven they'll take on heavier capital ship grade AA then just four turrets that a LAAT/i surcumbs to.
Well it sort of depends. If your pacifism is of the variety that allows for no violence whatsoever it is an inherently flawed ideology in that it forces others to put their lives on the line for your sake when you won’t do anything for yourself or others. But forsaking violence except in self defense is another matter.
