Cyberpunk 2077 :Phantom Liberty VS Starfield in a Nutshell 

Having do deal with at least 4 loading screens before escaping the enemy really took away the adrenaline

Want a break from the ads?

​@@vel5063 "Buy premium right now..."

As a PC player ,i am tired of repetitve starfield ads on notifications

​@@vel5063auuggghhhh

For me it runs way slower than Starfield on my 7800XT, especially in terms of the feeling of fluidity. 🙈 It's popular now to shit on Starfield (and I also gave it a negative review on Steam, because the primitivity of the gameplay systems infuriates me), but not everything is terrible in the game. The frame timings are really great in my experience, which help a lot in making it feel fluid even if the FPS is not that high.

And it only took years after the games release!.. :D :D

​@@Howch125 it looked and played better than starfield at launch too. lol

Why am I getting massive Deja Vu? Sounds like every few years, an unfinished game comes out, everyone trashes it, then a few years patches and content updates later everyone loves it and dunks on the new unfinished things... rinse and repeat. Sounds familiar? It was the same with No Man's Sky, it used to be known as One Big Lie but it is remembered nowadays as the "redemption game" even though that's what every game with long term support is called these days (or Battlefront 2, for another example) Don't get me wrong, I am glad that these games improve compared to the idea of them not, but this sets a dangerous precedent of "yeah sure it was broken at launch, but now 5 years later it's great so all is forgiven" which companies will most CERTAINLY take advantage of, and that's assuming they don't know what they're doing already (which they probably at least partially do) I like my games to be mary sues, thank you very much - as good as possible, right from the start. I don't need them go through a soul searching path of fighting their inner demons and patching out their inner game breaking bugs. EDIT: I feel like some of the replies are kinda missing my point here - even if Bethesda doesn't do the bare minimum, the fact we are even having this conversation about who the lesser evil is shows how far the standards of the AAA industry as a whole have fallen. Meanwhile, look at an Indie fan favorite like Hollow Knight - not my favorite game (not one of its fanboys) but it's 15 dollars, tens of hours of more than functional fun, and updates provided free DLC expansion packs - and as popular as it became with its cult following, it still doesn't succeed nearly as much as the big dog devs do even when they push out the same formulaic, factory made samey soulless crap every year. And no, it's not because it's 3D and more high scale and ambitious, it's because of corporate greed rushing them out. Capitalism doesn't work.

@@knowledgeanddefense1054 name one game that Bethesda didn't abandoned from the start of the company, except TESO and Fallout76, because another company doing updates, not Bethesda. Starting FROM TES2 they only released bugged games and never done patches to fix them. Unofficial patches for every Bethesda game comes only from modders.

I wish that game was 100000h long, I'd play it for years. Every story is form of art

Immersion in Cyberpunk is next gen, Starfield feels 20 years ago.

@@nebylicza But enough people love the gameplay from Bethesda Games and plays Starfield. See the numbers. It gives enough people that plays Hunt Showdown or No Man's Sky. Two games that I can't get along with. Bethesda games has a style of freedom and Quitness, no harsh overload. Not everybody loves dirty cities with freaks and drug addicts.

@@Cenot4ph But it makes any better for anybodys. Not everybody loves dirty cities with freaks and drug addicts. Cyberpunk has a good story. I played all missions 2 years ago. After this is nothing and it is boring. Do you continue playing Witcher 3 after the story?

@@SebbS82 doesn't matter the game, I stop when the story is done

100% agree.

Especially NMS, since cyberpunk was releasing Phantom Liberty around the same time. NMS had been fixed for years and people just realized it was a better game.

Cyberpunk had technical issues, NMS had a lack of content issue, both of which can be fixed. Starfield on the other hand has structural issues. The only way to "fix" Starfield is by remaking the game with an entirely new engine

I mean if both NMS and CP2077 were as broken and unfinished as they were at launch, people still wouldn't love them.

@@lolwutyoumad CP2077 also had content issues

No 3rd person mode...

​@@tenborckthat's the only thing keeping me from buying this game

Well yeah. Shitty broken game at launch, moderately repaired, playable, more cut features added, features promised added, why wouldnt it go up from when it was literally bricking consoles and had to be taken off sony stores?

Cz everyone already know CP got the potential...

@@StormierNik No cap if they released it on this version.. it would have been a guaranteed "MASTERPIECE" but nope they just have to fcking rush it.

This is literally downgrade. Most of FPS games have hits info on screen. Bethesda run out money for simple HUD animation?

if you look closely there's sometimes a red indicator, but it's so faint that you won't notice it unless you look for it

@@ishiblack7497 No Bethesda is flush with cash because they force devs to run on a skeleton crew and release games way before they are ready.

@@ishiblack7497 Dude, Bethesda can't even fix FOV in any their game, people do it by themselves, and it's not that compicated problem, it's literally just few lines in ini file.

I've always been under the impression that Bethesda CAN do it all but they don't bother since they know the dedicated modding community will do it for them. Probably the same reason they won't update the engine and whatnot, if they do the modding community will take a while to immediately fix their games lol

Yeah but the reality is that the action scenes in cyberpunk are all scripted, even the shootouts. Still, great game.

​@@Ecliptor.I honestly don't mind that it's scripted, you wouldn't get the same immersion without those mocap character animations and events. I guess it comes down to a bigger focus on player freedom rather than immersion for starfield but it still just makes it all seem terribly boring

@@JohnnyRocker023 I don't like scritped action scenes. In the best case scenario, you can easily tell it's scripted, so it ruins immersion. Worst case scenario, pathing glitches out and you end up with a fucking mess that is funny at best (happens way too often with any car chase in cp77)

I ran into an obstacle only to turn around to see the Chimera stomp the absolute shit out of me. Guess Myers was right when she said run

@@Ecliptor. i dont think you played the game at all because the gameplay was parted between in game action scene with not, even if you prefer game that does not include "action scene" pack of feature, still there are alot more game greater than starfield in term of that

i love starfield because it helped me with my insomnia. so much so, i fucking fell asleep.

Imagine going back to 2012 and showing these or similar clips to people while explaining that one of them is a $60 cross gen game while the other one is $70 and only runs on consoles that are 2 generations newer.

​​@@valentinvas6454​ and they'd say "Wow, even more advanced and immersive and only $10 more? What a steal! Must be nice living in the future! "

@@SpaceCadet4Jesus Probably but they would think Cyberpunk is the next gen game LOL

​@@valentinvas6454Cyberpunk was released for 30 bucks in gog and Phantom Liberty for 20. Even with the DLC, cyberpunk is 20 Dillard's cheaper, as a day one release lmao

Todd Howard's "next gen game"

@@ScytheNoire maybe is stopped in 2008 game?

It's optimized, you should upgrade your computer ;)

It's true because it's "Bethesda-experience"

@@SebbS82 i have a 4070 ti and it still runs like shit, it's very poorly optimized (especially for the dogshit graphics and AI it offers)

It's a slow descent. They used to have way too high ambitions with Arena and Daggerfall. Then they got the perfect balance with Morrowind. Then they kept simplifying systems and removing depth from their games. This is where we are now. I would love to see the people who made Daggerfall get the funding to implement their ideas with modern tech.

Remind you, there's only "ton of love and dedication" because their reputation was tarnished.

People forgot things easily lol. We are saying good job to a game that needed 2 years to be out... I'm not saying Starfield doesn't deserve its criticism and it's not a goty lol but it's above average, at least that game didn't launched like Cyberpunk 2077... We'll see how people will treat Starfield in two years lol, it will be the same thing as Cyberpunk just like how they forgot about fallout 76 Also learned from their mistake, they are trying so hard by saying that the criticism was undeserved. Like the dude above me is saying, if it wasn't for reputation, they wouldn't care at all

No, stop the copium because it's not love at all. If we never complained about how trash their game was, they wouldn't have fixed it. With all the pressure they received they still needed almost three years to fix it, nobody should be meat riding them for doing their job

Cyberpunk is not an RPG. CD Projekt had already changed the game's style to "an open-world, action-adventure story". At least they have the honesty to state the obvious, but people keep repeating this false premise.

I was wondering that when I stabbed the core with my mantis blades, it’s the little things

I punched it in with my gorilla arms :)

@@chrys_stone8716 Went full monkey mode on it

Yea I had gorilla I remember just busting the top then throwing grenades in

oh i didn't know that, i played monocable :(

And the best thing about this is that Cyberpunk + Phantom Liberty is only half as expensive as Starfield lmao

Facts 😂😂😂 Bethesda fanboys will get mad though

I did exactly the same thing! Starfields performance was a bit crappy on my PC, on my HDD. Refunded Starfield for 70 pounds, bought an SSD and Phantom Liberty with the money and loving it!

Amen to that 🙏

bbutt!!! Modders will fix the game!!!??1111111 9yos, probably

It's just like me at work. They were "running" for their life's for sure.

That makes sense actually. The AI is so advanced in Starfield that it became sentient and has its own will now, but the game engine and script forces it to act certain ways, so it reluctantly does it.

Hello Kitty has better AI than starfield

@@pianissimo7121 Did I ask you about your work tho. You probably work for McDonald's making me my

@@nebylicza yeah. Weird nobody mentioned that. funniest shit of the whole video 😂😂

I think it's a reference. Ghost in the Shell is a landmark cyberpunk story.

could be a cool easter egg

It definitely is especially the ending kill of the robot. Wink wink

I made a similar comment noting the similarity, then scrolled down to see if anyone else noticed.

2 games come to mine Warframe and Destiny both games have robots like these just roaming about as side activity.

xD

Cyberpunk also deserved the hate/criticism the first years of release.

@@Shack-lion Actually true, but now it deserves the love

@@Shack-lionthe difference is starfield isnt gonna have much room to improve other than adding more content. The entire foundation is unfixable unless they want to remake the whole game while Cyberpunk while broken at launch was still as seamless and cinematic as we see here.

@@Boxscot49 It was clear Cyberpunk was built with love from the beginning though, they just needed to fix the bugs

Member that time you killed that guys kid, so he knows what its like to lose a son If you know why, you know

@@dontfrythis2458 Ah yes, the XBD editors working for Maelstrom, a regina gig if I remember correctly. Killed the son, waited till the father's tear filled lines were done, then finished him off. As a side note, they definitely didn't pay the voice actor for the father enough lol

It's so good.

xD

It's the difference between heavily scripted and non scripted. CP77 is like a cod campaign getting you your dopamine hits SF is like Minecraft, where the action is tame. Now that I think about it, SF doesn't have any big scripted moments like the village attack in Skyrim or The BOS entrance is FO4.

@@JuicedOnKids That was disappointed based on how they advertising and how big the development team. At least 500 people, same with Cyberpunk.

@@JuicedOnKids Single player games need to be on par with Hollywood blockbuster so scripted scenes better reflect that. Starfield being marketed as a cinematic masterpiece is misleading. Whether scripted or not, Cyberpunk is a much better "interactive movie" especially after GTA like pursuits and other unscripted chase/gang wars added to the game. Star Citizen, despite being unfinished, is a much better space sim than whatever crap Bethesda came up with.

@@cytroyd comparing star citizen which has been alpha release for a long time and still haven't officially release is not really "better" lol compare it when starfield will gain mods a few years from now, cyberpunk "interactive movie" is of course shorter because the content itself is shorter. It has less side quests less map than starfield it is easier to make an interactive style that way.

Always is Bro It’s From Phantom liberty

More like loading

Who needs ships when you can fast travel?

Starfield is a game where you can build and customize your own spaceship but the catch is you don't actually get to fly it

More like a dog shite sim.

Death Stranding is a better walking/running sim and that game came out like four years ago.

Which might explain the issues. You need enormous balls to tell your boss his pet project he wanted to make for decades is just bad.

That’s what we are here for. The money the critics get to give games like Starfield a good review is sickening.

lol it isn't, the only reason why they even have a "trailer" for it was to boost their selling price when they sold to Microsoft.

I am sure my grandkids will be playing the next Elder Scrolls

Probably better. Microsoft just got a taste of having Todd as the unquestionable leader, and they won't do that anymore. Hopefully they can put a short leash on Toddie and have him work on things that he actually does good and let the rest of the company work their part with their own leaders.

Same engine. Same issues.

The only keep berthesda game alive is the insane porn mod.

Morrowind is 10x more interesting to play still than Starfield

you reminded it because both games are created with the same old dinosaur engine. the creation engine 2.0 is the same shit as the old one just added some bells and whistles...

but those older bethesda game are still a lot better then starfield.

That type of people made hollow knight… indie people will make better

And they bought the cans with that money

You just insulted every indie game ever

only difference being that the ""cheap"" indie game would be worth whatever they charge us

Dude, that's how Larian studio started 😂

"meme them to death.. then meme them some more"

Remember, the truth is never slander. When you see Todd standing on a street corner at night with Legendary Mythic Dragonborn edition of Skyrim in hand...coming in 2024. It's ok to call a spade, a spade. Bethesda is a one trick pony and they aren't even that good at their trick anymore. It's just Starfield: The Elder Scrolls, it's all they know. Just enjoy it, Bethesda doesn't eat even 1/10th of the shit they should with the products they put out considering time spent and the resources they have available.

Slander? What is slanderous about any of this?

Damn. Xbox games are no good. Glad to have enjoyed the halo reach and halo 3 in coop as a teenager. The kids defending starfield theses day have no taste. They keep repeating the arguments provided by microsoft. Poor fellas, really

@@padnomnidprenon9672 “those were good times bros”

Facts, I just be trying to find the most stylistic way to take out an entire group of enemies

It didn't. Combat in Cyberpunk is lethal. And in video game it's a joke.

It kinda did tho. It set out to give you a power fantasy and it delivered. ​@hadeseye2297

@@hadeseye2297you’re comparing the TTRPG which is designed to basically be darksouls the board game against an Action RPG open world story game. That’s kinda like saying “Man I wish there was character customization” in tetris. It’s not supposed to be mega hard combat that takes hours to get even passible at. It’s just supposed to be fun fast pace action

And if you play on Hard or Very Hard, it can be quite lethal- you die rapidly if you fuck up, outside of specific high tuned as fuck late game builds. But so do your enemies, cus they didn't try to make bullet sponges.

They truly redeemed themselves with phantom liberty and the 2.0 update. I just wish it released in its current state, cd project red is an amazing company that deserved a bit more time to tinker with their games before release, witcher 3 released in a questionable state too.

@@McJizzleBerries Yeah, I lot of people forgot but Witcher 3 was a fucking WRECK on release.

@@RicochetForce And now it’s praised as one of the best. Social media is a funny thing xD

@@McJizzleBerries What's bizarre is that W3 being moldy cheese at launch was to be expected because Witcher 2 was like that as well. People have very short memories.

@@RicochetForce Now the Witcher 2 releasing terribly is something I don’t remember. It’s less about attention spans and more of what’s the new hot thing to criticise xD

Its good they didnt gave up on it and look at the game now ❤

Just sounds like an extension of the already incredible narrative of the main game. The way you interact with characters makes you feel like you're in a big budget hollywood film. Other games just have wooden quest giving NPC's

@@kuruptzZz If you haven't played the expansion I'd be surprised because you hit the nail on the head. Phantom Liberty is definitely a cinematic experience, doubly so with the npc interactions, even minor ones. The actual performance in body language and facial animation is like nothing I've seen in an rpg. I'd argue that Phantom Liberty, and by proxy the main Cyberpunk experience, is comparable to Naughty Dog experiences. Well acted, well shot, and beautifully rendered. Tho, Naughty Dog games tend to be more stable, with more consistent gameplay interactions. Can't squash every bug when it comes to games at this scale.

Baldur's gate 3 would like to enter the chat especially when it comes to quest design and outcomes

They should still fix the game and bring it to it _promised_ state instead of selling interactive movies regardless how good they are. There are a bunch of things still missing.

100%, as did Oblivion. Hell, Fallout 3's baby start was more entertaining.

Still remember Skyrim got me hooked in first 10 minutes, while Starfield fanboy trying hard confincing others that the game gets good after 20 hours, f*ck that, the game is ass imo

​​@@howzhauzan63I agree. Skyrim is interesting from the very beginning, and the action begins fairly quickly. Not to mention after escaping the cave, the entire world opens up to you and you're free to go anywhere. In Starfield, idk, you walk around in a mine, something happens to your brain, some pirates show up, whatever. I don't even remember much of it

@@believer431 it doesn't even make sense in starfield.. like they trying hard to make "another" skyrim. but failed miserably

@ShoddyMagician-id8fg The newest are saying you should reach new game+ to get good 💀

Oh, it's absolutely a reference. Furthermore, the song that plays during it is called BFG and sounds very much like a Mick Gordon style Doom song.

Nvr felt it was bad at all bugs never hit like that

CP77 had good core gameplay, story, quests, characters, climate etc... from the beginning. Issues were technical, many bugs and lack of optimization. SF needs rework in almost every aspect of the gameplay...

You make fun of CDPR - they fix and remake the game. You make fun of trash Bethesda - hehe memes

Bethesda cant make a player driven, even semi RPG-like game if it costed them their life. They have army of idiots worshiping them and fixing their broken games

There were quick time events? I don't remember those?

@@lucylu3342 There's a few parts where you have to select an action while a timer appears. Mostly stuff like dodging but not doing it could lead to getting flatlined. They happen more often when giving V the choice to stay silent or speak up with a timer.

@@CptKosher Oh those lol Honestly never considered those qtes before

Asmon told us that's a 6 out of 10

After three years CP better be seamless lol xD I remember when cyberpunk’s skin texture was that of clay. But with time, patience. And a dev team held hostage by a code of honor….. the skin texture be skinning 😎

Not entirely accurate. In addition to bugs, the combat-related parts, such as the numbers and balance of skills, equipment, and items, are completely chaotic and unfinished. For example, player can have 2-300 meds on their backpack with no cooldown, making you immortal. A tier 4 silenced revolver can deal up to 600,000 to 1,000,000 damage per shot. Many people who post stealth assassination performance videos on RU-vid will turn off the numbers in order to cover up this issue.

or they turn it off because many people dont like seeing damage numbers in their UI@@maidoll_fei

@@maidoll_fei So you're just making shit up.. cool.

@@pinnacleevolution1634 What? There are lots of 2077 million damage build on youtube. Without any exploit a handgun or a sniper rifle could million damage on headshot. Even without any upgrade. That is why in 2.0 the game changed upgrade system(some gun can not be upgrade anymore) and change med into cooldown-item

Game balance is so bad in early version a player can 1 shot 90% enemies in the game by a body shot. Because most enemise only has 5 digit hp. Or 1 shot a cyberpsycho. (If you cant do this much damage just because you didnt read the numbers on skill tree) So saying "Cyberpunk was always a great game" is not right. But there are lots of non-combat in the story so people could still play it like a tell-tale game.

😐

😐

😐

😐

Oblivion has better action quests then Starfield :D

I've been salivating from all that action. Took a nap, too.

What's funny is a lot of people who hate Cyberpunk cause it launched broken, didn't buy it at launch and never actually played it until PL. They have no idea that the game was always good but everything else around it was fucked.

@@Two-ToneMoonStone yep I played it on launch on pc enjoyed the story but I didn’t buy it until the edge runners update and tbf they turned it around so much preordered phantom liberty as I trusted them to deliver and they did

Except "somewhat damaged" mission, that one makes you feel like a little bitch xD

I made myself a walking tank. I wanted to feel like sex change robocop

fr bro I just finished my first playthrough and running as a hybrid gunslinger/swordmaster was insanely fun

You know what would make this even more accurate in comparison??? :) waiting for 3 years of Starfield patches …. Or showing cyberpunk 3-5 months after launch

@@Shack-lion Nah, man. The release version of CP2077 was better than the release version of Starfield. All the CP patches did was fix game breaking bugs for an otherwise well thought out and executed game. But no amount of patches can fix Starfield's fundamentally flawed game design and antiquated visual style. That's baked in.

@@visicircle the ceo had to come out for CP 2077 and apologize haha and a lot of promised things wasn’t at launch . And rendering was shot, the NPC walking around was like 3-4 NPCs. Unless you were a youtuber paid by cp 2077 than there wasn’t much good, to say about cp 2077. NOOOOW cp it’s good. But again the video we’re commenting on is showing two games at different times in there shelf life.

@@Shack-lion but content from video is from released, this year, Phantom Liberty, why should we wait 3 years.

There is not a single thing that Starfield does better than CP2077, or most other comparable games for that matter. Literally not a single thing.

No no no it's actually completely fair. Even if we used the base Cyberpunk withouth PL it's a 60 dollar cross gen game while Starfield is current gen only and 70 while looking and playing like this. What a freaking joke.

Its worth it bro

The intro of Skyrim has more action than that

@@veryrare432hz It does show they're capable of more, but it was also kind of a cheap trick. The game never again has action like that. It's just to look good in the trailers and draw you in.

Yep you are right the next gen bethesda exclusive was made by a newer found branch of bethesda instead of the main branch.

That is because it kind of wasn't. 27 third party and 4 Bethesda studios worked on the game.

​@@RatchetandClank145this is misinformation lol. The 4chan user is intentionally twisting information.

My guy this has all the signature jank, bad animations and door loading screens that's in all bethesda games. An outdated game like wouldn't be made by any big studio in 2023 except bethesda lol.

It feels like modders took Fallout 4 and made a game.

25 years since they've made a new IP, not 25 years of development. Lack of reading comprehension on your part I guess?

@@Squatimusyeah, not a single fresh idea for that IP in 25 years. The Elder Scrolls and Fallout lore, quest design and writing are miles ahead of whatever on Earth Starfield is.

@@MarcoVeraccio The only thing that Fallout and Elder Scrolls do "miles" better is exploration and the general npc ai , SF regressed in those areas but everything else is fine.

​@@Squatimusstory and characters are a big downgrade compared to other games imo.

@@Squatimus I mean people keep trying to make the same point about Cyberpunk with the 8 year development time when that is also in fact a lie, they didnt start making Cyberpunk until the last witcher 3 expansion was done (2016).

Me too! The fight, the place, it gives off so much vibe from that spider bot fight.

@@3plecheeseburger Cyberpunk pays tribute to a lot of games, movies and series, in form of easter eggs and theres even a Batman easter egg in the game...

@@efxnews4776 of course. There was a direct reference to Ghost in the Shell in one of Cyberpsycho missions where you fight a girl in optical cammo at the back of an alley in a pool of water. It's just cool to see it.

Nah, we already saw 100 of his previous videos.

There's a specific cyber psycho mission involving someone from Maelstrom with ritualistic imagery in the area. I was genuinely unsettled and searched around as one typically would. However, after reading a few data shards, she emerges calmly from the bathtub and relentlessly attacks with her mantis blades, accusing you of being a non-believer, and more. I can't recall her name, but it was chilling how she seemingly trapped you there as if she were an apparition.

Mass Effect Andromeda is doing better than Starfield this days, ME trilogy is leagues above Starfield, just the lore alone can be more epic than all Starfield.

@@efxnews4776tbh, Andromeda's combat made it really enjoyable for me, yeah story isn't great, but at least making specific gun builds, shooting and using skills felt satisfying.

they've improved on gigs too. and combat (which isn't scripted at all) is still the one thing I keep playing for

Bethesda actually deserve this far more than CDPR did, if this was their first game, but no, they have decades of experience making basically the same game over and over, besides, they got a free pass with Fallout 4, but when Fallout 76 came out and stay like when came out... well that was the point where Bethesda should have changed, now Bethesda is like that old uncle you are half way expecting him to die from cardiac arrest any day...

Its actually sad to see people defending this 5/10 game. Bethesda has always been overrated af. They haven't made a good game since skyrim

Worst of all i got that for free offa gamepass and it felt like i wasted 7 hours of my life

I played it for free with a free gamepass sub. It's an ok game for 20 hours but then I got bored with it

In graphics and filmatic action. But the geame is very dumb and boring out of the story.

Maybe light-years as in how you are with your ass in distance. But I can agree that it is definitely ahead of Starfield in glitches

@@SebbS82 Writing, acting, animations, effects, art style, directing, action an rpg mechanics, vehicles, weapons... etc in everything CP2077 is light years ahead of Starfield

@@1vaultdweller And? Do you need it really? 2 years ago all people makes jokes about Cyberbug. I had less hours fun with Cyberpunk. I had played the story at beginnung (2020) with all quests. It was a good story like in Witcher. But out of this it is a blink blink backdrop. No stuff to stay in the game. And Starfield has more possibilities besides the story. In Fallout 4 I had played 500 hours. In Starfield since beginning over 130 hours. I find Cyberpunk needs functions and options like in Bethesda Games. Why it is so hard to create more interactions with people in game? To create random reactions with npc or npc with other npc's?

@@1vaultdweller And you need a Nasa-PC to play Cyberpunk with all ray traced options. With my RTX 3080 12GB I can play only with DLSS performance in 4K.

they still live on the succes of skyrim

Bethesda fans are a cancer.

Bethesda must have something special to them, I guess, idk. Me personally, I was randomly recommended Skyrim years ago and I just tried it on a whim and it became like one my top 5 favourite games. I used to get excited thinking about the next elder scrolls but now after reading online about how they only use that one old engine/method of making games and how Starfield is, I kinda don't expect greatness from them anymore.

@@sordesturpis6076They live as publisher at this point, now owned by Microsoft

@@TakumisBizarreRacingAdventure what bethesda has is a modding community of thousands of people with great ideas. all their games are average but with mods you can take all the aspects of your favorite games and put them into a bethesda game and make your own personal perfect game. like fallout 4 you can give it a far cry landscape, every weapon from modern warfare, random enemies from halo to star wars to alien vs predator, and run around double-jumping with a destiny ghost over your shoulder. there's no telling what'll happen with starfield but to expect bethesda themselves to make a well polished game is just unrealistic to me. they've just never done that. its still funny to see videos like this though

I killed reed on my first playthrough now i gotta do the one with the robot i already know my blood pressure is gonna go up 😂