A bit misleading as it has the lead at the 1/8, but the Porsche is gaining fast and will beat it in the 1/4 which is why the video does not show the entire race.
Don't forget everyone, including Elon, stated it's in the 1/4 mile. The Cybertruck performance is impressive. However, can't stand the misleading advertisement and, for that reason, will never buy a Tesla product.
@@GrandmasterFU666 I havent seen the claim that it beats a 911 while towing a 911 in the quarter mile. I have seen, including on this video, where it says that it has a faster 1/4 mile time than the 911... at
It didn't even go the full 1/4 mile...you see it crossing the 1/8 mile mark...where the Porsche caught up...but if you look at the footage, the ET clock is next to the 1/4 mile line (which is normal)...but in the "photo-finish"...you don't see it...even when they show the video of the two vehicles racing toward the end...you can clearly tell its the 600 foot mark...because A) its definitely too close to the start; B) its the only clear mark on the drag from the start (the 660 foot mark is the first)...and you don't see the ET clock next to the line....so...did the Tesla truck beat the Porsche in a 1/4 mile drag race, while towing a Porsche...no clue...because we haven't seen that yet...but it clearly can beat it in the 1/8...and given how much ground the Porsche cleared from the start to the 660 foot mark, my money would be on the Porsche in the 1/4 mile
Even more, on some other tests the worse Porsche 2023 911 did a much better time on the 1/8. So, either the Porsche's Pilot was bad, or he was restraining himself. In both case, it's just a fake.
There is also camera trickery involved the cybertuck is actually in front of the porsche at the starting line that's why there is no overhead shot of the start. The camera is set up at a slight angle to make it look like the front of the cars are in line. and the shape of the cars make it more dificult to see the camera angle trickery. but you can clearly see it when the camera starts moving the porsche is a bit faster in taking off, but the way the camera moves it makes it look like the ct is taking off faster at about 00.33 the ct is about the same speed as the porsche. in the cam angle from the front of the porsche the speed of both cars stay the same for a couple of second at about 02.88 the cybertruck starts going faster than the porsche. if it wasn't ahead at the start the porsche would have even won the eight mile. It's actualluy quit the angle if you check on google earth you can see the blue piles in front of the concrete walls. and since they are not evenly space with the gaps in the concrete walls you can see exactly which pilon is which and where the camera was positioned and at what angle it's shooting and than you see how much the image is skewed to get the porsche and the ct fronts to line up it's more tha a couple feet so the ct would definitely not win the eight miles the lead the ct has at the end is less then the lead it had at the start.
@@RadiationNetwork 800hp vs 400.. If you love unfair races that much, you should see a Dodge Demon vs a Cybertruck in a 1/4 mile drag race. Drink your copium.
There is also camera trickery involved the cybertuck is actually in front of the porsche at the starting line that's why there is no overhead shot of the start. The camera is set up at a slight angle to make it look like the front of the cars are in line. and the shape of the cars make it more dificult to see the camera angle trickery. but you can clearly see it when the camera starts moving the porsche is a bit faster in taking off, but the way the camera moves it makes it look like the ct is taking off faster at about 00.33 the ct is about the same speed as the porsche. in the cam angle from the front of the porsche the speed of both cars stay the same for a couple of second at about 02.88 the cybertruck starts going faster than the porsche. if it wasn't ahead at the start the porsche would have even won the eight mile. It's actualluy quit the angle if you check on google earth you can see the blue piles in front of the concrete walls. and since they are not evenly space with the gaps in the concrete walls you can see exactly which pilon is which and where the camera was positioned and at what angle it's shooting and than you see how much the image is skewed to get the porsche and the ct fronts to line up it's more tha a couple feet so the ct would definitely not win the eight miles the lead the ct has at the end is less then the lead it had at the start.
You mean it beats a Porsche 911 over 1/8 of a mile while towing about 4500 pounds. The CyberTruck would beat 99.9% of all Porsches ever made if it wasn't pulling a Porsche and trailer and its truck not a sports car. Don't believe me? Go look at the production numbers of all models of Porsche built and out of 3 million made only a tiny tiny small fraction made to date can do 0-60 in under 2.6 seconds or the 1/4 mile in 10.8.
@@RadiationNetwork extremely wrong, multiple people have already done the test in real life (all here on youtube) and the cybertruck loses against all 911 models in the actual 1/4 mile even without the trailer. This was just hype for their shitty product.
@@seanpalmer3982 No Dork. That video was not the same 911. It was a $230,000 Turbo S type 992. Stop cherry picking to deal with your copium. The Cybertruck will beat 99.9% of all the 3,000,000 Porsches ever built on the road as there are only a few thousand limited edition models like the 911 Turbo S Type 992 that are faster than the Cybertruck 0-60 and 1/4 mile. The other 2,997,000 are slower than the Cybertruck. Go look at Porsches spec sheets and total build numbers.
Yes how fucking pathetic, a 3,5 ton truck towing a 911 not even able to beat the fastest 911. You must suffer from brain damage if you think you somehow put a stain on Teslas name with that comment.
@@ChR0nos_7734 So we are just going to neglect the fact that a TRUCK beats a sportscar while pulling a trailer with the same sportscar on the trailer? Is it the fastest porsche? No Can the Cybertruck be bested? Sure Is this feat impressive? Yes - don’t care if it is Tesla, Rivian or Ford. This is impressive.
There is also camera trickery involved the cybertuck is actually in front of the porsche at the starting line that's why there is no overhead shot of the start. The camera is set up at a slight angle to make it look like the front of the cars are in line. and the shape of the cars make it more dificult to see the camera angle trickery. but you can clearly see it when the camera starts moving the porsche is a bit faster in taking off, but the way the camera moves it makes it look like the ct is taking off faster at about 00.33 the ct is about the same speed as the porsche. in the cam angle from the front of the porsche the speed of both cars stay the same for a couple of second at about 02.88 the cybertruck starts going faster than the porsche. if it wasn't ahead at the start the porsche would have even won the eight mile. It's actualluy quit the angle if you check on google earth you can see the blue piles in front of the concrete walls. and since they are not evenly space with the gaps in the concrete walls you can see exactly which pilon is which and where the camera was positioned and at what angle it's shooting and than you see how much the image is skewed to get the porsche and the ct fronts to line up it's more tha a couple feet so the ct would definitely not win the eight miles the lead the ct has at the end is less then the lead it had at the start.
That's not a ¼ Mile Run, thats Sacramento Raceway which is a ⅛ run, the 911 catching up at the end catching up would of absolutely demolished it in an ACTUAL ¼ run 🤣🤣💀
At the end. How far of a gap are we talking, would it even be a gap? But you would agree that the cybertruck would be right behind the 911 right? Cause i mean, it showed them almost at the 1/4 mile line and they were neck and neck. So, maybe half the porsh more than the bumper of the cybertruck? The.... 11,000lb cyber truck vs the 3500lb porsh? Yeah, that sells me. Also, 911 times are about 11.4 on the 1/4. Cybertruck without towing is less than 11. Get smoked.
@@DAmoreEngineering1. porsches are track cars not drag cars. they are not meant to be fast in straight lines but around corners. 2. because of that this isn’t even a good matchup, put it up against a hellcat 😂😂
it's worse it would not even win the eight mile. the ct is way in front of the porsche at the start more than it's lead at the end. the camera is set up at an angle to make it look like the cars line up. and the footage of the lining up is a different camera angle and is edited in to make it look like they are line up. Elon can't stop lying stoopid bag of shit. for proof check the sacramento raceway on google earth line the camera up with the blue piles and the concrete walls, since you can clearly see which is which as they are not spaced evenly with the gaps in the concrete walls, and you wil see what a skewed angle they shot it at.
I’d love to try one of these out during an Upper Peninsula Michigan Winter. Not sold this vehicle will handle the extreme cold, snow and be economical and efficient. It cost $30-$50 a month in electricity to run my diesel block heater on a timer daily for 4hrs with several days where it had to remain plugged in for the entire day on my PowerStroke F-250. Could move the earth with it and get 11mpg. 15-18mpg daily driving. I’m intrigued by this cyber truck and would love to see and hear more. Thanks. Shane
😂😂😂 Only to tesla fan boys. The rest of of know that Porsche 911 Turbos are quicker than 11 seconds. And 10.9 seconds. The Porsche driver was sandbagging. It's a video about Tesla BY Tesla. Elon has zero integrity so no one outside of you fan boys can trust that the results weren't predetermined. $50k says a third party wouldn't get the same results.
I'm a huge Tesla and EV advocate, even though I currently drive a v8 sports car ( still drive a tesla too). This video is can't be true at all, unless the races against a 992 Carrera T M7 which is dumb IMO. Stock a Cybertruck runs 11.0 @ 119 according to Hagerty's tests. It was around 11.2 according to carwow's test against the hummer EV pickup. A stock 911 base RWD according to caranddriver does 0-60 in 3.2 seconds and the 1/4 mile in 11.5 sec @ 120 mph. While the 911 Carrera rwd is cheapest and technically should be the slowest, it is not. That would go to the Carrera T M7. According to caranddriver, they could only achieve 0-60 in 4.0 seconds and 1/4 mile in 12.2 @ 116mph. Now times would be dependent on the driver since it all comes down the shifts. Okay so lets assume a stock Cybetruck does 10.9 because tesla claimed under 11s and the Carrera T does 12.5 because the driver isn't the best shifter. This is all best case scenario for the Cybertruck by the way. The cybertruck is towing another a trailer (lets guess 1000lbs even though it likely is more) and another Porsche which weighs roughly 3300lbs according to caranddriver weights from various base/s/t 992 911 porsches. In other words the the cyber truck is pulling another 4300lbs at least is my guess which definitely adds more than 1 second the 1/4mile. I know that because in carwow's video, they tried to make the race more fair for the Hummer EV pickup by adding 4 additional passengers to the Cybertruck. They were all full grown adults who claimed to weigh about 85kg or lets round to 190lbs. 4 x 190 = 760lbs extra weight which resulted in a 1/4 mile time of 11.5. In this video we are guessing the Cybertruck is pulling an additional 4300lbs. 4300/760 = 5.657. In other words the cybertruck would require an additional 5.657 x .3 (according to the difference in carwow 1/4 mile times with 1 vs 5 passenger in the truck) = 1.69 or lets round down to 1.6 second. So 10.9+ 1.6 = 12.5 seconds. This is literally the best case scenario in every possible way for the Cybertruck just to be equal with the slowest 911 with a meh driver shifting the car. I call BS as someone who drives a Tesla and a V8 muscle car.
Wdym it’s just not real? It is. The evidence is right there. If your that upset that you are going to do 2 hours of math then just don’t worry about it.
@@jaxt2578 we dont necessarily know. CT has 4 Wheel Steering with full lock at less than half a turn - Hagerty just dropped a video taking it around a gokart track like it was nothin.
Now we’re talking.. maintenance per mile, battery life after 1000 charges unchanged? Battery life expectancy? I get it, it’s badass because it’s bulletproof and fast and powerful… but reliability and cost effective and ease of use? Not yet I don’t think
could have been racing against better car as well and would still have won. its a drag race. and its an electric truck. you cant compete with that, its misleading and the porsche 911 is still almost 2x faster at top speed
Wait a minute....something's up here. They only show them cross the 1/8 mile where it appears the Porsche is gaining. The aerial view cuts off well before the end of the 1/4 where they look to be even. Something's going on.
wdym? Increasing power without addressing other aspects, such as aerodynamics, weight, and efficiency, may lead to diminishing returns and potential safety issues. That is why it's just steadily increasing and not drastically. Optimization requires a holistic approach, not just blindly adding power, even in EVs. @@idknils2920
@@fdjizm The truth hurts. The only fake laugh you get is in your imagination or virtually on the Internet pretending you have a nice car instead of your cringe mobile.
suprised there a few things I can see are issues already. The hub caps will definately get smashed off on curbs. The concave button for the box cover will have water and dirt puddle and deteriorate the switch. The door handles and charging port cab on the wheel well will definately have dirt and mud build up with use on backroads and muddy conditions and will restrict the covers and latches from opening without pinching on the panels. On second look, the interior has lots of concave panels that are going to hold and trap dirt. I'm sure lots of these will get sorted in the near future.
Looked t the specs and Porsche 9-11 turbo has 0-60 of 2.6 seconds which is same as highest trim tri motor cyber truck. But highest trim cybertruck cost 100,000 while Porsche cost 230,000. So cyber truck is not only faster, but has better value and utility.
I'm a huge Tesla and EV advocate, even though I currently drive a v8 sports car ( still drive a tesla too). This video is can't be true at all, unless the races against a 992 Carrera T M7 which is dumb IMO. Stock a Cybertruck runs 11.0 @ 119 according to Hagerty's tests. It was around 11.2 according to carwow's test against the hummer EV pickup. A stock 911 base RWD according to caranddriver does 0-60 in 3.2 seconds and the 1/4 mile in 11.5 sec @ 120 mph. While the 911 Carrera rwd is cheapest and technically should be the slowest, it is not. That would go to the Carrera T M7. According to caranddriver, they could only achieve 0-60 in 4.0 seconds and 1/4 mile in 12.2 @ 116mph. Now times would be dependent on the driver since it all comes down the shifts. Okay so lets assume a stock Cybetruck does 10.9 because tesla claimed under 11s and the Carrera T does 12.5 because the driver isn't the best shifter. This is all best case scenario for the Cybertruck by the way. The cybertruck is towing another a trailer (lets guess 1000lbs even though it likely is more) and another Porsche which weighs roughly 3300lbs according to caranddriver weights from various base/s/t 992 911 porsches. In other words the the cyber truck is pulling another 4300lbs at least is my guess which definitely adds more than 1 second the 1/4mile. I know that because in carwow's video, they tried to make the race more fair for the Hummer EV pickup by adding 4 additional passengers to the Cybertruck. They were all full grown adults who claimed to weigh about 85kg or lets round to 190lbs. 4 x 190 = 760lbs extra weight which resulted in a 1/4 mile time of 11.5. In this video we are guessing the Cybertruck is pulling an additional 4300lbs. 4300/760 = 5.657. In other words the cybertruck would require an additional 5.657 x .3 (according to the difference in carwow 1/4 mile times with 1 vs 5 passenger in the truck) = 1.69 or lets round down to 1.6 second. So 10.9+ 1.6 = 12.5 seconds. This is literally the best case scenario in every possible way for the Cybertruck just to be equal with the slowest 911 with a meh driver shifting the car. I call BS as someone who drives a Tesla and a V8 muscle car.
Cybertruck cyberbeast has 845 horsepower, the 911 which seems to be a standard 992 carrera has 385 horsepower, but still they did not even beat it in the actual quarter mile, while towing a 911, they beat it at the 1/8 mile. If you compare the Carrera’s actual quarter mile of 11.5 seconds to the cyberbeast’s quarter mile of 11 seconds without towing a 911, you can see that there is no way it’s beating the 911 on the quarter mile while towing a 911! The cybertruck is slow. It has the same 0-60 as the 911 992 turbo S, and has a way way way lower top speed than the turbo S has, even though the 911 Turbo S has 650 hp not 845 as the cybertruck has. Specs: Tesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast: Horsepower: 845 Top speed: 130mph/209kph 0-60mph: 2,6 seconds Weight: 6603 pounds/2995 kilos Quarter mile: 11 seconds Porsche 911 992 Carrera Horsepower: 385 Top speed: 182mph/293kph 0-60mph: 4,2 seconds Weight: 3317 pounds/1505 kilos Quarter mile: 11,5 seconds Porsche 911 992 Turbo S Horsepower: 650 Top speed: 205mph/330kph 0-60mph: 2,6 seconds Weight: 3615 pounds/1640 kilos Quarter mile: 10.1 seconds So the fact that Tesla say’s that the cybertruck is faster than a 911 on the quarter mile while towing a 911 is completely false.
I’d like to do this outside Scomo's house, the ex- prime minister of Australia. He famously said about EVs "they wont tow your boat, & will ruin your weekends" Lmfao!
@@callumdonington2227 He was disparaging EVs because he thought they couldn't tow anything. He is an idiot, and likely being paid off by Toyota and the fossil fuel lobby in general.
But Porsche is one beautiful looking car. Cybertruck on the other hand is a literal deformity. Even kindergarten students can come up with a better design
@@senpai1628 Hell no, all Porsche look the same and all of them look ugly. Had you put a McLaren, Ferrari or Lamborghini then yes they look much better but Porsche are all ugly with the same shape and design 🤢🤢
@@SRNAR8 because if it's not broken, it won't be fixed. At least Porsche's design is streamline and is updated with each generation, and not looking like a sharp angled mess. It's worked for over 60 years for enthusiasts with a timeless design.
@@SRNAR8 I'll take any Porsche over this cybertruck. Musk needs to fire the entire Tesla designing team. Most of their cars have excellent performance and features but look hella ugly
There is also camera trickery involved the cybertuck is actually in front of the porsche at the starting line that's why there is no overhead shot of the start. The camera is set up at a slight angle to make it look like the front of the cars are in line. and the shape of the cars make it more dificult to see the camera angle trickery. but you can clearly see it when the camera starts moving the porsche is a bit faster in taking off, but the way the camera moves it makes it look like the ct is taking off faster at about 00.33 the ct is about the same speed as the porsche. in the cam angle from the front of the porsche the speed of both cars stay the same for a couple of second at about 02.88 the cybertruck starts going faster than the porsche. if it wasn't ahead at the start the porsche would have even won the eight mile. It's actualluy quit the angle if you check on google earth you can see the blue piles in front of the concrete walls. and since they are not evenly space with the gaps in the concrete walls you can see exactly which pilon is which and where the camera was positioned and at what angle it's shooting and than you see how much the image is skewed to get the porsche and the ct fronts to line up it's more tha a couple feet so the ct would definitely not win the eight miles the lead the ct has at the end is less then the lead it had at the start.
@kuvnatalejandro9466 it hurts more that farmer Joe brown is now outrunning your precious porsche on the way to whole foods. The mighty porsche has been PORCHed.👨🌾🛻🤠💨
@@jazzabighits4473 I mean, you can always hope? xD Truck beating a sports car while towing that same sports car, a Porsche 911... what do you mean ??? This is ridiculous man.
@@gregggoElon has mastered the marketing of useless drag races 😂. The Porsche is designed for a race track which involves beating on the engines, brakes, and suspension all while taking corners at a high speed in a controlled manner. They could care less about a 0-60 or 1/4 mile which is all the Tesla seems to be good at
There is also camera trickery involved the cybertuck is actually in front of the porsche at the starting line that's why there is no overhead shot of the start. The camera is set up at a slight angle to make it look like the front of the cars are in line. and the shape of the cars make it more dificult to see the camera angle trickery. but you can clearly see it when the camera starts moving the porsche is a bit faster in taking off, but the way the camera moves it makes it look like the ct is taking off faster at about 00.33 the ct is about the same speed as the porsche. in the cam angle from the front of the porsche the speed of both cars stay the same for a couple of second at about 02.88 the cybertruck starts going faster than the porsche. if it wasn't ahead at the start the porsche would have even won the eight mile. It's actualluy quit the angle if you check on google earth you can see the blue piles in front of the concrete walls. and since they are not evenly space with the gaps in the concrete walls you can see exactly which pilon is which and where the camera was positioned and at what angle it's shooting and than you see how much the image is skewed to get the porsche and the ct fronts to line up it's more tha a couple feet so the ct would definitely not win the eight miles the lead the ct has at the end is less then the lead it had at the start.
@@BasementTracksyou do have many ev and hybrid alternatives to Tesla, including Chevy bolt. If you're going to bring up promises, two years ago it was "financially insane" to buy any other car because Tesla was about to reach full automomy and have a million robotaxis driving around the US. Today GM is still selling 6 times more cars that Tesla (not ev, sure, a decade later people still prefer traditional cars), Mercedes is selling cars with more autonomy than Tesla, Toyota and Hyunday are much more reliable cars than Tesla (lookup any customer survey in car magazine), and we have 0 robotaxis and 0 full automomy Tesla or even 90% autonomous miles, that Elon promised "in the next few months" in 2015 lol
I'm a huge Tesla and EV advocate, even though I currently drive a v8 sports car ( still drive a tesla too). This video is can't be true at all, unless the races against a 992 Carrera T M7 which is dumb IMO. Stock a Cybertruck runs 11.0 @ 119 according to Hagerty's tests. It was around 11.2 according to carwow's test against the hummer EV pickup. A stock 911 base RWD according to caranddriver does 0-60 in 3.2 seconds and the 1/4 mile in 11.5 sec @ 120 mph. While the 911 Carrera rwd is cheapest and technically should be the slowest, it is not. That would go to the Carrera T M7. According to caranddriver, they could only achieve 0-60 in 4.0 seconds and 1/4 mile in 12.2 @ 116mph. Now times would be dependent on the driver since it all comes down the shifts. Okay so lets assume a stock Cybetruck does 10.9 because tesla claimed under 11s and the Carrera T does 12.5 because the driver isn't the best shifter. This is all best case scenario for the Cybertruck by the way. The cybertruck is towing another a trailer (lets guess 1000lbs even though it likely is more) and another Porsche which weighs roughly 3300lbs according to caranddriver weights from various base/s/t 992 911 porsches. In other words the the cyber truck is pulling another 4300lbs at least is my guess which definitely adds more than 1 second the 1/4mile. I know that because in carwow's video, they tried to make the race more fair for the Hummer EV pickup by adding 4 additional passengers to the Cybertruck. They were all full grown adults who claimed to weigh about 85kg or lets round to 190lbs. 4 x 190 = 760lbs extra weight which resulted in a 1/4 mile time of 11.5. In this video we are guessing the Cybertruck is pulling an additional 4300lbs. 4300/760 = 5.657. In other words the cybertruck would require an additional 5.657 x .3 (according to the difference in carwow 1/4 mile times with 1 vs 5 passenger in the truck) = 1.69 or lets round down to 1.6 second. So 10.9+ 1.6 = 12.5 seconds. This is literally the best case scenario in every possible way for the Cybertruck just to be equal with the slowest 911 with a meh driver shifting the car. I call BS as someone who drives a Tesla and a V8 muscle car.
Correct me if I’m wrong. I believe the 911 they used is a Carrera T which only comes in a manual transmission. An electric vehicle vs a manual transmission in a short race…. The manual loses everytime. Impressive nonetheless!
dont forget the fact that this is really just about how fast you start off. and the cybertruck has an electric motor.. so.. you know.. its obviously gonna have an advantage. this is misleading. acceleration is higher but it says nothing about top speed etc. so you are gonna be faster in a short track, or if you go through a lot of curves. but the top speed of a 911 is 330~ kmh. the cybertruck is about 180 kmh if the data is still correct
@@onezweithree are you just playing dumb? you must be, right? its literally marketing. make it look better, those who dont know as much about cars will think "WOOOOW it smoked a 911" and do not mention the fact its actually 2x faster at top speed cuz that would be bad. and nobody can say you did that on purpose, cause you didnt say anything against it.
Not saying that Tesla can’t do this, but how do we know that this is not staged? It’s a professionally produced and edited video with no spectators in sight.
And they only show the 1/8 mile. Supposedly the trailer wasn't rated for over 80, so they decided not to do a full 1/4 mile drag race, but they swear it would still have beat the 911.
I am going to wait for a channel like Carwow to make a video like this and then I will see if it is actually true. I have a hard time believing that a 911 turbo s lost against a fully loaded cyber truck. Edit: I just watched the Hagerty drag race and on a prepped surface the cyber truck with 845 HP goes a 11 sec flat for the quarter mile without a trailer and a car. The Porsche 911 turbo s 992 does a quarter mile in 9.9 sec on a prepped surface. It also does a 0 to 60 in 2.2 sec. This is what you call a false advertisement.
Oh yeah, this is absolutely manipulative. The "less than 11 seconds" and taglines "faster than a 911".... What? Around a track? Top speed? Quarter mile? Oh wait, the 911 is faster in every single one of those.
That's electric vs petrol. How many times can the Cyber truck do this without a recharge? How many times can the Porsche do it on one tank of fuel? Which one isn't ugly?