D-Day but, with Modern US Military Power - Normandy Landings - Simulation - ARMA 3 

Great summation

This guy needs to be promoted to General Secretary

Next: 1. Find hitlers bunker 2.destroy it with b2s 3.break german moral with a lot of crazy stuff 4.defeat germany 5.defeat the soviets 6.kill stalin take over russia 7.profit

Nah, in regards to number 4 you gotta think like a general. Specifically a general that was in the airborne or something that just wants a chance to conduct a combat jump that he never got to do as a young officer all those years ago so now he's gonna do it because he can. For anyone who is too oblivious to tell, this is a joke.

Ther would be no F-22 or F-35 at Omaha but F-18 since US send its carriers, and right now, they only carrier combat aircraft is F-18, and they would not send their modern air force to England Air Fields for 2 reasons. 1. It is still internal war between US and UK for dominance after WWII 2. No airfield in UK at the time is capable of operating raptors

Imagine this.

You're welcome!

UK 6th Airbourne Division on D-Day: Are we a joke to you? (you probably will when you know what a Tetrarch looks like :-)

Say hello to my Bradley's

Look Hanz they’re killing all of us!

If German won WW2 the american don't even know what moon is!

@@kkjkkj2584 most of Trump voters do not know what the moon is.

Semper Fi

@@simeon4837 lmaooo

@@simeon4837 lol

Now do the sim in reverse, give the Germans modern equipment and let 10940's US military try to land the beach.

@TOH YONG JUN Moe lmao

Its still roleplay, but in a different way

@@michaelgamble2848 10940 US Military wins they are from the far future

@@secondhanzo4938 They could just walk into machine gun fire by 10940 and come out just fine cause by that time armour technology would make our current tech almost useless 😂

Lol 🤣

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Yep

Fuck, I'm about to Say That 😅

Yes

I don't think that's a correct beach to field vehicles, place is surrounded by cliffs.

and there would be no bunkers left as any fortication would be blasted by a cruise missile or a bunker buster(if they still use it)/smart bombs..

@@userjlj there'd be plenty of bunkers left. The SAMs would have denied the air to any planes trying to get withing 200 miles of the beach. No amount of HARMs could make a dent in something built that scale. The idea that a western air force can just waltz in over an airspace defended by modern AA systems is jingoism and self delusion. SAM systems are a whole lot cheaper to build than planes are, and they're a lot more effective at anti-air ops too. You'll notice that in the last 50 years, only in the Arab-Israeli wars of 67 and 73 did modern aircraft face modern SAMs. There a reason why we don't do this anymore. And a reason why the Russian S400 and US Patriot is so feared. SEAD against such is IMMENSELY dangerous even with high tech weapons such as a F35. If Normandy had the equivalent S400 systems stationed there, no aircraft would have ever gotten withing 100 miles or more of the coast. They'd be stuck in Britain. WW2 tactics with modern weapons doesn't ever work, if your opponent also has modern weaponry. Only when they don't does it work out OK.

I would get depressed

The bunkers would be taken out by that time by satellite guided cruise missiles.

More like papercut from filling out the paperwork.

@@TankratRustDust another US soldier sneezes because of some dust.

Realistically the only American losses would be either an unfortunate friendly fire incident, or just some freak accident like getting hit by a jeep or falling off the side of a ship.

C: In the meantime Russian ground forces enter Berlin 😀😀

WOW

60-70 years is a huge diffirent for the 20th-21th century dude

So much overkill. Anything from the F4 onwards would have been enough - no point in using a stealth anything when no one else has anything approaching modern radar.

@@TheFaldoran nope the F4 is still be able to be shot down by WW2 AA gun (Vietnam war is an example)

@@builuuquanghuy4144 WW2 era AAA fed information by far more modern and capable radar systems. WW2 era radar couldn't track F4 Phantoms.

@@builuuquanghuy4144 Good point - I was referring more to the poor FW190s being shot down more than anything - AA is a different story and would be able to hit anything the in the vid if it was on a strafing run

This was my reaction, basically this was total destruction.

The final countdown, D-Day Europe edition.

Even cold war fighters can obliterated those BF109s

Do believe that was an F22 bro, honest mistake though.

Still me 262s would at least have a chance

@@cascadeflims7261 Dude the Vietnamese and North Korea airforce with their 1950s MiG 21 would shit on Nazi Jets. Our modern Jets would wipe the floor with them.

Kuroyae good point

Lol if I was the commander.i would think it's aliens

Uh Hans what was that. I thought they didn’t have V-1

Americans: THEY HAVE OIL

@@Danishboi6766 no. more likely the Americans would be going straight for Holland and the free drugs so they could take them stateside and sell them. you have to think like politicians. Where's the $? and of course if el presidente Trump was in charge he would just sell out to Adolf for a few prime location hotels.

Brrrrrrrt what does this mean?

@@MPlain lol

@Rickrolmao deez nuts

It would be like the intro from Wolfenstein: The New Order 😂

They would still use the MG42

@@bardocomunista just re chambered and redesignated because the blueprints are lost

@@bardocomunista MG3 would be used instead lol

What about STG 44 Assault Rifle?

…and Berlin would’ve fallen a lot sooner. Then Stalin would have a heck of a choice- stop the Red army where they were at & no split East/West Europe (how far west was Russia in June ‘44?) , or risk it all attacking the Allied army just to avenge Operation Barbarossa

Bro we can't even win wars with current tech lol...think last war we won was back in 91 and that was only 90min I believe

War on large scale and individual battles do not play out like a game my friend .. it’s much different. Afghanistan is a great example of how simply having the technological advantage won’t win you a conflict

@@Existentialcrisis_1488 except Afghan culture and European culture s are way different.

Sooner, the Germans would sue for peace when entire panzer divisions disappear and the Richstag(sp) gets hit with a MOAB

shooting fish in a barrel

IFVs could take care of everything up to the less armored versions of the Pz.3 and Pz.4 with their autocannons alone

@@Two-EyedShockwave yes but also remember that most IFVs are only rated up to 14.7 HMG fire not a 37 mm cannon so those light tanks might be able to pen them an Abrams on the other hand is rated to stop some thing like a 125 mm APFSDS shell yeah nothing from ww2 is going to come close to penetrating that

@@gwydionrusso3206 OK, OK, hear me out. A tank driver gets some bigger balls and has a concussion and decides to challenge a battleship... those rounds would do something!

@@Cylius. he might be able to penetrate it but it wouldn't do any Significant damage

Yeah, see... that wouldn't happen. The 30mm rounds are supersonic. They would arrive before the sound of the gun. So suddenly the world around them just explodes in a hail of metal and depleted uranium as some rounds explode, and others just punch through everything. Pretty standard for the GAU-8 Avenger to run 'combat mix' as they call it. Then the sound of the gun gets to them. Why observers here two sets of sounds are thanks to the fire rate of the A-10 is from the impact of the munitions and some detonating, and then the sound catches up. Both sound about the same, since they have the same frequency. But the target is dead before they hear 'the fart.'

@@tearstoneactual9773 maybe it was brrrts to another bunker

Fritz: INCOMING

Splash the zero I repeat splash the zero

Its the final countdown... *guitar noises*

The movie and the music like holy fuck this a coincidence? I fucking think not

No replies?and 8 likes? Let me fix that

💀

Imagine being a tiger tank and then seeing an a10 and its heading towards you:

@@armageddon-tank I don't think they would think much of anything - they would be dead before they knew it.

I think Hitler would be the first to get obliterated by a B2 fleet

On the positive side, we would learn the German version of "fuck my life" straight from the Fuhrer's mouth.

@@petergray7576 idk why but this made me laugh XD

DAS WAR EIN BEFEHL! Der Angriff Steiners war ein Befehl!

Nah, this would downright scare the shit out of him

FPS GAMER BE LIKE:

Mag 2.0 is a dream…

You sweet summer child.

3/4 of those German pilots probably didn't even know they where in trouble when the first AMMRAMs started to hit them...the rest of 1/4 knew they were in trouble but by that time the battle was over...

It's like watching "Independence Day!"

Harry Turtledove wrote a book that went something like that.

A little less one sided for sure! I mean all the people gloating is like cheering on a bully who's beating up the Special Needs Kid in the Class!

Basically WW2 with modern equipment? A war like no other we have ever seen

What if modern US military fighting nazi in wolfenstein new order timeline?

The one with the modern equipment Would win always

Germans would still get wrecked. The Germans barely have a military

Musketeer can reload three times a minute, whereas an experienced archer can loose around fourteen arrows in the same time. These weapons were together on the battlefield for around two hundred years.

@@cambs0181 Muskets and cannons have a greater range than bows and arrows, which is why the latter was phased out over the centuries as muskets and cannons became better and more advanced. A platoon of modern soldiers, fully armed, would defeat a company or even a battalion of soldiers from 400 years ago, thanks to the advancements of weaponry. Even generals and soldiers back then knew about the advantages of superior firepower and that new and more advanced weapons were being invented all of the time.

Have you seen an anime called "gate: so the self-defence force fought there"?

best comment ever

@@oceanologistftomatlantida6626 can we make this comment have more replies? And likes

GC: OI! YOU CAN'T JUST LEAVE US HERE- BAH, FORGET IT! RETREAT!

No, modern aircraft have a higher stall speed than any WW2 fighter's top speed, iirc. Additionally current RADAR capabilities are might not detect WW2 Luftwaffe aircraft, due to not having enough metal content in their construction, so those missiles wouldn't work. IFF would also only be "hearing" friendly signals, so technically that works as intended. Heat-seeking missiles might work, but they might end up targeting your own aircraft, or even ground vehicles, of both sides, but I don't know exactly how their seeker programming works. The best air defense in this case, modern United States Armed Forces, versus WW2 German Whermacht, would be to destroy the airfields the Luftwaffe are operating from. Classic SOCOM mission, see Britain's SAS in North Africa earlier in the war. Or add those airfields to the target list for the cruise missiles, and initial air strikes. Failing that, the Phalanx CWIS can do the job at the beachhead, once deployed, and before they are, the M2 .50 machine gun was originally from WW2, so any vehicle mounting one of these, as a pintle-mount, like on a Humvee, or atop the turret of an Abrams, can contribute to the air defense of the beachhead. Disclamer: I'm an Australian civilian, with no first hand knowledge of American military weapons, and technology. The above has come from my own thought expirments, born from an interest in 20th century warfare, including WW2 and Vietnam.

@@deathdisclover999 Every year for the last 5 years i have seen a tribute fight with the F-22, A-10, P-51 Mustang, and an F-15. If what you said about stall speed is correct that could never happen but I've seen it. With thrust vectoring I would guess that a F-22 can go slower than the stall speed of any fixed wing WWII aircraft. Don't forget the Harrier, it can sit stationary in the air if it wants to.

@@deathdisclover999 While the metal content in a target is a factor in RADAR detection, it is but a minor one as modern day systems have a resolution strong enough to detect birds at long range, its however filtered out to prevent signal saturation. Remember, every single civilian passanger jet has a radar designed to detect individual water droplets that make up the clouds. IR-missiles however might see a drop in efficiency at least initially as prop planes have a sginificantly lower heat signature, but they would rarely if ever target friendlies by accident, as they are being fed the targets aspect directly before launch and ignore anything that doesnt have the same aspect. The workaround would be to simply fire the missiles are closer range where the high resolution seekers of the missiles have a much easier time to lock on to a planes signature. This was actually the big issue in Vietnam, early gen IR-missiles were tested and developed in a dry environment, but Vietnams humid climate made the otherwise sharp exhaust signature of a jet engine bloom out to a massive blob on the seeker head which lead to the missiles often missing their targets. While this was quickly fixed in later versions, the stigma never really went away in those days. On a final note, when engaging a significantly slower target, the Air Force has two options for engaing. One is the "boom and zoom" tactic where the engaging fighters take up speed, get into firing range, drop their missiles, fire a couple cannon salvos and leave the field without much maneuvering and then use their momentum to get out of the engagment zone, make a turn at a safe distance then come in again for another pass. Jousting, basically. The other is the "bait and switch" where one fighter actually slows down enough to make themselves an inviting target, becomming the bair, then when a tango gets behind them, the first fighter maneuvers in such a way to open the pursuer up for the second fighter that has been out of sight this whole time, effecitvely switching the roles between hunter and hunted. Your analysis on how the Luftwaffe would be crippled while still on the ground was spot on. Just to correct a minor technicallity, the ground based version of the Phalanx CIWS is called a C-RAM. ^^

@@DanielTaylorOCMD But not for long, hovering in place with jet engines consumes a fuckton of fuel in a rather short time, and the Harrier isnt known for having large fuel tanks.

@@DanielTaylorOCMD fir only 39 seconds the harrier is not q helicopter

Those were marine's sea stallions, 30 troops per load iirc.

I love that concept, just imagine a German scientist off the coast on ship activating a Time Machine and sees a Virginia class Sub coming through the portal.

🤣🤣🤣

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-vfrh9PtLoZ8.html

1 week max before the Bismarck is ⚰️

Both bismarck and Prinz Euguen would be probably one or two shot by torpedoes even whitout seeing them coming.

"to the Zulu War" I mean... Personally, I hate making typing mistakes.

With the Zulu war. I think the Brits will definitely win

Bye bye Zulus. Spears vs helicopters. lol. oh man.... that image. The 262 was impressive for it's time. but no match for a Tomcat. Too bad the Horten 229 never got built.

you don't even need a regiment.. a battalion(or even just a company) together with some light vehicles(with heavy MG's like the .50 cal or LMG's on top) are more than enough.. at one point they were only up against 4000 zulu warrior.. tanks would be overkill..

@@userjlj a couple of mortar round and some HEAT rounds would be enough

Hello fellow AIAW reader :)

@@rizkyputrar6646 hi 😁😬☺

Ayeeeee

Hello fellow reader

@@lt.x-02s-wyvern25 hi 😁.

"Good gunter, now pray for your life"

Not to mention the carrier group having sm6 missiles offshore.

While i liked the movienit was such a tease lol. I wanted a sequel where they went to dday or something

Idk if you’ve ever seen the movie where the Nimitz carrier and it’s full fleet of F14 Tomcats and A7 corsairs get put back in time to Pearl Harbor. It’s pretty interesting

Or tv series

I’m assuming the F-22s took off from air fields in the UK. Then maybe the carrier’s F35s and F18s are striking targets deep inland.

but girls think this is borin n nerdy tho

F-22's aren't carrier aircraft.....

@@painhertz proof that I legitimately dunno about modern Weaponry

WW2 Soldiers see their futare selves

F-22s? I think you mean F-35C Lightning IIs (which, along with versions of the F-18, are operated by the US Navy, yes). The F-22 Raptors, on the other hand, are primarily developed for and operated by the US Air Force.

@@MDDeGrande1994 back read lad...

The other important question is "what stage of 1944?" January 1944: Would fight; would lose. December 1944: "Is Hitler alive? No? Alright, we'll surrender if you can feed us."

Still lots of pro Hitler simps out there.

I would bail out