Although the companies in my portfolio are solid, I experienced a 35% decline in overall $360k portfolio at the height. thus investing makes me anxious . I'm uncertain if I should sell everything and go in on A I Stocks
De-risk your portfolios, shore up your core holdings, and take some profits while balancing your portfolio allocations. I’d also suggest you go with a managed portfolio, so it’s best you reach out to a proper fiduciary to guide you, that’s what works for me. We've made over 50% capital growth minus dividends.
The decision on when to pick an Adviser is a very personal one. I take guidance from Sharon Ann Meny to meet my growth goals and avoid mistakes, she's well-qualified and her page can be easily found on the net.
AI Stocks are pretty unstable at the moment, but if you do the right math, you should be just fine. Bloomberg and other finance media have been recording cases of folks gaining over 250k just in a matter of weeks/couple months, so I think there are a lot of wealth transfer in this downtime if you know where to look.
you’re right! The current market might give opportunities to maximize profit within a short term, but in order to execute such strategy , you must be a skilled practitioner
I've been in touch with a financial advisor ever since I started my business. Knowing today's culture The challenge is knowing when to purchase or sell when investing in trending stocks, which is pretty simple. On my portfolio, which has grown over $900k in a little over a year, my adviser chooses entry and exit orders.
Certainly, there are a handful of experts in the field. I've experimented with a few over the past years, but I've been stuck with Annette Christine Conte for about five years now, and her performance has been consistently impressive.
Strong BUY. Still early innings. NVIDIA is the dominant leader in AI and the preferred technology partner globally. Even w new competition on the horizon, NVIDIA is far ahead of the competition. 85% market share. 76% margin. Unrivaled demand for new Blackwell chip. Demand far exceeds production for Blackwell through to 2025 and beyond. No competitor has anything close to Blackwell. And forward P/E is about 33 (cheap for a high growth stock). Buy this stock and wait. You will be rewarded.
This is Interesting because i bought NVIDIA around September last year. The company is selling shovels in a gold rush. It accounted for almost 80% of my market return last year, and I'm sure this year will present other interesting stocks.
When it comes to investment, diversification is key. That is why I have my interests set on key sectors based on performance and projected growth. They range from the EV sector, renewable energy, Tech and Health (AMD) alongside coins, and gold. I'm also working on an investment plan that includes AI looking into Nvidia, MSFT, Alphabet stocks among others with my Fin. Advisor, . It's been a year and half of steady growth.
I appreciate the implementation of ideas and strategies that result to unmeasurable progress. Being heavily liquid, I'd rather not reinvent the wheel, thus the search for a reputable advisor, mind sharing info of this person guiding you please?
Finding financial advisors like Marisa Breton Dollard who can assist you shape your portfolio would be a very creative option. There will be difficult times ahead, and prudent personal money management will be essential to navigating them.
I greatly appreciate it. I'm fortunate to have come upon your message because investing greatly fascinates me. I'll look Marisa Breton Dollard up and send her a message. You've truly motivated me. God's blessings on you.
Why I prefer NVIDIA is that they are better placed to maintain long term growth potential, and provide a platform for other AI companies. I know someone who has made more than 200% from NVIDIA.
I bought into NVIDIA around September because my financial advisor recommended it to me. She said the company is selling shovels in a gold rush. It accounted for almost 80% of my green market return last year.
That's a great analogy and I love the insight. Professionals could make a really big difference in investing, and I think everyone should have one. There are aspects of market trend that is difficult for the untrained eyes to see.
Amber Dawn Brummit is the licensed coach I use. Just research the name. You'd find necessary details to work with a correspondence to set up an appointment.
I already own shares of TSLA, NVDA and APPL as well. Sure, I don't mind having these equities sit around for a while, but I'd also like to appreciate short-term opportunities that could fetch $200,000 or less..
No doubt, having the right plan is invaluable, my portfolio is well-matched for every season of the market and recently hit 100% rise from early this year. I and my CFP are working on a 7 figure ballpark goal, tho this could take till Q3 2024.
bravo! the whole markt has gone berserk now, almost not possible to outperform without expert guidance.. think your adviser would get on the phone with a newcomer? i'm in dire need of proper portfolio allocation ?
MICHELE KATHERINE SINGH is the licensed fiduciary I use. Just research the name. You’d find necessary details to work with a correspondence to set up an appointment.
Made my first large buy with NVIDIA in 2020 and have literally been buying quarterly since then. I am thinking about trimming some at $4,200 per share. Is this a good strategy? Please let me know what you think.
A large part of my $200,000 portfolio consist of Nvidia and other share holdings doing incredible numbers in my portfolio. I’m up 47% from last year! I also own good blue chip companies and I have stop losses in place.
You're right, I and a few Neighbors in Bel Air Area work with such advisor who prefers we DCA instead of a lump sum purchase, Following this, my portfolio grew 40% in the last quarter.
Dan Nile's comments about 3 big draw downs for Cisco in the 90's is a good reminder of what can happen with NVDA. I had CSCO back then and the best move was not to get shaken out of the stock.
Love your guests - HOWEVER - Dan are you aware that a good interviewer asks a short question and then STFU ? Nobody wants to hear a 10 minute question Thanks
Thanks Mate, the sad truth is that no one has a clue, we all react to what happens as it happens and try to analyse it but can’t predict an iota of what is going to unfold in the markets… content creators are like amplifiers, when times are good they affirm it and try to tell you why it’s good and that it’s looking bullish but then all of a sudden the market turns bearish and everyone affirms it again and try to analyse why… it’s so sad that many are so powerless and it's not about guessing the market's next move; it's about playing it smart and steady during trading...managed to grow a nest egg of around 2.3Bitcoin to a decent 19Bitcoin in the space of a few months... I'm especially grateful to Sandy Barclays, whose deep expertise and traditional trading acumen have been invaluable in this challenging, ever-evolving financial landscape.
Exploring new investment opportunities demonstrates your proactive stance towards financial growth during these volatile times. Diversifying your portfolio can play a crucial role in effectiveIy mitigating risks..
Over the years, I've been a part of numerous trading programs, sifting through a barrage of information. Yet, nothing has come close to the sheer clarity, depth, and precision of Sandy insights. It's akin to finding a diamond in a coal mine.
Even in the midst of this whirlwind, there are chances to be found, thus an increase in volatility is not always a bad thing. You can rebalance your portfolio thanks to volatility. Employing a financial counselor to help you with every stage of the process is the best course of action.
Dan has some weird hard-on for hating on Elon Musk, one of the brightest and most successful people we have ever seen. I’m sure Elon gives a shit about Dan criticizing his decisions on a podcast. Dan is a liberal, so this is probably some perverse political thing
The comparison between Cisco and Nvda is dead wrong. Nvda is the universal computational platform that majority will need to develop AI. Cisco was an internet Company in 2000.
Dan Niles missing out on Apple again lol only 2 decades now, missed out on every next run. What a loser, bought and recommended Intel to people this year, check how that stock been doing. Hahaha.
@@TruthSeaker-t6q I would politely disagree. The stock was around 30 when he picked it as his 2023 pick and ended 2023 at almost 50. So you could have had decent upside if you had sold it.I am specifically talking about his Intel pick, not defending him in general.
@@TheGreatOne428He recommended a stock that was yearly pump and dump, you could've made 50x more if bought GME when kitty appeared if you are about short-term movement. When these people give recommendations on stocks to others, it should be stocks that can pay you for years ahead, not worst performers for they year, so he's terrible. Like all finance mafia, they never want you in great stocks, they want you out of those and into something that is going to be dead money for a long time.
I do enjoy listening to these podcasts. But it's really hard to invest an hour listening to the constant risks from Dan Nathan in the form of "what ifs" and "ifs" without offering mitigations.
I keep telling both friends and family; Now is the perfect time to own a Tech Stock, With everything going on and seeing how the world is been run by AI and all Tech is here to stay and you don’t want to miss it
With everything going on in the market My advice to anyone starting out in the market is to seek guidance as its the best way to build long term wealth while managing your risk and emotions with the passive investing strategy.
I took charge of my portfolio but faced losses in 2022. Realizing the need for a change, I sought advice from a fiduciary advisor. Through restructuring and diversification with dividend stocks, ETFs, Mutual funds, and REITs, my $1.2M portfolio surged, yielding an annualized gain of 28%.
I just Googled her name and her website came up right away. It looks interesting so far. I'm going to send a mail to her and let you know how it goes.Thanks for sharing truly!
Sooooooooooooooooo VERY wrong on AAPL. Looking at this today, after it's up $26 from its low just prior to WWDC. These guys are sooooo down on it, but it's zooming up!
Are Dan x2 ever bullish? All I hear are how bad the economy is and overvalued everything is. I know before they even speak, what they will say. That's not a good sign.
thanks for this episode. Always love to hear from Dan Niles, but will also always do my own thinking. - Don´t understand the many disresprectful comments here...
The main focus for markets now is Nvidia, which has powered a large chunk of the S&P 500’s recent earnings. Nvidia’s stock, up more than 90% this year, rose 2.5% in New York on Monday, sending the Nasdaq 100 index to another record high. I'm still looking for companies to make additions to my $350K portfolio, to boost performance. Here for ideas...
I think the safest strategy is to diversify investments. Like spreading investments across different asset classes, like bonds, real estate, and international stocks, they can reduce the impact of a market meltdown
A lot of folks downplay the role of advlsors until being burnt by their own emotions. I remember couple summers back, after my lengthy divorce, I needed a good boost to help my business stay afloat, hence I researched for licensed advisors and came across someone of utmost qualifications. She's helped grow my reserve notwithstanding inflation, from $275k to $850K
This is definitely considerable! think you could suggest any professional/advisors i can get on the phone with? i'm in dire need of proper portfolio allocation
Would have been nice if Dan had spent less time venting on Tesla and followed up on SNOW and ADBE. Would welcome Dan Niles’s take on Amazon. Niles, now that you’re in Florida get jacket that fits. Maybe Dan Ives can give you a tip on Miami-Vice wear. Appreciate your insights.
What happened to Niles the “I told you so” and Satori? I saw this guy come on CNBC make calls after the fact, never before the fact. Dan, the great fade Nathan and Dan, the I told you so, Niles.
Watching Dan Niles dismantle Dan Nathan’s flawed take on Elon Musk and Tesla is deeply satisfying. Nathan’s erroneous views and clownish antics are increasingly embarrassing to witness. It’s baffling how he continues to stay relevant despite his glaring inaccuracies.
Dan was on cnbc when apple was at $148 share...He made a very convincing bear case, so convincing that i sold my shares that day!...All the stock did after that was go up. How some people get paid for being wrong, now i just mute the tv when he is on. (Good thing he is not an airline mechanic.)
The blackwell chips are already shipping and earnings are going to be better than expected. I think the stock price to $150 is going to be coming sooner than anyone expects.
@Dan, your hatred toward Elon and love of WOKE makes you keep judging the market wrong. I hope you can get out of tis love/hate loop sooner rather than later.
This moment in time is like buying Apple stock in 2007 when the first Iphone came out. Apple managed to come out every year with a new and better phone and their revenue, cashflow and stock price grew every year. Eventually, competitors came into the picture, but the Iphone held its loyal customers due to it's proprietary technology. My guess Nvida may follow a similar path. They will dominate the next 2, 3 or 5 years, make big profits, stock price goes up and up. Eventually, competitors will come in and there sales my slow down. How ever, if their technology can stay ahead of competition, they could maintain big enough market share to drive stock price higher. So Jensen Huang as manager is the key, just like Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, etc. This just the beginning of the gold rush into AI. Nvida sells the pick and shovels.
Dan Nathan is such a bear. So much so you can't trust him. Dan Niles said early in the interview he thinks NVDA could drop by 23% by year end. Later in the interview, Nathan said Niles thinks NVDA could fall by 35-40% by year end. In other words, he added 12-17% to Nathan's prediction. Nathan can't help himself. He doesn't see the glass half empty; he sees every glass with a giant hole in the bottom. How does he ever make money? How did he get a gig on CNBC? As for Niles, he said our government does not support them. I wonder where he thinks TSLA would be today without all the tax credits our supposedly non-supporting government granted them. Niles has a bro-crush on Elon so much so he misrepresents the facts.
Finance mafia buddy, you have to learn these people don't want you to make money on no brainer stocks that you should hold for decades, they will always bash them and try to get you out or try to create doubt, you only win if you don't buy any of the sht they selling to you.
If you been in markets like me over 25 years, you would realize they never had credibility to begin with, it's a finance mafia channel made by elites to influence public opinion, teach you bad TA, make you sceptic when we hit bottom and then go for decade long bull runs, etc. etc. That is their job overall, to keep scamming retail for decades to come.
Dan is so irritating to listen to. Hater of the market hater of Elon blah blah. We get it Dan. It’s so old. Also how can he be wrong for so long and CNBC keep him on air.
Graphs can only tell you what can happen short term and what supports or resistance you will face but once you go out past two weeks anything you read from a graph is a crapshoot. What the company is doing and quarterly results will give you a better outlook for the long term.
I thought Adobe went down, because of AI ( as if AI was just going to conjure up whatever, which I guess it could. I have no idea). Dan Niles thinks Adobe will be using AI? Can you give an example of how that works?
Elon sets extremely high goals and overly optimistic timelines. People like Dan Nathan who have a huge bias against Elon and Tesla choose only to look at the delays. Dan Niles makes a good point that Elon does eventually achieve his goals. They both talk about the competition. But what I see is a lot of companies losing money making EVs while Tesla remains profitable albeit with reduced margins. So to me, the big question is not how many competitors Tesla has today but rather how many they will still have in 5 to 10 years. As for legacy automakers, if you think EVs are a failed experiment and will die out then go ahead and throw your money at GM. But as EVs get cheaper, as battery technology improves and as charging infrastructure expands, we will likely be looking at a gradual shifting of market share to EVs. One final thing, don't overlook the Optimus robot which is NOT just a story anymore as Tesla is now manufacturing them and putting them to work in their factories. You could argue that they haven't sold any yet, but I can guarantee you will be paying a lot more money per share when they do. And when Tesla is at $1000, Dan Nathan will still be telling us what a terrible company it is and how it's gonna go back to $500 any day.
Dan has been wrong for so long and he keeps talking smack. He will be right once in a while but you will lose if you act on his take in general. He’s a joke. No shame.
MR WOKE ANALYST DAN NATAN. SO MUCH HATE TOWARDS ELON FROM THIS GUY. HIS HATE AT THE END POLLUTED THE WHOLE INTERVIEW. THREW FEW FLOWERS TO NILES AT THE END SEEKING TO FINISH ON A GOOD NOTE BUT.
I realized that the secret to making a million is saving for a better investment. I always tell myself you don't need that new Maserati or that vacation just yet. That mindset helped me make more money investing. For example last year I invested 80k in trading with *Michael Hugh Terpin* and made about 246k, but guess what? I put it all back and traded again and now I'm rounding up close to a million.
The pandemic came and taught everyone the importance of having multiple stream of income, unfortunately having a nice paying job doesn't mean you are financial secured anymore. So we all need to put in an extra-income earning chance, like investments.
My advice to you all is that you shouldn’t just venture on any asset for the sake of it, I’ve come to understand that the recent dip trail is everything.
Michael’s services are very genius and experienced in the market for over a decade and counting, he changed my life from a poor plumber to a better and middle class family man with 2kids.
*Michael Hugh Terpin* is a highly respected figure in the field. I suggest delving deeper into his credentials, as he possesses extensive experience and serves as a valuable resource for individuals seeking guidance in navigating the financial market.
All the (cnBS) jokers from “fast-money.” Time to tell the algorithm to NEVER recommend this channel. No offense to Melissa Lee if she ever appears on this channel she is actually good at her job.
I disagree - I appreciated his contributions to the conversation for a few reasons - one is that they helped flesh out the topics. I think most of his comments had plenty of aim to them.
I’m grateful that Nathan didn’t let Niles get away with calling Elon a God. More podcast hosts need to be willing to rebut their guests when the guest is saying something that’s off track. Kudos to Dan Nathan for that.
Good DN insight to AAPL set up for relative improvement/acceleration. AAPL also benefits disproportionally from luxury component. Don’t forget the uprating to AAPL valuation has a lot to do with its outstanding return of excess cash flow to shareholders and growing revenue composition in high margin services. What if AAPL attains a gatekeeper position re consumer use of AI based on privacy and ease of use. What AAPL is about is monetizing its loyal customer base. The valuation could be rational. Sure it would be great if you could steal it but don’t count on that especially with the company’s appetite for its own shares. I like his comment about software, going forward does AI eat software. With respect to that AAPL is positioned well with respect to its technology integration, a strategic position it has always refused to relinquish.
Sorry, Ed Yardeni has been right while all these other experts kept us waiting for recessions. Hearing Gene Munster had no NVIDIA tells me I am better off managing myself
Agree, and Gene Munster fund is all about deep mind artificial intelligence but doesn't own the #1 company in AI. Kills me. I would rather own the S&P then invest my money with some of these so-called experts.
