DANA Self Propelled Gun 152mm Mobile Artillery - Overview 

Brácho..... 🤣💪

Same. Škoda že som nikde nenašiel ZUZANU. DANA myslím už nieje v slovenskej armáde. Neviem ci tam nieje len ZUZANA 2

Cz make the best air rifles in the world aswell as actual firearms but the air rifles are just amazing olympic quality accuracy rugged fair priced i love em im english but slavia as a company and the cz s200 are world beating in accuracy im getting a slavia soon well another slavia should i say ive already got one its my handy rifle no scope just a sling and it is perfection

@@sikertsok225 Stop spreading bullshit, Tatra is pure Czech company created in 1850.

All I see is a BFG on wheels, Wow!

why tf???

Krupp: *HOLD MY BEER*

cries in kv-2

That thing can hold ALL THE BEER

That thing can piss beer. 🍺

Czech: Hold my Pilsen

Aircooled Diesel sound is the best

to si dobre dal ZTS Dubnica bola za vojni Hermann Göring Werke

@@ANDREJCELKO88 ''vojni''

2serveand2protect i think the famous 88ts been produced in Ceska Zborojovka

@@jurajschiller8557 88 sa robili v Plzenskej skodovke a v dubnici

Skoda made some cannons, howitzers, machineguns, etc. as well. And don't forget the Zbrojovka Brno. Just to mention BREN, meaning BRno - ENfield.

lmao bullshit

Well I wont glorify reds but soviet NAMI created behemots who were better in off road than tanks

Czarnobyl why arent their tanks on wheels? Why arent all of their artillery pieces on wheels?

@@kloschuessel773 Its all about weight vs ground contact area. If your vehicle is heavy armored like paladins, the ground contact area would be too small to have good traction, hence they need to increase the area by using tracks.

@@kloschuessel773 If you look around in the world, you will see that everywhere the tracked artillery is slowly replaced by wheeled artillery. For IFV's the same movement is discernsble, even Israel has chosen to produce a 8x8 wheeled product. Why? Well, cheaper, faster, uses mostly truck components and engines, etc. Are they better? Time will tell, but it is rather surprising to see a 120mm tank cannon on a wheeled vehicle. Maybe the end of the MBT is near?

Jens Danbolt Lady Gaga and Fiona from Polish army

It does, to be honest. Seeing these guys roll up will make you think twice about playing ping pong

Pfffft 152mm is the Warsaw Pact version of our 155mm artillery. This is a standard NATO artillery caliber! I haven't seen it on any ships other than the Zumwalts, and there isn't any proper naval ammunition available for those. Besides, most Naval guns are 127mm or 76mm.

Todays, yes. Used to be quite other way earlier... But THOSE naval guns like 18" would squash such platform on the first salvo (their recoil) :-)Even the sheer weight would.

@@SYNtemp Yeah... Imagine slogging around 1.5 tonnes of 18" shell, and then you'd still need the powder charge :o

Robert Verlinden sounds like something America would do

@Smrt Phn Chasis is Czech design, the whole weapon system on it is Slovak design.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/152mm_SpGH_DANA

Han shot first!

Jess Dubnica nad Váhom.

Simply it’s Czechoslovak, 2 brother nations that were amazingly together

Biased Sherman it is

Biased Sherman I am sure experts will find more ops. differencies between howitzer and a tank 😆

A far closer comparrison would be to a mobile crane platform given the drive train and forward steering design!

Well, at least they tried...

Indeed they did and its an impressive design. My comment wasn't meant in a derogatory sense only to clearly outline that the platform more closely followed that of a mobile crane not a lorry or truck.

I bet the engine is 330 kW, not 330 hp. You may like the new MORANA artillery. Nowadays also NEXTER is using tatra chassis for Cesar II artillery. But that one requires crew to exit wen shooting. Morana needs only 3 people, and they stay inside cabin. Edit: 3 people

@@Pyrochemik007 Wonder how long it takes to shoot and scoot. It doesn't matter the format but I feel like that is what the future holds since counter artillery is only getting better. Unless you have a significant range advantage I don't see how a more static defense is viable. Towed artillery seem so vulnerable to set up, fire, and relocate. It is so easy to scout with drones, aircraft, and now we have radar and computers that can pin point the location of your location. I forsee artillery firing a few rounds for a few minutes then booking it to some predetermined location. Better when coordinated with others spread out over a few KM.

@@dianapennepacker6854 6 shots in first minute, and it has MRSI, which means several shots are shot at different angles, but hit enemy at the same time. It can start shooting 40 seconds after stopping. I bet moving will be shorter, because you do not need to wait until the hydraulic arms stabilise the vehicle. Since the vehicle aims everything on it´s own, you do not need to act as a group of howitzers, each one can shoot from different location. That makes it that much harder for enemy to spot them. The vehicle is literaly designed around what you wrote, shoot and scoot. Carries 45 rounds of ammo, so it can eliminate 10 targets with simultaneuos 4 grenades, before resuplying.

Cannot find data for this exact version, but the slightly newer one (but still fully mechanical, naturally aspirated, air cooled V12) with the same horsepower had 1295 Nm peak torque.

kokos742 I had to look up what you said, but don't worry, you're awesome :D

the DANA word origin must be russian, I would recognize czech language since I speak it ... and our country was occupied by russians at that time so that makes even more sense

Mojmír Křížek no its czech or made and researched by Czech We were occupied by Russians but they don't play any role in this vehicle

Maybe the DŠKM heavy machine gun

oh, sorry, my bad but this sounded anything other than czech please Matsimus Gaming, use Google Translate to read it for you :D good video anyways

+1

was just to ask for it!

Oh yes please!

u took my comment :D

Please do Swedish Archer :)

torque and reduction gearbox....

Why do people even mention HP with DIESELS? Its the TQ!!!!

And most military vehicles have lower HP to get a very durable, reliable engine that can run for decades with low maintainance. The military is smarter than civilian customers.

@@just_one_opinion Horsepower is the ability to do work. People who go in about torque being more important than power don't know what they are talking about, and are usually just noticing that high torque vehicles usually have a nice power curve.

I wonder how much the recoil will increase

@@imperialguardsman135 you might wanna check on results of sport racing in trucks division, although results even more boring than CL or ATP. 1'' kamaz 2' tatra 3'' the whatever rest. best trucks come from Russia and chechoslovakia

Every country has its own good truck so I doubt that best trucks are from Russia or Czech. As example my country Poland uses Polish "Jelcz". If it was bad Poland would buy Czech or German trucks but Jelcz is very good vehicle.

@@themitri5643 The truck is not an F1, it will last a million kilometers before it is sold on to some poor country, such as Russia, where it will continue to compete with the new Kamaz. Kamaz is cheap scrap metal, old Mercedes constitutions, from a decade ago, 99% of potential customers of truck manufacturers do not even know the winner of this race, it is a commercial niche for perverts like the world championship in speedway.

@@nietzschegonierosumiesh2639 sorry mate, but Kamaz is simply better. Tatra is the only truck close to Kamaz and the rest are simply not even close. So, I don't know what are you on about, but I know there is no need for Russians to buy tatra. Mounting Ceasars and Archers on a Tatra is good though, much better then Scania or volvo.

Yes, I'll 2nd this one, awesome piece of hardware for it's time.

+1 I've always wondered about matsimus would say about it!

Koper Vermeulen "It's time?" Still is its time, easily one of the best SPGs around - especially in terms of range.

h1017412 Yip, that's so true!

the G6 is a great piece of equipment. im surprised tbe more governments didnt buy it.

Kobus Downey Oman have some of these .

I worked at the firm which designed the fire control computer. When the Army test-fired the gun at a range of 40+ kms, the shell landed 5 metres from the target!!!

Its not a fcking czech design dana and Zuzana is design by slovaks

@@filipzemba3453 its not a fcking slovak design dana is Czechoslovak and zuzana uses Czech chassis

Crispay A-10 sssst

Looks like an old relik....

that someone has a ability to think. dana is an archers dad.

It makes sense, though. They want your movements to be automatic when in combat. By treating it as a drill, the young guys will take it more seriously and try their best.

Claudy_Focan We're NOT eastern

Kuba Uhlíř the dana is a eastern tech though. Built back in the days of warsaw pact.

funny, our capital city is way closer to the west then vienna but ok ...

Eastern...ehm no... Best...maybe the platform...the gun sucks

czech rep and slovakia are central european being called eastern only because we were unlucky enough to be snatched by the commies back in the days

well czech are in the eu why spend money on a military when there is 100% of no war of eu fighting eu and the russia aint a threat cause it will be like cold war both side know what happend if one attack the other. should have spend on thing that will develop your economy

neni tazke povedat dubnica nad vahom

dude, why would chechs or Slovaks need an army? no offense here, but seriously.

@@themitri5643 For simply reason. To fight any threat ( Germany, Russia) or to fight terrosits, help in NATO missions, help civilians when natural catastrophes happens(floods etc..)

The G5.. awesome machine

The G6 Rhino. The g5 is a gun.

@@gbear1005 I worked at the Company that made the fire control system for the G6. First test fire at 40 km range landed only 5m from target. Awesome weapon!!

@@anthonysheffield5717 my association w G6 is pure fandom.. I traveled to the military history museum in JoBurg 10 plus yrs ago just to see it and visit the technical library. Was in contact with Denel to make large scale model kits of it but it kind of fell apart.. only the movie Aliens APC moves me so much...

Czechoslovakian :D

Hohoho stop it. I am from Slovakia, turret with main gun is from Slovakia, it was developed and manufactured in Slovakia. Only the truck is made by Tatra, cczech company. That is big difference. You can put Slovak turret on anything you want. After dissolution of Czechoslovakia it is the same. Now slovak engineers deleloped Zuzana 155 howitzer, Zuzana 2 155 howiterz and Eva 155 howitzer, and now our engineers are working for howitzer for all European conuntries in program called PESCO, hopefully it wil be successful project.

@Graham Ariss One of my many gripes about our UK Government, irrespective of which ever party, is since the Minister for Procurement for the MoD frequiently has little to no military experience, let alone combat experience, our track record of buying the right equipment, at the right price, in a timely manner, has been ... what's the correct adjective ...? Oh yes ... a total dog's breakfast ... Take the Eurofighter Typhoon. Granted, its may well be a great Interceptor/Air Superiority fast jet, but, in my very unexpert opinion, by the time the Typhoon eventually entered into service, it was at least, iirc, a decade late, and, at minimum, one generation behind both the latest MiG and SU. As soon as the delays began to happen, the MoD should have pulled out asap. But, the again hindsight is 20/15* ... I would love to see the Dana deployed alongside the infantry, along with the Wiesel, with the main reason being its 'shoot and scoot' capability. Personally, there is alot to be said for maintaining that fine balance between being highly mobile, but yet still able to put a heck of alot of firepower down range. This is especially true, as the conflicts that the, say, British Army has been involved in of late (cf. Afghanistan), means dealing with a highly mobile, but still relativly decently equipped, opposition. After all, despite everything the Russian army threw at them, short of battlefield nuclear weapons, they could unseat, let alone come even remotely close to routing, the Afghan-Islamist fighters (the mujahideen). Instead, the Russian army often found themselves frequently beaten back, due to the use of guerrilla warfare, despite the Soviets not only having the numerical advantage, but also in terms of weaponry and sheer firepower. One can argue that to the Soviets of the 80's, Afghanistan was to them what Vietnam was to the Americans, in that they were forced to pull out entirely due to the enemy having arguably much clearer and better strategy and tactics. I am pretty sure Sun Tzu mentions that one should never fight an enemy on their territory, as it makes it easier for them to set the 'terms' of any battles. Bearing this in mind, the Army needs to think of mobility, such as the Wiesel, and, once upon a time, the Scorpion. Personally, I would love to see the former introduced, and the latter brought back into service with major, but fit for purpose, upgrades. But that may be too sensible, and thus unlikely to happen ... [*= ok, I expect to be flammed for this, but instead of both the Typhoon and the F35, I would have spent that money on:- a) Upgrading the Tornado to F4/5. b) Upgrading the Harrier to AV-9a/b. c) Buy the SAAB JAS Gripen, but ask for a slightly bigger airframe to allow for twin engines, along with the existing twin cockpit variant (call it the Gripen G). d) Buy the A-10 Thunderbolt II, but in the twin cockpit, all-weather, version that was once trialled. c) This will definitly raise some hackles, but I would argue for also adding a few AC-130; keep the 105mm M102 howitzer, but upgrade the L/60 Bofors Cannon to 50mm, and add 2 x 25mm GAU-12/U Equalizer. d) And last but no means least ... Ever since the retirement of the 'V-Force', the RAF has lacked long rang, strategic deep strike, bombing capability and capacity it once had with it. Granted, the Tornado F3 has filled in some of that gap admirably, but still pales against the likes of the B1-b, the B2, and, of course, the venerable B52. Hence, my idea would be to dust off the plans for the TSR-2, and call it the TSR-4. Of course everything besides the airframe (and possibly that too ...) will have to be updated, but since the draw-down of the F111, it would be nice to have an aircraft that fills in the niche it once occupied, and in fact, which was chosen over the TSR-2 ...]

and we all (slovaks and czechs) are really delighted that you try so hard to do the best you can to pronounce those words ;)

Try some Ř :-D

Haha, dear brother, I live in Prague already 6 years and I still can't nail the sound properly. Its really hard:)

I've been to Czechia (that is official name in English now! Hurray! :)) a few times and I actually like the simbolos! It makes it clear and consistent which sound to make for the corresponding letter. Unlike in English where you have to guess unless you grew up with the language, either through Pokemon as I did or through living there.

Actualy it has = unlike german or english pretty clear rules. That is why we dont have things like spelling contests, since we writing directly what we are hearing. exceptions are words originating from diferent languages

Yup. An effect of the Polish boys fantasy. :)

CaptinSnuggles 3 The idea me made me cum

CaptinSnuggles 3 its old, all you need to know.

btw no one can destroy it because it will just heal itself

Its not czech engineering its slovak engineering not every fcking thing in czsk Army is czech fcking engineering

Max Power HAHAHAHHAHAHA!! YES!! Awesome!

ZUUL

hahahahahah,i laughed my ass off

Are you the key master

In Poland is Dana