Dangerous Sushi? Is Seafood Safe To Eat After Fukushima Nuclear Wastewater Release? 

Sorry I wasnt convinced. To be me APLS remains a black box solution. If is that effective, they should share it to other countries their achievements and claim Nobel peace prize. Facility should also be opened to the Chinese, Korean or other interested scientist to investigate and allowing them to verify that the water are safe. To date, Japan says no. So how to regain that trust ?

Treated water CAN be safe, IF TEPCO and Japan government do their job. Problem is, precisely because TEPCO DID NOT DO THEIR JOB in the first place, otherwise we would not be even discussing this now!! Not to mentioned even after the incident, we even found leakage of undiluted water. THEY FAILED TWICE!! The real focus of this video should be on what are the processes in place to make sure water are treated properly. And whether there is a truly independent third party constantly monitoring water safety (eg IAEA being accused of receiving money from Japan). CNA pretend that they are unbiased by only focusing on the ‘scientific’ part of the story. They only briefly mention (or didn’t mention at all) WHAT ARE THE EXACT measures and monitoring process implemented. This, in effect implicitly assumes TEPCO and Japan government will do their job. This is completely unacceptable for a national media. What if TEPCO went broke in five years time and they didn’t have enough money to properly maintain the dilution system. Some Singaporean mother-to-be think the fish is still safe, eat them and give born to a retarded baby. Should CNA be liable to the mother? Is it because Singapore government do not want to test all the fish from Japan, hence this video?

CNA is lying when saying it is used in watches. It has been illegal in Germany and Switzerland since 1998 and tritium use in Japan is also illegal, its use in watches has been phased out due to its danger.

How efficient is ALPS? Has the treated water been analysed and if yes, where is the report? Or are you assuming that once the contaminated water is filtered, all the radioactive elements are successfully removed? Unless the Japanese Government release the report of the filtered contaminated water before it is released into the sea, I will never be convinced. Furthermore, the sea belongs to the entire human race. Japanese Government has no right to subject it to such risk. This is an irreversible process, and in years to come, when something bad happens, it's too late!

I've always giving a thumbs-up for CNA's reporting quality until this episode. The host kept circling around those circumstantial evidences instead of going straight into the root cause of the dispute: the difference between the normal treated nuclear water (which have no direct contact with the radioactive chemicals) and the Fukushima's nuclear plant water that's DIRECTLY CONTACTED WITH THE RADIATIVE TRITIUM. Why couldn't CNA spend a bit more time in figuring this out first and revealing this essential piece of information to the viewers? Whether it's motivated by political or some other factors, they are just the secondary consideration if your episode's subject is to find out whether the sea water filled with the radioactive water where the seafood comes from is safe. What's making your program's quality even worse in this episode is that your point of focus seems to be only relying on those opinions which are highly prone to subjectivity, and on the so-called experts who only spoke their personal opinions without convincible fact base but only citing the already controversy-filled investigation report by the IAEA. Just so you know, the IAEA's report has never made any guarantee or endorsement for the safety of the tested nuclear water if the host or the CNA's program editor had ever read or studied the report yourself before producing this episode. More thorough and in-depth research backed by un-biased scientific evidence which can clearly demonstrate the whole leaking process and its immediate consequence is needed before the host can call for the viewers not to worry. Because essentially you are advocating viewers to buy into your poorly-argued and groundless reporting. CNA, you could have done better than just recklessly and conveniently collecting the 'He said, she said' types of sources to make such uninformed programs.

i bet most ppl think their salmon in their sushi is from Japan, just because Sushi is a Japanese cruisine. they might be surprised to know their "salmon nigiri" sushi has nothing to do with Japan, in some outlets, they use Salmon from Chile or Norway, short grain rice from Australia..

contaminated water dumped by Japan, that's not waste water again. everyone is not clear with the concept

Trust is built on multi-party testing, but Japan only disclosed its own test results and did not adopt Chinese testing agencies. Even so, a recognized third-party testing organization can regulate the quality of discharged water. Unfortunately, over time, Japan has shown significant lapses in existing emissions management, such as frequent instances of manual valves being left open. In the absence of effective oversight, such serious incidents could occur more than once, underscoring Japan's untrustworthiness in this regard.

Why dont we release the water near Singapore coast. I wanna see the reaction of CNA. It is safe. 😅😅😅

Eat the seafood now and see the effects years later!!!

If the so-called treated water is as clean as claimed then why did they not allow verification by independent 3rd party organisation when requested? Did this so-called reporter try some fish raised in this dirty water?

If the water is so clean and even drinkable as Japan has claimed, then how about pouring this "clean" water to your water utility system and let your citizens drink it? BTW: Looks like most western countries are basically silent about this. If the same thing happens on China, how would Japan (and those western countries) react? Western countries accuse China of their "uncontroilled" rocket debris threating lives and damaging environment, but allow Japan to dump radioactive water to the ocean. Double standard!

I got news for you. Food that contains potasium is usually naturally radioactive so bananas, nuts, avocados, potatoes, beans, carrots, red meat, etc. The question is not if the food radioactive/not. Rather question the safety of radioactivity in the food itself.

What she really meant on 4:18, "Countries like the US, UK, and Japan sucks each other off."

It is. So is the air in the place you eat and so are you... Also I recommend avoiding any people around you they are probably also radioactive...

At the end of the day, if it is so safe, why don't these water be poured into the reservoirs in Japan so that Japanese could drink it off as normal water?

CNA getting any financial rewards from Japan doing this?

Now you know why Godzilla is from Japan

These poor people. They're all going to glow in the dark like my watch.

Why isn’t the treated (tritium) water used in industry in lieu of or before releasing directing into the ocean? ei cooling machinery (in manufacturing plants), hydroelectric generation, transportation…

If the water was really safe, Japan should have kept it for their own consumption and usage, or treat it further before using it themselves. The fact that they didnt do so, and chose to release it into the ocean, tells us everything we need to know.

Recently tons of fish found dead. Can you help us to find the details?

The issue is different experts have different opinions as we saw in Covid and as this isn’t something that’s tested or human studies . We can’t accurately say for sure the long term results

Fed up with all comments yelling to use waste water in fields. These guys dont desalinate or use it in agriculture but release all into the ocean

28/12/23 ( Thursday ) 9.53 am. After tons of dead fishes washed up on Pacific side of Hokkaido, 1 month after this digital exclusive was released. CNA insider should have known the answer.

As a Singaporean i dont really care i just eat any food even Japanese food i dont really give a f if its nuclear or not.

if there is no Godzilla, then shld be safe i guess

its easy, why not drink those waters themselves then we see after a year or so if no mutation occurs

Fun facts; Japan import mackerel from Norway for local consumption and export their local catch.

To know if it is…make a trip to Bikini Island Atoll in the south pacific, take samples of sea life and test them for generational Radioactive Exposure post NATO Nuclear bomb testings 50-60!years ago…

Wondering how they know its safe? Did they reach conclusion by putting live squids, fishes, tuna, scallops into treated radioactive water?

I dont think that the water release is safe for ocean.

Fish from Japan.... Horror 🤢🤢🤢

Yes. If your fish comes from China.

CONTAMINATED PART OF TREATED WATER HAS TO GO SOME WHERE.

Tritium is not natural in nature in any large amounts. Tritium is dangerous at genetic levels and creates mutant babies!

A lot of people still travel to japan for holidays tho 🤣 and eating the seafood from japan as well

China 🇨🇳 is alone in this Fukushima protest. - This is not about safety or science, but about hate.

The PM of Japan ate the fish on camera only after they tested it for radiation.

since its deemed to be safe, why channel it out into the sea and not channel it to potable water for its own consumption?

What rubbish! no one knows the long term impact and consequences

if its so safe use it as their own drinking water, swimming pools, and what not. even the Japanese locals are dubious of the govt. all these scientists and experts are not the one that are affected, and can therefore issue irresponsible comments to the rest of the world. i dare these people to stay, eat, drink for the next few decades there. and CNS Insider, you reply on controversial reports for your reporting, seriously ????

In this world of fake news. Singaporean news source is among the few that I can still believe.😢

Who cares if the water is treated or not, where are the missing cores?

I mean...if we tested the fish, and they are normal...and people still complaint about it, then that's their own stupid fault.

I only believe Patrick Martin if Patrick Martin records himself catching a Fukishima fish then eating it immediately. Im pretty sure he wouldnt eat it

Conclusion : Probably safe. . .

You eat you die.

🤣🤣🤣 remember NEVER to trust those promises‼️😒😒😒

Cheaper sushi!

CNA a propaganda medium for Japan ? Simple logic will tell you if it is safe, then use the water for agriculture.

china already ban

Classic PR stunt showing Kishidia and his henchmen eating teishouku. Today's communications landscape has drastically changed. Modern consumers are not 100% susceptible to such stunts. We trust Yoshizawa's version of events than Kishida and TEPCO's "PR" team's. An international Human Rights or Consumers Rights Watch along with "globally sanctioned" presses like Aljazeera News need to test the waters around Fukushima and the results published. This concerns food safety; politicians' voices and powers can be swept aside or under the rug.

If the treated water has negligible impact to environment and human health, just consume within Japan for construction, irrigation and all other water related national activities, why rush to go to the sea? All excuses and scientific analysis from here sounds silly and ridiculous. All the essential points are avoided in the video and some unimportant/unrelated stuff are amplified in the video. Even the reason and the statements that Japan provides is not persuasive and are full of loopholes, but CNA analyses and justify in the video. Japan said they had no money to deal with so-called treated water and soon after which they bought another land again in Brazil. :) There are documentaries interviewing residents in Fukushima, which evidences that Japan government never actually placed any action for protecting the island and whole world from the explosion, and they still claims they had everything in control and even filmed movie to tell a fake story and fake Japan's hero image in the explosion. Anyway, nuclear waster into the sea is not recent news, no even Japan or the country behind Japan did so, developed countries are all in the environment sacrifice from long long ago. Environment risk is yes, human health risk is also yes, trust your common sense. Media is the trumpet belonging to the capital and the power class.

US /Japan bot

China not buy Japan fish.... Smart move

Good reporting job, CNA. I can definitely see Singaporeans rushing for cheap sushi from Japan. Must kiasu.. they dowan eat we eat hor!

Yes, continue to reach out for Japanese produce, feed the kids and eldetly. Perhaps put the young, our future man and woman, who cannot reproduce at, unknown risks. Whose to blame if it was indeed Tritium? 20 yrs would have pass, blame who then? TEPCO? Blame your own decision and greed. Pour the wastewater for the world to share, for they've had their share too in the past.

kosher certified

bahaya sekali makanan jepang

Cna for once have the gut not to follow propaganda blindly. I hv no problem with Japanese seafood

Shame on you CNA. If the water is sooooo SAFE, why release it into the sea? Just use it within the country!!

For the Japan haters out there, if Tritium water released by Japan is a threat, wait till you know about the number of nuclear water waste from China that is 1000x more in volume, but undisclosed information from Chinese government on their treatment. Even France as the current number 1 on nuclear water waste cause no concern in Europe, and they are being transparent

Initially I thought only Japan is doing it. Then I found out other nuclear plants have been doing the same for decades 😅.

G7 countries, including Japan 🇯🇵, are looking for measures to respond collectively to *China's old habit of economic coercion.*

Singapore is getting some kickback from Japan and its American ally now?

it could have been buried underground and forgotten, however, the Janapese corporations would not sacrifice their land and choose to pollute the whole world. The Japanese should demonstrate how safe tritium waste water is by drinking it. So does the CNA reporter

I still eat sushi and fresh yellowtail tuna.😊😊😊😊

CNA pls dont kill Singaporean 🙏

If the ALPS are effective, Japan should be able to use it as source of drinking water. Not to dispose in sea.

Have stop eating any Japanese seafood ever since they release it to the sea.

The question would be why Japan bans advanced semiconductor equipment and materials from export to China ? Japan can't give an straight answer without resorting to vague "national security" blah..blah..blah.. So, China is just returning the favor.....

No point talking on how safe is fish caught off japan seas. Better be safe than sorry. I rather not eat it then later in life suffering from its radioactive found in those fishes. Singapore govt is not going to TEST EVERY FISH IMPORTED FROM JAPAN and therefore if you think it is safe then good luck to you.

Don’t biased la, if concentration low why not japan use the water themselves you didn’t say?

All japanese have to drink that waste water ~~

This is so typically kiasi 🫣