Il pezzo si presta ad essere interpretato in maniera romantica.. Anche a me veniva di suonarlo così , e mi dicevano che era troppo 'Beethoveniano ' bellissimo ma un pò troppo lento l'andante (!)per essere Mozart..Tuttavia l'allegretto è molto bello
сравнила с представленным выше исполнением Гилельса и почувствовала дпугое время, другую мысль и душу. Как прекрасно Денис играет, даже горько немного за такое проникание в суть вещей. Какая ранимвая душа. спасибо ему за все.
Outstanding performance. Much better than the muted way most pianists play it. My only one small thing I would like the intro to be just slightly faster even if its not all out andante. Also, there was something wrong with one of the keys kept sounding muted every time which I would guess was the fault of the piano. Almost sounded creamy on some notes. In any event you can play it far superior to me and so many others
i think its very chopin like. but mozart did not wrote it like that. mozart was a huge bach fan, a fan of beethoven and had some wit and drama from the italians operas. leads to another conclusion than chopin. though trifonov rendered it exquisitly perfect chopinesque :D.
I have played the Fantasia for many, many years. I agree each one has their own interpretation, depending on the mood at that specific time, but I, too, feel his was too slow in areas it should have been faster and too fast in areas not appropriate.
Hi Dolores, hope you have a great time playing it, I'm sure you do! I wonder how you feel about watch?v=t7J7TcFk40Q, which he played 2 years after this cideo was shot. Even slower, and to me, a much more impressive performance than this vid.
Lynn Hamilton Your mistake is: it´s not about me or Trifonov - it´s about Mozart! What do you think why Mozart wrote "Andante" (= going) and Alla breve (=count in halves)? Hm? However the "Allegretto" is good. ...and BTW: I play fairly well ...
mp You say you play fairly well, but do you always play the same music the same way? Do you always wear the same clothes and shoes, eat the same food? Perhaps in the future Trifonov will play this piece more according to your taste. But don't hang by your eyelashes.:-)
Lynn Hamilton Hi, when playing a piece I try to come as close as possible to the intentions of the composer - and one of the 1st things is to note the indicated tempo designation. Mozart let enough space between the notes for all of us to find an individual interpretation, but simply neglecting an important indication is - well, the wrong access. Or would you play as 2nd triplet f sharp - thinking it´s better that way? BTW: have you ever thought about the tempo relation between the Andante and the Adagio?
Maria Yudina plays Mozart Fantasia in D minor K397 (imho one of the best) - for comparison ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ULmji3DMukQ.html
I did not like watching his performance because he had too much expression on his whole body. But I listened to this music while looking at sheet music, it made me almost cry. Now I like to see how he played this music. How did you do it, Daniil !!
One of my most favorite pieces. I used to study it at the most distressful part of my life, and it helped me to survive. Genious piece, and Genious interpretation. Thanks!
Simply the best version I have ever heard. Wonderful! He gets the pace perfect, the emotion is sublime and the playing is simply stunning! Daniil is the best!
Спасибо!!!!Изысканное ,великолепное исполнение и великий труд!!!! Послала своим студентам как лучшее исполнение Моцарта. Спасибо Даниил!Это наслаждение!
Se puede sentir las las lágrimas de Mozart al componer esta pieza tan sentimental y de dolor profundo por un amor imposible y el que la interpreta es un pianista de 1ra🥲🤧
Here we see Mozart being a lot more free-form at the piano, and adhering less to the rigid Viennese classical style. It sounds very much like light Beethoven, and at times one can even hear Chopin.
There is just something about this piece. I'm kind of obsessed with it. So many great interpretations, this being one of them. All giving a slightly different take. I've been playing the piece on a near daily basis for a few months now. It's fairly straight forward to play physically. Endlessly complex to work out and execute exactly HOW to play and WHY to play. Genius.
I think he plays it well, I like the rhythm he's got all the way through. There's a Chopin-esque feel to the way he is playing it. There are some versions where the pianist uses less pedal, but I only like one or two of them. I think its more pleasing on the ear with more pedal, but without it, it kind of intensifies the piece making it exude an eerie feel. Adding more pedal makes it feel more romantic. When I play this piece, I use more pedal but that's only because I'm hiding behind it to make it sound better, as I find it really difficult to play it well without the pedal.
The tempo played in this Fantasia is rather slow in some phrases. Yet, the melody is so delightful, it has that pure texture, tone and enrichment of resonance. Relaxing and enjoyable performance.
+Harrison Richter It's how people perceive it. Some like it slow, others like it fast or maybe some like to add fast or slow parts in the music because they think its how the music should be played.
Yes, but they don't make up these decisions based on just ear alone. It's also based on markings in the score, for ideas the composers wanted to convey. And the varied tempo marks definitely communicate something other than how he plays it; he plays it well, to be clear, but it's a little too romantic.
@@harrisonrichter9414 hey, he is an artist, he does his Art, you can't tell him how to play it, the only who could perhaps do that Is in this case Mozart and he is dead. In any case i don't think even Mozart would like everyone to play the same way. Interpretation is an art in itself, it's not a servant of composition.
First, Mozart’s compositions are difficult because you are exposed; there’s no way to hide if you make a technical or stylistic mistake. Also many of Mozart’s work are deceptively difficult as far as interpretation, only a true artist can bring out the purity and genius of Mozart. A respected piano teacher once said something like this, “You have to be a child or if you’re grown to be young at heart to play Mozart.”
The most dramatic thing about this piece is the runs. This song is played perfectly. I learned it too fast, as did almost everyone I knew who could play it. The beauty of it is the slow, exacting music punctuated with the incredible runs.
Fantsia by its very name means to play it as a fantasy. Slow when you like, speed up when you like etc . At least that is what Professor Emile Philippe told me at the guildhall School of Music in 1961 when he taught me this piece.
I'm sorry, but just too damn slow. I kind of play it in a comedic fashion however... because its fun that way, and people tend to love it. In my opinion, it helps to give classical some "life" to it :P.
Barely recognizable. The tempo sounds like he is a novice and his teacher told him to play it slow until he can learn it. Most of the scholar/performers I know play this twice as fast. Mozart Wrote for Fortepiano, which does not have the sustain to pull this off.
The tempo only sounds like he's a novice because most professional pianists are anemic to slower tempos of children's recital pieces. Trifonov can give it a tempo that fits the music and not his ego.
