If the whole world would watch this interview .. don't think Israel would last another year. Applied sovereignty? You can't annex something thats yours? Biblical evidence as international law? I'm lost for words
Will try again! The borders of Israel are defined in a number of international treaties the most relevant of which are the League of Nations treaty of July 24th 1922. ( includes the San Remo resolution April 25th 1920) and further rectified and endorsed by the treaty of Sevres section V11 article 95, which was inserted into the Mandate of Palestine ( a region! that includes Southern Syria and Jordan) and the treaty of Lausanne on July 24th 1923. The USA not being a member nation of the League of Nations at the time, codified all this into US law in the Anglo-American convention of December 3rd 1924. The UN in its charter ( specifically Article 80) was legally obligated to continue where the League of Nations treaty finished. Estoppel and acquired rights cannot be taken away from a Nation which has been given, and Estoppel cannot allow any giving Nation the right to take away what has been given under international law. Article 42 of the Hague Convention on October 18th 1907 representing the customs and laws of war states... land is considered occupied when placed under the authority of the hostile army and the occupation extends only to the territory where such authority has been established and exercised. The paradox is that the current Israeli settlers are the legal occupents and the Palestinian Arabs are the illegal settlers as a direct consequence of Trans Jordan's occupation. Breaking the Geneva convention does not apply to the government of Israel ,but to Trans Jordan's occupation and its cohorts and the 5 Arab countries that simultaneously ethnically cleansed their Jewish civilians....a bit unpalatable for those who attempt to make a legal case for Palestinian Arab claims to territory, as under international law no such claims exist.
Stephen sackur is a very veteran journalist, I respect all his Frank, transparency in his talk, accurate information and he isn't biased towards any with his guests.
Israel cannot be divided, it belongs to the Israelites, and Jerusalem is the ETERNAL Capital of Israel. Public opinion does not matter. The Word of God came before any other so called 'Law'
God does not exist! Old Testament is an unreliable source. Super natural does not exist. Moses existence is 100% questionable. Talk about tangible evidence...
@Karl Dubhe maybe god exist or maybe not, but if any land belongs to someone is definitely the lend of judea and israel for the Jewish people and not for arab tribes from Arabia!!!
The borders of Israel are defined in a number of international treaties the most relevant of which are the League of Nations treaty of July 24th 1922 ( includes the San Remo resolution April 25th 1920) and further rectified and endorsed by the treaty of Sevres section V11 article 95, which was inserted into the Mandate of Palestine ( a region that! includes Southern Syria and Jordan) and the treaty of Lausanne on July 24th 1923. The USA not being a member nation of the League of Nations at the time, codified all this into US law in the Anglo-American convention of December 3rd 1924. The UN in its charter ( specifically Article 80.) Was legally obligated to continue where the League of Nations finished. Estoppel and acquired rights cannot be taken away from a Nation what has been given and Estoppel cannot allow any giving Nation the right to take away what has been given under international law. The legal borders of the State of Israel include the geographical areas currently called the West Bank and Gaza too. These territories were illegally conquered and occupied by Trans Jordan and its cohorts from 1948 to June 1967 ( during which time no offer to establish an independent state of Palestine, a region! Was offered to the Jordanian residents, nor was it asked for. ) the territory had been unlawfully annexed and the former Jewish residents had been ethnically cleansed. Article 42 of the Hague Convention on October 18th 1907 representing the customs and laws of war, states...Land is considered occupied when placed under the authority of the hostile army and the occupation extends only to the territory where such authority has been established and can be exercised . The paradox is that the current Israeli settlers are the legal occupents and the Palestinian Arabs are the illegal settlers as a direct consequence of Trans Jordan's occupation and its cohorts. Breaking the Geneva convention does not apply to the government of Israel, but to Trans Jordan's occupation and its cohorts. Breaking the Geneva convention does not apply to the government of Israel, but to Trans Jordan's occupation and the 5 Arab countries that simultaneously ethnically cleansed their Jewish civilians...a bit unpalatable for those who attempt to make a legal case for Palestinian Arab claims to territory, as under international law no such claims exist...so, ??????
These interviews are all the same. Will Hardtalk get Hamas on their program and ask some questions? When I search RU-vid, the last Hamas interview was 8 years ago.
Jew hater hiding behind his Arabic language. This is what he is saying, "How can a thief recognize and defend his crime? Zionists are murderers and criminals".
The myth that there once was a people, the Palestinian people, who were the indigenous people living happily on their own land for thousands of years, is just that: a myth. They are not the indigenous people. Most of the current Palestinians descend from people who immigrated into the area since 1880, people who considered themselves members of different tribes, people who regarded themselves as ethnically Arabs and who identified themselves as members of the larger Arab nation and its culture. They did not say they were Palestinians, nor think of themselves as a nationality till many years later, starting in the mid-1960s. The leader of the Palestinian Liberation Organization, Yasser Arafat, was born in Egypt, like many other Palestinians of his generation.Countries are for real nationalities with a real history: not for those like the Palestinians who have no history. Not to be harsh, but it is a fact that the people who call themselves Palestinians now did not call themselves Palestinians a century ago. Mark Twain described the land as desolate: “There is not a solitary village throughout its whole extent (valley of Jezreel, Galilea); not for thirty miles in either direction… One may ride ten miles hereabouts and not see ten human beings. For the sort of solitude to make one dreary, come to Galilee… Nazareth is forlorn… Jericho lies a mouldering ruin… Bethlehem and Bethany, in their poverty and humiliation… untenanted by any living creature. - Mark Twain, “The Innocents Abroad”, 1867
By that logic Ben Gurion is a Russian. Also, did you forget the crusades happening?? Are you seriously telling me that Arabs have only been in the levant since the late 19th century? No Palestinian nationality until the 60s? Then what do you think the Great Revolt of the 1930s was about? Are you seriously confusing the emigration of chechens and circassians by the ottomans into the levant with the current population of Palestine? maybe you could make that case for Jordan because before that it was basically only a couple of bedouins but definitely not the levant, and in that quote describes how the people who were there were extremely impoverished which if you know anything about the Ottoman empire at the time you would know that it comes from a time when the ottoman empire was in steep decline which was also a factor that would eventually lead to the great arab revolt of 1916-1918, actually go know the actual facts.
@Karl Dubhe More than 50% of the world's population are adherents of Christianity or Islam which both stem from Judaism that evolved in that part of the world.
