So asked the petition which over 100,000 signed, but which the government said it would disregard and not debate. (It's still current and people are still signing it.)
Money control by mindset greed can continue as required by the WEF. + WHO United. NewPandemics new weapons by Gain of Purpose of Nature Zoo genic barrier gene break in . Think on.
We the people have never been asked, the same dismisive behaviour towards the people who pay their wages whenflooding our country with people we do not need or want.
If you still think they give a toss about what we want you don't understand Westminster'utter disdain for us. We're being replaced for a reason wakey wakey
@@iagree5313 thats the question and yhats the difference. The masses are looking for a leader and if one appears there will be hell on earth for the so called elites. Once the public start in earnest it will be game over and they know it.
your right, but voting doesn't seem to make much difference, they get into power then hey just follow WEF directives, REFORM seem to be our only option now!
@@davidanderson7138everyone needs to just vote reform or a strong independent candidate. Voting red or blue is a vote for unelected globalist institutions like the UN the WHO and the world economic forum. Its just the same as turkeys voting for Xmas.
The people have the power and not the governments! They choose to ignore this fact, time they had a very sharp reminder that they are servants not masters They DO NOT decide anything for us, we do.
We don't want to have anything to do with this corrupt who. We cannot trust this government . How they lied about covid. Listen to the people for once. We are keeping an eye on you all.
We can! No one can stop us. They can sign as many bits of paper as they like, my signature is not on it therefore it does not have any power over me or you, the signatories are the only people that are legally bound by it!
This shouldn't even be up for discussion. It's a straight NO. Give ANY power to the WHO or UN that puts our government subservient to them, then you immediately have the embryo of a one world government. That embryo will rapid grow and given digital IDs and CBDCs everything we have known until now will be ancient history.
In other words ''We the government will decide to order lockdowns when the WHO tells us to''. And who decides what constitutes ''national interest'' when our MPs don't believe in debate or scrutiny of such important things? Easier just to wave them through, isn't it?
@@chillsterdlux I agree with you 100%, I have done nothing told by anyone ever, well school was a debate, the power's that were in westmonster they won't do it cos they have then lost the power they think they have, its quite funny really.
Is this an example of " ministerial lip service " ??? There should be no ratification on any treaty that involves any loss of sovereignty to the UK . A referendum should be put in place in any instance involving such a treaty .
Surely it should be up to the citizens of this country to tell the government (who work for us!) what we want and not be dictated to by the government.
Can we trust the government and civil services? No! WE the people should be asked what WE accept when it come to the safety, security and or sovereignty of the UK and NOT the government without our consent!
A national referendum should be put to the people of the UK to see if the people want to give away anything more to the WHO. Im pretty sure thr mass majority would like to at least keep the status quo, if not leave the WHO
The WHO treaty should not even be discussed. It is overreach by the WHO and we do not want any part of it. If any agreement is signed they can incrementally change rules to tiptoe to the powers they want. Throw the treaty out.
The only statement I want to hear is, We Are Out. I do not believe a word coming out of this minister's gob. Ha ha another mistake use of the word effective, you missed the word SAFE. Telling
350 detached ministers cannot make decisions for 70m people. When will they realise they are the minority and we are the majority. This needs voting on by the public before anything passes.
Have you a link for it.. I know farage has jumped on the bandwagon at the last minute and was going to organize one.. I think I'd trust Andrew bridgen a little more as he's been the one constant voice in a Bill SATAN GATES controlled WEFminster. !!
Was right to challenge but it was the wrong challenge. Why do we need to be associated with the UN WHO at all. Why do we need a non doctor from a third world country telling us anything about our health. This is another conservative give away of our country. My god, you really are set on ruining this country
A British red line...mmm we've experienced that line. How about a British PEOPLEs' red line, as opposed to politicians who have no regard or interest in the 'national interest' or the people at all. Leave the WHO, the WEF, the UN and all the other letter people.
@@user-gs6zr7vp9u 'Red line' is English for a line you do not cross, and as I said, we have experienced their 'red line' -it is a line of hypocrisy. No, he doesn't mean read line :D
The people are sovereign not parliament, stop signing away our rights. Any politician allowing this to happen is complicit in overriding our rights when we all know it’s about control regardless of the amendments. Who voted the WHO in to make decisions affecting the people of this country? Not me
We shouldn’t be signing any more of our Sovereignty away, have we not learnt our lesson from the problems we’re having now with immigration and the ECHR?!!
They should NOT be signing up to this under any circumstances! The health of each individual is their own private business and none of the governments, far less the WHO!!! There is nothing to 'debate' the answer is a very loud and clear resounding NO!! We the people DO NOT consent and we DO NOT want it end of discussion!
I would not like the MPs to sign any treaty with the WHO As the orginisation lacks trust and transparency ,Q ..Who funds this orginisation is a very important question that should be asked …
Well done, Mr Kruger. Keep up the battle. Every time you make a Minister respond you make it more difficult for them to slide through this appalling agreement, against the will of the majority in the House, and against the public will.
Thank you Danny Kruger and Andrew Bridgen, may you regain your MP seats on 4 July. You both speak uncomfortable truth to Parliament. It will be interesting to see if any MP speaks FOR the W.H.O. at any point in Parliament before it closes for the 6 week election nightmare.
Some very vague and non-committal answers from the minister there. What he doesn't say is perhaps far more telling than what he does. And I don't recall anyone ever suggesting that "20% of vaccines should be given away" (as he rightly refutes) but rather that "10% of vaccines should be given away and 10% of vaccines should be sold at an affordable price" (whatever that means). Was that a deliberate error on the minister's part, or does he simply not know what he's talking about? Thank you Danny Kruger for all the great work you are doing to bring attention to these vital issues, despite the government's apparent reluctance to be open about them.
