Darrell Brooks accuses juror of flipping him off, is removed from courtroom again 

You mean "Local Youth"

yeah well this " child " needs to be put in time out.

obnoxious child

ACTUALLY, I'm beyond fed up with this judge for arguing back and forth with this child. She doesn't seem mature enough to shut him down

Tbh they don’t like it when any citizen defends themselves in court

Definitely not helping his case. He thinks he’s intelligent but what his actions shows, he’s nothing but a clown.

This is part of the whole SovCit shtick. They talk about rights and laws but don't feel that they should be held BY them. "Rules are for thee, not for me."

@@Hunee- he's not trying to help the case he's currently in. He's trying to help a future appeal or mistrial case. He's got nothing to lose so he's going to do everything in his power to crack the judge and get a mistrial. Hopefully she stays strong and doesn't fall for this nonsense he deserves nothing. He's a terrorist who carried out a racially-motivated attack, trying to kill as many white people as he could.

Constitution is based on Sovereign rights.

@@Kalamain Laws are just opinions backed by guns.

She’s literally too patient w him. He’s making a mockery of this case. The poor victims and families that have to go through this bs

Goodness, She must wake up every morning and take 2 Tylenol having to deal with this entitled Jack A$$

@@claudiad7864 I think that’s tactical - it absolutely does suck, but this judge isn’t leaving any wiggle room for an appeal. End of the day, with a guy like this, the prosecution was really smart to keep the murder victims families out of the courtroom and utilise other witnesses so that those family members don’t have to face him

I completely agree.

you got that right she's very patient cuz if that was Judge Judy does Judy would have been through him out

Exactly...flip him off A MILLION TIMES...doesn't even compare to what he did..

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 YESSSSS

With a big hug and a bow. Lol

Indeed!!!

I wish I could do more than flip this idiot off. He's a disgusting POS.

LMAO! 🤣😂

@Edith lmao. He is a nut case. Excuse me he is one very snotty nutcase I can see he has a quick fiery temper I can’t stand him my god the judge has a lot of tolerance and has the patience of JOB ( in the bible )

He definitely has arrested maturity

My 4 year old absolutely comprehends and will listen when it’s explained 😂

Welcome to the netherworld that is the wannabe "sovereign citizen".

But he says he’s a sovereign citizen and the law doesn’t apply to him, but then cites why he can’t use the law in his favor. 🤯🤯🤯

If you seen his past offenses you would see why he thinks this. It was ridiculous.

Well it kunduh does..

Now that’s a horrific thought

Do not put up with him

I would need a years vacation after this

I never even thought about the stenographer! 😱

Stenographer types-"for the record..." 10000 times

Who’s that?

“For the record” will be one stroke in most stenographic systems used in court.

I can already see him asking his cell-mates whether they are making “judicial determinations” about him and telling them that he “doesn’t consent to the rules of qurom” for years on end 😂😂😂

@@steveg9302 hahaha

He’s probably going out (feet-first) much sooner than that.

Why he represented himself?is it because no lawyer want to represent him or he just didn't want to?hahaha

@@God0fGambler he's a sovcit. He downloaded a sovereign citizen script that he thinks supercedes actual law....and decided that that was a smarter move than a real lawyer that knows the law. In other words...he's stupid. It's like every day he learned a new word or pseudo legal term and would overuse it incorrectly that whole day...of course he's too stupid to figure out that didn't work.

That's EXACTLY what she's doing!

TRULY

I truly wonder would his behavior change if the judge was a man.

I want to bitch slap him with the Buick!

​@@ebonih7138 I wondered the same thing. Also wondered if a Male judge could keep his cool as well as a Lady judge. It's so interesting lol

Not really...theyre fumbling around themselves...if you cant outsmart an idiot like him, then we got extra problems.

It’s ok he’ll probably get his ass kicked in jail.

People throw the term narcissist around too much.

@@nellatl Not in this case. He is, indeed, a classic example.

@@pfdrtom Right

Imagine him working with a clinician. He has mental health diagnosis I’m sure.

@@83janell It drives me crazy watching this fool.The judge is a Saint cause I would have already lost my license to be a judge

If you can get answers from him without arguments

Like insane!!!!!!

That's why im watching it. I'm like... Man be really is in his own world.

He thought he was smarter than everybody around him.

As Sovereign, his interpretation of the law is to be honored. Uses the Constitution to push his way through life. He changed legal documents to suit his own agenda. Edited legal documents. Claimed those were legally binding contracts with Judge Dorow. If she doesn't honor the contracts, he threatens to file civil law suits again her. Disclaimer on each page of those pages stated no editing can be done nor will any editing be acknowledged.

That's because he would not be able to sit quiet

A true definition of a narcissist!!!!!

But she is allowing him to control this hearing.

@@carolwebb7655 No. She is doing her very best to avoid any grounds for appeal. This man is twisting and turning at every point to try and disrupt the process. She is not giving him what he wants.

@@HS-ie8tj ^^^ Absolutely true

Looked to me like he was in fact controlling the whole situation up until just before the video ended. Just my opinion

Shes a better woman than i i would have flipped tf out already

yuck . she’s biased and rude asf . she acts as if she’s doing him a favor “ courtesy “ no he has rights , i’m ok with convictions however the way she’s going about it is disgusting

@@badazzbarbiePOV honey, do you even know the definition of “rude”? Your comment says no.

@@badazzbarbiePOV You either don’t have a clue about what rude means honey, or you’ve only watched this discrete segment of the entire proceedings. If you watched everything from the Pretrial hearings in the last week of September when he demanded to represent himself, you would see that she is still being INCREDIBLY patient with him & is being considerate to him far beyond what he deserves. HE is the one constantly interrupting her, ignoring her, being rude, arrogant, obnoxious & obstructive. He is refusing to behave like a decent person MUST behave in a court of law & is not showing her ANY respect as the Judge which he MUST do under the court rules. No one should behave like he is in court.

@@badazzbarbiePOV And if you had watched the Pretrial hearings, or had a clue about criminal law, you would know that she IS doing him a favour by allowing him to ask these questions. He demanded he be allowed to represent himself under the CLEAR understanding that he would be treated like any other attorney & she would not explain the law to him & would not give him legal advice. THAT is what he is asking for in these filings & with his rude whining. She could have cut him off at his first interruption, held him in contempt & she is LEGALLY allowed to have him literally bound & gagged during the trial or removed all together. None of which she has done despite his repeatedly disgusting behaviour & ridiculous attempts to impose SovCitiot gobbledygook on the court, none of which has any legal basis nor standing. He put in his filings. She ruled. That should be the end of the matter. If there’s any bias, it is to assist him as much as possible within the confines of the law, and to placate him as much as possible, so he has no possible grounds for an appeal with merit.

Don't let him get under your skin. He WANTS to get under everyone's skin! Just laugh it off and smile about the fact that this piece of human garbage will die alone in a cage.

It's literally that one line from Epic Rap Battles Philosophers by Confucious: "Your ego's just so distracting; free speech doesn't mean you just keep yapping."

Exactly its sad but this is how these type of people due. It's sad.

He is trying to get her to mess up so that he can get a mistrial. You can't try a person for murder twice.

@@Personincrowd A mistrial can mean he gets a new trial.

She does have patience but honestly she needs to shut him down. I wish the Kyle Rittenhouse judge was there to shut him up

@@Personincrowd ….you can try a person again after a mistrial….and if that’s a mistrial or hung jury you can try them again..it depends whether the prosecution want to persevere. In the U.K. I’ve not known a prosecution go past a third trial

I guarantee she didn’t expect this shit!!!!

@@chinadoll534 No kidding!! It's ridiculous. I hate that attention is on his antics and not the victims. I can't imagine what the families are going through.

And if you live in Wisconsin, you're paying for this circus side-show, which stands to go on for some time to come.

@@deebennett7912 I can’t imagine either

Oh please

My thoughts exactly

she played him like the fiddle he is. give a man enough rope..... and you know.

Its unfathomable.

crazy, right?

He asks what is the law, doesn't he? Maritime law courts are different than honorable common law courts ( of yesteryear) ? Maxims of equity need apply.... Look into history of why judge "honored", perhaps? Rabbit hole.....

I'd be pissed every time the judge would keep responding to nonsense and prolonging the useless banter.

Thank God for the ability to record it all. I imagine she spends hours going through it to make a proper record!!!

I think I would have thrown my hands up and walked out!

she has arthritis now!!👏👏🥇❤️

I also see this Judge documenting more than enough for appeal court to prepare and defend her courtroom😮

He will get 6 life sentences without the possibility of parole. 🤣 there is no way he doesnt get life without parole because if he doesn't the towns people will burn the court house down.lol

He is a disgrace to his race. Makes us dislike them all the more.

@@tundralife5570 I hear you but no DP in Wisconsin. I still think life in prison is worse then the DP. He will be in misery everyday locked away and not being able to do what he wants to do.

@@TimesUp777 I understand and that’s unfortunate. I am a believer that to understand and help prevent future assaults,murder or terroristic acts an individual should be made to understand that pain they inflicted on innocent people. They don’t fear jail time as much as they would fear real punishment that mirrored the pain in which they caused. For the record, thus would apply to all races, religions and even my own family. If you go beyond to cause others unjust harm then you should pay the price. We do that and word travels fast.

@@tundralife5570 I know what you are saying. In my opinion all murders, sex offenders, pedophiles, and those kinds of people should be tortured everyday in prison! It will never happen in the USA but if they did it I get crime would go down drastically.

I have a friend learning this profession and it's insane

Oh man I didn’t even think of that

I didn’t think about that. They probably walked off the job.

I know! I was thinking the same thing. How do you think she types it when they're both talking?

lmaooooooooooooooooooooooo hahaha i didnt even think of that hahahaha

Nope. He's just slightly delaying the inevitable. This won't reduce the time he spends in jail at all which will be life, in fact it will only increase the severity of his sentence as the sentencing judge has significant latitude in personal discretion when it comes to not only the term abut also the location of his incarceration. He's utterly f--ked, he's going to do the hardest of hard time, as soon as he enters gen-pop he'll be living on borrowed time because he killed children.

Smfh he is one sick individual… I wouldn’t be able to compose myself dealing with him 😢

Would it be fair to say that the justice system is a joke and deserves this type of mockery?

SMH exactly

Outlaw- This isn’t about what the justice system deserves. This is about what the 60+ victims in this case deserve. They deserve justice.

And that's exactly why he chose to represent himself. It's like a playground for him.

@@Catsenui a means for control. Absolutely agree.

I wouldn’t last 5 minutes! I would lose my patience, my calm and my job. I would punch him in the face. I hate him for bringing the worst in me. Why do I watch him? It’s like self harming! And yet, I don’t seem to be able to ignore a YT notification whenever his name appears on it. I know if I click on the link, my lovely, relaxing evening will turn into a sickly, depressing, revolting session. I get nothing from watching that man but a fat dose of negative energy. But here I am.

@@annahenry3025 I agree!

He has no control. If you mocked his 'music', he would have had a tantrum thus showing his true self. He kept showing his true self as the judged treated him like a child.

Her job wasn't to school him her job was to be a FAIR & IMPARTIAL JUDGE. She was more a tutor than a judge

Tbh: I don’t think it’s fair she’s schooling him in law lol

He thinks he can argue his way out of this.

Narcissists are used to getting their way after exhausting reasonable people around them. They believe everyone who cedes to them by exhaustion are stupid. Hence their feeling of superior intelligence, and audacity in believing they can self-represent in court/that an entire Law School education is owed to them to achieve it.

He's a narcissistic, psychopath with Defiant Disorder ... not just a criminal.

He’s a narcissist. And I know that word is overused these days, but it definitely seems 100% true for this dude

actually he’s correct . he has rights sorry

😁😁 He's a genius... like Kanye

Lol I wanted to say the same thing. It seems like all Sovereign Citizens think that the rules don't apply to them but that they are still protected by the same laws and constitutional rights they try to reject. It's a "Rules don't apply to me but they apply to you" situation. I also think he's not utilizing the law library at all in jail because if he had, he'd understand what a motion is and that he's representing himself "Pro Se" not "Pro per" (whatever that is) I remember when he said he was representing himself and when he said "Pro per" the judge corrected him and yet he still says it. That tells me he thinks he's smarter than a woman with a decade plus of education and experience as a criminal defense lawyer and criminal court judge. Plus him saying she's violating his First Amendment rights when he obviously doesn't get that just because he has the First Amendment right to free speech doesn't mean there aren't laws and rules of decorum for court proceedings that supercede certain rights. He can't enter random evidence and say whatever he wants without consequences. Freedom of speech doesn't protect you from the consequences of your words and he's not getting that. This man is convinced he's the smartest man in the room! 🤣 Honestly I wish Michigan had the death penalty. Money is going to keep him in protective custody when he should be sitting on death row. They can't put him in Gen pop because he killed a kid, is a sex offender, and he's a high profile inmate.

🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣💀💀💀💀

@@NicciStarzz well said 🙏

@@tvs9978 Or a genius like Joe Biden 😅😅

Are you going to spank him?

He is a perpetual victim and oppressed. Therefore he has a right as per righteous indignation to do what ever he wants. Even if it's murder. Just ask a typical lefty or BLM.

@@CumTruckWithMe and Alice: Get him hard.

Never relax around these animals.

Facts

👋🏾😂

I don’t think I’d even watch. I think I’d just go to sentencing.

I said the same thing. The families in the courtroom must be so angry to have attention on this clown.

That’s all I’m thinking about. Imagine your 8 year old was killed by this pos and he’s playing sovereign citizen games in court. I would lose my effing mind. What a hunk of shit.

Sad

@@deebennett7912 no

Client*

He said nothing wrong. You all give the court WAY too much power because you all think the world and law is black and white when it is NOT. It’s all up for interpretation and when did the constitution mean less than court procedures?

Both

Lawyers are garbage what would it matter

I represent myself thus year 3yr felony battery again a white miami dade cop..I won force the state to drop all charges

If she gives him a little wiggle room it will look better come appeal time. He won't be able to cry racism. The appellate court will see he was giving every opportunity.

THE CONSTITUTION TRUMPS ALL COURT PROCEDURES. THE GUY EVERYONE IS CALLING STUPID IS THE ONLY ONE WHO UNDERSTANDS HIS ACTUAL POWER IN THAT ROOM. HER COURT DOESNT MEAN A DMAN THING TO THE CONSTITUTION!

No she is bending over backwards so that he has zero chance of appeal.

@@snowangel1066 Sovereign citizen here! We got a sovereign citizen here! See, nobody cares.

@@koriko88 good cause yall are jokes... How do yall want to be afforded everything, yet don't want to follow any damn rules of the law? Sovereign citizens are full of ish and a joke...

It's our "justice system" that allowed him to be out. 😕

@@msdarby515 It's the people not the system, they don't stick to the guidelines.

The justice system is light on violent criminals.

@@Scorpio-tn4vy Well, when I reference our justice system I'm also referring to the people within it that create the chaos. The DAs who have released violent criminals with no bail, the system that thinks it's okay to release violent offenders to make room for people convicted of marijuana. It's stupid.

Blue state?

Just put it out of its misery

No grown up people has the right to shut up a person no matter where they are

You are absolutely correct. That thing is an it.

@@trukngal yes they do. Once you’re a criminal, your rights are over

LOL "IT" is the PERFECT name for this clown lol this mad me chuckle lol... I can barely stand this guy. He is an embarrassment

Same so much stress but I keep watching ! What is wrong with me

Same here. It's like a train wreck...I can't look away lol.

One of the people commenting on You Tube told me how to speed up whatever is being said. I am not very adept with computers and this was one of the best things I ever learned. I set the Darryl Brooks BS to 1.75 and put on closed captioning. You can still tell what he is saying but it makes listening much less painful. 🙃

Ikr!! I feel my anger blowing up and I’m not even the judge here 😭

*is

I know this is heartbreaking for the Families who have lost their loved ones in such a senseless manner. His disrespect for the legal process is sickening.

No. Mistrial has nothing to do with this A mistrial is very difficult to acquire. This is ridiculous and a disgrace to the victims and families. She’s doing this for her own selfish ego.

@@taniele84 if it were about her ego she would be flexing, not giving him chances.

That makes more sense I was wondering y she was being very coy with him

@@benf6822 Not all ego induced behaviors exhibit typical“flexing” She’s putting justice at risk here. She’s in fact causing for more probable grounds for a mistrial than she is any ridiculous notion of attempting thwart future appeals. He has more grounds for a mistrial with her allowing this circus to continue and allowing him to destroy his image and his social representation in front of the jury as well as by allowing him to delay the trial like he is. That sure sounds like ego to me. I assume her motivation is the attention and the popularity that media sensation trials like this has become tend to gain, in addition to the popularity, fame and attention the judges on those cases tend to gain as well. Do not assume that because she is a judge she is beyond that. You’d be appalled to know the monstrosities committed by judges over the years in regards to a thirst for media attention and fame. They are literally politicians in robes. Having a case as big as this and gaining this reputation as being so merciful and so saintly with the defendant could easily become her future cape. It could also easily become her future match, the match that strikes to the fuel she’s pouring on by continuing this charade. If I’m a teacher and I allow a student to disrupt class every single day, (which, if you’ve been watching since day one you will see this has been an every single day occurrence, even on zoom, she’s had to mute him, and she took way too long to do that ) , and every single day I spent 99% of the classroom time allowing a student to argue with me, disrupt my class, and disrupt my lesson-- am I at fault at the end of the day when the student fails or is the student? I AM. Because I’m the teacher, I am in charge of the classroom and I’m _choosing_ to entertain the repeated disruption and the interruptions of the lessons so as to go back and forth all day with the student verses exhibiting my powers and my duties as the teacher and pulling the student from the class for their own benefit and acquiring a means of teaching for them that allows them to get through the lesson and also respects the rest of the students in the class. The student is not to blame in that case- while they would be at fault for their own behavior, it is not their fault that they were allowed to behave that way throughout the life of the lesson - or attempt thereof. Any judge worth their weight would be ashamed of this circus and her leniency. The repeated claims that this is about preventing any appeal are just people repeating what they saw trending during the Depp vs Heard case. Big difference, btw, between those proceedings and that process verses here. This is not about future appeals. And you, as a judge, are not supposed to base the handling of your current case on future “what if’s” regarding appeals. That’s not justice. That lowers the ability to remain present, fair and balanced. If that is the case than it is only further proof she was given that robe way too soon. But it’s not the case. Appeals are difficult to acquire with the exception of death penalty sentences. A mistrial is my fear. And she is doing more to HELP him gain a mistrial than she is to prevent one. I would never have thought a mistrial possible if not for her ridiculously unprofessional handling of this trial.

@@taniele84 she's not putting justice at risk, she's ensuring it. If she let her temper get the better of her or even introduced for a moment impartiality she introduces doubt to the jury. By allowing him enough rope to hang himself, and he is definitely doing that, she's avoiding trouble. Plenty of judges have gotten in trouble for being to quick to call contempt or be too harsh on those representing themselves (even though they're idiots and deserve it) It's not about appeals, it's about the jury. He's allowed to represent himself and he absolutely has a right to speak. Even though he's saying stupid shit, it's his right to defend himself and if for a second the jury thinks that's being taken from him, that's trouble.

Wait till he gets in prison and they find out he killed children!!

Yes ...judges are not allowed to practice law from the bench

@Anita Martini judges are not allowed to practice law from the bench.........

Same thing I've been saying. This is a joke!

Hang em all

Michelle and Barack Obama must be proud.

@@beckydoesit9331 Doubt that. You're pride and privilege of this corrupt government makes you a 🐑.

This judge is just being too patient. This man is an idiot!!!

I agree This has gone on too long this is a circus now

She's scared to be called a racist.

@@kambasiartre6187 I think your right. The dude in another video took his shirt off and she still didn’t bust his ass. He is having fun playing with her.

@@ARTWV untrue she knows he is right. Court procedures DO NOT TRUMP THE CONSTITUTION…

@@lilygatschenberger8811 that’s for damn sure. It’s ridiculous. Put his ass in cuffs and shackles and see if he is still playing.

And cops that want to break him off!! I hope they drop his food!!

For what putting BLACK men in jail

Wish she was the judge in the Nikolas Cruz case

@@daybyday0731 why ????

@@thankful316 yes for putting a black criminal in jail. Does this BOTHER you?

@@thankful316 Black men (at least THESE types) put THEMSELVES in jail with their actions, attitudes, and idiocy.

She has to be, to make sure there are no technicalities, and so he can’t request a mistrial.

Or a Christian.. patience is fruit of the spirit😁❤️

Exactly the vibe I've been getting the whole time

@David Bloomer She is a Christian & has three children. Imagine after dealing with him all day, she has to go home & do motherly duties. Her children are probably better mannered than his disrespectful a$$!

@@SweetyD2023 what does being a Christian have to do with anything?

I bet the jury already knows their decision. It will take 5 minutes to deliberate and find him guilty.

Not really. She's actually very milk toast at best.

She is horrible

@@vladdracul2379 okay Mr Judge expert 🤣🤣🤣😭😭 So funny you think you have any place to make such a judgement!

@@Amanda-Renee Go wash them dishes before you hurt yourself.

He has a right to represent himself. Nothing to do with sovereign citizen. He's a narcissist and had no idea about court decorum and rules. Just like the judge said.

These Sov Cits find this stuff on the internet. The Supreme Court does not address issues that are not before them and the Constitution, The Bill of Rights and all SCOTUS and state Supreme Courts have already laid down these laws. The kooks just refuse to accept what they don't like. A 7 or 8 year old can defeat there nonsense in a class assignment. Most Sov Cits can't read, comprehend, follow thru and the majority have criminal records or lost their licenses for DUI's or drug convictions.

There’s no legal allowances in any court ever that supports sovereign citizen bullshit. They technically don’t need to do anything because these SC’s dig their own graves in court

@@Spartacus88 Yes, and the court is under no obligation to entertain the defendants disruptions of the court. Further she doesn't shut down his attempts to bamboozle the jury by claiming he is not Darrel Brooks the defendant but a third party, basically an attorney representing Darrel Brooks. This is insane, among other things. She doesn't shut down this Sov .Citizen idiocy by explaining that the 6th Amendment says he has a right to confront the WITNESSES in his Trial not the ACCUSER which he conflates with the state of Wisconsin. Very simple to shut down, maybe she doesn't want to have the melt-down he will surely have when realizing that this trial is just for show and he can not get out of this at all, but that is also out of line and unnecessary. She goes back and forth with A DEFENDANT like a quarreling COUPLE, like many people pointed out besides me that this is exactly what it feels like. She is completely out of line and lets him a make a mockery of the justice system and the victims. Also there needs to be more thought put into the self-representation law, especially in clear cut cases like this where the defendant will just waste time and money on purpose, or terrorizes victims and relatives because he is allowed to like in the trial of Ronnie Oneal, which was also presided by a female judge. Also women shouldn't be judges and she is the perfect example why.

@@uncleanon6445 wow ur sick as he is...

He's not smart enough to do that. He doesn't understand what she's saying. He doesn't know what unfettered means, and doesn't wish to know.

She is a very good example why women shouldn't be judges..

😡

@@uncleanon6445 I can't believe you said that.

@@rkml59 I understand your confusion. The first thing humanity needs to deprogram itself from is the error of thinking man and woman are the same. We have collectively been lied to on such a grand scale that merely stating obvious facts is met with utter confusion and vitriol.

So called Sovereign Citizens have murdered Police officers in the commission of their duties....They are Domestic Terrorists

Sovereign citizens = Blackistan

Americans

Lol this guy wasn’t a “sovereign citizen” until he thought it was an outlet towards his defense

If you followed the case very closely, he's not even a sovereign citizen and doesn't believe in the ridiculousness of it, he clearly spoke to other morons in jail he never started off with this excuse and just a stall

She doesn't want to pave a road for an appeal.

@@skullduggeryfilms7052 smart of her!

THE CONSTITUTION TRUMPS ALL COURT PROCEDURES. THE GUY EVERYONE IS CALLING STUPID IS THE ONLY ONE WHO UNDERSTANDS HIS ACTUAL POWER IN THAT ROOM.

@@snowangel1066 freedom of speech does not give you you the right to disrupt a court proceeding. Just go into a library sometime and start yelling and see how long it takes for a cop to show up and escort you out. Start creating a disruption at a movie theatre, a restaurant, or city council meeting and see what happens. There are rules and procedures in place in order for things to move along in an orderly fashion.

@@kevinduveneck1504 your analogy does not apply. He has the right to be heard in his trail as laid out by the constitution. Decorum does not trump the constitution. Actually you can argue in court that yelling in the library is allowed and take it all the way to the Supreme Court. LAW IS NOTHING BUT INTERPRETATION AND YOU ALLLOW TO INTERPRET IT. It’s how the good ol boys get off all the time and delay things in court all the time. Even trump is doing it yet you all don’t give a crap when they and senators do it… because your all b@tches who bow down to suits and ties as if they are somehow better than you. They are only human like you and I. Fair trials for all or none. That’s all I’m saying. I’m not rooting for his innocence…

Textbook.

Literally lol

It literally is but she did her best to keep him from being held in that. It's what he wants so he can call for for mistrial and appeal. He's so gross. Those poor families.

@@onangelwings462 yea that was his goal and it failed. He knows if he can get held in contempt he gets to stay in jail and delay sentencing which will put him in prison, and with paperwork like his that shows he a sex offender on the registry and a child killer he's on borrowed time until the prisoners get him.

Racist?

lol no, she's being careful to ensure his disruption doesn't jeapordise the trial

A negative reaction from her would result in a mistrial and him being off the hook. Duh.

Exactly

@@jamesremey2017 judge is white he is black anything she does will be considered racist if it's against him in the media.

🤣🤣🤣🤣

I couldn’t do it. I would be swearing at him but she must have so much tolerance or patience. I couldn’t do it

It's embarrassing he is walking all over her.

@@pandabearmadness6263 I think she is trying hard to respect him. And he has a right to represent himself now most of these questions he could be asking his lawyer to explain to him but god almighty after all this behaviour I couldn’t see a dog even wanting to be near him with all the prattling on and on. He never shuts the f##k up !! I don’t know what is going to happen but I do think there should be someone sitting in for him in court anyways if he is In another courtroom. This is all ridiculous and stupid.

She is also a garbage judge like many in the state

Omg. I couldnt be held back from slapping him

And this point a Supreme court nomination lol 😂

She needs a paid vacation equivalent to 100 cases after this trial 😢🙄

She needs to be stricter and run the courtroom like she owns it. The way a strong judge does. He's a narcissistic. And selfishly and angrily mowed down innocent people without any feelings or remorse. He's wasting everyone's time and taxpayers money. He has absolute disrespect for the judge and the people in the courtroom.

@@meatwork2321 and leave it open to Appeal?

@@deenad3562 well you can be stricter and let him know who the judge is. She was too cotton soft. You know, Judge Judy style.

She’s a pushover

If you saw a mother in the grocery store with a spoiled brat child who was rude to other customers and managers, throwing tantrums and lying on the floor . . . and this mother only spoke soft gentle words of rebuke to her son, would you say she was a patient mother? Would you say that she deserves an award? By allowing Mr. Brooks's awful behavior she is supporting his behavior. This is judicial leniency for a white hating racist murderer taken to an absurd extreme. This is no way to run a courtroom.

I can be there to witness that too as I live right down the street from the courthouse and it's a media circus in my neighborhood right now. I would enjoy a night out to see that.

Dear Shelia Johnson: The same as these silly RU-vidrs, gabby protest organizations, and church babblers who harass the police and spout nonsense about the law they don't understand.

@@eddyvideostar def not the same . Sorry bud . Half the people on the police force do not know the law . High school dimwits

That will be VERY unlikely

The judge was very aware of that, hence her patience and grace. To make it a waterproof case he can't appeal.

So true

Question if you thought he was innocent would you think its ok? There are laws if she feels hes disruptive. Locking him away on mute isnt one of them.

@@tqueen7131 Considering she did exactly that multiple times, yes it would be ok. 😂 And if he was innocent and acting as disrespectful, argumentative, and disruptive as he is, he'd still deserve that treatment.

It's a riot that he is now actually saying that he doesn't UNDERSTAND something, when his entire schtick during the pretrial hearings was that he does not accept that word as being part of his vocabulary. 🙄

Court procedures DO NOT TRUMP THE CONSTITUTION…

@@David_B_Dornburg typical sov cit bullshit

No lawyer on the world can save him. But him acting as his own attorney assures he will never get an appeal. Lol he’s hanging himself for free.

I think he knows what he’s doing , he’s trying to get the case thrown out via judicial misconduct

There’s been a few cases where I’ve had persons represent themselves as sovereign citizens and they are the worst as far as making a stenographic record of the proceedings

@@eleanormassaro5195 the poor stenographer. his recording probably read like a 2nd graders book report

You want the judge to behave in a way that results in a mistrial?

@@jonescrusher1 You can be more firm than what she’s being and it not result in a mistrial. This is ridiculous.

@@awesome_life6728 Exactly. This isn't the first time someone tried to make a mockery of the system in court. She is being ridiculously kind where other judges would burn him to the ground right there.

@@awesome_life6728 Not really, it's just that you find it frustrating to watch.

He trying to make records so that he can file an appeal after the guilty finding. Even blaming the juror of misconduct.

Because certified lawyers understand the rule of decorum in the courtroom, for the most part😂

@Anita Martini He can't plead that he had ineffective counsel or even incompetent counsel because he acted as his own attorney.