Like a decade from now we are going to find out this was all actually one of the greatest pieces of performance art ever. Dave wanted to see how long a man's career could last if it was in a constant free fall, to what levels could he sink? Dave figured the whole thing couldn't possibly last over 12 months, the fool.
Rubin blocked me on Twitter for quote tweeting his own tweet in one of his comment sections like 6 years ago. He's the single most petty blocker on the platform.
He made another assertion, similar to this, and was just lying. I quoted him and asked if he was going to correct his comment, now that the truth was out. Blocked me.
It's so rude to use a person's own words against them. Free Speech 2.0 baby! I want to say one thing today and the exact opposite tomorrow and don't you dare call me out on my hypocrisy.
This is true. Conservative media LOVES the 'gay Jew who rejects progressives' archetype for some reason. Wish I understood it. I think it's cringe. Rubin, Milo, and Bari Weiss come to mind. I think there's another one or two I'm forgetting. Normie conservatives trip over themselves to do the "look, THEY agree with me on this" shtick lol
Megyn did not fact-check Rubin's racism, she just fact-checked him on who is assigned to the various courts. Megyn is equally as racist as Rubin. Also Megyn is equally as ignorant about the Middle East, Africa, Asia, South America, Haiti, as Rubin.
The left had the same racial view of that court. They just cheered at the initial story because it fits in with their politics whereas it doesn't for Dave. That's the only difference in this case.
@@CanadianEhHole Apart from, you know, the fact that what Dave said is literally not true and also assumes your ideas are determined by your skin colour. But apart from that everyone is the same yes.
@@CanadianEhHole < Found the Right Wing Meat Puppet that just told us without telling us they are maulding right now and are desperately trying to find a bright side to this
He does care about race. It’s a stupid “get out of jail free card” that many white people play because they think it makes what they’re saying not racist
@@davidr24 you don’t think it’s possible in a country as big as the United States that 5 people are part of a group that is ~6 of the population??? And it would be fishy why?
I mean the title is a bit wrong, Megyn didn't fact-check his racism, she's fine with the racism, she fact-checked his understanding of the judicial jurisdictions.
We all do. Every time I miss him I play the few mash up videos here on youtube of all his characters and impressions. Nation of Islam Obama and Right Wing Mandela. 😂
As many minority conservatives must adopt a “but I’m not ‘that’ kind is gay man…I’m like you are, really” position, it’s no problem being racist, or homphobic etc, etc
If David were in a room with 5 gay men, does that mean all of them would be thinking exactly alike?? Nobody ever mentions all white men supreme Court, or question their authority and intelligence... I don't think Dave has ever been around a lot of African Americans, he cannot be this stupid.
I'm remembering that one white lesbian couple that accidently got a black guy's sperm and then didn't want the baby after having carried it to term because it wasn't white. Yeah, 100%, gay people can be racist (just as non-white people can be homophobic of course) and when they insist that the black struggle is the same as their struggle, what they don't understand is that they can at least be in a closet and still enjoy white privilege. A black person, gay or otherwise, can't do that. You can't "hide the black". Some (usually white) progressives like to draw 1 to 1 comparisons on gay versus race struggles and it's offputting. It's a bit like white feminists telling other races of women to unite with them against male chauvinism but they downplay race issues. All bigotry and discrimination should be opposed but it's not all the same and those differences matter in a society that still has various hierarchies.
Historically, it’s never been virtually impossible to have a court made up of five white men in America. What’s Dave’s issue exactly? Ignoring the fact that what he said is factually wrong and the court he mentioned isn’t exclusively made up of only Black women. What exactly is his issue with a court that hypothetically was made of exclusively Black women? I’ll bet you could find a southern city with a population that was 70% African-American that magically had a court exclusively stocked with white jurists. What would ol’ Dave’s objection be in that example?
His issue is the same reason the left led with this story and touted it as a victory for their side. Demographics give pre-judgment info. The court, if they have 5 black women, are more likely to be staunch Democrats and not Republicans. This is why the left celebrated it and then when it came out it was not true, they just backed away and now this stupid video plays Dave Rubin as a racist, but so too would every leftist who first celebrated the fake news (including these 2)... just because they're on the opposite side of an issue doesn't mean their take isn't playing on the same prejudicial info. They just took 2 different political takes, it's STILL using the same prejudicial view though.
Whites were 85% of the NY state population back then so having all 5 be white would be statistically a 44% chance even with nonracist employers, VERSUS today black females make up only 6% of the workforce in New York, so having FIVE black females judges is statistically a near impossibility without conscious racist selection: 0.06 x 0.06 x 0.06 x 0.06 x 0.06 = 0.0000007776, literally less than a 1 in a million chance non-racist employers would pick 5 in a row. Whereas even today, the chance a non-racist employer would hire 5 white judges would be 0.75 x 0.75 x 0.75 x 0.75 x 0.75 which equals 0.31, so there's a 31% chance that an impartial, unbiased employer would hire 5 whites in a row even today vs. a 1 in a million chance of only black females. Keep in mind this is disregarding the huge asian male, asian female, hispanic male, hispanic female populations as well, there are far more of them in the legal profession as well.
Oh I love your brain. If Rubin had half a brain he’d realize the years of unfairness people of color have gone through having all white judges and jurors. For one second if he was speaking to someone else you could get that point across to him and maybe a light would go off in his head. “ He’d fall to the floor gasping if he took a look at Oklahomas conviction rates and the “evidence” prosectors brought to a totally non bias jury 😂.
What you fail to understand is that the "blacks" aren't good at the education. Also, women. I mean do I even have to explain the logic there? Did he even need a racist "algorithm" to do the math? 😅
"M-Megyn... I was throwing you a bone, you're supposed to agree with me and continue my racist conspiracy to the audience.. not correct me and ignore it! You're not lying right!"
"I don't judge people on the color of their skin, I just log that data into a spreadsheet"... is one of the wittiest things I've heard in a while. Based on the Nard Dogg curve, you nailed it.
He blocked me about 4 years ago for the heinous act of disagreeing with, a grand total of ONE of his dishonest Tweets. He blocks F*cken everyone who disagrees with him on even the smallest of issues. It's ALWAYS the loudest screamers of "BUT FREEEEE SPEECH" that have thousands of people on their various social media "BLOCKED" lists.
Whenever you hear someone say "I don't judge anyone by the color of their skin, but..." or "I'm not trying to be racist, but..." just know that you're about to hear some really racist nonsense. Never fails.
well, it's not really Dave's fault. He's a homosexual man. so by his own logic he should really only be commenting on things like fashion, hairstyles, etc. because we know that all gay men think exactly the same way, and do the same things.
@@hewlettwilliam4650 I'm surprised at how homophobic Democrats are. Is this normal among democrats for you all to make "bigoted" remarks about LGBT people? Not that I care, as I'm not a fan of Rubin or the LGBT community, just surprises me to see all the democrats in here making tons of jokes about his s-xuality, I guess you guys don't actually support the LGBT and were just using them? Also, his point was that it's a mathematical impossibility to select a racial gender group that is 6% of the population five times in a row without conscious racially selective bias, black females being 6% of the NY state workforce (and only 3% of law school graduates, but I'll be generous with the workforce) so the chance of that happening is literally 0.06 x 0.06 x 0.06 x 0.06 x 0.06 = 0.0000007776, meaning there is a less than 1 in a million chance. And this is happening all over. Now if you want to PRETEND all these 1 in a million things are just random coincidences then you must believe in some sort of new religious cult, because it's not. If you think that racism in hiring is okay, then just admit that, otherwise you end up looking ignorant.
Ruben is so clueless that’s he talking about the supreme court like it has 5 judges. The NY Supreme Court has over 100 judges, but appeals don’t go to just the “supreme court”, they go to the appellate division, which has a number of judicial departments. I understand that this appeal will go to the first division which has like 20 judges. It’s so annoying hearing idiots talk BS without asking someone who knows something to explain things to them.
No, he'd assume that five Jews or five white guys definitely got the jobs based entirely on merit. But I suspect he's basing his impossibility "calculation" on blacks making up 13% of the overall population (and black women would presumably make up slightly more than half of that of number). That definitely means it's unusual (but not impossible, obviously) for all five supreme court judges to be black women but if whites make up 60% of the population (and slightly more than half of that number is made up of white women), then on average and all things being equal that supreme court shouldn't be comprised of five white guys either, and yet we know Dave wouldn't have any issue with that in the slightest.
"I don't judge people based on the color of their skin.... I'm just mortified that there aren't enough people with my skin color in power" What Dave is really saying.
For everyone’s situational awareness, Megyn Kelly is the “Santa Claus is undeniably White” lady who left Fox News and one of the OG Blonde fascist prototypes. Kelly not even accepting Rubin’s form of racism makes me question his ability to even last long on that tier. He’ll need to step down to the Alex Jones/Q’anon tier to look intelligent (until they find out his sexuality of course)
Tell that to the ideology stood up on virtual impossibilities. After so many indictments, civil losses, criminal losses, and incarcerated associates - they still think he's 100% innocent.
There is one black woman on the New York Court of Appeals, the highest court in NY. The chief judge is an African-American man. There are three other women: one is Latina and the other two are white. And the remaining two judges are a Latino and a white man.
LOL I just f**king love The Majority Report. It's the one thing that makes me feel less depressed about Anerican politics. Because the hosts make it just insanely funny.
" It's virtually impossible to get a court with 5 black women". We had a Supreme Court with 9 white men for 200 years. We didn't even have a white woman on the court until Sandra Day O'Conner.
It's almost impressive to me, given the amount of times he's been humiliated in public by being exposed for not knowing what he's talking about, that he still doesn't do even a minimal amount of research on any given topic, before confidently trotting it out to the world, only to have him fall flat on his face, yet again. He'll never learn. He just isn't capable.
@@daveyellick6685 Nothing is wrong with making mistakes. Pretending like you never make any is far worse. Dave isn't smart. He isn't liked because they think he's smart, they like him because they see a lot of him in them, in their transition to holding their current views, as well as the fact that all people like a bit of an echo chamber. Otherwise you're going to be in argue-mode 24/7 and that is a good way to put yourself in an early grave from stress. They probably also see some genuine honesty in him. The right has a lot of commentators but not too many big journalists (at least not ones that will get crazy loads of funding) whereas the left has the opposite. Big journalists (most MSM outlets) and then atrocious commentators. It's why so few debates are held by the more prominent left-wing commentators. And when they're held, they're crushed. A good example of this is Sam Seder getting annihilated in his debate with AJW, Sean Fitzgerald. Either Seder is too stupid to know how stats work or is a total liar, willing to deceive people who don't have a strong grasp of English or understand how data, particularly year over year in comparison to total, are two different comparison metrics. I'd take him just being a weasel as I've Seder outright lie about his actual positions, to argue easier ones to defend, and then be eventually caught out on it. Slavoj Zizek is by far the best debater on the left but I haven't seen him in anything in at least a couple of years.
@@CanadianEhHoleBeing a "good commentator" has absolutely nothing to do with being a good debater. Any commentator who is popular can be considered "good" that doesn't mean they make good arguments. Furthermore, debating is a useless waste of time. A person can be completely wrong and still have a better argument and "win" a debate. Debating does nothing except massage egos.
That’s crazy how you just wrote 4 paragraphs of nonsense. Lol. Dave is liked because he gives his followers an excuse that they’re not completely terrible for following terrible takes hook line and sinker, because he’s palatable in a way Steve Bannon and Charlie Kirk aren’t. They will ditch him when he starts becoming too out there for them (which is why he stopped mentioning his husband and never mentioned his surrogate babies ever again), and they find a smarter gay shill (not a coincidence his career rose when Milo’s tanked)
He's not a journalist. Some media outlets, however, reported this which is why he repeated it. Also for these 2 to pretend like they didn't have the opposite take of Rubin, to cheer for this potential court because of their demographic, is so disingenuous. They prejudged the court and what they'd potentially rule in the case the same as Rubin did. They just weren't worried about it because they align with the partisan view they were hoping the court would have.
@@CanadianEhHole I've seen you defending this idiot all through the comments. This is Rubin's least embarrassing mistake. I've legitimately done more research before posting RU-vid comments in the past than he does for his shows. Defending a willfully ignorant grifter really won't do you any favours.
The reason it's "virtually impossible" to overturn Trump's conviction is because the vast majority of appeals don't work, regardless of the demographics of the court.
I think I'm going to give props to Megyn Kelly 🤮 for letting Dave talk on and on before correcting him. Glorious! I am putting my brain on recovery mode for the rest of the day. Peace out.
Because famously Dave Rubin is married a black guy. Do we really want to get into a discussion around racism within the gay community which also takes quite a lot from black culture?
As a former affirmative action officer in higher education, as far as hiring and the false notion that it's quotas, that's so wrong. Search Committees are formed -they hire the best qualified applicant without regard to race or sex or gender, how do they look on paper & how do they interview? Can they do the job that they are applying for? I'm so sick of all the misinformation around hiring. Especially in affirmative action. It's been working correctly for a long time unless there are bad actors, of which there are some. Those are the racists. I weeded them out, and there were some in HR but I said goodbye!
We hate megyn because she's terrible... NOT because she's a woman. Your misogynistic take is counter to the entire point they are making in this segment. 21 likes, you should all be ashamed of yourselves.
“My guys on Twitter crunched the numbers and it’s statistically impossible for black women to be in higher positions of authority than me.” Is Dave arguing that judges should be appointed at random?
7:00 This is a good example of why Dave Rubin has a team for this kind of analysis. If they had his spreadsheet, they could put in the inputs and see where Dave and Sam think the same because they're Jewish and where they think differently because of their respective sexuality.
I know zero about US politics i stumbled on this channel because im a fan of Andy Kindler. But, man do enjoy the Rave Dubin dunkings. And Dennis Miller bop bop bop
Can't wait to see how the Rubin algorithm applies to the people in Congress. Especially in the republican party. No doubt it's going to be diverse and fully representative of the American population, no demographics will stand out in comparison to the others, no no no good Sir. Or else, I expect he'd already have talked about it a long time ago.
No, in theory it mirrors the demographic makeup of the legal profession in NY state [for the NYS Court of Appeals and the Appellate Division] so lots of white guys would be totally unexceptional.
The gay conservative who is only relevant because, well, he's a gay conservative using his sexual preference as a means to stand out is talking about how people only get their roles based on diversity.....fascinating....
Out of the 21 justices who sit on the First Division of the New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division, five are Black: Presiding Justice Dianne T. Renwick, Justice Pitt-Burke, Justice Troy K. Webber, Justice Tanya R. Kennedy, and Justice Marsha D. Michael.
What the hell is judicial thinking? Judges are actually supposed to apply the law and so all judges should be on the same page there especially if there’s plenty of evidence the only place a judge’s discretion comes applies is in sentencing but there’s still guidelines for this.
LoL there is a Key and Peele skit sbout this. All the black men, glasses, mom jeans, same brown jacket, same haircut, all married to white woman. LoL We are not a monolith! 😂
