DC supply for Vacuum tube filaments (1/2) 

Usually when a simulation is running to slow, or just does not want to start - there is a conversion error; I try adding the ".options cshunt=1e-15" statement. - this adds 1e-15F (0.01pF) to all circuit nodes and usually helps. The exact value you use can be different of course 1e-13 to 1e-16

Remember Murphy's LAWS!

Imagine if it literally explodes the next episode

Unforeseen consequences time! Have your crowbar ready just in case.

That is true.. I guess it would be possible to set the DC supply voltage from the beginning to be ~5.7V (6.3*0.9) to account for this case; or any value that can be obtained under any conditions between 5.7 and 6.3

Differential thermal emission. If one side of the filament is grounded then the other is 6.3V or whatever negative and electron current (although low) will flow from one side of the filament to the other. Also some ion migration kinda like electroplating. If you let the filament float that won't save you either because you'll still have one side of the filament -6.3V relative to the other. This also messes with grid voltage and causes uneven heating of the tube because the edge of the grid closest to the most positive part of the heater will fry. Grids are usually rated for dumping, say, 50 mA into the entire grid, but only 25 mA into just one little edge will melt it and short it and "how could running DC filament cause my amp tube to arc over when running way under ratings?" There's a classic technical paper from 70 years ago from some guy with a B in his name where you take a tube with like 5 heater wires in series and due to drop they're all at different voltages relative to the grid causing some kind of massive linearity problem, you could tell in the linearity graph which PA tube was powered by AC and which powered at DC. Perfect conductors don't exist in the real world and if you have the gear to measure enough dB of SNR it'll show up, even if it may not matter in practical applications. If you think running DC will prevent hum, surely running ultrasonic AC would prevent hum even betterer. So yeah, decades before 2000's era switching power supplies there were guys running tube heaters at 20 KHz. You'd never do this in production, but typical ham radio stuff you go to a swapfest and come home with a 10 watt audio xformer and ... As usual with engineering, just because you can prove to two decimal places that running DC will turn a 10K hour life tube into a 9.9K hour life tube, that doesn't mean anyone outside the engineering dept will care. Also most people don't run right up against the limits of grid or plate dissipation nor do they run 1 dB below linearity limits, so "most of the time its OK enough to run DC" Another typical engineering thing is you could buy DC rated heaters which just had larger heavier more expensive wires, but if 99% of non-automotive tubes ran on AC they're going to ship with the cheaper thinner wire. (edited to add, I forgot about thoriated filaments, thorium is expensive so if they thoriate it they'll apply it evenly which is fine for AC heating but a DC heated filament will emit more from one side or the other so it's thorium layer will "wear out" faster than the other side of the filament. Again, typical engineering stuff where just because you can prove the tube will only meet specs for 9.9K hours after you pay for 10K hours doesn't mean anyone will care, but its a real measurable effect...)

@@VinceMulhollon Ah, excelent point! I pretty much wasnt thinkng of directly heated triodes when watching the video. Has anyone thought of flipping the dc polarity occasionally to "Even out" the wear on the filament? I wonder if that helps?

dead short > much lower resistance than when at working temperature. impedance > RESISTANCE, agree?

@@paulcohen1555 I would say that the load is almost 100 percent resistive hot or cold. I would think that reactive components are minimal.

You ALWAYS need bypass/decoupling caps right_next_to_3 terminal regulators though.

Its coming out this week :D

Yes, I have use this many times because of low headroom for front end of guitar amps with 2-3 12a_7 tubes I usually end up with about half an ohm split between top and bottom (1 Ohm total) with the bottom being reverenced to either ground or some small positive voltage. It is fun to see the arc of videos leading up to this one though!

I think the closes thing to that, currently in use, would be the active PFC circuit; since the big issue with a rectifying bridge+ the rest of the circuit is still the poor power factor. Anyway; I guess you could adapt an active diode bridge to also work as a voltage regulator - not just to compare the input to output but also to a built in reference.

@@manitoba-op4jx Sounds extra extra complicated, but a sound point.

The 4 mosfet bridge would have needed some more complex circuits to work correctly, and most regulators do have some built in over temperature and over current feature - its highly unlikely they will self destruct during the startup, but that remains to be seen :D

Why do you need a voltage doubler ?

@@cat-ie6yp The whole point of the video was that a standard bridge rectifier would be inefficient to meet the Dropout voltage of a standard linear regulator

@@davidkclaytonThe doubler will be impractical, as it will require a very high capacitance. The several filaments together may take amperes of current that will drain almost any capacitor much faster than the next charge will come. Doublers work reasonably well for low-current circuits.