Did anyone spot the mistake ar 5:45, when he said that the type 55 carries 84 vertical launch cells aft, but the caption said 48? (48 was the correct quantity)
They have smaller speed boats that can go 45 mph and fire missiles and heavy machine gun fire. These smaller speed boats are armored and one could take out dozens of speed boats. The larger ships also are able to fire massive amounts of heavy gun fire. So it is highly doubtful that a 100 enemy small boats would ever get within range to even fire one missile.
@@effexon Submarines are by far the most deadly instrument of war in existence with the possible exception of stealth bombers. To counter this threat, carrier groups are escorted by submarines. The destroyers in the escorts also are very good and destroying enemy submarines. The sensors and various radars that carrier groups use detect threats several hundred miles away. It is very difficult for an enemy to get close enough to attack an aircraft carrier. The greatest threat are new, ultra long range missiles that are said to have a range of over 800 miles. However, these missiles are at best in development and have not been used successfully in battle. It takes multiple coordinated guidance systems to guide a missile accurately that far away.
What about the Kirov heavy class battle cruiser? There's only 1 in service but 2 more are being modernize for deployment by 2025-2030. NATO did say these ship can project more firepower than the Iowa or any battleship. I think it deserves a spotlight on this list
Old.... if you notice, he say they are talking about the newest ships, that are on the drawing bord.... on side note, a single submarine like for example, the Norwegian Ula class, can easily take out Kirov.... but then Ula class was build for that, to make havoc in a fleet. Kirov's only advantage is it's size... so it can carry many weapons, it is a mobile fortress build to protect home waters with the ability to launch many missiles in a short period of time.... that size is also it biggest weakens.... The reason Kirov class and the other Russian cruisers was build big, was due to Russian (Soviet) missiles during cold war wasn't as good as western missile that could be compact. so to compensate for that, Soviet Navy build ships like the Kirov that could carry enough missiles to overrun a defense system and at least a few of those missile would get trough... But then US-Navy developed Aegis combat system with the SPY-1 radar, that have the capability to detect and track multiple targets (in the hundreds+++), and suddenly Kirov advantage was gone. There is a reason Royal Norwegian Navy use an light version of SPY-1 radar on the frigate's.... for that reason, when you have a small frigate that can detect all your 100+ missile and can engage them all within 10 seconds + - ..... suddenly a big ship like Kirov is ...pointless, and the same frigate can deploy advance stealth anti ship missile in form of NSM/JSM.... and at there are no Navy that have defense against it. When size kills you! There is a reason Russia si building only corvettes and frigates now. And are planing a future Cruiser/destroyer to replace there aging cruiser and destroyers and one day Kirov class!
Can't say wich one of them is better. Every ship has it's own capabilititys and it's own purpose in order to fit with any country needs. Other countries need small vessels, fast and flexible while others need large ships in order to carry warheads.
This Yatch comes with aerial Combat, Anti Submarine warefare, Modular Payloads, Sleek looks and can Hold Refrigerated Beers and Kitchen as Per international Standards. *Bruce Wayne* : Dose it come in Black? *UAE* : is there a Gold coated module? *Indian* : Whats the Mileage per liter? *China* : We can make it for 90% Lesser price !
1 Billion Dollar a piece... Imagine what you could do with "just" the money needed to buy these ships, I'm not even talking about equipping, maintenance etc... Why does all these weapon systems always seem to cost more and more money. And don't tell me now that a Bismarck today would cost at least 3 Billion....
That german one looked so nice, I'm just so sad that there's so much focus on milatary and we disregard so much the devolopment of tech to aid mankind as a whole....
So all of these warsips became smaller and smaller. a little bigger than gunboats. Does any has any form of armor plating or CHOBHAM on it or no one used that on these ships anymore?
Canadian Type 26 is to be armed with a very bright light and a bullhorn to ask subs to 'scuse me please. Edit: bright light deemed too offensive in nature and removed from plans.
Wait a minute...why buy Type 26 when you could buy Type 55...no wait, why buy Type 26 or Type 55 when you could buy MKS 180...no wait, why buy Type 26, Type 55 or MKS 180 when you could buy the SeaSword...no wait, why buy a Type......................
The German MKS-180 is perhaps the most impressive overall. Special mention to the C-Sword though for the sexiest looks and intriguing tech. By the way, the French are now giving English names to their ships? Sacrebleu, what has the world come to? ;)
@@sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152 One small Dutch sub sank a US carrier, a cruiser, two destroyers and 3 frigates in one training mission (JTFEX / TMDI99). I'm sure the flying dutchie could deal with a random destroyer.
@@janvanvroonhoven3278 dude, that sub was swedish and was able to do what it did because it was old. Anyway the flying dutchman isn't actually dutch, davy Jones was scottish
That Type 55 is NO JOKE. It's advanced weapons systems, stealth, and capable radars make it a very formidable foe. Especially when Zumwalt is non-performing as of right now.
Once the US gets the railguns or some other high-tech weaponry on the three Zumwalts, those things are going to be deadly. The Arleigh-Burke flight 3A is another thing to look at
French Corvette sounds very marketable to many other nations which maybe its real purpose not too expensive while promising to do much in compact size Operation
One of the clips you showed when discussing the Australian frigate, you depicted an Australian flag. Trouble is, it wasn't the Australian flag...it was the New Zealand one!!!
please indicate metric units. I doubt the British navy or the French navy create their ships in feet and pounds. Nowadays it makes more sense to use metrics internationally. Your videos are not only seen in Texas...
Sweden is a dark horse ..They have some very nice stealth ships in the pipe line and their sub managed to " sink " a US Aircraft carrier in a naval exercise it was so quiet
So many errors in the commentary, that this has lost all credibility. Shows the NZ flag as the Australian flag. Mistakes 48 as 84, cannot correctly identify helicopters, etc, etc, etc.
AS FAR AS HELICOPTER IS CONCERNED, I ASSUME U ARE AUSTRALIAN AND THE HELICOPTER HE SHOWED WHILE TALKING ABOUT UR COUNTRY IS A MERLIN WHICH IS A BRITISH HELICOPTER. WHICH IS NOT THE ONE YOUR COUNTRY WILL USE, UR COUNTRY WILL USE THE AMERICAN HELICOPTER. BUT GIVEN THAT IT IS A BRITISH PROGRAMME HE SHOWED THE MERLIN MAY BE TO STRESS THAT BOTH COUNTRIES DESIGN HANGAR WILL CARRY A DIFFERENT HELICOPTER.
john cloves it's true that in France we only do shit, it's not like we had one of the best combat planes in the world and one of the best tanks ... The Americans have was surprised when they saw the aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle, they did not expect us to make such a good aircraft carrier.
i don't know much about the design, but i can say that is not getting built. CMN isn't in a good financial state at all, and nobody ordrered a C SWORD 90 since 2014. I have doubts, maybe an african country bought some for anti piracy purposes, but i can't find any trace of it on the internet. CMN is eating dust right now, and i'm pretty sure the C sword 90 doesn't belong on the list with the others, while it does look cool.
"Imagine an 8000 ton frigate that has no anti air missiles or anti sub weaponry... " Germany: "Hold my beer. Here's our Baden-Wuerttemberg class frigate.... "
Too bad there were so many gross mistakes in this video: to include showing the Merlin helo instead of the Sikorsky MH-60R that the RAN uses or the flag of New Zealand for that of Australia. Also showing ships no longer in service such as retired USN battleships, Iroquois destroyers of the RCN (soon to be phased out completely) to name a few.
@@JP-xn7si nope, its not because if a missile gets shot down, you just launch another but if a plane gets shot down, you've just lost a pilot and $200million and then have to go thru the process of readying and launching another
nowadays you don't need speed, we have missiles for that, unless the ship is build for carrier escort. In the old days, you need speed, so you could catch up with you'r enemy and get your guns in range
@@davidandmartinealbon3155 Actually no. No line of Battle Battleships of WW1 could exceed 26 kts. A few mid/late war 1 Battle crusiers could near enough but not dreadnought/Battleships.
@@philippesoares1745 Thanks for the info. One example is the carrier Charles DeGualle; awarded the U.S. Navy Meritorious Unit Award for the ISIS campaign.
From ship to ship please compare the same things don't speak about whatever you have in your head..!! Take Length, Speed, Crew, Tonage, Radar range, EW system comparison, Cells for air defence, cells for shore bombardment, anti UAV/UCAV technologies, max range of missile systems etc.
SDS Olympus Mons SWSC-1 I’m a fan of naval vessels civilian and military lots of navies used metric for armaments and vessels dimensions. Only the US navy used the imperial measurement sir. Get your facts right.
Type 45: 4.5inch mk8 USS Arleigh burke: 5inch Mark45 Hms vanguard: BL 15 inch gun KMS Bismark:15in SK C/34 USS zumwalt: 6inch advanced gun system Kms Scharnhorst: 11inch sk c/34 These are the official names for the weapons, notice how they're all in imperial?
Just to clear this up for anyone wondering, the naval speeds, operational ranges, and even armaments are usually classified information. The numbers and details civilians receive are the previewed and accepted numbers that those countries' governments are willing to share with the public. Meaning with the Chinese and Russian ships, they are likely to have much faster and wider range of operations than publicly available information would say.
USS Zumwalt and USS Michael Monsoor are both commissioned in the active fleet and PCU Lyndon B. Johnson is soon to join them. The class was curtailed, not scrapped.
