DEBUNKED: Verse of Quran Proves Muhammad ﷺ Lied 

Full episode: ru-vid.combvMwjT1Vu-g Support our work with a donation: muslimskeptic.com/contribute/

Allah states "had he", which means he didnt.

Problem with his argument is also that basically he is telling us to believe in the Quran.

He says we are not logical but he believes 3 in 1.

Kaffir don't believe in Muhammad SAW as a prophet, but used Qur'an verses to debunk Islam. So ironic...

Guy is from David Wood school , man these Christians are really funny

the audacity of a christian using the phrase "logical thinking"

Christians need to understand that the Quran is read by contexts not Verse the like the Bible

Bro got browed!

This argument is aslo easily refuted with a simple question. Did the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, die from a severed aorta? The answer is no. These young fools are so arrogant, instead of spending their youth learning, they spend it thinking they already know.

The death of the prophet ﷺ did not occur suddenly, hence it does not fall under the intention of the verse 1. The surah is makki, and the prophet ﷺ died almost two decades later. 2. The poison was given by the Jew in khaybar, 7th year after hijrah The prophet died in the 11th year after hijrah. So again, it wasn't a sudden death, nor can you definitively say it was the poison that actually killed the prophet... Some scholars have said that Allah wanted to grant the prophet the status of martyrdom, hence the pain of the poison resurfaced The quran says that the jews killed prophets. Similarly, they tried to kill our prophet ﷺ. They tried to poison him. They managed to kill one sahabi by the poison. The prophet ﷺ lived for 3 years after the attempted poisoning, and at the time of death he felt as if the pain from the poison resurfaced. The verse on the other hand implies a sudden death if the prophet lied upon Allah; a seizing by the hand, a sudden cutting of the aorta. Hence it's clear that the verse of the quran in no way belies the prophethood of muhammad ﷺ

Barak Allahu feek Brother Daniel for defending the Deen from these conniving kuffar.

Daniel l love you man

Paul is the liar while Muhammad (SAW) is the truthful

I stopped taking Christian apologists seriously a long time ago, but it’s still nice to see videos like this for pure entertainment

full life of 63 years ~1400 years ago, protected from assasins, enemies and mistakes - Allahumma salli 'ala Muhammad.

From what I've read from tafsir of scholars, Al-Wateen (the life-line artery) refers to a specific part of the Aorta that if it were to be cut, the person would almost immediately die (E.g ascending aorta), while Abhar is not specific, so it can refer to the abdominal aorta or the thoracic aorta.

Calm down BRAAA whats up BRAAAA hahahaha i am dead

...wait..so he believes that the Qur'aan is a revelation from God? That's what it looks like because he uses it as proof against the Prophet peace be upon Him. How would God send a prophet who lies? What's the point of sending a liar to deliver a message? But, if he believes that Muhammad peace be upon Him wrote the Qur'aan, how can the Prophet incriminate himself so blatantly, and how can he predict his own cause of death so precisely (according to what he claims was the cause of the death)?!

First of all does anyone know of any poison, a natural poison considering this is the desert of Arabia which has a catalogue of poisonous plants, that has such an extreme physical effect that it severs, again "severs" as in cutting in half, the aorta?

This argument was popularised by David Wood and older than his rеtаrded kids.

Please, Ustath Daniel, more refuting, less mocking of physical appearance. It's a bad influence on your viewers and I've always seen commenters who go out of their way to ridicule somebody's look or way of speech.

now I think none arabs criticizing islam are worse than arab ones

Surfer dude just got cowabungaed

They put this "argument" a lot. They all seem to "learn" from the same source. May Allah bless you Daniel. They also use a lot the verse 39 : 4.

Another point is that this is an instant punishment had the prophet lied The lie would be followed by instant death as a punishment The prophet died a natural death of senile age after he delivered the whole message

Even if it’s true than the prophet is a real prophet and the Quran is a revelation

The ending 🤣🤣🤣🤣

قوله تعالى ( و لو تقول علينا ) هنا حرف ( لو ) هو حرف امتناع الامتناع فيكون معنى الكلام ( لو أن محمداً تقول علينا لأهلكناه و لكنه لم يفعل ذلك فلم يجب حينئذ معاقبته ) ، هذا أولاً ، و ثانياً العقوبة ليست هي قطع الوتين ( الموت ) لأن الموت في حد ذاته ليس عقوبة و لكن العقوبة هي ( لأخذنا منه باليمين ) أي لحرمناه من النبوة و الرسالة و الوحي ، و هذا لم يحدث بل أتم الله تعالى الرسالة و أكمل الدين قبل وفاة النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم و كذلك فتأييد الله تعالى لنبيه لم ينقطع عنه حتى وفاته صلى الله عليه وسلم.

it’s so simple, how can he be a false prophets but also prophesied exactly how he would die?!

Jazakillahu khairan brother Daniel for your logical response to these scumbags 😅

He is the most prominent ignorant! Thanks Daniel!

So one hand he wants to prove that the Prophet Salla Allahu alaihi wa sallam is lying ma'adha Allah, which basically him saying that the Quran is not the truth from Allah, and then using a verse from the revelation that is false (according to him) to prove his point.. how lame!

Please do a debate against sam shamoun. that dude brings up similar idiotic arguments but no one is catching him.

that was a full blown humiliation

السَّلاَمُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَرَحْمَةُ اللهِ وَبَرَكَاتُهُ Assalamu’alaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh

I have studied Arabic for 8 years and English for 14 years. I would like to mention that most of the translations aren't accurate. Most of them are because of the fact that there aren't many words in English that conveys the full meaning of the words in Arabic. But...a few of them are because of the interpreters themselves who use the wrong words and there are other words which are better to use.

Without lies Christianity dies

one would only have to ask who delivered that very revelation to immediately figure out the irrelevance of this stupid question.

Dang.. he embarrassed himself.. life time recovery brow.. 😂

i challenge any muslim to find out what happend to his eye brows hahhaahahahahaha

Daniel, you are savage. Brooo Brow😂

1. Allah has commanded the Prophet ﷺ to convey the message and Allah promised to protect him in doing so i.e until it's completion. "O Messenger, announce that which has been revealed to you from your Lord, and if you do not, then you have not conveyed His message. And Allāh will protect you from the people. Indeed, Allāh does not guide the disbelieving people." (5:67) 2. Allah indeed saved the Prophet from dying before the completion of Islam. While Al-Barra R.A died immediately after being poisoned at the same time. The poison normally should've cut the "al-wateen" (immediate death) not "al-abhar" which mean it was not affected as it should which also directly destroy the argument. 3. The prophet ﷺ did not die before the completion of Quran. Therefore, the "aorta" argument is baseless. In conclusion, fear Allah. The Quran is a true reminder. Those who are disbelief will be in hellfire. May Allah guide us and have mercy upon us to be entered His paradise without reckoning.

Which poison specifically affects the aorta?

Another way to look at it is . If you believe Allah promise in the Quran to bunish the prophet Muhammad if he told lies in the name of Allah. And then saying according to the hadeth that the prophet died as in the way of punishment as in the Quran. Doesn't that mean that the Quran said the Truth. And as such if the Quran is true then the prophet Muhammad wasn't a false prophet.

A christian talks about logical 😮!!!

I remember hearing this argument some years ago, and it caused me some doubts. Alhamdulillah i came across Bassams article and it all made sense.

BrOooO 😂😂

bro did not believe in Muhammad but sumhow he believe the Quran??🤣🤣🤣

Maybe bring Bassam Zawadi one day to your show? I'm subbed to his newsletter.

First of all, there is inherent negation in the ayahs he is mentioning. It's like "If you had stolen the money I would have punished you". This means subject didn't stole the money. Secondly, ayahs are revealed in Makkah, Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) was poisoned in 7th years after the hijra during battle of Khyaber and Allah punished Prophet Muhammad 3 years after that. What a logic!

This will be a bit technical but, the first thing that debunk this argument is you cannot base a mutawatir narration which is Quran, on ahad (all the narrations other than mutawatir) narration, which is aformentioned hadith in the video😂. These guys know nothing about Arabic or Quran or hadiths but they really think that they are debunking the whole religion with just these ignorant arguments🤣😂😭. What an arrogance!

Thanks for mentioning that interesting website.just to add: we can read the text as saying, that the prophet would be seized by his right hand(he’d have his right hand seized) and he didn’t + if he had his aorta cut, then he’d just pass away directly, without having the time to say that I’m abt to pass away

So he accepts the Quran as an authority or what?

This argument was made by hammer time and 'Farid responds' debunked it years ago

He claimed that the verse in the Quran wouldn’t be meant in a literal sense. And that’s a dishonest presumption and very common for the people of innovation (either from the Muslims or all Christians and Jews). The Arabic language is taken in a liters sense except there are indications in earlier Arabic sources that an expression is not to be taken literally or could be taken metaphorically. But the standard position is to take the statement literally.

I never understand why this people exist as if we stole their land,houses,ethnicity and... oops that already been done by certain people that claim that they are the chosen people.

why do these christians hide in a direct confrontation? -doglogic got annihilated by uthman on a wrong interpretation of corinthians verse after his master sam shamoun ran away from sheikh uthman. and eventually he was so embarrased from this interpretation that he brang up the consciousness argument to cover up his doglogic embarrasment. -sam shamoun acts tough online and even when some muslim agree to have a debate, he posts lies that "i destroyed a muslim" like heck he did nothing. he did the same with you and he eventually became quiet after you embarrassed him the 3rd time by pinging him to have a debate.

I feel like that was his first time ever reading the word aorta because what was that pronunciation 😭

Christians come up with the most childish amateur arguments to troll Islam challenge: IMPOSSIBLE.

I am a Bengali. So, we have this word 'যন্ত্রপাতি' (Jontropati) which we use for both Heavy Machineries and Light Tools (Like Hammer and such). Thing is, Heavy machineries and Tools are very different things, yet, we use the same word. It's not weird. This is a such case. The English language didn't have that word, so both are expressed as aorta. Very simple. I am saying this because christians will probably get frustrated at this point and say something like, "you moslems are making excuses!". No matter how much you cope, a valid explanation is a valid explanation.

GUYS GUYS GUYS HE DEBUNKED ISLAM LOOOOLLLLLLLL such high IQ argument 🤣🤣🤣🤣

if he read well and was interested in understanding the Koran as well as his interest in his beautician, we would have heard nonsense

Alhumdulillah summa Alhumdulillah I was so relieved that brother gave him a authentic and logical answer!

SubhaanALLah.... I can't believe how desperate some Christians are with there stupidity in trying to disprove what's always Right, i think that's why they all end up disgracing themselves. I pray to God to open your heart so that you all can see Light

Brother Daniel may Allah bless u even more

Moreover the word used in Qur'an is in past tense .. meaning if that was the case it we would have surely done that... Not will do this in the end

JazakaAllah Khair..

I heard same exact opinions before in somewhere 2010s, 😂 seems like they need an upgrade

To every non-Muslim who feels they have an amazing argument that totally debunks islam in its entirety. A Islamic scholar from the Middle Ages probably wrote a detailed refutation of it a long time ago. Peace

GOTEEM Ustadh

Watin is carotid, abhar is aorta

Even if the translation was correct and both meant aorta: Let's take a language lesson you do realize the difference between these two phrases: "I ((feel)) my aorta is being c-ut from that po-ison" "I feel like my leg is c-ut off from the nu-mbness" And "We would have cu-t from him the aorta" "We would have to c-ut off his leg in su-rgery from the car acci-d-ent" No still didn't cli-ck maybe get ba-ck to school then. Plus you do realize if the aorta is cu-t off how quick dea-th would be maybe other than language lessons go retake biology classes. Plus another person whovwas infl-icted with the poi-son di-ed immediatly while the Prophet PBUH didn't and managed to sur-vive for years until finishing his message so your narrative again sha-tters.

Good Job Brother

david wood used the exact same arguement ages ago

2:26 I know exactly where he got this idea from: David Wood. I have literally heard the same line of thought from David and this christian dude just repeats after him.

Brother Daniel You don't need to make fun of his appearance to refute his argument his argument based on ignorant of the Arabic language

Actually if the prophet Mohammed was a false prophet like what he said, then he can’t get a revelation from God because he is not a true prophet, then that mean the Quran is not the words of God but rather it’s the prophet Mohammed who made it up , so then God didn’t not kill the prophet Mohammed in that way because it is not the word of God to begin with. Funny and weak argument to be honest 🙂‍↕

JazakAllah'u khairan brother

HE SAID THE WORD WHICH DOES NOT FIT ON TRINITY 😂😂

بارك الله فيك وجزاك الله خير الجزاء أخي دانيال.

"obviously not in a literal sense" Where does he get the idea from that that is not literal? I think because in christianity they choose and pick what is metaphorical and what not that they also think this applies to the quran?

4:20 i lost it there 🤣🤣💔💔

1500 years and nobody can find a single error or contradiction.

I think it's a little too much to attack his appearance, it's not like he's being derogatory, he's just pointing something out as a disbeliever. I think the condescending comments are uncalled for. Allahu Alam

You can’t fault the guy ..his reasoning is logical although still an error but he doesn’t know the Arabic language and unfortunately there are non Arab speaking Muslims who would fall for this and doubt Islam when they hear these things

Mashallah brother.

Im so sorry for everyone who doesn’t speak Arabic. You don’t even have to look what Al-Matin(المتين) means, Allah said لو تقَوَّل and and then used the past tense لأخذنا منه باليمين: Which literally means if he did lies we would… but he didn’t😒. Besides The Prophet death was normal like any other man and if his aorta was cut or infected by any kind of pathogens he would die immediately and not after 3 yrs of illness🤦🏼‍♂️

Let me wrap up this real quick: - The surah from which the christian apologist quoted that verse was revealed around 5 BH (before hijra). - the words used in the surah, for anyone who understands the ways of Arabic, mean that the execution of that punishment would have been quick and swift. Because as you cut that major vein, the animal dies immediately. - now the prophet upon whom be peace ate that poison from that woman 3 years before his death. - between those two times, ie between the revelation of surat Al Haqq'a and the poison incident, most of the Quran was revealed with the most dense verses of legislation. So the probability for lying would have been highest during that time. - the prophet upon whom be peace, by saying that, he just disproves the whole point, because if he was a liar, why would he mention that? - the best thing these apologists can argue against is that the prophet WAS a true prophet but then changed. But the only fact that he survived with that poison for three years and some of his companions died then and there proves that the verse didn't apply to him, because again the verse was talking about an immediate swift death, similar to severing the aorta. Other points I may have missed. But that's the general gist of it.

daniel knows how to cook, god bless with that ending hahah

His arguments is self defeating. 1. The Prophet never had his aorta cut. This alone should suffice as evidence. 2. One is not able to talk if the aorta is being cut or been cut. Let alone live. 3. The religion of Islam were finalized and perfected a while before the Prophets death (sura maidah verse 3). The Prophet lived to finalize the holy Quran and Islam. 4. Cutting the aorta is an instant death. The Prophet didnt have an instant death. 5. Cutting the aorta occurs immediately after an false revelation. Not waiting days, weeks or months and then God would suddenly decide to cut his aorta. 6. The verse talks in past terms, not future. 7. The verse before (69:43) and a few verses after (69:51) clearly says that the Quran is the absolute truth, a revelation from God. So the verses before and after is debunking their claims. 8. As Daniel pointed out, there are two different words used in the Quran and hadiths.

In the field of rhetoric: The phrase "لأخذنا منه بالوتين" (We would have seized him by the right) in the context of Arabic rhetoric uses the "ل" followed by "ب" (لام followed by باء) to imply immediate action. It suggests that God would have punished him instantly, right then and there, which contradicts the false claim that Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) lived for years after the revelation of this verse and then passed away. The meaning here is that if the Prophet had falsely attributed something to God, He would have swiftly inflicted His punishment. The phrase "لأخذنا باليمين" (We would have seized him by the right hand) implies seizing with power and force and punishment . But where in history do we find that ALLAH seized the Prophet with power and force? Where is this punishment? Secondly, regarding the aorta and the wateen: They are not the same word. According to "Al-Mu'jam Al-Waseet" (2/1010), the aorta (الابهر) is a vein, while the wateen (الوتين) is the main artery that exits the heart and supplies blood to the body. This distinction itself is a scientific miracle in the Quran and Sunnah. How could the illiterate Prophet, who could neither read nor write, know the difference between an artery and a vein? and we know in medicine the cut in the artery will kill fastly than the vein choosing the word alwateen is an indicator of a scientific miracle in fact This clearly indicates that these words are not from Muhammad but from God, proving the authenticity of the Quran and that it is indeed from the All-Knowing, the Wise. Thirdly, the incident of the poisoned sheep: When Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) ate the poisoned meat, a companion, Bishr ibn al-Baraa, ate with him and died immediately. Why didn't Muhammad die along with him? Lastly, in Arabic language usage: The phrase "انقطع ابهري" (My aorta has been cut) is a metaphorical expression meaning "I feel that I am going to die." It does not necessarily imply the literal meaning. The evidence for this can be found in the poetry of King Ibn Idris, where he says: "ويكاد من يرقي اليه مره يشكو انقطاع الابهر" (And one who ascends to him once almost complains of the severance of the aorta), implying imminent death.

As a Moroccan ane Arabic speakers, You guys in the English part of the world, have another game 😂😂😂, i find people having debate about things that doesn't mean even what they do understand from the translation. For Arab Christians at least, they do have questions inside the game, not as English speakers 😂😂

العرب اللي ما عارفين فالوتين (الشريان الرئيس) وأما الأبهر فوريد من الأوردة! ففي "المعجم الوسيط"(2/ 1010): " (الوتين) الشريان الرئيس الَّذِي يغذي جسم الْإِنْسَان بِالدَّمِ النقي الْخَارِج من الْقلب". وفيه (1/ 73): " (الأبهران) : الوريدان اللَّذَان يحْملَانِ الدَّم من جَمِيع أوردة الْجِسْم إِلَى الأذين الْأَيْمن من الْقلب" انتهى.

What kind of delusion is that, how defeated must he be for speaking gibberish..!

So this cristian is ready to accept the miracle of the prophet pbuh dying from the poison after 3 years, Subhanallah Also the prophet died from the poison not from cut of the aorta, he was just describing the pain

Do you think it’s logical to believe in a god who turns to flesh , dies for YOUR sins and he reaurrect himself back because he loves you? That is logical? 🤦‍♂️

Let's say for argument sake that this guy is right. He's basically saying that the Quran is right for predicting the death of the prophet (pbuh) for being wrong, so what is his point? That the book sent to the prophet (pbuh) is right because he's wrong? Someone explain the argument of this "genius", please.

It's nice that you proved him wrong, but it's not nice that you made fun of his eyebrows. We as Muslims should not make fun of others.

According to his own logic, then the Qur'an is the word of Allah because he believes what Allah's says in the Qur'an came to pass. What's the arguement now? Not only these people have bad intentions , they are also so ignorant. When one isn't sincere and rejects the truth after it has been made clear to them, then Allah seals their hearts and hearing and put a covering on their eyes. Allah never wrongs His creatures, this happens as a result of their own making. May Allah give us deep understanding.