Deriving general relativity from quantum measurement - Seth Lloyd 

Thats why he divided it into two parts. The first part he motivates the limit and at the beginning of the second part he explicit ask the audience to forget everything he says before and start just from this limit. In other words we can take the geometric limit as our starting postulate or axiom

Yes, It would appear Shrinking would be the correct answer Using Bulk Modulus actually is a pretty good work around adding mass to the Elastic Medium drops the Oscillation Speed which drops the energy carrying capacity (redshifting all energy transitioning the mass loaded portion of the Medium ). SR & GR would already apply because the Medium itself is electromagnetic Like the loosening of a guitar string, Hubble constant would be releasing of initial stretch of the Medium, a homogeneous & isotropic Contraction of the Elastic Medium, while (the speed of the effects of light & Gravity) would be equal to the P-wave wave .... S-wave verses P-wave. The fastest wave, and therefore the first to arrive at a given location, is called the P wave. The P wave, or compressional wave, alternately compresses and expands material in the same direction it is traveling. The S wave is slower than the P wave and arrives next, shaking the ground up and down and back and forth perpendicular to the direction it is traveling. And it gets around the Speed limit of light for calculating the properties of the Medium. Speed of light = ( total system speed ) - (Hubble speed * 8^0.5 ) (3e+8 - 2.997935248198935e+8) / (8^0.5) = 73000 ((800000 / 8.88888888888e-12)^0.5) = 3e+8 137*73 = 10001 Bulk Elastic Properties & Wave Speeds (Elastic Property / Inertial Property)^0.5 = Velocity ((1 / ((4 * pi) / (10^7))) / 8.8541885e-12)^0.5 = 299792446.448 hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/permot3.html hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Sound/souspe2.html#c1

I believe it was the clock that was radiating and making state changes. Light self-radiation (vacuum polarization) is higher order QED effects which were not incorporated into the model hence the non-appearance of the cosmological constant.

+ozdergecko elementary computations

+DerGastAusDerZukunft -- Danke und schöne Weihnachten!

Yes, changes in quantum states. He says this twice, I think.

As I understand it, the object will not only 'slow down' but will also be red-shifted to the point where it is invisible against the background.

No, that's been discussed before: The redshift is important to what is perceived, but irrelevant to what really happens! It's the same for special relativity: You can accurately and instantly calculate where a far away object is from your perspective (frame) and how time passes there from your point of view (frame), even though you are not able to SEE the result up to the point where the light from that object reaches you, maybe years later.

The gravitational force of the black hole warps space in an area around it, like a stream of water, at some point the still water become shifting due to the pull of water downstream, or something like that anyway. You are perhaps best looking at documentaries that explain it more simply, like Brian Greene or Brian Cox.

It takes finite time from the viewpoint of the participant to fall into the singularity at the center. The apparent slowing down and coming to rest at the event horizon is an artifact of how the coordinates are defined in the Schwarzchild metric. The Wikipedia article about the Schwarzchild metric explains this and gives other metrics that don't have this property.

what do you think of as the physical process you call "completely turning a proton into energy"

are you complaining about math in an MIT lecture?

@@damonbates6004 i do not know interest and level grade of his audience and popular you tube watchers. So i can not answer.( Note: math is a language helping researchers to express scientific, natural phenomena events etc. Law ,finance sociology psycho issues can also be expressed by logical, mathematical terms aritmetical processes too )

How hung? How deep did you receive him?

lol

Regurgitation without understanding is the norm these days. Misinterpretation is a big issue. If youre capable of completely understanding this topic youre also capable of seeing its flaws as you did. Glad theres more of us out there.