Might just be me (people saying 10/10) but i think both X and No Stylist were just ok, showing the potential they both have but also that theyre better together at this point with their tracks together being the main highlights on both albums for me. I think lone played it too safe with the vocals overall on this
I felt that way about X but not No Stylist. On X, Ken didn't really venture out of his main sound and it all kind of sounded similar and it had some weak tracks. This album shows Lone's versatility with him hopping on rage beats like NOSTYLIST and VETERAN, more rock style songs like DANGEROUS and CRYSTLCSTLES, and the icy and atmospheric beats like LNLY and PRSSURE. Even though VETERAN with Ken is one of the main highlights, Lone still shines on his own on most of these tracks. I do wish he used his high pitched voice a little bit more but this was still a very solid debut album.
@@invox7561 yh fair point bro pretty much agree . main thing for me is that i wanted to see more unusual delivery and vocal inflexions which we know lone is capable of
We have all sinned and fallen short of Gods glory and we all deserve hell but Jesus Christ Gods perfect sent son died on a cross so we don’t have to go there and we can now be saved by grace through our faith in him
Damn you're apparently the exception lmao. I excepted this album to be better than x and to me it is (NOT by far at all). Even tho I still would say that Ken is overall way more enjoyable to listen to. But not as technical or versatile. At least right now.
