J Sai Deepak ji is absolutely right. I appreciate your all out efforts against misguided people of India. I am fond of your intelligence from Bangladesh.
Americans in the north USA and south USA look the same, Chinese in the north China and south China look the same, Russians in north Russia and south Russia look the same, take any country, people all over that country look the same, until and unless, that country has a history of invasion or colonisation and demolition of the local history...It happened in India, Aryan invasion happened in India and that's why North indians are so different looking than South Indians. Aryans and Dravidians are different races of people, belonging to different lands
The problem is not Google. The problem lies in the mindset that Google is always right. We need to come out of that. Unfortunately, everywhere in the world, facts have always been hidden from the general masses for promoting the propaganda which is always anti India. JSD has done exactly the opposite and I think it's time every Indian does the same in some or the other way and degree. Kudos to JSD for his enormous contribution towards understanding and representing India in its true essence.
First of all Google is an western platform, so they'll show only western propaganda and narratives first. Google individually doesn't have much information, Google just redirect us to certain websites and platform. Now it's on us should we believe on those websites or not, which country, which authors have written and running those websites needs to be evaluated first.
@@Mytbustr With what brain did you come to that conclusion? Or are you a sheep looking at others' fabricated work? How about looking at current research, which tells us that there have been a genetic continuity in Bharat/India going back 10,000+ years. In fact, after the African migration and settlement in India for a long period, there has been a migration out of India to Europe and other continents.
@@Shiva_20 smith is not a cast name, Yadav is. Until and unless hindus are ready to shed their cast identity, there is no proper hindu religion. You can fool yourself saying this is remembering one's ancestors.
@@vasanthirajiv9707 You will not reach anu where by denying social realities. Cast is absent in western societies. So they can use surnames like that. Thats not the case with hinduism. Caste based discrimination is still a hot reality here. and caste is the single most reason for the weakness of hindus in front of muslims. You cant have the luxury of both indulging in your caste supremacy and having a strong religion.
Aryan "invasion" might be the wrong word but aryans from steppe regions have migrated to india after the decline of IVC. Vedic period is basically their rise and expansion within north west india
Most Amazing and Interesting Speech by Sai Deepak. !! His Clarity and articulate way of Giving answers is really unparallel. Always enjoy Listening to Sai Deepak for his Versatility and amazing Knowledge of our ancient History and Culture.👌👌👌❤💘💘
Sai Ji is a true sapoot of Bharat. His knowledge, talents and scholarship must be utilized. He should be made chief of NCERT or UGC and be made responsible for educating the coming generations.
Jaja, Did he show you any research based article? He is argoloesist or antrologyiest? Or linguisticiest? Did he or you know what was recently found results in keeladi and kodumudi sites in Tamilnadu? Can you show a single religion evidenceon these sites? Atlest do you age of Tamil Bharmi script? Fake un scientific sangi's.
@@vyogana Yes he has shown research- read his books. One can wake up the sleeping but not the who is pretending to be sleep. Congress-Communist-Jihadi gangs and their ass-lickers pretend to sleep selectively. Pray tell, what research Romila Thapar did that is being taught for decades ?
@@bkk5153 jaja, As always no straight answers. Addional questions, did he published research work in any international journals on this topic? Or his book recommended as the textbook book for any research subjects of anthropology in any reputed university? Anyone write a scientific fake history book like ramayanam and bhagabaratham. If you can or dare answer my all pervious and these additional questions in stright. Please stop your rama Krishna stories in Tamilnadu. We are much more progressive than your sangi's India
If a 5000 year old skeletons from Indian subcontinent does not contain any steppe pastoralist gene in them . That means Indo European language speaking steppe pastoralist or Aryan's did not existed during Indus valley civilization period . Sanskrit did not originated from Indian subcontinent
70 years congress agenda was गरीबी हटाव....For that they made 7 years planning and planning commission. Did this old man accept that congress failed to eradicate the poverty but successful to create a vicious circle of poverty in its 70 years.
Sanskrit is not oldest language...Indus civilization is Tamil civilization. Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof. 1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C. 2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C 3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago.. This is the mainly Proof .. India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable 1.) Tamizhi inscription 2.)Poly language inscription 3.)Ashoca inscription 4.)Devanagari inscription.. 5.)SANSKRIT inscription Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available.. Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams. 1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association. Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD. The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature. Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu.. As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages.. Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
@@Mytbustr He starts with "I don't have an understanding of DNA, genealogy, or archaeology, but my interpretation of literature is...". Sai is retarded, literature is the most inaccurate sources of history, they are fables and lies. Science is irrefutable, and DNA shows proof of the Aryan invasion theory.
Sanskrit is not oldest language. Indus civilization is Tamil civilization. Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof. 1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C. 2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C 3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago.. This is the mainly Proof .. India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable 1.) Tamizhi inscription 2.)Poly language inscription 3.)Ashoca inscription 4.)Devanagari inscription.. 5.)SANSKRIT inscription Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available.. Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams. 1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association. Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD. The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature. Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu.. As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages.. Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
I am not an anthropologist, genesist, etc. But I am expert enough to give a verdict on stuff only a group of anthropologists, genesists, historians etc should give. Great.
You can believe what you wish to but the reality is that there was indeed an aryan migration to India. Hordes of steppe tribesmen migrated to India over several centuries and their progeny formed the vedic culture of whats now called India. Hinduism was brought to India by these people. Now I don't consider them foreigners or anything. Their ancestral contribution to indians' genepool ranges from 6% to 25%. So we don't have to really deny their invasions. 25% means that their genetic contribution is like your paternal grandfather. Sanskrit is like your paternal grandfathers heritage, even tho 75% of Indians ancestry comes from South Asia itself. But aryans? They are our ancestors! Why deny them? The genetic evidence is undeniable. I accept the Aryans migrated in waves to India but I also consider Hindu culture my own even tho it came from the outside.
@@Gabbargaamada ooo then Ramayana and Mahabharata are then supposedly Aryan texts .Then why are people of mahabharat mentioned in Tamil Sangam literature and buddhist Jatakas in sri lanka
Aryans, derived from the original Sanskrit word Arya, means cultivated educated person, according to Sri Aurobindo, used to have very high moral standard with great regard for truth, promise and hospitality. Their sages, or Rishis, after many years of meditations and learning, derived some great ideas or hymns(Riks) on God and universe. Recent DNA evidence shows that Europe experienced a massive population influx from the east, beginning around 4,500 years from the present. Several haplo-groups were involved in this expansion, including the Indian-origin R1a1a. This was almost a total replacement event, which indicates that Indo-Aryans, among others, expanded westward into Europe and to a large extent replaced indigenous European males and their Y-chromosome strata (Sharma and his associates, 2009) This genetic evidence indicates that several Y-chromosomal (patrilineal) lineages, one of which was the Indian-origin R1a1a, gave rise to the modern European population. Out of these lineages, R1a1a is the most widespread and numerous. Recent DNA evidence shows that Europe experienced a massive population influx from the east, beginning around 4,500 years from the present. Several haplo-groups were involved in this expansion, including the Indian-origin R1a1a. This was almost a total replacement event, which indicates that Indo-Aryans, among others, expanded westward into Europe and to a large extent replaced indigenous European males and their Y-chromosome strata (Sharma and his associates, 2009) This genetic evidence indicates that several Y-chromosomal (patrilineal) lineages, one of which was the Indian-origin R1a1a, gave rise to the modern European population. Out of these lineages, R1a1a is the most widespread and numerous. It proves that: 1. The R1a haplogroup originated in India. 2. The Indo-Aryan people have lived in India for at least 15,450 years, which invalidates the theory that the Indo-Aryans invaded India 3,500 years ago. 3. The hundreds of millions of members (possibly over a billion) of the R1a family living across the world today - a very large fraction of humanity - are all descended from one single male ancestor who lived in India at least 15,450 years ago. This discovery demonstrates the close genetic (and hence linguistic and cultural) affinity of Indians with the Russian and Polish people, the Vikings and Normans, and with the ancient Scythians and Tocharians, among many others (Sharma et al, 2009). References: Sharma S., 2009, The Indian origin of paternal haplogroup R1a1* substantiates the autochthonous origin of Brahmins and the caste system. Journal of Human Genetics, 54, 47-55 Sarker, A., A., Deshpande , A., Mukherjee, M. K., Bera,, B., Das, N., Juyal, P., Morthekai, R. D. , Deshpande, V. S., Shinde, V., & Rao, L. S., 2016, Oxygen isotope in archaeological bioapatites from India: Implications to climate change and decline of Bronze Age Harappan civilization, Nature, Scientific Reports volume 6, Article number: 26555.
Sanskrit is not oldest language...Indus civilization is Tamil civilization. Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof. 1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C. 2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C 3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago.. This is the mainly Proof .. India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable 1.) Tamizhi inscription 2.)Poly language inscription 3.)Ashoca inscription 4.)Devanagari inscription.. 5.)SANSKRIT inscription Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available.. Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams. 1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association. Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD. The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature. Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu.. As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages.. Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
There is one ancient temple in Gudimallam Village near Tirupati air port which has a lot of interesting features. Lingam in that temple represents earliest concepts of gods of Bharat.Though the temple is said to be from second century BC , lingam appears to be much more older. How did Aryan gods appear in South India few thousand years back without any such from north India? This temple needs a lot of study to prove or disprove Aryan invasion.
Sanskrit is not oldest language. Indus civilization is Tamil civilization. Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof. 1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C. 2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C 3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago.. This is the mainly Proof .. India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable 1.) Tamizhi inscription 2.)Poly language inscription 3.)Ashoca inscription 4.)Devanagari inscription.. 5.)SANSKRIT inscription Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available.. Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams. 1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association. Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD. The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature. Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu.. As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages.. Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
I’ve noticed the same thing. If they do adress the migration theory they just tacitly oversee it as just another name for the same concept as the invasion theory. The reality is that no one believes or even considers the invasion theory anymore (not since at least a half century), unless they are extreme white nationalists and or neo-nazis ..
Read any history textbook in india ...its taught as aryan invasion theory..dont dilute the concept to push the narrative...aryan invasion to aryan migration
I'm glad someone else pointed this out. It seems to me that this dude and the others have built themselves an effective strawman in *Aryan Invasion theory.* They "debunk" and "destroy" when not a single serious scholar or researcher takes the theory seriously anymore. And, turns out, they spend no time to debate actually science, which is the *Indo-Aryan Migration theory*, which they have effectively conflated to be the Invasion theory.
If a 5000 year old skeletons from Indian subcontinent does not contain any steppe pastoralist gene in them . That means Indo European language speaking steppe pastoralist or Aryan's did not existed during Indus valley civilization period . Sanskrit did not originated from Indian subcontinent
@@nitikakolnad8465 Interestingly the same people say North India protected South India from Invasions. If there is no invasion what did North India protect South from? Did North did not invade South?
Yes. There's no Aryan invasion. If we agree with the Aryan invasion then the question arises that Aryan also migrated to other places other than india. There's sanskrit, varna ashrama dharma, vedantha etc only in India. Ok. If Aryan were the owner of sanskrit, then that would be prevalent in all places they migrated. If Aryan is from North then why are all the pancha bhutta stalas are in South india. Why aryan God parshuram is associated with Kerala. All Aryan Gods are black in color. So Aryan invasion is a myth created by the British to divide our society to rule.
The Mongols committed genocide in places previously occupied by what would have been the Aryans. The Islamic caliphate/empires also wiped out various cultural identities, including that of western India. Although Islam was bad, the Mongols literally had a policy of killing everyone, so much so that CO2 levels decreased measurably as a result of the decrease in the global human population.
That Uncle the moment he asked the question i know what JSD is going to reply back.. However, JSD with utmost respect to his age replied in a very non JSD way LOL.. if the other person would have been of my age.. i am sure he would have knocked him out with his ruthlessness yet factual answers... but i somehow felt that uncle still got some ego left in him... each to his own.. i am nobody to judge somebody..
If you read some of the literature written during the early 1900s or late 1800s by Indian authors they all regurgitate this Aryan-Dravidian narrative. This includes even authors who were practicing Hindus. That was the level to which our own people had been brainwashed by these ideas put together by the foreigner deliberately to undermine India's contributions to the world. Our own people didn't question these theories or offer a counter narrative. The first person to rubbish this Aryan theory was Swami Vivekananda (to my limited knowledge) although at that time he didn't do it on the basis of genetics or evidence. He took the position that the whole of Bharat and all its people are Arya (i.e. noble). It is only today that some of our own Indic scholars have come up with theories like 'Out of India' as a counter to the Aryan Migration Theory. So it is not surprising that the older generation (like the old man) still believes in the Aryan-Dravidian narratives. I assume JSD knew that reality and perhaps that is why he went easy on the old man asking the question using Google as some sort of definitive source to understand this complex topic. But you can see JSD's face when the question was asked - it was amusing to observe his facial reaction.
@@AshwinSriram There are a lot of people who noticed early on that Aryan Invasion was pure nonsense. Shri Arubindo for example. I think Tilak also said that. But Islamist + Leftist cabal was very successful in suppressing the truth.
When I visited Ooty in 2012-13, there was a region in Nilagiri hills where we were not allowed to enter. We were told that that area was given to adi-vaasis. Also note that Aadi-vaasi is a Tamil word. The question is, why would English/western people use a Tamil word to refer them? Secondly if invasion (I would remove the word Aryan for clarity) theory is incorrect, can you please explain me why in this land that starts from Kanyakumari to Kashimir or even west, we have so many differences, i.e., languages, food, utensils type, dress, culture or religions (this includes the ones combined by Adi Sankara)? And why so many hierarchies & differences based on their second names? At least Invasion Theory tried to answer some of these questions. If that is not true, then propose a theory that would answer these questions? Don't try to fool yourself by saying that there are or were no differences, suppression and neglect-tions in this land (i.e., like saying earth is flat, not round).
He said Aryan invasion theory is incorrect. He never said someone called "Aryans" never came to the Indian subcontinent. India has been a place of travellers, immigrants since millennia. They have come, settled, syncretised in every way possible. Hence the huge medley of cultures. Plus, like he said, read his first book. You will likely get all your answers.
For everyone asking which book he is talking about towards the end , it is "India that is Bharath". I have had it & read it. It's a bit high level English. Lol But read it slowly & multiple times you will get your answers about 'who is the original inhabitant of India" . If you are wondering which books he refered in his one hour speech at "Tamil Nadu Dialogues" or somewhere recently - he doesn't mention it here. We will probably have to find that hour long speech & listen to see what books he names. But yeah, first book where he directly answers the question in the title is his first book India that is Bharath. Edit - the straight answer is "Aryan invasion theory is a hoax". Long answer of why it is hoax, who created it & propagated it is in his book. The first section he talks about is 150 pages it addresses in detail (with books& citations) everything about coloniality, indigenous faiths,entrenchment if coloniality through European political structures , decoloniality etc..
Just at an academic level, who are the first inhabitants? Not between Aryan/Dravidian or anything. What is the rough progression of people into India and how did they settle? I don't buy into the Aryan Dravidian hoax either. It would be nice to know this progression. If you can answer this in short that would be nice.
@@ranjanrajagopalan6194 Read About Dashrajya Yuddh mentioned in Rig Ved 10th Mandala The 10 clans of the defeated kings were expelled by King Sudas and some of them migrated towards Europe and while some migrated north of Bharat This Means Arya Migration happened,But the inhabitants of Bharat migrated towards Europe and not vice versa
@@kartikchaturvedi7146 Yeah,they were from NW Akhand Bharat(Afghanistan, Pakistan) and some Eastern part of Iran Hear about the Yamnaya Invasion of Europe from "Abhijit Chavda"(RU-vidr),There you will find all the info about history
Invasion may be wrong but not migration. Aryan Migration is backed up by Genetics, Linguistics and Archeological research studies. The Rakhigarhi DNA report, sinauli excavation, Keeladi site findings, similarity of Sanskrit with other Indo European languages all prove Aryan migration. OIT is not at all supported by mainstream academia.
Aryan migration/invasion however you call it both of them happened simultaneously in harappa History is so much complex even if you try to simplify it you can't! The genetical evidence alone prove Aryan conquest of harappa They brought Hinduism and created castism to oppress native Indians and keep their bloodline pure
They invaded in the name of culture.They introduced new gods and customs,rituals etc. Vedic culture spoiled India. Our forefathers could not get basic education because of vedic culture.Just do pooja and some customs show urself as pious and pure to the society.
Sanskrit is not oldest language... Indus civilization is Tamil civilization. Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof. 1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C. 2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C 3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago.. This is the mainly Proof .. India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable 1.) Tamizhi inscription 2.)Poly language inscription 3.)Ashoca inscription 4.)Devanagari inscription.. 5.)SANSKRIT inscription Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available.. Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams. 1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association. Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD. The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature. Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu.. As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages.. Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
The people in the comments are brainwashed. Let them be. Let them believe in this fake Indian superiority belief In the long run, we will see how this Hindu supremacy negatively affects India. Then these people will understand and by then, it will be too late. Wise people will run away from this nation in the near future, mark my words. The data doesn't lie, Lakhs of HNI's already gave up Indian citizenship
Sometimes I feel south feel superior over North Indians and vice versa . We really need to unite as Hindus irrespective of diff language and colour - reason is just climate in south it is hot and in south it is cold . Btw am dogra from Jammu but first of all am a sanatani
People get richer they start having superiority complex which is present everywhere instead of rectifying them we should work towards better so people can sit with equal footing I have seen south people beating and slapping poor Bihari’s but it couldn’t change until Biharis make Bihar better and stop migrating. I am from Rajasthan and I can understand superiority complex before emergency we were one of the richest states with highest. Number of army personnel’s but Indira Gandhi all the gold now Rajasthan is one of the worst performing state it Is due to our own negligence. So in the end people who are more reacher than us will feel superior currently southern people have more money then northern once thus they have superiority complex .
@@chilpeeps haha bro same with jammu jammu is rich and not a british colony search the maharaja hari sing and the joke of the day is rajasthan and jammu comes on no 1 and no 2 in unemployment
You are not a south Indian. You are an Aryan. Please unite as Hindus and go back to your original country-the Steppes of Central Asia and live with your cousins the Iranians and the Europeans. You have made a mess of this country with your inhuman caste system. Please take all the south Indian Hindus who speak all those funny languages like Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam and god only knows. They are ''chocolate'' Aryans. Take them with you. Show them their original homeland. With so much of problems we are trying to live our lives peacefully, but these Aryans and Dravidians are creating new problems every day.
@@chilpeeps welcome to Mumbai Having billionaires living in the city and it's not in south it's in west. Been born and brought up here never treated a small town guy as inferior.
Sanskrit is not oldest language. Indus civilization is Tamil civilization.... Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof. 1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C. 2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C 3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago.. This is the mainly Proof .. India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable 1.) Tamizhi inscription 2.)Poly language inscription 3.)Ashoca inscription 4.)Devanagari inscription.. 5.)SANSKRIT inscription Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available.. Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams. 1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association. Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD. The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature. Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu.. As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages.. Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
The person asking the first question knows nothing about the Aryans. The word Arya is there in the Vedas, Ramayana and Mahabharata. And these periods have been dated between 20000 and 5000 BC respectively with astronomical calculation by Mr. Nilesh Oak. Thus this story of the Aryan invasion to India around 1500 BC is all a cock and bull story. This north and south divide is also a political agenda of the Dravidian parties. That the Indians are of the same genetic root has been scientifically proven beyond any doubt.
Its saddening when you see how mislead are the senior intellectuals of india. How can such an educated old citizen thoroughly believes in aryan theory and dare to say that gap between poor and rich has gone more wider in the past 5 years.
@@losblancos6462 he is quiet right my sociology professor is a brahman but he is very hinduphobic and anti india. we have to listen to his senseless bullshit every day.
This guy never answered the gentleman's question before the audience. He shamelessly deviated from the point. The comments section has also not questioned his behavior. This is breakdown of logic !
Mr Aravindan Neelakandan has written a good narration of the history of India in his recent book. It kinda of complements what Mr Sai Jai Deepak is sharing in his talks
Aryans migrated from Central Asia over hundreds of years n brought along with them their culture and language. They slowly assimilated n incorporated pre vedic Gods into their belief structure.
What makes more sense is that ancient Indians migrated out of India instead of Aryans migrating into India. India has always had a high population historically, so, a land with higher population throughout time means that People from that land likely migrated out instead of migrating in. Heck, even the 'gypsies' in Europe were a bunch of North Indians that migrated out of India more than 1,000 years ago. The reason for skin color difference amongst Indians is similar to skin color difference amongst People in other Countries, those who spent doing labor out in the sun were darker, those who spent time indoors away from the sun were lighter, those who lived in areas with high sunlight were darker, those who lived in the mountainous regions or in the colder regions were lighter. If you go to Europe, People in Italy are darker than People in Scandinavian countries, does that mean Italians were some other group of People who migrated into Italy? Or it's just a matter of geography and climate.
Aryan never attack us this is propoganda by muller n macaulay for division in india so brits rule And bharat original name is aryabharta jambudweep bharatkhand our bharat is huge and we rule 60%of land this world .. During chakrawarthi samrat vikram aditya n his evidence in turkey sher e okul ..
I humbly urge our central government to utilize the intelligence and knowledge of respected J Sai Deepak ji to rectify the myths and falsehood which we are being taught since 1947. Hail to honourable J Sai Deepak ji.
Utter RUBBISH! Whole 12 minutes or so this man kept talking but only point he kept on the Aryan Invasion Theory, was to say, "read 1st chapter of my 1st book". And continued praising himself and his ways.
Aryan word came from the Sanskrit word Arya, or cultivated people. According to Bal Gangadhar Tilak the Aryans had their origin in the Arctic Circle of Russia before the last Ice Age, before 27000 BC. At the time of the Ice Age they came to India, which was Ice free but they lost everything during the flood that followed after the Ice Age, possibly in 17000 BC. They developed new civilization in India. In about 6000 BC some of them, called themselves Asuras, went out of India and went to Iran, Iraq, Syria, Armenia and Russia, Ukraine, Bulgaria and Greece. There are Genetic evidence. These civilzations are related. Western mainly the Anglo-American historians are propagating a false history that the Aryans came to India in 1500 BC. Thus, according to them all the characters of Ramayana and Mahabharatas are non-Aryans. Ramayana was about 9000BC and Mahabharata is about 7000 BC. Reference: Hall, HR ,1939, A Season of Work at Ur, Al-Ubaid, Abu Shahrain (Eridu) and Elsewhere:Being an Unofficial Account of the British Museum Archaeological Mission to Babylonia, London: Methuen Oak, N., 2011, Mystery of Arundhuti, Atlanta: Danphe Inc. Pravda, 2005, ‘Ancient Aryan civilization achieved incredible technological progress 40 centuries ago’, 16 July 2005 Tilak, Bal Gangadhara, 1903, The Arctic Home in the Vedas, Messrs. Tilak Brothers, Pune. Guseva, N. R. 1995. Induism: Aryi, Slaviane. Moscow: Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology. Oak, N., 2011, When Did The Mahabharata War Happen?, Atlanta: Danphe Inc Oak, N., 2014, The Historic Rama: Indian Civilization at the End of Pleistocene, Scotts Valley, California: CreateSpace. Zharnikova, S. V. 1986. K voprosu o vozmozhnoi lokalizatsii sviashchennykh gor Meru i Khary indoiranskoi (ariiskoi) mifologii. Informatsionnyi bulleten’ Mezhdunarodnoi assotsiatsii po izucheniiu kul’tur Tsentral’noi Azii 11:31-44.
Sanskrit is not oldest language.... Indus civilization is Tamil civilization. Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof. 1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C. 2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C 3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago.. This is the mainly Proof .. India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable 1.) Tamizhi inscription 2.)Poly language inscription 3.)Ashoca inscription 4.)Devanagari inscription.. 5.)SANSKRIT inscription Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available.. Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams. 1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association. Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD. The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature. Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu.. As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages.. Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
@@targetii nothing wrong in being bhakt Read again It's Andhbhakt that means blind believer n if u r proud of being an Andhbhakt feeling sorry for u 😂😂😂
Sanskrit is not oldest language...Indus civilization is Tamil civilization. Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof. 1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C. 2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C 3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago.. This is the mainly Proof .. India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable 1.) Tamizhi inscription 2.)Poly language inscription 3.)Ashoca inscription 4.)Devanagari inscription.. 5.)SANSKRIT inscription Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available.. Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams. 1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association. Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD. The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature. Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu.. As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages.. Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
I read his book (the 1st section and the 1st chapter) nowhere has he mentioned the answer to the old man's question. He is just deflecting at that moment
(Contd..) The present social system of India (which is fundamentally Tantric) was developed by Shiva. After accepting Shiva as God without any reservation, the Aryans appropriated everything good of the Dravidians and other non-Aryans. Of course this did not diminish the Aryansʼ prestige - rather it enhanced it. After this appropriation there was a propaganda attempt to prove that Tantra was originally propounded by the Aryans themselves. The Aryans used to say: Ágataḿshivavaktrebhyoh gataiṋca Girijáshrutao; Mataiṋca Vásudevasya tasmádágama ucyat. That is to say, “This Tantra, or Ágama Shástra, was actually composed by Vásudeva [Krśńa, who was considered Aryan], and Shiva only revealed it to Párvatii.” Áre Bábá!(12) - if Vásudeva had at all been the propounder of this doctrine, why on earth would He have put it into the mouth of the non-Aryan Shiva instead of saying it Himself? In the beginning the Aryans used to recognize the superiority of Tantra sádhaná but practise it in secret; but after acknowledging Shiva, they openly declared themselves to be Tantrics. Not only in India, but in quite a large part of the world, in every sphere of life, the laws and injunctions of Shiva alone prevailed for a long time. Even today the civilization of modern India is intrinsically Tantric. On the outside only is there a Vedic stamp. Or if we take the Indian civilization as an enamelled ornament, then its gold is Tantric and the enamel Vedic. For both the wandering sannyásiis of the cemeteries and cremation grounds and the householders, Shiva alone is the ideal man and Gaorii the ideal woman. Shiva is the universal father and Gaorii the universal mother. Shivaʼs household is the three worlds. Hararme pitá Gaorii mátá svadesho bhuvanatrayam. [Hara is my father, Gaorii is my mother, and the three worlds of earth, heaven and hell are my native land.] When the Indians were about to forget the teachings of Shiva due to their fascination with the mundane objectivities of the world, there came another sublime entity like Shiva, who reminded them of those teachings. That great personality was Shrii Krśńa. The question as to which of the two was greater, Krśńa or Shiva, does not arise, because all knowers of Brahma are one: all are Brahma. Shrii Krśńa was the supreme teacher and ideal politician of the world, what to speak of India alone, Shiva was the guru, the father, of the human society of the world - a completely different kind of role. Shiva is the universal father. Just as Cáṋdá Mámá [The Uncle in the Moon] is the uncle of all, Shiva is the father of all. All three worlds are Shivaʼs family. His reputation is not confined to any particular country. Yet if anyone is to be singled out as the father of Indian civilization, or of Indian society, or of the so-called Indian nation - then I can say emphatically that Shiva alone is eligible to be the father, not only of the Indian nation, but of the universal human nation. Ancient Shiva alone, and no one else, can qualify to be the father of this more-than-five-thousand-year-old so-called Indian race.(13) Shri P R Sarkar May 1959 RU, Muzaffarpur Source: Tantra and Indo-Aryan Civilization Published in: Discourses on Tantra Volume One
So grateful to have you , sir Sai deepak ji amongst us . Very blessed to be at the receiving end of your hard work and knowledge and cannot thank you enough . May the lords choicest blessings always be with you and your family 🙏🏽
Interestingly the same people say North India protected South India from Invasions. If there is no invasion what did North India protect South from? Did North did not invade South?
In that sense the whole world has the same DNA, we can't go back to history so we don't know, but it's true that it's hypothesis, just a western propaganda to prove their race as superior, to divide India's diversity
Only two books written by sd uptill now studied by me,I completely changed by my thought process, enlightened tremendously.debating with facts.searching authentic source.Recommend to study these books.
You get all sorts of stuff in Google. Cannot take information therein at face value. There should be further investigation always. Furthermore, writing to Google is a waste of time.
all civilization came from Bharat, no other country full conquer bharat. North india immigrated to europe, south go to africa and some part of south east asia, east india go to east asia. it happens when sarasvaty river drying 4000 years ago. The source is The Mahabharat text book, Purana
I also never believed in Aryan Invasion theory and always had arguments with my father on this issue. However, I wonder why Sai is bringing the term Panchamas? I think that is a word coined by Sai Deepak's caste of Tamil Brahmins to refer to Dalits. Vedas do not speak of Panchamas. That said, I am very much against the concept of Panchamas and practicing untouchability and many of them made to do manual scavenging. It was indeed inhumane.
in the beginning he said he is not a scholar, not an archeologist not a Historian. Then he shouldn't have a right to answer this question, all he is speaking is out of his emotions and personal belief, one must have come out to a religious mindset to understand this and view whole humanity together. It is not an invasion theory, it is how we came into existence, how our species came into existence and evolved, you can't see it from your religious perspective. we have lingual evidence, archeological evidence that the Aryan Invasion theory is right, if you don't believe it is your fundamental choice but if you deny it you should have the evidence. There was no concept of God in Chola culture, in Indus valley, in early vedic kaal there were No Brhama, vishnu and mahesh, there were only natural gods like Indra, mother nature etc. there were sacrifices of thousands of cows in one go. That all have been brought by aryans, because the same gods were being followed by aryans Mesopotamia. there is a Parelel sister Sanskrit language in ancient syria religion calle jerthrusti, rhey are calling Hindu gods the devils and their god is Ahura mazada, (the don't have S in their language so in Sanskrit it would be Asura mazda). the language origin is the same. all indo european languages are coming from Aryans only. and how come the DNA of indus valley traces to south Indian people and not north indians? kindly read open your mind and accept the fact. Don't just see everything from a religious perspective. Why I am writing this, 1.First let me clarify I am an atheist and I don't represent any religion. 2. The answer is given by this good human being and he is quoting science repeatedly, if he says whatever you say I don't believe (because most of the extremists do the same like Muslims) that is fine. But if you discuss science you should have evidence. Aryan Invasion theory is the most accurate and explainable theory we have until now, even after 30 years of research we could prove it wrong. kindly let me know if you have some real evidence. Thanks.
WHY DO YOU GUIDE BY Google you didn't go to school, college.....you didn't read from library sources, teachers, GURU, PARENTS... you didn't live with your parents to hear about ANCESTORS......then SHAME ON YOU TO ASK NONSENSE.
Explain why Hindi has been attempted to be pushed on the southern areas, and Hindi influence trying to pushed over them over their own culture despite saying they even would prefer English over Hindi and Hindu culture
Aryan invasion is a fact and upar kasts are mostly aryans who came from central asia with manu smoothi and oppressed mulnivasis Dalits and Dravidians STs for centuries..
People started to clap right after the first statement of his reply which was "I disagree with your question fundamentally". It clearly says what the audience wants to hear which he continued. I don't know clearly about AIT but it's the advantage of choosing the audience smartly. So, you don't need to say the truth you need to say just what they want to hear.
He is a good speaker. In this speech, he just speaks like a politician by siting stories and not facts. And people love him for it. Because they just want to her stories. So, yeah he chooses his audience smartly, lol!
Guess you don't know what satire or sarcasm means. In just one statement he ridiculed the exaggeration in the question. So according to you the question was also based on stories and not facts. Also what do you mean by truth? History right? Then it the known by stories written by authors/historians. So you statement is just shows your ignorance.
@@bharatmirchi Just because I don't agree with this view, I'm ignorant? I don't know sarcasm..?? Sorry, there is no point in speaking to 4-year-olds who cannot distinguish facts from made-up stories. Shoo..go read Billoo or Akbar and Birbal!
@Vel A Triggered son? No one cares about your opinion. Everyone has the right to agree/disagree with the views of public speakers. But when you call views of well-educated and well-versed author a story, justify it with some facts..kid
Things doesn't work like that those who agree with you or belief same thing will be with you no matter what like if someone say earth is not flat people will say he is right even without thinking or referring to his argument because they share same beliefs labelling them as choosed audience would be incorrect so to speak
If Aryan Invasion theory is wrong why did govt allowed in CBSE syllabus ?? Why universities allowed Aryan Invasion theory in syllabus? So Govt is right or Universities are right?
@@songs1093it's just a western propaganda bro, trying to divide India's diversity, if sanskrit is western language then why there isn't any 3000 yo proof outside India , also if Vedas were there then why do they embrace indian rivers and mountains , also it mentions aryavart which was ruled by native Indian kings during Mahabharata, like kaurav
Sir you are challenged the theory of Aryan civilization by Rakhal Das Bandhopadhay the famous anthropologist who discovered Harappa and Mohenjodaro which is a truth in India and Pakistan , their was no mention on hindu culture in the same . Please proof you words not woodwink people
