Did Jonathan Haidt use FLAWED studies in his new book? 

Haidt didn't really respond to the criticism of making a conclusion based on bad studies, but if he's trying to get organize studies to disprove his hypothesis, I'm less bothered by that. Edit to add: Also, good on you Reason. I, and many others, critiqued the last video you had of Aaron Brown criticizing Haidt's conclusions, and soon after, you arranged for both to be in the same room. Kudos to you on that, it's an integrity move.

Kinsey as an example of “good research” is ridiculous.

I'm glad Aaron got to speak to Jonanthan here. Love to hear discussions of experimentation and statistical analysis like these.

I always like Jonathan Haidt. He's got a good respect for data and how it's supposed to be used. I haven't read his new book yet but now I probably will.

Kinsey's conclusions were junk.

Appealing to Kinsey is a rough start 🤨

Citing Kinsey makes me automatically want to call the FBI and have them check your browser history

Appealing to Kinsey? Really? Automatic loss of credibility for me.

Click bait-ish, but the discussion was good and not Haidt "bad" as the title could suggext. Reason you can do better.

The questioner is the epitome of why, from Gen X on, people fucking hate the hippie baby boomers.

The questioner has given me a lot to think about. Sample bias needs to be considered. 😮

“According to the Kinsey Report…” Was enough for me

I wish theyd tell audience members not to give speeches but to ask questions. Theyre letting this guy just ramble. Get to the point.

Jesus, it’s hard to take this guy’s criticism seriously considering how continuously impressed he is with himself. Those types of people will never think anyone’s research lives up to their standards… unless they’re dead. Dead folk are easier for egomaniacs to respect because they don’t pose much of a threat.

Correlation is not causation. It’s that simple. Statistics 101.

Why you gotta clickbait, bruh?

The book's premise seems sound.

kinsey was sick.. i don't care if he called it research, most would say closer to torture.

Thumbs-UP people! Now 5% (160/3600) is below the YT 10% average.

That was a long video of someone saying absolutely nothing of value.

Nick, could you please shut up and let people talk. Those interruptions and remarks become really annoying

Great discussion. It would have been much better without the click-bait title. Take the high-ground Reason!

THIS CHANNEL HAS ALMOST A MILLION SUBS BUT ONLY HAS ONE VIDEO IN THE LAST MONTH ABOVE 100K VIEWS. HOW DO YOU NOT SEE THIS IS A PROBLEM? START MAKING CONTENT PEOPLE ACTUALLY WANT TO WATCH!!!

Is it social media causing mental health decline or are doctors over diagnosing/prescribing meds? I like Haidt but troubleshooting issues isn't the way to govern. It is his ideal of troubleshooting issues that has taken decades to get things done. As a society we need to know what the issue is before we can address it and this troubleshooting approach only leads to delayed resolution. It is delayed because the powers that be continue to make small changes hoping that change solves the issue, that always leads to even more changes in hopes to solve the issue that isn't getting solved at all. We need to know what the issue is and put in place a solution that addresses the issue, we need to stop with this piecemeal troubleshooting. Edit: Added comment