I know for a fact Paul died in 1966 ,and Billy Shepherd replaced him .I am now retired but i had been researching PID for over 40 + years , i had 4 top PID research groups known world wide , been in touch with top PID researchers , lawyers doctors ,authors who have written top selling books on PID , people who worked close with the Beatles themselves who were apart of their inner circle . Billy Shepherd was hired in 1964 as a studio double for Paul ,and was not seen only in the studio , his plastic surgery some say came in 1966 but ,from my sources he was seen in public in 1965 and has been seen in many Photo shoots sitting in for Paul . The real Paul can be seen on all album covers before Sgt Pepper , but clues were already on Rubber ,Soul , HELP , Revolver Yesterday and Today albums , He could be Canadian with bloodlines to Scotland , as its said he is Scottish , My mother met a Paul deadringer in Canada in 1966 , he could have been a twin she said ( i am Canadian ) she spoke to this double for a while before he left , the odd thing about it was that he wasnt Paul but he was picked up in a long black limo like car , ( she never forgot that ) he said his last name was either Mcdougal or Mcdonald which are both Irish names . We still talk about it from time to time , Could she have met Billy Shepherd in person before he became Paul ? The clues are out there , you just have to look for them , their are many differences in the looks of Paul and Billy , height , weight , eyes ,eye brows , ears , face chin ,nose , teeth ,palate , hair , skull size , voice , ( speaking and singing ) shoe size , age difference of 5 years , .mannerisms , personalities , I have a source who has been to Pauls grave ,but well never reveal where the grave is , ( he is buried under another name and his family regular visits his grave in disguise , the only clue is that he is buried in one of Londons big 7 cemeteries ,one of which is Highgate cemetery where he is said to be buried It really happened and is the biggest cover up in music history . .
But why? Lots of famous musicians died in their prime. Elvis actually sold more records dead than alive. And how does one cover up a high profile death without government help in regards to official documents such as death certificates? Any ideas?
Watch yesterday live 66 vs anytime after. Paul played complex parts without looking at the guitar. Billy struggles with it and always checks the neck of the guitar. Forget physical appearance and look at a person's traits
There is a clip here on RU-vid of The Beatles performing "This Boy". It's from 1963. McCartney quite clearly looks down at the neck of his bass guitar several times.
Watch a video of PAUL with Wings doing any number of songs. Silly Love Songs for instance, he sings and plays bass at the same time like a champ. No struggle whatsoever.
Please watch The beatles - “yesterday” 1965 (reelin in the years archive) I went ahead and counted how many times he looked down at his guitar (6) and those were the obvious times. There were 2 or 3 more when he appears to slip a glance.
Billy Shepherd was working with the Beatles organization for several years before taking over the role of Paul in late 1966. Billy wrote for the Beatles fan magazine. He was a double for Paul and can be seen in both A Hard Days Night and Help.
@@lolly9080 yes you are quite correct Billy Shepherd is the author of the book "The Truth Behind The Beatles" under the pseudonym name of" Billy Shepherd" his real name was Peter Jones, he wrote both in the Beatles fan magazine and in the Rolling Stones fan magazine, under the name " Peter Goodman" Peter unfortunately died in 2015.
That sounds about right. I don't cave to people who call me out on this subject. It took a minute to unpack...but I can tell the difference between the 2 Paul's very easily....unless the photos were tampered with. And there are plenty of those.
I believe he died just too many clues and coincidences why would the Beatles go through all the trouble of adding messages and clues in pictures for it is not true.
One thing to mention, Ringo Star was on a TV show in Los Angeles in 2014 and said he wants the world to know the truth that Paul was killed in a car crash, he is the last Beatle, and that Paul Died in 1966, he did not want to pass away without the truth being known.
I thought he actually had a book written about it, that is out there to research. Though I think that it was when he tried lsd, the old Paul died, and a new "psychedelic" Paul was born.
Let's apply that same test to John Lennon 1964 vs John Lennon 1969: songwriting, radically different / Facial features, radically different / Disposition, radically different / sings in different styles, although his voice is the same...same goes for PAUL and George. (As for how he acted when John died, Linda said he was in tears after getting the news. Carl Perkins said Paul cried recording a song about John called My Old Friend. You can't always go by what someone in grief might say to a reporter sticking a microphone in their face.}
That is an O.P.P. badge which stands for Ontario Provincial Police (Canada). There are several dates given as to when the band acquired 4 of these patches as gifts in either 1964, 1965 or 1966. Also, Sgt. Randall Pepper (Ontario Provincial Police) is where the album name comes from. He worked security detail for them in Toronto in 1966. The John Halliday video is very interesting as is Miles Mathis take on all this.
The original badge did say O.P.P. but if you look closely at the Pepper cover the second P does seem to be changed to a 'D'. I didn't know about Sgt Randall Pepper, so thanks for that info.
It's obvious Paul is dead, the head shape of the two is completely different. Not to mention his second wife had something to tell the world that would blow everyone's mind about "Paul"? I wonder what that could be?!
They announced they would stop touring, coinciding with the time of his reported death. They disappeared for some time, when they resurfaced all 4 were sporting moustaches. Can you imagine the 4 of them saying to each other, let's all grow moustaches, that would be so cool? No way on Earth all 4 grew moustaches because they thought it was a cool thing to do nor by coincidence. It was done because Faul had to hide surgery scars, they thought he might stand out with a moustache but if all 4 of them grew moustaches, he wouldn't stand out. At the time, or at any time, the 4 of them copying each other with moustaches would have been considered as 'uncool' as it gets. Some of the photos right after 1966 show someone who looks much different than Paul. Over time and countless surgeries they made the replacement look similar to Paul, but in the beginning it was way obvious that it wasn't Paul. Faul even wore fake rubber ears for a while, until they could make them look like Paul's ears by way of surgery. The hair part is a clear giveaway. Paul always had his part on his left side, Faul never had his part on his left, it was always in the middle or on his right. If your part is on one side for 25 years or so, just try to switch it and your hair won't cooperate very well. Faul's head is 'taller', Paul had a smaller, more pudgy looking face, Faul is a couple inches taller and so on.
Lol have you even seen the 1967 magical mystery tour movie where it was only george who had a mustache on, so does your logic also mean George was also replaced?
Oh Dear. So I guess you look EXACTLY the same now as you did three years ago. And three years ago you looked EXACTLY the same as you did three years before that. And you will look exactly the same in three years time as you do now. Sheesh, we should all be so lucky. As for the moustache theory ... a simple search on the internet ... or perhaps at a bookshop that sells Beatles books .. you can find hundreds of photographs taken around that time that show all four of the boys sporting different amounts of facial hair and different hairstyles. Heck Lennon even started wearing granny specs after his role in "How I Won the War".
_anyone who doesn't think Paul is dead is willfully blind, if they have seen photos of both persons, as well as listen to the lyrics of The Beatles. It's called denial, and it is a very juvenile defense mechanism._
Um, right. Got it. An old outtake of "Love Me Do" captures John, George and Ringo saying they would start a rumor that Paul was dead because someone named William Campbell told them to do it.
THE BILLY SHEARS WAS NOT AS TALENTED AS PAUL....YOU CAN SEE FILM OF THE PRE 1966 PAUL AND HE PLAYS HIS BASE WITH LITTLE EFFORT...RARELY LOOKED AT THE FRET BOARD OR HIS FINGERS AS THEY PLAYED THE NECK OF THE BASE...HE WOULD DO SPINS ETC... BILLY SHEARS HAD TO REALLY ...CONCENTRATE ON PLAYING HIS BASE AND RARELY TOOK HIS EYES OFF HIS FINGERS AS THEY PLAYED THE NECK OF THE BASE....THIS IS THE PROOF MCCARTNEY DIED....!!!
I agree with you Luisa. A lot of today’s youth think that the psychedelic Paul was the best. I usually have them listen to “Revolver” and then the shut up.
@@randyjohnson6845 I am with you brother. My comment is about seeing the two Paul's. William has smaller eyes. And like you commented...they are Hazel Green.
Lets not forget, Paul was dating the actress in 66 then the swap and in 67 they split. She said in interviews that he changed and it was like the connection was just gone. She knows.....
They got engaged in 67 they broke up in 68. He cheated on her and when she publicly announce it she said maybe when they were older they would get back together.
@@hellsjamfleas Correct. Macca & Jane Asher had been dating for several years. Then Paul 'died' in September '66 but Jane failed to notice that he was replaced by Billy Shears (Campbell) and actually got engaged to this imposter the following year. Billy joined the biggest Band in the world which had been led by that well known shrinking violet, John Lennon and immediately took over. He dominated the Sgt Pepper Album and Magical Mystery Tour Project both in 1967.
@@neathletics2439 I’m glad you’re a Paul is dead believer. But do you really believe that Paul’s girlfriend wouldn’t notice that he had changed? And 3 inches taller? This is how I’ve heard it happened. In Fall of ‘66, Jane broke up with Paul because he cheated on her in worst way. Paul did a racing stunt to get her back and had a wreck on Nov. 9th,1966 at exactly 5:13 am. Jane was asked to keep quiet and to carry on the relationship with the double, including a fake engagement until she or he could not take it anymore. Jane Asher has not publicly talked about Paul to the public since the break up.
It is really a stretch that Paul died in 1966, especially since SOOOO many songs were written after up to this day. HOWEVER, interestingly more than once, George greeted Paul with, Hello William nice to see you and Olivia Harrison called Paul Billy as well. Why would they have done that?
Uh, maybe because both Paul and George had read some of the ludicrous "William / Billy fantasy stories and it became a sort of inside joke. George and John joked about "Beatle Ed" in the Imagine film. George reads John a ridiculous tabloid story about himself and John having a fist fight in the Get Back documentary...and then they laugh and pretend to have a fist fight. They dealt with silly stories about The Beatles all their lives, and laughed at them. John made it clear in interviews that he never said "I buried Paul" on Strawberry Fields Forever. It was "cranberry sauce."
The Beatles reunited in 94" the final reunion George said to Paul when u were the new guy and we became friends, how could that be possible when the real Paul knew George at School told John he could play and they both met up with George
@@handle-schmandle That may well be true Scott so why is George looking at Paul and not Ringo, also when The Beatles were inducted into The Rock and Roll hall of fame Goerge stated " We know why John can't be here and if he could be he would be, we loved him very much and we loved Paul too" George referred to Paul as William on many occasions
@@jakeet999 Because, in order, you have been shown an edited clip with deceptive text coaching, you heard “loved” where George really says “love”, and last, every instance of anyone saying “William” has been debunked. Like I said, you have been completely manipulated.
Some kind of International Incident that had to be covered up by the Crown. I have always suspected it involved The Rolling Stones since they are the only other band mentioned on the cover of Sgt Peppers.
I think something we have to acknowledge in regards to this conspiracy is that regardless of if Paul is dead or not and as big of a cover-up as that is we cannot deny the contribution of Billy to The Beatles and to the music industry whether or not he's an impostor He's just as much a member of the Beatles as Paul was
So this other person just took over Paul's life, wife and all this relatives who kept this secret from the whole world all this time? The guy we see today is not Paul but a look-alike? Too much after all this time there are still people believing in this non-sense. All those millions who wrote to Paul and records and CD's bought were not the real Paul McCartney? Come on Ringo tell us the truth! LOL.
This is so silly, Paul is a alive, he got older, he changed style that's life. I'm not saying is impossible for artist to have "fake people" playing them when necessary like the scenarios they mentioned in the video but to cover his death and join the band? Grow up people that didn't happen. This theory is actually insulting the artist (that's very much still alive and was not replaced to cover his death even if they used the double at some point or not).
People can fake their death and as proof it happened here where I live. An owner of a very busy furniture store did just that a few years ago. It was reported on the news and the family had a memorial service. The only one that knew was his current wife. Tax evasion and fraud and the store went into bankruptcy, I can't remember where he was found, but he and his wife were both arrested, I think he is still in prison, not sure about the wife. The family had no comment and were not charged. Yes, it can happen,
No. Only people who lust for conspiracy can see it. The rest of us think it’s a tad unlikely that the best melodist in the world and best impressionist in the world were the same person - and happened to look and sound just like another great melodist. Better life purpose than looking for conspiracies: show a family member you care. Volunteer regularly. Clean your room.
This is a different subject but if you look closely at John from 1962 to 1980 theres no chance and I mean no chance it's the same John...its more obvious he's different than Paul changing into Faul or Billy
Richard Starkey has a str8 up Character name! Whose to say that's not a clue the other blokes weren't stage names either. Yes, John's character is overlooked for being replaced as well. The murder of John Lennon was a hoax to retire the actor. It seems they create this stuff to mess with Our heads and hearts.
@@beatlebrian4404 Well, You're barking up the wrong tree, I'm an atheist! It's just another Day. I've recently just had My ass kicked working for Thanksgiving dinner and a couple of birthdays. It's Festivus season!
How could you possibly persuade all of Paul's family and friends to play along with this..especially Jane Asher and Mike McCartney (Paul's brother) and his father..and the many work colleagues of Paul..too many loose ends...its a bit of a 'fun theory' for super fans I think...and I even enjoy talking about it and reading the comments etc because it means we are talking about my favourite band.
Entirely possible. You obviously have no idea how much power some people have and how good they are at scaring people into silence, i.e. getting something their way.
@@LaMYsteriosa87 sorry but I do know how that works..but this is too far fetched.. couldn't shut up all those people for all this time..and besides, the man who started this whole conspiracy theory back in the 60s admitted that he did so
@@cliveedwards2958 Well then if you can't see the differences with your own two eyes between William and Paul, and you have done comparison work, you need help for your eyes. Then again, nothing helps if a person doesn't WANT to see what's right in front of his eyes.
@@LaMYsteriosa87 oh well in that case you have proved it beyond a doubt by splitting the word I'm possible...by the way..check out the voice analyst "wings of pegasus " where Paul's voice is analysed pre 66 and post..he hits exactly the same micro inflections on both..impossible to copy. Then tell me what you believe.
I think that the death of Paul refers to the death and rebirth of Paul after he took lsd, he blew his mind out in a car. Paul was the last one of the beatles to try acid. All the others had tried it and wanted to change their musical style, where as 'old" Paul wanted to keep making their original sound, then he dropped acid and was reborn, as the "new" Paul. The old Paul was dead !
@Van Messner's REAL PAUL McCARTNEY yes he did resist it, hence why he was the last one to try it. He certainly isn't anti psychedelic's, he is a well known pot head, he got caught smuggling cannabis, in his baby's nappy at a airport sometime in the 80's or 90's, and John lennon was on heroin for years before his death.
You wish it was so. John went mad/was driven to madness from grieving his best friend and work/life partner. Whom he lost. Macca died. Take another look at and listen to 'Free As A Bird'. See Paul's face in the back window of the Police Car, just before they show the car accident scene which hints at Paul's accident. In which he was mortally wounded/his life was lost.
The original Paul was the only Beatle who never took acid. His half-brother replacement William Campbell did at 20 years of age and was stopped by British police. He had his drivers license taken away and was not allowed to drive when he joined the Beatles in November’66.
Heather Mills the gold digger! That's your evidence is it? Heather Mills and her lawyers demanded, £125 million from McCartney and ended up with £25 million! now that to me means she didn't get what she wanted, which obviously means, she doesn't have any evidence regarding McCartney's so called death or replacement!
@@michaelkennedy6415 I know and saw it. I heard she was paid a large sum of money to keep quiet. She had written what she knew and gave it to someone to be put in a safe place in case there was an emergency. Paul isn't the real deal. They pulled it off 100%
@@deenastockton6073 Could you imagine the ultimate betrayal of marrying your dream idol, and finding out you’ve been duped? No wonder she used Princess 👸 Di’s lawyer? Smart woman hiding information. She did it right. Paid off for her in the end.
@@michaelkennedy6415 I have researched this so many times, a bit confusing. I was 7 I think when I saw the Beatles on Ed Sullivan big fan since. My interest in Paul started after I hear on the radio when I lived in Detroit that Paul died in a car crash. Haven't stopped since then. When I became Paul McCarney and Wings fan, got every album, and on Ram, I noticed a huge difference in Paul, and at the time I was just a teenager. Sparked my curiosity then too the only one and some others won't talk. Heather Mills McCartney can't and we know that.
The Paul is dead theory started as a student/ radio station prank in the USA in late 1969 after Abbey road was released. I don't recall the mock/doco on that but I wouldn't be bothered watching it anyway.
Hey, I’m from Texas too pardner. One of the most knowledgeable on Paul is Dead theory lived and died in Temple, TX. He personally knew both Pauls and had a hit song hinting at Paul’s death called “St. Paul.” He used to manage the band Grand Funk Railroad. His name was Terry Knight. You should look into him. The Rolling Stones called him “the Sixth Rolling Stone.”
Faul Maccartney" s double / imposter WON a Paul McCartney look alike contest and was s musician as well , His instrument of choice is the piano .and began in late 1966 , after the real paul died, and was the NEW leader of the Beatles, introducing Billy Shears , in Sgt .Peppers lonely hearts club band , up to the present time post 1966. DO some resesrch my friends .!!! look at comparison photos of all 4 ..they were eventually ALL replaced . Look at the differences in the original John's , and yoko John 's noses !! .They are playing parts , The Beatles is a trademark of Apple Corp. They were turned into a corp. because huge popularity , influences and lots of $$$$$$ .
5 years ago Sage of Quay on RU-vid did so much research on this and it was tracked back to Tavistock Center- social experiment, you see what you want to see ? People’s faces don’t change shape , their eyes don’t change colour and the don’t grow taller - made John Lennon very angry and depressed, likely assonated incase he blabbed - there was footage of him making sarcastic comments about the other Paul - they didn’t have the internet back then - just a fan club , pigeon post and it was announced in one of those fanclub pamphlets Paul was dead! Of course they could easily put it right back then. Billy Shears was actually a very talented musician, more talented than McCartney even ( didn’t just bring any old person in ) Paul’s whole demeanour changed then they all stopped touring- went off to India and grew big beards and then out came Sargent Pepper. As a child I loved Paul McCartney but as a child you can see things that the grown ups don’t see . The Sargent Pepper album cover scared the shit out of me because that wasn’t Paul McCartney on the cover ! I don’t know if Sage of Quay still have all their information I can’t find anything anymore!
I love the comments here. I do remember my dad telling me about Paul’s death when I was a child. The Beatles are a very controversial story. Everything from Paul’s death to Lennons death. Talk about a group that shaped the world and were definitely a milestone of the times back then.🐸🍺🔪🔥
@@wesleycook7687 Bulls do crap...and Paul is dead. William took his place. Horse face...Cowlick...light brown hair...detached earlobes etc. Fake Liverpool accent too.
Without a doubt....yes! Cranial bone structure determines a natural part for hair as it grows. Pre '66 Paul had a natural part on his left(our right looking at him) side and post '66 Paul had a part on his right(our left looking at him) side. A person can comb and comb and comb to part the hair differently, but when it grows long and shaggy it will part where the skull determines. There are 2 pieces of evidence that are beyond debate, tho....the different blood types and non matching fingerprints....while in Germany in '61 Paul was arrested and also got a gal pregnate. His prints were on file for the arrest and blood type for paternity. He actually offered and gave the gal financial support....when arrested years later in Japan i believe, the prints taken during booking did NOT match those on record. Apparently Japan thought he was a possible lookalike spy, it got real tense....also i believe around 2000, Paul was contacted by the daughter who asked for financial assistance for something. He declined and it let to a blow up and paternity suit. When he did a blood test, it wasnt the same blood type that was on record. Again a tense situation as the court thought he sent a look a like to take the test so it wouldnt match, which it did not. The thing is, why help financially for years while younger then deny years later? So...those 3 and the last 2 especially without a doubt prove that its a replacement
And how do you know these things? Because someone on the Internet told you? And it overwhelms the obvious unlikelihood of the best melodist of the 20th century also being the best impressionist of all time and also looking and sounding exactly like another great melodist? And with literally no one on the Beatles’ circle ever spilling the beans, even on their death beds, and with “Billy” showing an oozing chemistry with John Lennon during the Get Back documentary? You can see and hear all that with your own senses. Or you can satisfy your lust for conspiracy by believing someone online.
I don't know what to believe but there's no solid evidence that Paul Mccartney wrote Let it be. Maybe John Lennon wrote it and had Billy Shears sing it, if Paul did actually die. I don't know what to believe, but it's creepy
To anybody intrigued by this subject - the real 'Goto' is RU-vidr Mike Williams - Sage Of Quay. There isn't any aspect of this that MIke hasn't investigated in massive detail and the truth is surprising and compelling viewing.
@@beatlebrian4404 Of course you would say that, wouldn't you! Especially if you are protecting a self-serving interest. The harsh truth is that The Beatles were a made-up band; that didn't write most of their own songs, or even play on their actual records. But I prefer to let people research and make up their own minds. There are far too many priests and experts and know-it-alls in this world telling us what to believe and not what to. Do the hardwork and find out for yourself.
@@thomridgeway1438 well you know nothing about me! so as for research, I have been corresponding with the PID community, now for the past 10 years and in all that time I have not seen any so called evidence that holds up whatsoever! the harsh truth is, everything can very easily be disproved! To say that the Beatles are some kind of manufacture band, is ridiculous, if that was the case, they would not have to have to do any apprenticeship in Hamburg for a start! they didn't play on their records is laughable! They didn't write their own songs? That's an absolute insult to John Lennon and Paul McCartney.
@@thomridgeway1438 the last time I corresponded with Mike Williams was when he said that Ringo Starr never played the drums on any of the Beatles records and that Ringo could not play the drums! So I said but didn't Ringo play drums for Rory storm and The Hurricanes? Good old Mike didn't get back to me on that one why do you think that there never seems to be disagreement on his channel? His latest Madness "Billy's got a glass eye"!!!! Also anyone who talks about the powers of the occult can not be trusted to tell the truth its 2022 not 1622!
@@beatlebrian4404 Of course he could play the drums. I have no issue with that. The question is, was he good enough for a perfectionist like George Martin. There are numerous session musicians who claim they were on Beatles records - a version of The Wrecking Crew did exist at Abbey Road always waiting in the wings. Certainly in 1962, Andy White replaced Ringo Starr on ‘Love Me Do’. Incidentally the going rate for three-hour recording sessions was £5 plus 10 shillings porterage for drummers.
Sad that this "journalist" invites a knowledgeable man on this incredible band/band member, allow him ample time to share his reasonable findings and explanations, and then just blow him off at the end.
I didn't believe he died. It didn't make sense that his whole family would have kept quiet. Until a couple of weeks ago I looked into it more and discovered that he only had one brother and their father. The Beetles manager had a bad reputation for being one of the mob. If he and others wanted to keep the band going it would have been easy to threaten the father that his other, only remaining son would be targeted and threaten his brother their father would wind up dead. They would have kept quiet to save one another. The more I went into it the more I found by way of photographs which were supposed to be him but there were differences. Not only one other 'double'. I suspect the man who acts his part now might be a Paul Shepherd. How can one Paul be a very different height to another? Add to that his apparent reluctance to sign autographs. According to MSM this is only since circa 2008. However, reportedly, years ago he took the piss out of Phil Collins in front of others, when Phil asked him to sign an original LP and he didn't autograph it. This might have been that the replacement Paul has a different autograph to the real Paul. That said, if as is said the group were being misused for political purposes, Paul might have simply wanted out and may not have died. Or he might not have wanted to become that big and have his time and effort taken up for years by being in a band. It might have been great at first but if as often still seems to be case, managers kept most of the earnings he may have decided it wasn't worth it. I mention this possibility because of his cousin John Halliday who was at one time custodian of Paul's childhood home. He is the double of an older Paul. I wonder if any sleuth has looked into his aunts and uncles to see any of them had a son by the name of John Halliday? If the birth were actually registered ar their local registration office and then on central government records for births, as required by law? Perhaps Paul became John. It would take some research that I am not interested enough to undertake, with all else I have to do with what is left of my life now. So it's only an idea I am putting out there.
I believe too he was not killed but they needed a cover up for the coming nosy investigators to focus on so they would not look for a living Paul. This guy now is whoever if he is Billy Shears or one of the other doubles but for sure this guy is much taller than Paul and the other guys but Ringo who was the same height. Think why they had to split so there was no accidental taken photos exposing the difference that you see in the roof top video even they filmed from under to cover the difference.
I think the secrecy is bound up in the plastic surgery done by the MI-5, which is super top secret. I think the band went in with the knowledge that if this were told, there was a death threat because it would endanger many spies England had.
Not only that, Paul was arrested in 1962 or so when they were playing in Germany...a fire was started or something. Then in 1980, Billy was arrested in Japan for having pot. He was in jail a long time for that indiscretion, and reason (told in his book Billy's Back off Amazon) was that the Japanese police compared his fingerprints taken THEN versus those on record at (what's name of that police organization worldwide?) from the arrest due to that fire. The prints didn't match.
September 1966 he definitely looks different..the band changes almost every thing..they never tour again they never have a concert..they never play together except January 1969 on the London rooftop video..its clear as day he was replaced..I doubt it was a car accident..it was probably murder...Billy was waiting in the Wings to be the replacement before he died..Surgery and latex ...he wants the credit
The things listed as clues to Paul’s death. Are just goofy attempts to mislead the public to the real reason he was replaced IMO. If you just look at photo comparisons and voice and performance comparisons you’ll be able to see it. Billy is decent but not anywhere near a Paul McCartney
He’s not dead! Jesus. Do you think the Beatles found someone who not only looked like Paul but had an extraordinary gift in composing and playing music?! Paul wrote some of the biggest hits in rock music between ‘67-‘70.
Yes Paul McCartney is dead and have been since late 1966. William did not look much like Paul McCartney his first years in the band and unlike JPM, William prefers the piano over the bass.
I'm glad to find someone sane on here. I was thinking I was alone. It's bollocks all right. It's just the Beatles having a laugh at the expense of fans.
I was skeptical until I saw the comparison report from forensic scientists who have the same system as the FBI.... After I saw the report published in Wired Italy Magazine, I no longer had any doubts. Forensic scientists in Italy said that he may not have died, but that Beatle Paul from the beginning is not the one on stage today. Interestingly, John Lennon gives some clues about Sargeant Pepper...in the song How do Sleepy
It's William Wallace Shepherd from the Campbell clan in the Highlands in Scotland - not Billy Shears. In 1958 William Shepherd was a well known studio musician for Pickwick. If you can't see the differences in his face then you're as blind as a bat. Also, since Paul's passing, William hasn't been seen since. This whole clip is pure rubbish.
So, why did William leave the group, William and the Pepper Pots. Then the group was only called The Pepper Pots. William was also in Germany as was the Beatles the same time.
Well, no the conspiracy was seeded when, it is alleged, during the series premiere episode of The Monkees on September 12, 1996 the local station in the NYC Tri-State area ran a bumper (promo) for the "News at 11" that announced that a member of The Beatles had died in a car accident and to tune in at 11 pm for more details, etc. People tuned in and....nothing. No story about it. That was immediately followed by an avalanche of weirdness in the career of The Beatles.
@@lisastillwagon425 so iam wrong Am I, Can you tell me why no one from Mccarthys family or friends has ever come forward to spill the beans no deathbed confessions and of course that's the same for Billy's family and friends why, WHY ?
Are you kidding, there was a ton of songs that told the whole story A day in the life started it, come together carried it forward , heres another clue for you all, the walrus was Paul And on and on and on
Just read about the fingerprints in arrests and blood types in paternity tests....one talented musician is in the ground and due to another living as him on Earth neither souls will ever get peace...fake Paul needs to come clean so real Paul can rest
People will believe what ever they want to believe but this is absolute nonsense as if Paul’s family wouldn’t know there is a lot more to life than money completely pathetic
What are you talking about? Obviously, if this happened, Paul's family would know, and would have likely been paid for silence to keep up the charade. Its not like they couldnt afford to pull this off.
@@JonHop1 Absolutely. The sheeple cannot believe all the deception that happens around us. They are totally brainwashed. Don’t forget, the CIA invented the word “conspiracy theorist” back in 1964.
I didn't believe he died. It didn't make sense that his whole family would have kept quiet. Until a couple of weeks ago I looked into it more and discovered that he only had one brother and their father. The Beetles manager had a bad reputation for being one of the mob. If he and others wanted to keep the band going it would have been easy to threaten the father that his other, only remaining son would be targeted and threaten his brother their father would wind up dead. They would have kept quiet to save one another. The more I went into it the more I found by way of photographs which were supposed to be him but there were differences. Not only one other 'double'. I suspect the man who acts his part now might be a Paul Shepherd. How can one Paul be a very different height to another? Add to that his apparent reluctance to sign autographs. According to MSM this is only since circa 2008. However, reportedly, years ago he took the piss out of Phil Collins in front of others, when Phil asked him to sign an original LP and he didn't autograph it. This might have been that the replacement Paul has a different autograph to the real Paul. That said, if as is said the group were being misused for political purposes, Paul might have simply wanted out and may not have died. Or he might not have wanted to become that big and have his time and effort taken up for years by being in a band. It might have been great at first but if as often still seems to be case, managers kept most of the earnings he may have decided it wasn't worth it. I mention this possibility because of his cousin John Halliday who was at one time custodian of Paul's childhood home. He is the double of an older Paul. I wonder if any sleuth has looked into his aunts and uncles to see any of them had a son by the name of John Halliday? If the birth were actually registered ar their local registration office and then on central government records for births, as required by law? Perhaps Paul became John. It would take some research that I am not interested enough to undertake, with all else I have to do with what is left of my life now. So it's only an idea I am putting out there
This was in the era of Ceefax, a 24/7 TV text service, and it was announced early morning Sunday morning 12th September 1966 ,that Paul McCartney was Involved in a car accident, but there was only one report, and no mention of the accident again!
It actually began in February 1967 in the official Beatles fan newsletter “the Beatles Book.” Before that it was verbally circulated throughout Britain since November 1966.
I stopped buying their music on the spot.i was in Liverpool. It was in echo .and the shape of face is so wrong ..if I looked at my classmate Steve he was a paul double ..so Billy shears was a joke and still is
Here's why the theory "popped up." Because it's true. Anyone with two eyes looking at '62, '63, '64, '65, '66 PAUL vs post '68 Paul and guess what? 2 DIFFERENT PEOPLE 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆
From way back performing live in 1964 Australia, videos abound right here on RU-vid. Paul singing "Long Tall Salley" with such intensity that the big vein under his left jaw is pumping as he's screaming and violently shaking his head mostly filmed from his left side and you can see the movement of his jowls even back then. Fast forward through the years to EVERY interview on film which includes much of his left profile as that vein (and jowls) becomes more pronounced as time progresses. It's huge now as are both of his 70 year old jowls . Fast forward again--2022 Paul performing live in his "Got Back World Tour" with extensive left profile filmed showing the same big vein, jowls, eyes, smile, hair, singing, everything. That is the same guy in the interviews for 58 yrs easily documented as natural age progresses. The guy in the interviews all these years was the same guy in Australia singing his guts out in 1964. And on the "Got Back" tour this year. Same guy. No clones, no plastic surgery. Same guy. Yes John said they always created "subliminal messages". But they've never managed to say what it was or wasn't about. Kept the world wondering. To this very day. They had fun with it. Good call Danny. Cheers mate!
@@JubileeValence Think that message got sent to wrong person. But Paul#2 has polydactyly. Early pics 5 toes. Later pics 6. They are online you have just never noticed.
@@mr.g1758 Copy/Paste: "From way back performing live in 1964 Australia, videos abound right here on RU-vid. Paul singing "Long Tall Salley" with such intensity that the big vein under his left jaw is pumping as he's screaming and violently shaking his head mostly filmed from his left side and you can see the movement of his jowls even back then. Fast forward through the years to EVERY interview on film which includes much of his left profile as that vein (and jowls) becomes more pronounced as time progresses. It's huge now as are both of his 70 year old jowls . Fast forward again--2022 Paul performing live in his "Got Back World Tour" with extensive left profile filmed showing the same big vein, jowls, eyes, smile, hair, singing, everything. That is the same guy in the interviews for 58 yrs easily documented as natural age progresses. The guy in the interviews all these years was the same guy in Australia singing his guts out in 1964. And on the "Got Back" tour this year. Same guy. No clones, no plastic surgery. Same guy. Yes John said they always created "subliminal messages". But they've never managed to say what it was or wasn't about. Kept the world wondering. To this very day. They had fun with it. Good call Danny. Cheers mate!" ------------ That's my initial comment up above. Feet? Read what it is that I just showed you now for the second time here. Then LOOK for yourself starting from the Aussie concert "Long Tall Sally", then ANY interviews throughout the decades, AND his latest tour. Same guy. Feet? Seriously? Feet? Wha--????? 5 toes early pics 6 toes later He doesn't SING with his FEET What's with you cucamunga people? IT'S THE SAME GUY Look Any All ---- SAME ---------- Wasn't he barefoot on the cover? You've just solved the world's greatest mystery! He changed his FEET to Rick Roll everybody! Cheers! Psst! Only one guy....four feet....22 toes.....
Anyone that believes the real paul is dead should compare the 1964 interview with David frost and the video where Paul is asked if he is a Madonna fan . Clearly one and the same person.
Paul is like a McCartney Burger...Has anyone debated his ex missus who had no lessons as a photographer but went on to photograph The Stones..and lots of famous people..before she met Faul..
If anyone looks closely at Paul's head on his right side it clearly shows a severe head injury on the Abbey road photo...the other threes hair is well groomed..no wind there not walking fast but Paul's hair and head is definitely altered..its just about impossible to comb or brush his hair like that and decide its good enough for a photo..its manipulated
For that photoshoot on August 8, 1969, the Beatles purposely dressed differently to have hidden meanings. As you know, Paul removed his shoes. But for his hair, he got it completely wet. That’s why it looks weird.
@@randyjohnson6845 I know a little secret about how Paul really died. The wet hair (doesn’t it look matted down?) was the perfect symbolism. When I noticed it, I knew what they were trying to say. If you look at it it kinda resembles a gash in the head- but that’s just a reflection from the sun shining on his wet head. Hey did you know the very day that they shot that picture- two other things happened ? 1) the Charles Manson killing spree started 2) Disneyland had a party at midnight for the opening of the new ride Haunted Mansion.
Then tell me how his eye color changed from brown to green, he grew 4 inches after age 24, and he also grew an extra toe (polydactyly)? I have five photos of him barefoot, and the ones after 1966 have an extra digit and it isn't photoshopped because one pic is on the photographer's website and it has six digits like what is online. Go read Tina Foster's book Plastic Macca if you want all the evidence.
Billy and the pepperpots who released two obscure records of beatle covers in 1964, show what could have been a man named Phil ackrill, who coincidentally joined denny lane band in 1964, called denny and the diplomats, this seems to be the same man identified on the back of the empty bus at the start of the magical mystery tour film, the camera goes up to him and then back, to imply once again the changing of the guard, when the image is superimposed with the billy shears paul , he matches to a tee, on the cover of Billy and the pepperpots albums their faces are half shaded , much like the cover of meet the beatles, if you look at the cut outs on the sgt pepper original album release, sgt pepper is a man who appears to be wearing a fake mustache, without it , he has the appearance of Billy, from the pepperpots, you have to ask yourself, why these obscure session musicians who released these albums three years before sgt peppers, would not have filed a plagarism charge against the beatles trying to cash in on some of the financial gains of the record, did phil ackrill in return, hire denny lane into wings , to return the favor of being hired in denny and the diplomats?, these questions will probably never really be asked or investigated?
Go look up Billy and the Pepperpots' two albums in 1964. Guy named Billy Shepherd played in that band. Three years later he was Sgt Pepper leading the greatest band on earth...even mentioned his name in song in CODED LANGUAGE...what do shepherds do to their sheep? They SHEARS them, do they not? Why lonely hearts club band? Because Paul had died you see. That Pepperpot band is the key to that secret.
To be TOTALLY HONEST! i don't want to believe all the rumors about Paul being replaced but there is some very convincing things out there that suggest it's actually true
If you search on youtube and elsewhere a lot of the theories on Paul's death have been convincingly debunked. Examples : the Paul arm band on the inner Sgt Pepper cover is not APD (officially pronounced dead) but APDD the D is obscured. The number plate on the VW car on Abbey Road does not read LMW 28 IF but the number "1" not letter "I" 1F
The only real way to solve the question is to do a DNA test of the present Paul in comparison with the real Paul's family member! If it was a match it would shut up the whole idea, but if his is not, then it would open up a real can of worms!
If you look at John Lennon that was with the Beatles with their hair style and suits you will agree its not the same John that had Yoko with long hair,beared and glass
Hi! I don't want to upset anyone because we all have different opinions but I want to mention that "Billy Shears" could not have a voice so similar to Paul's, and even so you say that "Billy" was just a good composer, not a genius like Paul, but "Billy" wrote over 600 songs and most of them are fabulous, so it's a bit strange to say that Paul died and that a foreigner named Billy took his place and then made another 600 good songs