Тёмный

Different hammer tips | Introduction to modal analysis | Part 5 

HEAD acoustics International
Подписаться 5 тыс.
Просмотров 16 тыс.
50% 1

In this video you will learn why an impulse hammer is supplied with different tips.
We will teach you:
How the different hammer tips effect the excitation of the measurement object
The handling of the tips
The obtained frequency ranges
Corresponding Videos to Modal Analysis:
Part 1 - What is a mode shape? - • Introduction to modal ...
Part 2 - Defining Points and Coordinates - • Defining Points and Co...
Part 3 - Roving Hammer Method - • Roving Hammer Method |...
Part 4 - Roving Accelerometer - • Roving Accelerometer M...
-
Part 6 - Right sampling rate and block size for impulse tests NVH - • Right sampling rate an...
Part 7 - Quick guide: Modal Analysis Tutorial - • Modal Analysis Tutoria...

Опубликовано:

 

5 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 14   
@BasitKhan-te4ls
@BasitKhan-te4ls 2 месяца назад
I want to find the damping ratio of a helical spring using this method: 1. Attach an accelerometer at the top of the spring. 2. Disturb the spring by hand to generate a time vs. frequency graph. 3. Convert this time vs. frequency graph to an FFT to see the frequency vs. amplitude graph. 4. Find the damping ratio using the half-bandwidth method on the FFT. My questions are: a. Is this the right method to find the damping ratio, or is the FRF necessary to include the force with hammer impact? b. What if I use or don't use an impact hammer as in this video?
@HEADacousticsInternational
@HEADacousticsInternational 2 месяца назад
1.: Yes, the procedure is correct. If you want to know the damping for each resonance, this can be done using the averaged FFT. The overall damping can be determined from the time signal. 2.: The advantage of the hammer test lies in the ability to calculate a Frequency Response Function (FRF) using controlled excitation, where both input and output are known. A curve fitter can then process the measured FRF and accurately calculate resonance and damping for each mode.
@BasitKhan-te4ls
@BasitKhan-te4ls 2 месяца назад
@HEADacousticsInternational Thanks for the response, brother. 1: Okay, totally got it. 2: Without the hammer, we are getting the time vs. frequency data and then converting it to FFT in OriginLab, as there is only one output response. Now, with the hammer impact, we will have input data for the impact (force) and the output data we are already getting. How can we combine them into one FFT? Is there any method for this? Also the FRF would be only for force( input) or for both?
@HEADacousticsInternational
@HEADacousticsInternational 2 месяца назад
The FRF H(f) takes into account both input and output. There are multiple ways to calculate it. First, the FRF can be approximated by direct division of your input spectra I(f) and output spectra O(f): H(f) ≈ O(f)/I(f). This can however lead to instable results under certain conditions, e.g. when the input spectrum is close to zero for specific frequencies. The robust and accurate way is calculating the FRF based on the auto and cross spectra of input and output. The cross spectrum of input and output is: S_IO(f) = I(f) * O_conj(f), where O_conj is the complex conjugated output spectrum. The input auto spectrum is: S_II(f) = I(f) * I_conj(f), where I_conj is the complex conjugated input spectrum. Division of the two yields the FRF: H(f) = S_IO(f)/S_II(f). By the way, if you want to give this a try in ArtemiS SUITE, you might want to consider applying for our modal trial: www.head-acoustics.com/modal-analysis . All you need is your recorded time data, and we can provide the required software modules. 30 days free of charge.
@BasitKhan-te4ls
@BasitKhan-te4ls 2 месяца назад
@@HEADacousticsInternational How to request a 30 days free trial?
@experimentalandnumericalfl7370
@experimentalandnumericalfl7370 2 года назад
Sehr sehr gute Erklärung
@HEADacousticsInternational
@HEADacousticsInternational 2 года назад
Keep it simple and make it clear. Danke für die sehr sehr gute Rückmeldung
@geraldocarvalhobritojunior4793
Fantastic video! Excellent!
@vitormateusmartini3946
@vitormateusmartini3946 2 дня назад
É verdade, professor! hahaha Estou aqui fazendo análise modal experimental e aprendendo com os vídeos também
@geraldocarvalhobritojunior4793
@@vitormateusmartini3946 Bom receber notícias suas, Dr! Quando tiver um tempo escreva contando o que está fazendo e quando ocorre a defesa!
@engrshairkhan
@engrshairkhan 6 лет назад
very nice explanation!
@juicebettle4369
@juicebettle4369 5 лет назад
It's like condom hahaha!
@thatgoose2639
@thatgoose2639 4 года назад
Depends on what frequency you want to stimulate
@ariffaridi6699
@ariffaridi6699 10 месяцев назад
😀
Далее
Modal test and Modal analysis Webinar
24:59
Просмотров 7 тыс.
Introduction to Vibration and Dynamics
1:03:18
Просмотров 93 тыс.
Which Modal Hammer Tip?
4:43
Просмотров 2,5 тыс.
What is frequency response analysis - FEA for All
29:47