19:48 not only does biting crush NOT delete a lvl7, he did not discard a card to activate the eff of biting crush TO delete a digimon at all. Something tells me he knew this too because he knew there was no way to out the fanglong without something for him to swing over with. Not even a misplay just straight cheating.
Not that it matter but at the end of game 1 the Anubismon player could have played a digimon by effect to delete the lvl 5 so that the swings to security didn’t get complicated.
It's all in the past so oh well but... the Anubismon player is doing a frankly unacceptable amount of beneficial misplays. I feel bad for the Deva player. Hoping he reads/announces the card's effects in full in the future, rather than just saying 'kills here and here' and 'effect'. Either player might then catch the cards just frankly not being played as worded. (Biting crush without discarding AND targeting a level 7 is pretty bad)
Why does always overlytacking player tend to do "a lot of beneficial missplays" missplays in quotation marks because I highly doubt a purple player cant read that bitting crush for instance cant delete a lvl7 or have to trash to activiate the effect first.
Most likely this was the 1st week of getting new cards so effects might be misrepresented. Both players should read the cards effects before accepting the game state.
The anubis player did a lot of misplays. But I have a question, on the first play, when Ignite attack security and active his effect to delete Ebon, the security attack was denied by Ebon on deletion effect, but since the attack happens first, sidn't the security check have to be resolved anyways? Or what happens first?
When attacking happens first, so Ignitemon's when attacking will trigger, deleting Ebonwu. Once any of the attacking players effects finishing resolving, Ebonwu's on deletion will activate and delete the Ignitemon before any security is checked. If the Ignitemon was not deleted, the attack would go through.
