Dinosaurs Size Comparison | Walking and Running with Dinosaurs 

Glad to hear that😃🤝

Thank you for the compliment🥹🤝 I will keep your advice in mind😃

most of them are very inaccurate

Thanks for your feedback🤝😃 You are totally correct. I still have a lot to learn!

@@GsDL another thing i noticed was that several of the models are dated or innacurate, for example, diplodocus never had the frills that jurassic park depicted it to have. another is that carnotaurus’ arm structure is inaccurate. however i am also just a dino nerd and am biased as carnotaurus is my favorite dino.. other than that i really liked watching! i also loved the video of large underwater creatures. seeing the man actually swimming next to them made me realize just how gigantic some of our current ocean life is!

@@asherbelangia2175 15:10 What frills?

Why is tricerotops 7000kg?

@@asherbelangia2175dilopho have no frills not dippy

Thanks for your kind words🤝😃

Why is the briacisourus 50,000kg?

I have to disagree with the whole "ignore the criticism" comment. Without criticism, then the OP will never get the chance to be corrected, and I'm talking about constructive/valid criticisms. Negative criticism, on the other hand, are the ones that SHOULD be ignored; you can give critique without being insulting. Not giving criticism, then that means you're giving the OP a pass to keep on committing the same error again; not giving corrections is a disservice, simply put.

Yeah, constructive criticism is welcome😃🤝

@@GsDL Thank you, I'm glad you agree.

Thanks for the feedback and encouragement🤝😃😃

😁

Ggs

Some Dinosaur in this video are not dinosaur 😘

@@TrickyNamaSte EXACTLY.

And the isle like the dryo

Thanks for your feedback😃

My pleasure🤝😃

Thanks for your kind words😃

,დ😂

Mkm7y d

Thanks for your warm messages🤝🥹🥹 I am very glad to hear that🥰

Thanks🤝😃 Some of them don’t have rig, I can add rig and animations to them. But it is too much time-consuming to give up😵

@@GsDL Ok. Thanks for the vídeo

Hey the sauropod are real

lo único inexacto es tu opinión

@@Hassen00just jumping times like 2 times and i already saw one THAT IS NOT A DILOPHOSAURUA so uh ye do some research before being toxic

Thanks for your feedback😃 I am glad to hear that🥹🥹

​@GsDL where is apatosaurus

@@faichan4148 Sorry I missed it😅

oK

@@GsDL your dinosaur is great and nice❤❤❤🦕🦖

Thanks for your support🤝 I am glad to hear that😃🥹

⁠What

Thanks for your kind words🤝🥹

Thanks for the suggestion🤝 but the time is too short to do it😅 I will make it someday in the future🥹

@@GsDL here’s a list for you to add for the comparison: 1. Fairy Dragon 2. Dwarf Dragon 3. Knucker Dragon 4. Chinese Lung 5. European Dragon 6. Wyvern 7. Ampithere 8. Hydra 9. Drake 10. Chimera 11. Manticore 12. Gryphon 13. Hippogryph 14. Enfeild 15. Unicorn 16. Pegasus 17. Faun 18. Satyr 19. Ipotane 20. Centaur 21. Minotaur 22. Ichthyocentaur 23. Mermaid 24. Naga 25. Harpy 26. Siren 27.Lamia 28. Gorgon 29. Kelpie

@@dragonfire810 Thanks for the info! It’s very useful😃

🤝😃🥹

Yeah, thank you and the caveman🥹😃

Not everything is a dinosaur shown here

Thanks😃🤝

@@GsDL Welcome

Thanks for you detailed info. I have learned a lot🤝

@@GsDL The reason why you're getting criticisms on the word "pterodactyl" is because "pterodactyl" was once used for both as a catch-all for all pterosaurs, and to refer to Pteranodon specifically. "Pterodactyl" is a truncated word derived from the animal "Pterodactylus," and is an obsolete/deprecated word that is no longer used (the preferred word now is "Pterosaur." Here's another: in order for an animal to be classified as a "dinosaur," then the creature has to be placed on either the order "Saurischia" or "Ornithischia." If the taxonomy of a certain animal does not place it in either of these 2 orders, then the animal is not a "dinosaur." Dinosaurs, Pterosaurs, and Crocodilia are groups that are related to each other, and can be placed in the clade "Archosauria" (meaning that they are "archosaurs"). As birds are also the only surviving group of dinosaurs, birds are therefore archosaurs as well as dinosaurs. Synapsids are animals with only one hole behind the eye socket, while Diapsids have 2 holes behind the eye socket. All reptiles and surviving archosaurs are diapsids. Examples of synapsids would be the therapsids and stem-mammals of the Paleozoic like Dimetrodon and Lystrosaurus, and the only surviving synapsids today are the mammals.

I appreciate your teaching🤝

@@user-roninwolf1981 You just explained that! Thank you man!

Seismosaurus is invalid species that's now known as diplodocus

Thanks so much😃🤝

Thanks so much🤝😃

Thanks for your compliments🤝😃

🤔🤔

Just think about the model ​@@GsDL

Thanks so much😃

😃🤝

😅😅

They look a little similar😅

Maybe I missed it😅

🤝😃

👍😃

Thanks🤝🥹

Thanks for the comment🤝😃I would like to improve it in the future🙂

Sorry, I am not sure😔

Thanks for the feedback🤝🙂

🤝🥹

Thanks for the feedback🙂

Don't Metion It.

Thanks for the feedback🤝 I still have a lot to learn🙂

😳

Thanks for the feedback🤝😃

🤔

😃🤝

😃🥹

😳😵

Thanks for your feedback🤝😃

This is based on JP/w I think

​@@jlordbundang I'm pretty sure that Spinosaurus is the biggest Carnivore

​@@TerrorconLeader1993That's outdated information

Fanboys del rex llorando 😭😭

He was sent back from the future😁

He was showing his bone collection. They figure several hundred others have not been found or pieced together. Seems like the earth was one large dung pit. The dung beetles in those times must have been MONSTERS.

😅

They are man-made hybrid dinosaurs😅

Thanks for your info🤝

@@GsDL Great video G Data Lab! My comment isnt really "INFO". Just a personal conclusion based on existing scientific evidence for organic bio-mechanical operational thresholds in CEG (Current Earth Gravity). Contrary to current scientific consensus, I maintain 120 000 kg LAND animals are a bio-physical and bio-mechanical IMPOSSIBILITY in CEG.

@@k.t.5405 Would you care to share where you found your info on the CEG? I don't recall ever seeing anything on how Earth's gravity has changed since the Mesozoic era. I'm not discrediting your assumption on Sauropods being unable to live in our time, cause they really couldn't, but I don't think it has much to do with gravity. Instead I think it has more to do with Earth's atmosphere and Oxygen levels. Back during the Mesozoic era, creatures were able to grow to larger sizes due to higher oxygen content in the atmosphere. This allowed for evolutionary gigantism. That, coupled with the fact that our climate today is a lot colder, is the reason I feel why things can't get as big as they did during those times.

@@silversol8476 "I don't recall ever seeing anything on how Earth's gravity has changed since the Mesozoic era." You wouldn't have. Gravitational science is in its infancy, and quantum gravitation even more so. What I CAN point you towards is evidence that gravity on Earth is NOT uniform and that recent discoveries point to the fact Earth is expanding. Both developments that may lead to potential future discoveries regarding major fluctuations in Earths geo-gravitational past. "I think it has more to do with Earth's atmosphere and Oxygen levels. " Is there any observational evidence in modern day zoology or even in the fossil record that would indicate higher oxygen levels or a changing atmosphere would allow a given land animal to bio-mechanically withstand the gravitational pressures exerted by 120 000 kg of body mass? I can tell you there is NO direct evidence either in modern zoology or in the fossil record. After 70 million years of trial and error (post KPG), the only evolutionary path bio-mechanics has been able to find in the direction of a 120 ton animal, has been under water ( a gravity reduced environment),

@@k.t.5405 " Is there any observational evidence in modern day zoology or even in the fossil record that would indicate higher oxygen levels or a changing atmosphere would allow a given land animal to bio-mechanically withstand the gravitational pressures exerted by 120 000 kg of body mass? " I was about to reference ancient Arthropods, but I did some reading on some theories, and it turns out the oxygen content theory was undermined, as more recent studies point that the Jurassic and Cretaceous time periods had about the same amount of oxygen levels that we have today. " After 70 million years of trial and error (post KPG), the only evolutionary path bio-mechanics has been able to find in the direction of a 120 ton animal, has been under water ( a gravity reduced environment) " While older theories do suggest that Sauropods might have been amphibious, recent studies suggest otherwise, due to theorized muscle strength of said creatures, air sacks within their bodies, or their superb skeletal build up. Another recent theory has to do with their egg laying habits. It suggests Sauropods evolved to get so big due to laying smaller eggs. Doing this allowed them to potentially side-step the costs that constrict most mammals to their size limits.

Thanks for the feedback🤝 As your pointing out, there are many aniamls not dinosaurs but prehistoric reptiels😅

😃😃

Thanks for the info🤝

🤝😃

Thanks for the detailed info🤝I still have a lot to learn🙂

🤝

🥹🥹🥰

Sorry I didn’t study enough😳

@@GsDL I'm a nerd, I can't help it

@@damienbastings　I know😁

They are not there? Thanks for your info🤝

Thanks for telling me🤝🙂

Thanks for the feedback🤝 This video was made over a year ago, maybe I was lack of knowledge about it at that time😔

Sorry for that🥲

Thanks for your pointing out🤝

Because he was so tired🥺

El único correcto es el espinosaurio, pues es el mejor carnívoro, el más grande, fuerte y alto. Jajaja ❤

Thanks for the feedback🤝

Bio*

Brontosaurus is not real it'd a fan made dinosaur

Thanks for your info🤝🙂

😃🥹🥰

Thanks for telling this🤝 Maybe you are right

Thanks for the feedback🤝

Too small?🤔

😁😁

Thanks for the comment, you are right. I still have a lot to learn😅

🥲

Yeah, I still have a lot to learn😅

Thanks for your pointed out🤝

No Problem

Well same goes for the pterosaurs, marine reptiles and there were also some other reptiles in the video

Thanks for the feedback🙂

Thanks for sharing the info🤝🥹

Me too🥲

It’s pretty accurate for the most part. Yeah, there are some mistakes, but this isn’t supposed to be used as actual scientific information, it’s just quick entertainment.