I like the format of shortened videos. Gets straight to the essence of it. For somebody who learns from zero it might be useful to view full recordings. I think good if you could keep mixing them up but with slightly more short versions.
Cheers Paul! Yep, the shorter version is much better, I think. I know it's more work for you and I appreciate you put a lot of effort in making and editing those videos, but I kindly suggest you use some sort of a transition effect when you pass from one cut to the next.
Thanks, I don't mind spending the time. I'm more interested in making them useful. I actually DO use a transition at each cut but it's quite subtle. I quite liked it as often the only thing that seems to change is the Bet365 video and people would think it was THEM cutting their shot! Having watched the video myself last night before uploading, I can see that subtle transitions aren't helping the viewer! Thanks for the suggestion.
Cheers Billy. I will take the suggestion from another viewer to have a better transition between cuts in the video to make it more obvious where I made a change and I think the shorter version seems to have the most support from the comments so far.
I like how you say lay at this or back at that on both players, when you expect 3 sets. As you don't know who will take the first set. As its preferable to lay the favourite in early games unless the favourite is to strong and a break back is unlikely. As if the favourite doesn't turn up like in your last video you can profit, and not have to ride a big loss. As if you was wrong on the dog being competitive you wouldn't get the price you wanted on the favourite. and would exit early on the dog with limited prejudice as you could see there wasn't a good trade available. i like how you got a good green holding on ostapenko, but was a dangerous position to lay at 5/4 more than your profit, even if you favoured her to win. As you lost the majority of your green and then laid again to risk more money which worked. obviously trading in the heat of the moment is different than after. Bar that 1 mistake great video and trade.
One question regarding this match , you added on ostapenko when vekic was set and break ahead,and i know that's your favourite entry point and even mine , but what would you have done if ostapenko didn't break back immediately , you still be on a trade till end or you get out with a red if vekic had hold her service game?
I'd have given Ostapenko a couple of Vekic service games. If she put pressure on serve then I would probably let it go longer but if Vekic had held easily, I would probably have exited.
Question of interest. If your pre-event analysis suggest laying around 1.35 and/or backing at around 2.30 why not to place pending orders instead of waiting until that price comes?
@@TradeShark Understand your angle. Further thought on this - what is your view on drip laying/backing with pending orders? I.e. you lay target is 1.35. So you could split the stake in chunks and put in pending orders to average out 1.35. Let's say 100 pounds stake could go in 20s at 1.45, 1.40, 1.35, 1.30, 1.25. Keen to learn your thoughts on pros & cons.
@@TradeShark I guess this is execution part where different approach can be taken. Probably fair to say that pre-match analysis is super important to take a stance on the match. Without analysis it is unlikely that only execution itself will turn profit in long run. Essentially pending drip orders execution can be applied to any match. But more importantly need to pick the right matches. Then good execution will help to accelerate profits.
