Do God and science contradict each other? 

Amen!

💯💯

I have a science background, a medical career as a veterinarian, a Masters in Theology, and finishing a PsyD while is semiretirement. From that perspective you are so correct. Wrote a paper regarding how science and theology are not incompatible but must, if pursued without agendas come to the same ultimate conclusions. I call science a form of general revelation and argue that theology and science should be mutually informative.

As a Catholic you are obliged to adhere to the dogma concerning the relationship of science and scripture as introduced by Thomas Aquinas, so obviously then there is no conflict. It's unfortunate that so few people seem to know about this christian dogma when talking about christianity and science.

An interesting thing I remember coming across is that the constants are actually fluctuating, so what we thought as constants are not constant. But i could be wrong since there seems to be a lot of backlash to it.

That presupposes the existence of a god. It doesn't bother you that this explanation "works" with every mutually exclusive god ever conceived, and then only if you squint hard enough at every scientific field you try to reconcile with your god of choice?

Depends on what religion it is, for example the book of Genesis which is followed by Islam and Christianity (I think Judaism?) has a big flaw in it. It says that the Earth and everything is created within 7 days, many religious fanatics just blow this away with "oh it's symbolic we dont know what days actually means" but if you have read Genesis it clearly says ” And there was evening, and there was morning-the first day. " - 1 Genesis 3:5. Theists immediately jump to the conclusion that its not literal because they know how fucking ridicolous it is.😊

@artgaming0 Heaven doesn't have evening and morning.

@@wenomachosia ok so wheres heaven.

Who said that. Science expains how nature does it and how things work. It never presses or relies on a thing that has not even proved yet.

Science to me is just the study of God’s creation. You cannot use one’s own creation to prove one wrong.

exactly mate @@deejaythedeejay

For me it's like trying to understand a little bit of knowledge of god like what god show's job the details of his creation

i’m pretty certain that was Einstein, please correcting me if i’m wrong

einstein was an athiest @@naenaebaby585

Amen!

Not in the slightest. Where did you learn that?

True

you got it backwards buddy religion was created to explain stuff we had no answer to with science god is just people trying to explain stuff they don't understand, why the sun rise and fall GOD! Why does lighting exist GOD! why do we not float off into space GOD! People fear the unknown, so we created God to explain the unknown.

@@Why-x7g he isn't intelligent enough to even understand what that means. Or accept the information. He'll just make up some crazy ass comment, trying to misdirect.

Not to set you back but you should look into the “god of the gaps” argument… while science might be one way people become separated from religion… philosophy is another contributing factor…

@@zontzooit2415 I have looked into that argument, I might have to learn more about it though

@@7sGalaxy there’s also another fallacy that this video is implying but not outright saying… it’s the either or fallacy. Basically it’s the argument that because one thing isn’t true that automatically makes the other one true… you either like dogs or you hate dogs, When there could be an endless sea of options… I could also be ok with dogs, I could think some dogs are cute, I could hate other dogs, I could be allergic to dogs but think they’re cute. Just because we happen to live in this complicated world doesn’t mean their either is a god or their isn’t… especially considering his (guy in the video) conclusion is endless… could their have been multiple gods? Would if it was a non conscious god, intelligent but unaware kinda like AI almost… could it not have been us who created the universe but have no memory of it? Would if the universe is an entity and we just don’t know it? But also think about it, a wind breeze we know came from nature itself, Not an intelligent being… so why is it ok to assume that the universe came from an intelligent being? Just because it’s so difficult to comprehend that this wasn’t made for us? A lot of people being up the argument of “well we live in a house so it’s safe to assume someone made the house, would it not be the same for the earth?” No because look we can tell this house was made by humans because well we have evidence to support it… we have seen construction workers build before… we know the stuff in our house is man made… it’s very ovbiously made for us to live in we have a sink and place to clean ourselves and is conveniently designed for us by humans. The earth isn’t, the earth is dangerous, pandemics, hurricanes, snow storms, earthquakes, floods, thunder, Volcanoes, war, fire, lack of food(so many issues with the agriculture industry) famine, ect… laying on the floor is not ideal or comfortable, living in 109 degree weather(like we did earlier this summer) is not ideal for a human… neither is living in negative degree weather… it almost implies as if we adapted to this environment rather than it adapted to us by a god. I personally believe they come to this conclusion that it must have been a god because life is so continent, euphoric, and they have this sense of “it has to have meaning or a reason”, a sense of feeling special almost. Because we’re unuiqe doesn’t mean we had a creator. There’s a unique rock probably on an island with minerals and chemical compounds that aren’t found anywhere else in the galaxy…. Does that make that rock special? To us it does but does that mean it had to have had a creator? It’s such a. Weird conclusion to end up at esp considering it’s unscientific to jump to conclusions esp when the conclusion has so many possible options. That’s my opinion I remember being a tween and also questioning my beliefs…

I forgot to mention climate change, also we have to take into consideration the dinosaurs… the earth was so convinent for them up until the meteor hit

I'm a deist, but there is something I dont like about this guy's video. Those hominins we evolved from also had life, love and intelligence. Second, life didn't come from a sludge puddle, but formed from chemicals deep underneath the ocean in hydrothermal vents. Third, why would an intelligent god go to create a universe and then descend on a planet to make life when he can just create a universe that can have life assemble itself

Best comment on here

agreed

You are definitely right, but in speaking in terms of Christianity, I recall a Saint or something similar to that saying that anything NOT explained in the Bible be explained by scientists. So yeah, to respect Christianity, at least, is MOSTLY respect science aswell.

I don't really agree with you regarding the Qur'an, the Qur'an indeed has things that agree with science and doesn't necessarily contradict it.

As a Hindu I see this as an absolute win

I'm glad we can connect science and religion but it's definitely also ok to focus on science and facts without religion

@@Danger-sp6mk of course, I’m not saying it’s always best to believe both, some things need a view you can only get from either side

They're literally opposites. Science is being about as honest with yourself as you can, faith based religion is about being as dishonest with yourself as you can.

@@MrCmon113 Sure, you gonna go ahead and disprove multiple historians now?

​@@MrCmon113 The greatest scientists of all time were religious. Why do you think that was?

Your religion down plays our lord as merely a prophet and makes mohamed greater than him I want you to answer some questions .why did mohamed marry a six year old . The bible clearly says jesus is the son if god ( don't say that " he never directly said it cause he coud do miracles and acts only a god could do) .nit a question but truth Mohamed was an opportunist and saw the rise of Christianity as he was a Trader and wanted to copy (or he was insane)

sooo why did he give us the knowledge to destroy ourselves with nuclear weaponry?

@@loseymosey8686 God loves us, that is why He gave us freedom, that includes the freedom to sin, the freedom to even destroy ourselves. He wants us to be free, the Lord tries to show us the light, meanwhile the devil tries to decieve us The Lord could drag us all into heaven, but He wants us to choose our own home. The devil wants to drag us, but he can't, because his weaknesses have forced him to resort to cheap tactics such as manipulation. The Lord basically loves us so much, He even gave us the freedom to go against Him, He ofcourse weeps for these people, but the Lord knows it's right, someone who has seen the light and rejected it, could never be convinced otherwise.

@@lollllolll. Then why do rapist still get away with raping somebody? freedom my ass

Science, and scientists, describe the natural world to the best of their ability and knowledge. Religious people try in vain to squeeze their square book into the round hole that is reality.

@@ArKritz84 Exactly, religious people, not religion. Obviously there are religions that are wrong, but Christianity has proven to be very true based on what archaeologists, philosophers, historians, thinkers and psychologists say. You only said that because you want Christianity to be false, that's emotion, not reason.

@@Kairo005 is there a single supernatural claim of any religion that’s confirmed by ANY empirical evidence at all? And before you go off, I believe that you (and by extension all, or at least most theists) believe. That’s not in question.

@@ArKritz84 Of course it is in question. Yes, in fact, most Christians believe in empirical proof (not all, those who don't believe are generally agnostics) that Christianity is true. I can't speak for all religions, since I don't know them, I don't have details about them, only Christianity. The empirical proofs of Christians are 3 (that I know of, perhaps there are more), one cosmological, one ontological, and one of design.

​@@ArKritz84It's all about faith in what you believe

I think you missed the point of the video…

Funny how belief in god diminishes the more educated people are.

@@2l84me8 What are you on about?

god isn’t real keep coping

@secretshadow I think so. I think God speaks to us so we can understand. If he spoke to us in his All Knowing language we'd not understand one word.

​@secretshadow science disproves Bible as a verifiable and credible source of information as it contains many misinformations. Which in turn disproves the perfection of god and his knowledge.

ID is never proven by science. Period.

@JustSomething one prophecy? Nah, the whole thing is a joke.

​@JustSomething can you name one prophecy that was right? And by right I also mean not so vague that anything could fulfil it, such as proclaiming a savior will come eventually and some dude decides to fulfill that prophecy himself.

Amen. Science just explains God”s ways. Peace.

Ok so you do agree the incest to populate the world, the great flood and the second incest after that didn't happen?

Thanks for your comment. 1. Most physicists agree in the highly precise “tuned” nature of the physical constants, but as I say in the video, they do not agree on how those numbers came to be so precise. Many quantum physicists who are worth their salt conclude there is a super intelligence behind it. 2. Um. I think you just proved my point. You would think “someone” (with intellect and will) left the window open. 3. Just because we hold, at least for now, that most of our DNA is unnecessary or unused (junk DNA), does not negate the fact that it is still a coded language. Where does coding and language come from? 4. I think you missed the point. 5. I am aware of that explanation, it is just another theory. 6. Im not shouting magic, Im simply positing a logical solution, one held by most of the greatest thinkers over the past 5000 years. But yes, there is no physical proof that there is, or is not, a soul, it is beyond the reach of physical science. 7. Abiogenesis is highly speculative theory that has never been demonstrated. 8. True! But we're not talking about biology. we're talking about life - the force or energy that animates our biology. No one can explain its origins. It simply makes sense that it would come from an eternal source. peace.

@@imbeggar 1. You are simply incorrect. There is no means of even concluding a "super intelligence" could be behind it in the first place, and it is absolutely not the majority view among physicists. Again, no one has demonstrated a means by which universal constants could be "tuned" in the first place much less provided other universes to compare ours to to show it's at all unusual or unlikely. Any talk of "tuning" is baseless, pointless speculation without such. 2. You have missed the point of the metaphor, so I shall reiterate: it requires no leap of faith to hold the most parsimonious option. With a cold house, a window being open is more parsimonious than ice faeries. Why? Because we're quite familiar with people leaving windows open and not at all familiar with ice faeries. In the same way, we're quite familiar with a universe working via naturalistic laws and not at all familiar with anything "tuning" the universe, period. The latter demands numerous assumptions the former does not. 3. In short? DNA is not a language; it's a useful analogy for teaching undergrads but is not accurate when we get into depth. The physical properties of RNA and DNA determine their characteristics; they do not hold not arbitrary meanings in the manner of languages. In language, any word can refer to any object, but that does not hold true for genetics; the genetic code that maps codons to proteins could be changed but doing so would change the meaning of all such sequences and cannot create new arbitrary meanings for all DNA sequences. And as icing on the cake, the word frequencies of all natural languages follows Zipf's Law, while DNA does not. As to where it comes from? Chemistry. It's all about the physical properties of the chemicals themselves, and there's no reason that their interactions could not arise naturally. 4. I most certainly did not. You either knowingly made a strawman or are unaware of the mechanisms of evolution. Why else would you use the word "somehow" but to show you're either unaware or implying the explanation isn't sufficient? 5. On the one hand, if you are aware of how evolution explains the development of brains, consciousness, love, and so forth, then saying that "evolution cannot explain these things" in your video is simply lying. On the other hand, I must now question if you understand what the word "theory" means, for I suspect you're misusing it. 6. No, you are shouting magic for you don't even have a theory. You have no model, you have no viable explanation, you have no solution; you aren't solving anything by saying "it's a soul!", for unless you have a Theory of Souls that explains how souls work and why souls work it doesn't actually amount to anything at all. That's why it's equivalent to saying "it's magic" or "a wizard did it" or "faeries are responsible"; it's not an explanation, it's an excuse. And to be blunt, claiming it's "what the greatest thinkers thought" is a fallacious argument from authority at best, for there has been no one that can speak on souls at any time in human history with any authority at all. Literally no one can show that they exist in the first place, much less provide a model for how they work. Five-thousand years of never knowing anything does not a valid position make. 7. Again, you are simply incorrect. While still relatively young by comparison, everything I sated about abiogenesis has been firmly demonstrated. At this point, the consensus position is that life arose via chemical abiogenesis; we've demonstrated the stuff of life can arise, assemble, interact, and give rise to the mechanisms of life spontaneously via chemistry. And to be blunt it is awfully telling that you would assert that most physicists agree with you (and again, they do not) yet ignore the consensus among biochemists. 8. There is no mystical "life force or energy" that animates our body. That idea is called "Vitalism", and it was disproved way, way back in the day; continuing to push it at this point is a century out of date at best and pseudoscience at worst. Feel free to google it at your leisure. To the point then, there is no need for an eternal source for "life force" when such a thing simply does not exist in the first place.

@@studyingcereviciae are you a scientist?

​@@bmgmist273 Yes, I am.

@Chiefs Life First, your English is terrible. Work on that grammar. Second, I don't particularly care what you think of my expertise; nothing I've said is dependent on my authority. Also? Turns out scientists use the internet too, bub. Third, no, there's no such thing as "life force". Go ahead and Google "vitalism"; I'll wait. You'll find the idea has been debunked at length. Fourth, when the best you can do it is "Nuh-uh!", you have no grounds for calling other people's comments rubbish. Fine tuning remains pointless, unsupported, non-predictive garbage for the reasons I gave. If you want to actually address the problems I pointed out, go ahead. If you can't? Maybe think a little harder before you crack off four posts in a fit of pique; it just makes you look foolish. Let me know what you think needs demonstration. Be specific.

?

1) God has no creator, he is ''from everlasting to everlasting'' as it is claimed in the Bible. 2)93% of all deaths caused by war in recorded history were and are caused by atheism, which is very totalitarian in the form of goverment, for example : Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Mao Zedong etc.

​@@ΒασίληςΣαράντης-ν8ω1. Prove it. All that is written in the Bible, as you said, are just claims. Also, using your own logic, one could say that the universe also just began and had no creator. 2. Adolf Hitler was a Christian. Stalin and Mao killed people in the name of Communism, not atheism. Nice try though.

@@ΒασίληςΣαράντης-ν8ω 1): Special pleading 2): Citation needed

​@@ΒασίληςΣαράντης-ν8ωYou still didn't answer the question of why god, the being that created humans, would command people to kill other humans... It makes zero sense my guy...

god always existed. and also maybe we arent even close to being the first creation of Him.

Put perfectly, but he mentions this in the video already

How about the order of creation? Is that also relative? And is the mother and grandmother of the third generation of human beings the same person?

I like that

Religion is made up fairytale on why. Science tells ut how with logic and evidence.

That is exactly how my bio-anthropology class tough us as we learned more about evolution. My professors lecture really helped me understand this a lot to not let the two clash it out and to battle each side.

Science wants to explain things and religion only make shit up !

I really like that

Same

Science doesn’t disprove god, because nothing proves or disproves god. Sorry theists.

A) science doesn’t prove or disprove the idea of a supreme “God” being. B) nothing so far can “prove” or “disprove” the idea of a supreme “God” being. C) The thought that “We exist in the perfect and exclusive known parameters for existence, therefore those parameters must have been met by a supreme being” is ignoring so many things. First of all, it’s suspiciously similar to circular reasoning- *God must exist (claim) because we exist in such absurd circumstances! (supporting evidence)* - Our existence is not supporting evidence for the existence of a “God”. It has equal potential to be unrelated. Secondly, the odds of there being an infinite number of other universes is an extremely easy explanation, and i’ve heard the argument “But the chances of us naturally occurring is *[insert tiny %]* so it’s illogical to assume that we would occur naturally” and this argument is so annoying because our existence proves that theory equally as correct as it does in proving it was “God” (not at all), but the difference is that our existence does prove that within the parameters of our universe, life is possible, and therefore it doesn’t matter how unlikely it is, because it already happened. Although you may realize that last point doesn’t hold up at all if you believe in “God” because for you “God” created nature and nature created humans. I just wanted to add that in to show how your outlook before approaching information always matters more to you than the actual information, because if you’re a blank slate most of the “proof” wouldn’t be considered proof of anything because it goes both ways. D) I’ve been writing “*Supreme “God” Being*” and “”*God*”” because it doesn’t matter what god you follow, because any and all proof that proves a supreme being doesn’t say anything about your god’s abstract moral values. many of the Christian God’s morals make sense just from a civilization standpoint and a god decreeing them is redundant and completely separate from the idea of a being creating the universe. If a God exists it does nothing to help prove that *your* god exists. A monkey with a typewriter and an infinite amount of time typing will eventually type every idea, book, script, and event that ever happened, in chronological order, but that will take a finite amount of time for it to do, so it doesn’t truly need an infinite amount of time, only as much time as it takes the hypothetical monkey. This can be used in an argument that if it is possible for humans to naturally occur, and the universe will last for a theoretically infinite amount of time, then humans will eventually exist, and they will exist in a finite amount of time.

@@Filosofos1 what is your definition of god ? do you believe it is good and care about us we should pray to it, or evil and bad or may be ie doesn't care about us that we exist and it created us? and when it comes to science disproving gods it's about those religious mythological gods with their actions violating laws of nature they can be "disprove"!

@@Akkodha. ​ I used to be a strong ashiest myself, even an apostate, I'm not trying to prove the Abrahamic God but I'm proving that there is a God, But anyways, Where's the proof that there was an infinite amount of time? Explain how we went from something to nothing, and there is 0 evidence that there was a time of something always existing, it isn't possible for NOTHING to go to something now many physicists agree with this statement that there HAD to be a beginning to EVERYTHING, mark twain himself believed that this universe had to be a work of an intelligent mind. There is also 0 proof that there is a multiverse, and even if there was there would still have to be a point of Nothing even if you were to say that some form of matter existed forever (which there is no proof of), there would still need to be a cause for that matter to come to exist, it's the law of cause and effect for physical things, not supernatural things such as God himself. The universes code never shifts too, so explain the fact that the universe is so perfectly tuned and even a slight change in the code of the universe would cause vital things to not be able to exist INCLUDING hydrogen and life itself. The Hypothetical monkey that you are talking about cannot change his "typewriter" meaning that some things are just impossible to print, such as an apple or another monkey or print every single type of vegetable known to humankind, so that hypothetical monkey can only do things to an extent. There was never an infinite amount of time for something to create everything, like I said the universes code NEVER changes so it CANNOT create anything. "But for with God nothing shall be impossible." - Luke 1:37 By the way to mention, humans share 99% of their DNA with monkeys, if the 1% difference in the DNA is causing such a big difference within our bodies, such as going from this ape that seemingly acts off it's own interest and survival to thinking, reasoning, moral possessing, art making, technology revolutionizing, new emotion possessing, culture forming beings. And the beginning of life.. It just came from a pile of protons and neutrons rapidly expanding itself into a universe that made these Magnificent conscious living things, that started off as this well, sludge, and eventually Evolved (Which I don't discredit evolution at all since there can be changes done to the body as the body adapts to things. But not entirely transform itself. ( There was a scientist in Germany that conducted this research on flies to test evolution with special chemicals and formulas etc. to outrageously and tremendously speed up evolution , the only form of evolution that it showed, was adapting to it's surroundings, not turning into a different type of species.) Now as an illustration, depict in your mind Google, a engine that takes millions of computers, workers, servers, and billions of sets of code to run google, but it takes a perfectly arranged set of code to run you, a far more superior, complex, and intelligent being. Now just depict looking at all that code and saying that it just well, eventually scrambled itself together, unreasonable and quite stupid am I right? Every piece of work requires a builder. A thing that proves that God's intent was for humans to enjoy life, is that every single place you look on the earth that is NATURE, not manmade, is astonishing. But even if the Abrahamic God doesn't exist, there is still a God out there, one that let the Good, the bad, and the ugly exist, but most importantly let life exist. It's come to my attention that when people use the word God then people automatically jump to the conclusion that they are Automatically referring to the Abrahamic God (The God in the bible.)

Which god and how do you know?

werner heisenberg was also a nazi

​@@2l84me8 I love that you just decided to bother people talking to each other about their faith, just to be annoying. I get it, you're special. Chill...😊

@@runachan2910 Asking questions is “bothering people” now? We get it, you have a victim complex and you need to express how hurt you are.

@@2l84me8 No, asking questions isn't bad, all I'm saying is: people already argued this video with science. Either add information or move on. This is a Christian channel. Either give an argument or leave. Simple. How would you feel if I hop onto a science channel, write "repent" and leave? 🙂 + If I said Jesus, you'd yap back about antisemitism and islamophobia or just how we never study science +This question was answered by many Christians out there IN DETAIL, you aren't "asking". That's sarcasm. So, if you're going to be all fun and lol's then either stick to your Darwin or actually do a six second google search 😊

The comment-section here is trying to be open-minded and inclusive but just fails at it, tbh. I can think of a reason for that: They dont know just how deeply connected Science-Denial and Religion are. They dont know to what delibarate extends many Theists plan to undermine or even destroy Science, causing the Need for Debunk-Channels like Sci Man Dan and Planarwalk to increase more and more. The people in this comment-section havent seen Professor Daves Video on the Discovery Institute and havent given the End-Speech about Religion a big, long Think. I KNOW you all mean it well, BUT you are just under-informed about Anti-Science, Pseudo-Science and how it all connects; and your probably unaware of the insane-fact that... that some fight right now for a Reverse of the Seperation-fo-Church-and-State. Trust me, i dont want that to be objective reality either, but: Science bites Religion!

​@secretshadow So butthurt, stop

​@secretshadow like?

​@secretshadow give example bruh

@secretshadow I don't really understand what you're trying to prove here but I'm not the only one looking at the replies

Amen. Well said. Thank you friend. Peace. 🙏

@BradynLee same

Im 13 and this is deep momment:

I can relate. This is exactly what I’m going through. School is full of false ideas that are pressured to make it seem like they are right. People are always spreading rumors of each other. I literally just found out a lot of people think I’m a girl because my eyelashes are naturally big.

Evolution (to a certain degree) actually gives strong evidence to support one of the Bible’s most controversial and interesting stories: Noah’s Ark. Maybe God only had a few genus of species and decided to make everything better for His will. We can’t comprehend His will, anything is technically a possibility.

I don't know who you've been watching, but I've heard this argument many times, said with more sophistry or in just a few words. He even goes down the dishonest rabbithole of wording and presenting his view as the rational one and makes the opposing view a ridiculous strawman. The only thing here that differs is his presentation.

​​​@@JuhoPurola I don't see anywhere where he strawmans anything. He just follows Atheism to its logical conclusion. Something 99% of atheist refuse to do because it's impossible to live comfortably with that worldview. The reality is most atheist will make the claim to be atheist but never want to do the work of actually supporting their worldview. When pressed to give evidence most cower and say it's just a lack of belief which is a meaningless statement in it of itself. Either God exist or he doesn't there is no in-between. When you say you lack a belief in God but don't want to take the reality of God's non existence to it's logical conclusion then all you're doing is lying to yourself. This is why atheist who are intellectually honest and well read bite the bullet of Atheism and are honest enough to admit the sobering reality and absurdity of life without God. On Atheism there's No objective foundation for justifying or knowing Truth Logic Morality Reason Meaning All you are is a bag of flesh on a rock hurling through space that exists for a miniscule amount of time, nothing but a flicker before infinite darkness. All you're left with are subjective thoughts about what reality or what life is and with no free will of your own all your thoughts and actions are predetermined. Any science or rational you try to cling to is absolutely meaningless. Anyone else can disagree and you'd have no foundation for discerning truth. You need to face the reality of atheism rather than cower behind the pitiful lies left at your door about this just being a lack of belief. Those who take this topic seriously don't sit on the fence or retreat into a shell, they defend their ideas and face the reality that awaits them. You can read this comment and scoff or you could do yourself a favor and take a look in the mirror. Face the reality that stands before you honestly. Either God exist or he doesn't. Either there's an objective source for ethics, logic, and truth. Or we're nothing more than bags of flesh with no free will and nothing but delusions about what we think we know when in reality we have as much understanding about our world as the ants on the ground. Any solution you try to posit is simply chemical reactions going off in your head with no foundation grounded in truth.

@@petermuneme25 What a hilarious rant!🤣 First of, do you think that pink invisible universe farting non-corporeal omnipresent elephants are true? If not, are you willing to take the position to absolutely say and prove their non-existence, or are you smart enough to realize that given the parameters that is impossible? Then comes the third option for humans and whichever other concious beings exist, not being convinced of existence and therefore not believing in it, or pretty much what majority of atheists are. The rest of your rant is just meaningless drivel making the weakest points known to man. Maybe look into what others believe and think before spouting idiocy in bad faith about them.

@@JuhoPurola Go outside.

@Juho Purola Touch grass.

Ha. Thank you friend. Working on it. 🙏

This statement also works in talking to God

Leave it at 69 no one will like

@@steakfilly5199 BROOOOOOO THATS TRUE

No yall are so embarrassingly ignorant Read this ﴿إِنَّ في خَلقِ السَّماواتِ وَالأَرضِ وَاختِلافِ اللَّيلِ وَالنَّهارِ وَالفُلكِ الَّتي تَجري فِي البَحرِ بِما يَنفَعُ النّاسَ وَما أَنزَلَ اللَّهُ مِنَ السَّماءِ مِن ماءٍ فَأَحيا بِهِ الأَرضَ بَعدَ مَوتِها وَبَثَّ فيها مِن كُلِّ دابَّةٍ وَتَصريفِ الرِّياحِ وَالسَّحابِ المُسَخَّرِ بَينَ السَّماءِ وَالأَرضِ لَآياتٍ لِقَومٍ يَعقِلونَ﴾ [Al-Baqarah: 164] English Translation: (164) Indeed, in the creation of the heavens and the earth, and the alternation of the night and the day, and the [great] ships which sail through the sea with that which benefits people, and what Allāh has sent down from the heavens of rain, giving life thereby to the earth after its lifelessness and dispersing therein every [kind of] moving creature, and [His] directing of the winds and the clouds controlled between the heaven and earth are signs for a people who use reason. Shared with Ayah ayah.app ﴿إِنَّ في خَلقِ السَّماواتِ وَالأَرضِ وَاختِلافِ اللَّيلِ وَالنَّهارِ لَآياتٍ لِأُولِي الأَلبابِ ۝ الَّذينَ يَذكُرونَ اللَّهَ قِيامًا وَقُعودًا وَعَلى جُنوبِهِم وَيَتَفَكَّرونَ في خَلقِ السَّماواتِ وَالأَرضِ رَبَّنا ما خَلَقتَ هذا باطِلًا سُبحانَكَ فَقِنا عَذابَ النّارِ﴾ [Āli ‘Imrān: 190-191] English Translation: (190) Indeed, in the creation of the heavens and the earth and the alternation of the night and the day are signs for those of understanding - (191) Who remember Allāh while standing or sitting or [lying] on their sides and give thought to the creation of the heavens and the earth, [saying], "Our Lord, You did not create this aimlessly; exalted are You [above such a thing]; then protect us from the punishment of the Fire. Shared with Ayah ayah.app They didn’t in belief in hell expect after knowing the logic of the book so learn

Well yeah i would say the big bang isnt really a "pro-atheist" concept at all, or at the very least it doesn't help the argument along, it simply pushes the question of "so where did all that stuff that made the universe come from?" back, and at the end of the day science cant answer that question because the point suggests that the answer lies beyond our universe.

LeMaitre strongly disavowed any connection between his ideas and "Intelligent Design." Scientists of the 20th century never opposed the Big Bang because they opposed "Intelligent Design," religion never entered into it, they were simply skeptical as scientists should always be until a new idea is proved by conclusive evidence. Creationists were strongly against the Big Bang for decades until one of them figured out a way to use it as a self-serving argument for "Intelligent Design." No one in cosmology takes "Intelligent Design" seriously.

I believe in the BBT, I just think that God made it happen

@@The_Trident_Master You can always believe that your favorite deities are ultimately behind every natural phenomenon in some undetectable way.

@@TheTruth-cy4le It’s not undetectable though. God created the universe through science

how do you know that though? perhaps we would exist in a diffrent manner, after all there are many types of life on earth alone

ever heard of Douglas Adams puddle arguement? This is a typical watchmaker arguement or arguement from incredulity type deal that is the result of looking at the procession of time backwards with the ego to assume that you are an intended final result.

Dude it is annoying that people are so blinded by their faith that they can’t see that life was made for the universe not the other way around

@@McNoob5477ok but where did that life come from

@@sundeww life is just the ability for an organisms to have a controlled internal environment that just happened by accident. But the more complex stuff happens by evolution. Over millions of generations. Life gets pretty complex.

No that's not right

I hate to say but there is no evidence for or against god. You can have faith, but we will never know for sure.

Omg 👎🏻 read this ﴿إِنَّ في خَلقِ السَّماواتِ وَالأَرضِ وَاختِلافِ اللَّيلِ وَالنَّهارِ وَالفُلكِ الَّتي تَجري فِي البَحرِ بِما يَنفَعُ النّاسَ وَما أَنزَلَ اللَّهُ مِنَ السَّماءِ مِن ماءٍ فَأَحيا بِهِ الأَرضَ بَعدَ مَوتِها وَبَثَّ فيها مِن كُلِّ دابَّةٍ وَتَصريفِ الرِّياحِ وَالسَّحابِ المُسَخَّرِ بَينَ السَّماءِ وَالأَرضِ لَآياتٍ لِقَومٍ يَعقِلونَ﴾ [Al-Baqarah: 164] English Translation: (164) Indeed, in the creation of the heavens and the earth, and the alternation of the night and the day, and the [great] ships which sail through the sea with that which benefits people, and what Allāh has sent down from the heavens of rain, giving life thereby to the earth after its lifelessness and dispersing therein every [kind of] moving creature, and [His] directing of the winds and the clouds controlled between the heaven and earth are signs for a people who use reason. Shared with Ayah ayah.app

Does the quran in anyway states blindnes? At all its state completely the opposite

@@Filosofos1 that's the point of faith, you can argue the bible is for, and lack of audible communication is against

AMEN

IVE BEEN TRYING TO TELL THIS TO PPL!!! U SPOKE MY MIND. U ARE AN AMAZING BEING JUST LIKE ALL OF GOD'S WONDERFUL MASTERPEICES. GOD BLESS!

Total gibberish. All you're saying is that he is what ever it is that you decide. Anyone who disagrees with your interpretation is wrong because that's the only way you can be right. You don't know how something works, therefor god. Nonsense. You are defining what god MUST be. Is that not just a tad arrogant? Random collection formed by chance? So evolution is out of the question. You're telling me what god has to be, what he has to do, where he has to be. Damn you're sure of yourself. You even claim to know his location. Magic number three. Shhheeessshhh, why not seven? You've even decided gods volume as you know where he will and won't fit. If you knew his mass we could work out his density. You decide if he's worth worshipping or not based on his volume. So you place a limit on the size of god. Thought he was a god. Could be smaller than a plank length if he wanted but you wouldn't worship him then because he would be too small to be worth worshipping. So you withhold your worship based on your assumptions of the volume of a non-perceptible object? I hope you're young enough to learn that there is only one thing, reality. You've got it all worked out, size, shape, age and limitations. How very humble of you. I've never seen you but I can describe, down to the last one, how many hairs you have. A much lesser claim than yours. Sorry m8, I "believe" and have "faith" in logic. Not last years amended edition of the one true word. How can there be more than one version? Are they all true. You can't just ignore reason because it's inconvenient. I believe in flying penguins. Jet propelled flying penguins. Prove me wrong. I have the same evidence that you do, even more. I know penguins are real, I've seen one. It's not a personal attack on you, just trying to observe reality. And, please, don't kill your children because you have an auditory hallucination. Have you heard of ergot? Worth a look if not. It's 'independently' interesting substance and has much food for thought. Just one question please. Can god create a rock so heavy that he can't lift it? Crikeys, I'm jibbering on like a stuck record. Sorry. Keep well m8. 😀

but god said that he created man based off of himself,right? that means he is a man. and also,don't you think it's comedic how just because you cant explain something,e.g. " God is not a big man in the sky. God is an uncreated Creator. He is not affected by time, space or matter. If He is affected by time, space and matter then He is not God. Time, space and matter is a continuum and all of them have to come into existence at the same instance. Because if there were matter and no space...where would you put it? If there were matter and space but no time, when would you put it? You cannot have time, space and matter independently to come into existence simultaneously. The Bible answers this in ten words ... In the beginning (time) God created the heaven (space) and earth (matter) (genesis 1:1)", you come to the conclusion that,"oh ok so a god had to make it" what type of logic is that?

@@act1veee God said? When, where, HOW, why and most important, who heard it? Religion is a dangerously silly practice. :)

Amen. Thanks friend. I try to make as open as possible for everyone. We’re all brothers and sisters in Christ. Peace. 🙏

I would definitely choose to be a Baptist if I wasn’t a Adventist.

@@ceoofmilk2756 Well there's nothing stoping you...

@@servantmapper8893 well now I’m an atheist

@@ceoofmilk2756 Welp, God will always be there waiting, if you'd ever want to turn back.

Yes i love the fact that islam encourages science and people seeking the truth

@@sarpolaris1985 yeahh

​@@sarpolaris1985 have u even read Islam ? Islam is funny and earth isn't flat.

​@@sarpolaris1985 have u even read Islam ? Islam is funny and earth isn't flat.

@@majd8 islam is a fairytale. And muslims are blind followers. Ur an example.

Thank you for your response; I was looking for a comment that would refute the video in a respectful manner or simply say, "This is a bunch of nonsense," and be done with it. I also believe that he failed to mention the persecution that churches, whether Christian or not, carried out in the name of God against scientists (sorry for the bad english)

This deserves a million likes

@@yourfavouritenarcissist thanks man🙌

I knew I disagreed with the video, but I just didn't know how to put it in words, thank you.

I read everything twice

Whats good

@Purpful yet you still ignore the areas of the bible that science disproves? The great flood is a great example. Or dinosaurs existing with man. Talking snakes. Parting of the sea. ...and the list goes on And the examples given in this video prove nothing except that the god of the gaps fallacy is alive and strong.

​@@tonyclif1when he shows his glory please do not ignore it, rather invite it.

@@Mr.__Sofi glory? You mean like when he demanded every first born child be killed? (Real pro life huh ;) )Or when he says it's ok to be a slave? Or when he says stone your disobedient child? Or back to the science - when your book claims there was a worldwide flood, but there is ZERO scientific evidence that this happened. Instead of showing his "glory", why doesn't he just show HIMSELF so we can KNOW he exists? Besides, even if he were to exist, why would you worship such a monster?

@@Mr.__SofiI think you mean “if”, not “when” If there is undeniable proof that God does exist I’ll believe then, but neither science nor religion can prove the existence of God as of now

In response to the first argument, he pointed out that there were other ways to think about the problem, and that they are equally valid. Although I can see problems with believing the world was made for us, I can also see the problems with believing it wasn't. And for the second argument, although he is more aggressive, especially at 5:55, he's basically trying to get the same point across. That you can believe in a higher power working with evolution to make something complex. For the third point, we have completely detached from your usual science and moved into philosophy, _(why can I think)_ so a biologist would be hard pressed to help you here. And for the fourth point, the Big Bang theory does propose that the universe originated from an extremely hot and dense state, called a singularity. However, it does not specify what existed before or at the moment of the singularity. The theory does not provide a detailed explanation of the initial conditions or the cause of the Big Bang itself. Honestly, it was difficult to break down your sentence on the Big Bang, but I think everything else makes sense.

No no, science has a good handle on evolution. The only reason it’s called a “theory” is because that word is a scientific term. Cosmic background radiation also shows a clear leading towards the big bang, but you’re right, given more time we will understand such phenomena much better

@@dryfox11 Ur totally right lol

Either you completely ignored the video as a whole or you are being deliberately stupid. There is no dichotomy, he even explains it in the video that science is all about discovering how the world works. The notion of God is separate from that. It has nothing to do with a false dichotomy set up by spaghetti monster loving reddit atheist who think God doesn't exist because they have no gf.

this makes me think the video is even worse than I thought, I wasn't going to watch it, but now I am even more afraid, why must humans be like this?

@Your local Polish feller. "think the video is even worse than I thought", "I am even more afraid" and a little of neuron activity and you get the answer

@Your local Polish feller. "why must humans be like that?", "be like what?", "not an argument" no shit sherlock, look do you see that "?" symbol? let me tell you, is called a question mark, do you know its use? probably not, it is used to, get this, mark a question hm? question mark mark question, intuitive isn't it? well if you notice I kinda used that symbol, so guess what, it was a question! not an argument! oh how funny it is how dumb you are

@@NeroDefoggerWhy must humans be like what? Trying to find meaning in the universe? Well I’m sorry that not everyone is as hopelessly nihilistic as you. You’ll just have to cope.

@@thenelsonbruhs722 wait... meaning? did you really meant to say the word meaning? usually other words are used like... I don't know, understanding the universe? the laws of the universe, the rules, how it works, meaning is like, purpose, like something designed to achieve something, but there is no proof that the universe is designed by anyone, is dunno just weird, I think you meant understand the universe, so: no all the opposite, if people were trying to understand the universe I wouldn't be complaining about anything. I don't know what you mean about "hopelessly"

Let's not forget that the Islamic Golden Age was also directly responsible for a whole host of scientific discoveries and breakthroughs. Peace be upon you

Me too .

Sorry but. Earth isn't flat.

@@Proud_Kafir. we know that earth isn't flat !!!!

@@Proud_Kafir.( kafir) oh , I understand you are an apostate from Islam !!

Ha. Thank you. Peace 🙏.

​@@imbeggaramen

Wow, @Addison-RN. In all of my years (I'm 51) of reading comments on youtube/facebook/news sites, you name it...I have never seen a comment like this before. It's extraordinary for several reasons. I was kind of of the belief that nobody ever changes their mind based on a youtube video, or by something someone says online, let alone come back open up about that change of heart. I don't think many people realize how rarely this happens. It's not like I made this video or anything, but I'm truly inspired by your willingness to put this out there for everyone. Thanks. :)

👍

Jesus loves you

You point out your sexuality in the comment. I've been openly bi since I was about 16 years old, and my very Christian parents accepted that. We've since left the church we were in because of some very bad experiences and we hopped churches like 3 times before finally sorta giving up on it. But we still believe there's something bigger out there. We still think that Jesus is a wonderful figure and a good person to try to live by. Faith is very internal in my family and none of us are Christians by most people's standards but the things I learned as a kid are still with me and I try my best to not let whoever is out there down because after all, they created me and everything there is. I see a lot of very angry people from our side everywhere but you can't change a person's mind by being angry with them for not understanding, it never works. I don't expect others to accept me and ironically that's what has helped people accept it more than anything else I've ever tried. Good on you for seeing that only love can fend off hate.

@@valhalla_1129 I have waited all my life to hear this message. I needed /need a friend like you. ❤️

I hate to say, but there is no evidence for or against god.

@@Filosofos1 Please familiarize yourself with the works of Gary R. Habermas.

I'm interested in science that can be proven, not comic book ideas like the multiverse

​@@Filosofos1simple logic will tell u God exists, look around, study the human body and chemistry sometime, none of this was random

@@tomtemple69 It may very well not have been random, but that isn't evidence for a god.

Amen. Thank you brother.

wa alaikum salaam@@Wtakerman

Allah can't exist if he's all powerful and perfectly good. The existence of evil implies he's either not good or not all powerful. That alone destroys both the christian and the Muslim definition of God. No need to talk about physics or big "perfect" numbers to show there's a very simple and dumb flaw in theistic logic.

You can't both be right.

@@Wtakerman of course. Because even if I’d grant that there’s room for a a god in the ever-shrinking gap in scientific knowledge, all everybody has to say about that god is a finite pile of claims. And none of it has anything to do with science. Post-hoc rationalizations, arguments from incredulity and fallacious reasoning notwithstanding.

So you literally believe in a googol of googol of chances.

This is just simply wrong, obviously we wouldn't be able to recognize if the universe wasn't tuned for life because we wouldn't be alive, the mere fact that we ARE alive is basis to believe that we come from something. Multiple universes has never and will never be verified by anyone and even if there were an infinite amount of other universes out there, what's to say God didn't create them as well? God is all powerful and all knowing and can frankly do whatever he pleases, don't you think that an infinite amount of unfathomably large cosmic spaces and objects just points more to the idea that it all comes from God?

please speak english

Fine tuning hasn't been debunked centuries ago. How has it been debunked? Scientists are still talking about it. There main way of escaping it is to posit a multiverse but that doesn't really work and its pseudoscience at this point.

Awesome. Thank you for this Oliver. Peace.

System is the problem 🏡 Our Life should be around these Great Qualities. 1, Show all living creatures; all the love and kindness as much as you can. 2, Only try to be honest with yourself. If you try to be honest with others, you will get into big trouble soon or later. 3, Aim only one target at a time; otherwise you are chasing two rabbits and you will miss both. So, the reason behind it. Have one powerful reason and never ever give up the one you want the most. 4, Don't try to be good person only but be the powerful person. We will grow to be the one or we will die. There is no other choice. 5, Always learn and look for to improve something your life. 6, You are not alone. Love and faith the high power reduces unnecessary stress in life. But never completely rely on it. 7, Success and happiness are the byproducts of our usefulness. So, always increase the possibility of success. 8, Life is not going to be easy. Because of our unnecessary things. Eliminate all the unnecessary things as much as you can by organising yourself well with the environments. 9, Never believe anything without the proper evidences. 10, Always try to give more than you take. Because it is dignity/ character of the divinity within you. 🌎 As long as people continue to see themselves as separate from everything else, they lend themselves to being completely enslaved. Success depends on how well we relate to everything around us. Joy comes from that bliss of connectedness. I believe that unarmed truth and love will have the final word in reality. To love; you should have good heart. I am a good person until I see a person better than my standard of goodness. Being good is the progress towards a worthy cause. Love is God. Whoever lives in love, lives forever. How selfish it is to try to keep something forever? Love is all about nourishing, nurturing, sharing and expanding the love within you for all. The principle to which we adhere to is that we have kindness of love at heart for the whole of mankind. As long as there is the unnecessary differences within us; we can not live peacefully so we have to eliminate all the unnecessary differences among us so we can love all. People abilities may vary but not there true love. If we love a person/ God for a reason then we love the reason but not the person. No reason is the reason to love the person because true love never fails. So do not compare or measure the true love as first or the last but love all truly. If you love people truly then you can understand people. If you don't love then you don't understand people at all. People are controlled by system why? The Cyclical Consumption is the current economy all over the World. It is making the scarcity problems of the earth finite resources to deteriorate day by day. Current Monetary System is legalised theft. Real money is Gold and Silver. Scarcity gives the money more value. Real money won't lose it's value. When Governments stay away from Gold & Silver then very easy to transfer the wealth / resources to upper class the Rich (Corporatocracy) Elite. When the Governments are printing out more new fiat currency with reserve banks, our old currency is losing its purchasing power everyday. They are printing millions of currency everyday. All governments and laws are existing right now to transfer wealth to upper class the rich elite. The USA Government & other Governments are in many countries, bailed the investment banks & financial institutions in 2008 against the majority of the people. There is no democracy in any countries. Because of the Money System based on profits motive only above all else even humans lives and well-being. So, we do not have freedom to protect our values with the money so on. The violence, bankruptcy & all the negativities are build into the Monetary System of our society. All are owned (including ourselves) by Reserve Bank. Which is private cartel the corporation. So, in legal system, we are legally considered as chattel the properties. They make money in the capital markets with our birth certificates. They do not consider us as Humans. That's the truth. We are at the invisible war with the Elites (Corporatocracies). We have to fight for our Freedom. Resource Based Economy is the Solution. We have to declare the earth resources as the heritage of all the people of this world. So everyone has access to it. Please have your research about zeitgeist movement then you know the truth more. Truth About Health/Drugs Industry Because Of It Your Life At High Risk The drug industry is a 1/2 trillion dollars a year worldwide conglomerate. Almost 300 billions dollars just in North America. That is really big business. What would happen if everyone were well? There is no money in health. You see, good health makes a lot of sense but it doesn't make a lot of dollars. Because everything they do is toxic. Every drug they use, prescription drugs, all drugs are liver toxic, bar none. If you've had amalgam fillings put in your mouth by dentists. It is highly toxic. There's cancer because most of the chemos are themselves carcinogens. To view the tumor as the cancer and we know the tumor is not the cancer. The cancer industry is 200 billions dollars a year. The more work they get, the more profit there is. You have to dismantle; If the truth ever came out about what we would need to do. 30% of people of females in America are at risk of getting, will get cancer of the breast. The ones that are already dead have been grossly mistreated by the medical profession and by the government that supposedly is supposed to encourage free research and development of all possibilities. Why would medical doctors who studied medicine and practice medicine and are heavily funded by pharmaceutical companies why would they go and look into vitamins? That they never had the answer orthomolecular. And as more and more of our population start taking their health into their own hands, there's going to be even more and more of changes. It can't go on the way it is. The system is failing apart. We must make nutrition the primary prevention strategy for the population. You are what you eat. You are everything that you have ever done to yourself. The choices you make directly affect the outcome of your life. - (Food Matters Documentary in Netflix) 😊 Well, I truly love God. I am not religious but very spiritual person. So, I believe 1) Religion is the beliefs in someone experiences But spirituality is having my own experiences. The mainstream religions people promote religious ideology by giving guidelines and guide but In my spiritual life; I do not want anyone or anything between God and me to restrict my freedom to worship God. 2) We do not need any authorities to do good work. The god work is the good work always. In contrast; organised mainstream religions are claiming that they have the authorities to do God works as leaders so on. 3) God is not capable of doing wrong thing, change the past for us and create anything out of nothing for us. Nothing means not anything. So, even God is limited. The mainstream religious people believe that God is unlimited. 4) God wants us to take responsibilities for our righteousness life but not for all the consequences of our actions because they are continued to exist among us. So, How can god punish us for all our consequences? The mainstream religious people believe we are full of sins because of all our actions. 5) Freewill is an illusion. People always choose the perceived path of greatest pleasure. So, we do not have choices all the time. In contrast teachings of the mainstream religions are promoting people to do god's will always because we all have choices of freewill always. 6) We can not separate everything into groups. So, everything for good and evil and there's no success and failure for everything. If everything is real then real things can not be threatened. Once you come to understand that God/The Holy Spirit is in each of us, You will no longer need a Book to tell you how to live. Then why we need religious scriptures? The Virtue is the expression of the basic goodness in our actions. The Basic goodness is the fundamental worthiness of every individuals. We are worthy to God always in everything. 7) Beliefs in a cruel God makes a cruel man. No matter what; every living creatures has the right to live and What makes their life cheap? Everything depends on everything. Nothing too big or too small in value. We can not love and hate at the same time; Being a vegetarian means love without cruelty happily. The mainstream religious people are killing people and sacrificing animals in the name of God. They promote God's cruel punishments. The Punishment is endless for Sinners/Devil according to religious scriptures. But God is love always. Overcome hate with love. If all religions for peace, unity? No way. Because they are not for peace. 8) Well, The God gave us everything to go from moment to moment in our lives as we do our part and pray only to thank god then the Love is in progress. The Love is always for everyone. We are always worthy of the God's love. Our greatest fear is; not to be loved by anyone but we are all loved by someone. When we eliminate all our unnecessary differences among us then true peaceful life is possible with the true love. If we can't find the peace within ourselves then we will never find it anywhere else. 9) This is the Fight for independence and freedom of humanity to worship God freely without religious guide and guidelines to restrict us. Unnecessarily, We do not want third party controls over us in anything ; especially in spirituality. 10) Revive Survive Thrive. Sincerely, The Real Peacemaker against religious oppression. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-HbvCxMfcKv4.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-pIJHJzDQcRM.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-MyxbdmAnIcI.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-wLzeakKC6fE.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-P8vHa8zD7jY.html

92% of Nobel prize winners are Christian and Jewish people , Einstein was Jewish, Isaac Newton was a deep believer in God , Israel itself is deeply rooted in science and technology development lol

​@@charmed0009what does that surah have to do with his comment?? Can you explain??

​@@AliFarooqui111idk man imuslim too but cmon this is too random for my brain to comprehent. its like saying your next in an funeral. :/

​@@charmed0009sorry I don't listen to religions started by people who rape children and murderer people

I’m glad that you guys don’t have a bad relationship just because of your religion

What alternative best explains reality according to you?

we walk by faith, not by sight.

@@leafy_allosaurusTry crossing the street that way and your chances of making it across decrease dramatically.

​@@Maksie0 Non sequitur. Poor argument.

@@croscoe333 How's it a non sequitur?

Same here. I also doubt that god would Choose us personally for the days over the trillions of other potentially intelligent life forms

No, it's a method we use to find out the real answer after millennia of your kind making up answers.

Was waiting for this reply Amazing bro

The irony of it all is that science basically was born from theology. Most precursors of science where religious people. God Bless.

@@LuisPipoComunica a lot famous contributers to Science were religious. here are two famous scientists associated with each of the major religions: **Christianity:** 1. **Gregor Mendel:** An Augustinian friar, Mendel is often called the "father of modern genetics" for his pioneering work on the inheritance of traits in pea plants. 2. **Francis Collins:** A physician-geneticist, Collins led the Human Genome Project and is known for his significant contributions to the understanding of human DNA. **Islam:** 1. **Ibn al-Haytham (Alhazen):** An influential polymath during the Islamic Golden Age, he made contributions to various fields including optics, mathematics, and astronomy. 2. **Abu al-Qasim al-Zahrawi (Albucasis):** A medieval surgeon and physician, Albucasis is known for his detailed writings on surgery and medical practices. **Judaism:** 1. **Albert Einstein:** A theoretical physicist, Einstein developed the theory of relativity and is one of the most famous scientists in history. 2. **Robert Aumann:** A mathematician known for his work in game theory, Aumann won the Nobel Prize in Economics for his contributions. **Hinduism:** 1. **C. V. Raman:** An Indian physicist, Raman won the Nobel Prize for his work on the scattering of light, known as the "Raman effect." 2. **Homi J. Bhabha:** A nuclear physicist, Bhabha played a key role in establishing India's nuclear research program. **Buddhism:** 1. **Ananda Kentish Coomaraswamy:** An art historian and philosopher, Coomaraswamy made significant contributions to the understanding of traditional art and culture. 2. **Daisaku Ikeda:** A Buddhist philosopher and educator, Ikeda has written extensively on peace, education, and interfaith dialogue.

Science has progressed a lot due to religious folks. It is a sad thing to see Atheists and Creationists to differ solely based on personal beliefs. when we can all work together without bringing in God into this. This goes for both categories of people.

There is a whole slew of intellectual eras in both the christian and muslim world. Many caliphates and muslim empires were masters of reason and the sciences. Many noteable europeans were also devout christians yet also intellectuals that rationally examined the world. Religion is a lifestyle, people who simplify it down to it being a simpleton's way of evading science ignore the fact that all of their ancestors were directly religious and also people with a passion to learn. The peoples who invented writing, created the first bombs, and discovered mathematics were all likely staunch traditionalists and religious people like everyone else at the time was in their respective civilizations. The chinese scholars were almost certainly like this and this was the case in most of recorded history as well. Its only the advent of the modern age (mostly the internet era) that science has been somehow deemed a non religious area of study, solely based on unflattering stereotypes.

@@manipulatortrash I wholeheartedly agree with you on this take.

it unfortunately lacks evidence, all unfounded speculation to intuitively make sense of a universe that really doesn't make any, with no obligation to do so either. You are faced with a dilemma of seeking either consolation or objective truth, the choice is yours, the former is abundant

Ok now listen to someone who actually knows what they are talking about.

lmao what. yall are so gullible

Because the Church has sistematically killed and silenced many scientists that proved biblic ideas to be wrong, even Christian ones. Also, the Bible was written in a geocentric context and evolution wasn't discovered at the time, so many sections of it do contradict modern science.

Thanks for watching.

​@@imbeggarYou are completely wrong about evolution and your way of thinking shows how ignorant you are. First of all, you point out the chance of us being here, the thing is, if the environment aren't suited for us, we wouldn't be here so there are obviously several fails for life to form and you made a stupid argument out of it. Second, evolution does not explain the origin of life, it explains how life develops. You're misinforming thousands of people, with your bad understanding of science.

@@sustavo67 Are you a dumbass? He clearly stated that he wasn’t a scientist. And secondly he isn’t wrong, evolution still doesn’t explain how life came to be.

In a way we did become inferior in the way chimps use photographic memory to scout other packs that may be a threat, we ended up gaining our imagination in the caves we’d fall back into and carve interpretations onto the walls as warnings to the point where grasping over concepts became the stepping stone of our curiosity for this wicked world outside the walls. Only some of us retain photographic memories while the rest can only catch up through vivid evidence we’ve left behind.

Yet you base your cosmological premise on information gotten from some dude on the internet, be it Neil or whomever, and not on your own senses and experience? How is that "advancing your knowledge", exactly?

@Flat Enough Neil Degrass Tyson is a famous astrophysicist, and ik I leave the evidence to him, but the beauty of science is that I can look up the calculations and do it myself. I trust the ones who made those calculations because I use them at school, and they work for various scenarios. If you destroy every science book in 1000 years, it will come back the same, but if you destroy a religious book, it will come back differently.

@Matt it's whatever environment we got presented hundreds of thousands of years ago. We might not have to do photographic memory or the strength of other animals, but our cognitive ability is the highest on the entire planet

@@medericdurand3460 so am I correct to assume that you cannot prove to yourself and for yourself, by means of experience and practical reference, all those stories about the ball Earth inside a void, abiogenesis, "evolution" but you are rather content to stay in the sidelines and take them on faith?

True

yea the father of modern medicine was a muslim

it didnt

@@byonex no it did

True, Islam has laid the foundation for modern science ❤

Yea... excluding the universe

In the same way a circle doesn't have a start?

Sadly, cosmic background radiation tells us otherwise. But you’re on the right track. While matter may not be infinite, nature can create nature, meaning there need not be a creator.

@@dryfox11 Cant nature create nature and have god exist? I don't get your point. Maybe god made it so that nature can create nature? This doesn't explain away god.