@@joshuajavawell obviously it is more mixed in the end, it got more time to be worked together compared to knife. A fairer test would have been to mix it with knife after the split equal to the time taken for the hand kneading or 100% knife vs 100% hand
FUN FACT!!: this is actually how mixing paints also works! When you mix paint, the small coloured pigments intertwine seamlessly, making a new colour despite the pigments themselves remaining the original colour. Here, it’s a lot easier to see it’s mixed because you can make out the individual sand grains better than small pigments. So this is actually exactly like paint mixing under a microscope!
About that, my original fun fact was a little shortened just so I don't bother people. But, if you're curious heres a more thorough explanation: Our eyes have red, green and blue colour receptors, yes? They don't respond to just a single value, but rather it's a curve. This is the colour spectrum. The colour receptors overlap with one another, most notably with red and green overlapping the most. Paint reflects light, so keep that in mind. Light with a frequency that's between red and green will trigger both light receptors for red and green so our brain will interpret the colour as yellow or orange. So, what happens with a mixture of two light sources? Instead of singling out all the separate pigments, our brain will perceive those two lights as one. Yellow stimulates both red and green receptors, but our brain translates that to yellow for us despite the fact there isn't any physical yellow. Now, do keep in mind pigments don't create light - rather absorb and reflect it. So, this is all explaining additive light - it's what happens with your screens and monitors. With painting, what happens is called subtractive lighting because there are more pigments farther from white so they can't reflect as well. That's why when you mix a lot of colours together, you get a muddied colour because there's less white to reflect. From what I know about physics, Subtractive and Additive lighting are both very similar - except that additive uses its own light while subtractive uses reflected light. So, subtracted light appears more muted. I fail to see where in my original comment I mentioned colour theory, as my OG comment was more or less a dumbed down version of this reply. I'm not gonna take any offence to it at all as I'm aware that your reply came from a place of curiosity and there wasn't any malice :) We can gather that the mixing process for paints does happen like how you thought, hooray! I just kept the OG comment short in order to make it more friendly to read so more people can know about the beauty of paints :) @@luscious_hair_dude
@@Be727zwhen we briefly had this in physics i was so bored and barely paid attention. This is actually so interesting now that I’m genuinely curious about it myself and don’t have a test about it😂 and have picked up painting again. Maybe i can sneak into our lab and look at this under a microscope myself soon:)
@@ArtzieKitYou’ve literally just described most color as it exists in nearly everything. The color we see is rarely a monochromatic (single wavelength) color, but a mixture of various wavelengths being reflected and interpreted.
These sand color mixes are always so awesome since I can switch between seeing the combined color or focusing on the individual colors that went into it.
This is so relaxing I'm about to go to my choir concert. And I'm kind of nervous but this makes me calm and it makes me feel like that I can do it. Thank you so much for uploading this I appreciate it!
@@McShrimpssTv girl is a band and they have an album made in 2016 called ‘Who really cares’! The album cover has a man in blue and a woman in pink, which makes the person remind them of tv girl!
Fun fact: If you mix two colors, yellow and blue for example, under a microscope you'll notice they don't completely mix, they are united (like a hug) but the pigment is still separated. (I took the information from a biologist that speaks spanish, and i saw it myself, lol, the channel is 'Biologia Desde Cero')
It doesn't "mix" so much as the pieces of the two colors become smaller and smaller until they are small enough to blend together in our eyes creating an almost pointillist illusion of mixing.
Unless pigments are changing each other's chemistry, that's what's happening on a molecular scale when you mix paint too. 🤯 Mind-blowing stuff, I know.
Mate, I can’t stress this enough, you need to slow these videos in their original speed and compile them in a regular RU-vid video, it will do NUMBERS.
Scientific answer : No, they don’t mix, the sand is broken down so much that it is packed together so that from a distance it looks mixed but up close it is no less mixed that the start
@@breathychestclipsViolet, Purple, and Magenta are distinct colors. If anything Purple is a bluish shade of Magenta. And Violet is exactly halfway between Blue and Magenta.
This explains the difference between a mixture and a compound. This is a mixture, all the particles together but not bonded, if you had all the time in the world, it would be possible to separate them again. A compound would just become the colour purple and there wouldnt be pink or blue flecks in it.