Do NOT put your finger in the Tesla Cybertruck Frunk 

😂😂😂😂😂

Brokeass

Lol yes, blink twice if you're not ok 🤪

@@Jasey357 one day there’s gonna be a support group for all the wronged Elon fanboys

That is exactly what Tesla fans sound like. 'It was my fault. I shouldn't have done what I did'. The willingness to submit to an 'authority' is proudly on display with these people.

@@dmwalker24 it’s so sad. These guys would die for Elon and he wouldn’t give them the time of day. Remember the definition of insanity?

Excuse me sir, but can you show me on this doll where the cyber truck hurt you?

Try to put your finger while someone else is closing the trunk manually.. Very cool!

Preferably off a cliff.

​@@RicardoPereira-pk3py lol the cope from musk stans goes from 0 to "completely detached from reality" every time, just like this guy's finger if he had left it in there

Ha!

@@iplaydodgeball BS. He worked against the algorithm. The first banana was the proof the system worked. After every failed attempt it increases the closing force until it is fully closed. Then the force algorithm resets itself again to delicate. What’s not to like about that engineering genius? He just fooled himself by doing what he was doing. Where is Teslas mistake in it?

Intrusive thoughts

Completely insane.

Expected nothing more from a cybertruck owner

he'd better try his 21 first finger )) darwin award.

@@alexk6745 LOL

Word

Exactly. No other manufacturer is having to defend their safety feature because of "user error"

I mostly agree, but i could see myself with that frunk packed with stuff to where it barely shuts. I'd bet the intent for it to go down harder/be less sensitive was for that kinda situation.

That's what happens when Elon fires everyone who isn't a type A narcissist.

You want the world to baby proof everything??? It’s called life, try living in it using your own logic

Hey shut up, Tesla died for your sins and posted about it on X, be grateful that Elon Musk stole such a shitty idea.

normal people when trying to close a car door: it didn't close, let's see if something's stuck in it, remove it, and gently try again... weird people: it didn't close, I should try again with more force... and after that I'll see also why my toddler is screaming over the top of his lungs, jeez...

If someone has to say "you tested it wrong", then the problem is not with the tester, it's with the product.

You'll try 3 times to close it on your child's hand?

@@andrasbiro3007 Well, imagine the situation: You tried closing it on luggage twice and when you try it the third time, unfortunately a child put its hand at a position, at which the front trunk (I refuse to use the other silly word) closes on its hand. These things happen. Murphys Law was invented to describe exactly that: If anything can go wrong, it will. And as an engineer you have to make sure that you think of ways of avoiding anything going wrong. Tesla fucked up here.

@@andrasbiro3007 siblings? without a doubt.

@@richardauer3131 Extremely unlikely situation. You are essentially just making it up to justify your emotional response. Imagine this situation : It's a manually operated trunk, like 99% of cars have, and you slam it down without looking around properly, right onto someone's hand. I know someone who had his skull cracked in such an accident.

I assure you elevators would be way worse. (I doubt garage door could make you roleplay bacteria reproduction but elevators probably could (didn't do the math).

That was honestly comedy gold. He physically could not force his body to do that. His lizard brain was like not today.

I like how you guys’ minds tick

Tesla cult

Can't stop laughing at this post...

Call of the Void

Imagine if people tried this while flirting . "The more you deny me the harder I'm going to try!". Eventually it turns to sexual harassment

It assumes that you want to close it despite the resistance. Pretty logical, that's what you do manually too, if it doesn't close, you try harder.

​@@andrasbiro3007might also be a kid playing with the mechanism. Makes absolutely no sense to not differentiate humans at least.

​@@TBombahhone mans sexual harrassment is another mans rizz

@@andrasbiro3007copium ass comment

Its technology, it shuts itself like a van side door there needs to be safety just incase. Do you think its a better idea to go back to the days of kids getting hurt and parents saying just walk it off? Why do the same type of people want to go back to the wild west? We missed that period, just live in this day and this technology

@@davidvickers8425 hey, good point, you got me with that one. Well done.

@@georgeburdine5660 The point missing is - other manufacturers have safer "self closing" mechanisms. I think this guy on the video made another vid comparing many car brands.

If he can afford to drop $100K on a vehicle he probably is pretty intelligent.

​@@xyzxyz6406Wasting 100k on useless shit is the antithesis of intelligence

imagine being the ER doctor and you're just ready to grab some lunch and then that guy shows up while dragging his cybertruck along...

Say what you like about German engineering. Too hard to work on. Not very intuitive. The German solution would be, "If it doesn't close, there's some kind of obstruction. We're not forcing it closed, because you want to act dumb". I took a look and Mercedes uses a system that will stop, and reverse if anything is detected from fully opened to within 8mm of the trunk being closed.

​@@dmwalker24 Kids have small fingers, that's a good thing

It’s Florida? I no longer have any questions

Yeah man I thought I was the only one irrationally angry over it

😅🤣😂😂🤣😅

@@sullivan912 Maybe he already did but decided against uploading that video 😂

😂😂

Remind me of someone putting their d in smarties tube.

It would have slipped out a lot easier than that finger. 😂

after seeing all that food wasted I was kind of rooting: go Tesla, bite it off... but ok... I'm guessing if the finger would be clear off Elon would pay him handsomely to shut up about it?

You can also enable "hardcore slam" mode if you need to use It for chopping wood or emergency amputations.

What is really surprising is that there exists technology that can keep a spinning wood saw blade from nicking a finger, and it would surely work on a situation like this much better than what they are doing. It could even choose to squash a bag a little and be able to tell the difference between a bag and a finger. Tesla is just being cheap... ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-CUjat1JA_rw.html&ab_channel=MarkWalters

That would require competent people who actually care the tiniest bit about safety.

That's what you do manually too. Imagine a normal use, not vegetable torturing. What could cause resistance that doesn't go away after the first try? Most likely the luggage in the trunk that's just a bit too big. And the owner seem to be really wanting that frunk to close, since he pushed the button repeatedly without removing the obstacle. So the logical thing to do is to try harder.

@@tomsteele937 i agree tesla's fucking it up horribly but i dont think you can run an electric current through the car the same way you could through a saw blade.

😁😁

I wish that he'd keep doing the "Cyber Truck" it obviously needs more testing with different body parts.

I agree it was ill conceived but there are way worse ways to show this crappy mechanism. I want him so show us those. Very cool 😉👌

How? He put his arm in and could feel it didn't push too hard. So he didn't expect it to push harder when he did his finger. Perfectly understandable, and kinda unsafe like he says

Okay Musk Fanboy, calm down. This was simple testing of safety. I hope you aren't ever involved in any QA/Safety testing if you think this is of idiocy.

😂😂😂 this is equivalent to "Ow my Balls"

​@@Anthony_MaillyIf you think customers are the people supposed to do QA testing you are the dumbo here.

@@Anthony_MaillyBro just watched it break a carrot in half and decided to put his finger in it. If that isn’t the definition of being an idiot I don’t know what is. There are other ways to test safety without putting yourself at risk.

Yea, I remember that . Classic gaslighting.

yes, I always put my finger under a closing hood. very important feature.

And there were Apple fanbois who were stupid enough to believe them at the time.

Well, considering he named his car Lorena, I'd not try it myself....

Or maybe the guy who volunteered his child as a crash test dummy thinks the kid has a few too many fingers

At least he wouldn't be losing a critical part of his body...

Honest to god that is funny stuff. Almost as funny as a cyberpunk buyer.😂

Darwin awards aren't given to just stupid people, they're for stupid people that remove themselves from the gene pool. Unless in the next video he tries closing the trunk on his neck or his balls, he wouldn't qualify

It doesn't even need a "complex" algorithm like this. If something's in the way, don't close. Simple.

Sometimes, the most obvious results must still be tested.

the weird part of the video is that the dude looks very sober... there's a bunch of 'Fist of Zen' inspired drunks going to wanna play a game with this device...

exactly, and after that he'll look why his 5 year old sister is screaming so annoyingly... :)

By the fourth try it's powerful enough to crush a cinder block

It's a perfectly logical idea. You told it to close repeatedly, so it just tries to comply. The assumption is that if someone's finger is in the way, they'll remove it after the first attempt, so any remaining resistance must come from the luggage.

​@@andrasbiro3007dumbest assumption ever. Swear they don't do actual engineering, just random pipe dreams. It could be anything in the way, if you want to close it, like everything else, move the obstruction, don't crush it, wtf

@@andrasbiro3007 there is nothing logical about crushing your luggage harder each time it fails to close. Read back what you wrote to yourself. The logical thing to do would be to have an indicator for trunk obstruction, not repeatedly attempt to crush your belongings.

@@c-spam9581 As someone who recently went on vacation, I can understand the logic. The bulk of the luggage is just clothes that can be squished without harm, and it is unlikely that anybody would put something delicate in there in a way that it could be crushed. That being said unlikely is not impossible, and well they just failed to consider people demonstrating the feature.

Finding Tesla videos to btch and moan about a company you hate is also a look 🤡 HAHAHA the Elon hater has a video of them at a pro refugee protest... Can't make this stuff off. TheCommies are always the ones crying about Musk.

imagine having to drag that entire vehicle to the ER so they can have it removed... we're gonna have to amputate... NOOH, I was talking to the car...

What’s with the hate on teslas and the cyber truck

He did lose the little compassion I felt for him when I saw him wasting all that good food... I was going: come on Tesla!

I remember the SAW-movies... this would definitely be the preferred vehicle of that 'jigsaw' guy, although knowing him, he'd probably put a Diesel engine in it before anything else...

😁 Now I don't have to say it.

We’ll have to wait to see if he reproduces in order to give him the Darwin Award or not lol

Don eladio

sadly cant update the hardware...

Too late purchased an EV, and a "Cyber Truck" too (snort 🤪)

I wonder if they're still making movies in that weird horror genre of the SAW-movies... they could make a dedicated episode with a bit of Christine (Stephen King) added...

@@marcdc6809 Brilliant. Name your cybertruck: Christine. (Stephen king) It only chops up people it doesn't like. Don't insult my truck or it'll come after you. (Assuming self driving works well enough to come after you)

Why even put your finger?

Given the series of stupid decisions that led him to this point, I'm sure he never would have thought of that in a million years

Nothin wrong with driving an electric car. People who bought cybertrucks are idiots because it’s been clear for at least a year now that Elon just isn’t an intelligent man