'Do The Words Separation Of Powers Appear In The Constitution?': Kennedy Grills Legal Expert 

Wow. A witness that actually answered every question and with few words. I tip my hat to you Ma’am.

That was powerful.

I really like Kennedy. Flip the script and everyone agrees. Just because it’s not President Trump and they agree. 😢

Way to go Sen. Kennedy, try and teach them something.........ANYTHING!! God knows that some people NEED knowledge!!

Thank you so much Senator Kennedy! LA, you are SO lucky to have this national treasure as a Senator! We, in WA state, have terrible Senators!

I really like that Professor Jennifer Mascott. She never dodged questions and answered directly without hesitation

Great speech! Everything makes sense! This man has wisdom, knowledge and discernment!❤

Kennedy is a great man.

Well said sir thank you

Feeble minds always run from this man of wisdom 😂

Are lawyers cheap? I know they’re cheap. Kennedy is a gem.

Sen.. Kennedy is so wise ..😊

Obummer and Oprah needs to be brought to light

He snuck in "now former President Biden. LOL

Senator John Kennedy, I think you are absolutely awesome! You don’t let them get away with anything and you keep on pushing for the answers to your questions that we all want to know the answers to! I am truly thankful that you are in office and that you are fighting for the constitution of the great United States and trying to keep it honest! So I thank you and may God bless and keep you!

Kennedy is excellent here in getting out the truth

Mascott has been under investigation several times

Love this man!!!

They should ask if the word oversight is in the Constitution.

I can imagine it!!!

"are lawyers cheap?" "only those of us who teach law" "...wait I know they're cheap... are they expensive" These two have such good chemistry!

THank you Senator Kennedy fair man the fairest.❤

When you have a situation where the ruling party acknowledges that their candidate is unfit to fulfill the role yet allows him to continue as president-reveals a significant disconnect and raises questions about political motives, governance, and accountability. Here’s an explanation of the logical inconsistencies and potential reasons for this disconnect: 1. Acknowledgment of Unfitness vs. Continued Leadership If a ruling party publicly or privately acknowledges that a president is mentally incapable of fulfilling their duties, but takes no steps to remove or replace them, it suggests a major contradiction in governance. Logically, if the individual cannot perform their role effectively, continuing to allow them to remain in power compromises the functioning of the government and the welfare of the country. The decision to retain such a leader despite concerns may suggest that the party is prioritizing other considerations, such as political optics, party unity, or maintaining control, over the actual well-being and capability of governance. 2. Political Stability vs. Practical Governance One potential reason for this disconnect could be a fear of political instability. Removing a sitting president-even if deemed unfit-could create a leadership vacuum, fuel divisions within the party, or weaken their standing with the public. The ruling party may be trying to avoid the perception of chaos or disarray by keeping the president in office despite reservations about his fitness. In such cases, the party may calculate that the appearance of continuity and stability is worth maintaining, even if the president is incapable. This would be a short-term strategy to preserve power, but it creates long-term governance risks. 3. Power Dynamics and Control Another explanation for this disconnect could be internal power dynamics. If the president is mentally incapable, they may be more susceptible to influence from key party members or advisors. This allows those behind the scenes to wield more control over decision-making without having to deal with the disruption of replacing the leader. The party may be reluctant to lose this control by installing a more capable leader who might be more independent or challenging to manage. Essentially, the continuation of the president’s tenure might reflect a desire to hold onto power through a "figurehead" leader rather than address the unfitness openly. 4. Public Perception and Political Costs The ruling party might be wary of the political fallout from admitting that the sitting president is unfit. Acknowledging mental incapacity could damage public trust, harm their credibility, and offer opportunities for opposition parties to capitalize on the perceived weakness. By allowing the president to continue in office, they can avoid public confrontation over the issue, even if it compromises effective governance. 5. Legal and Constitutional Barriers In some cases, the ruling party may be constrained by legal or constitutional requirements when it comes to removing a sitting president. Even if the party believes the president is mentally unfit, they may face hurdles in initiating a formal process (such as invoking the 25th Amendment in the U.S.) due to political divisions, lack of support, or fear of backlash. This could explain why a party might allow an incapacitated leader to remain in power despite acknowledging their unfitness. Conclusion The disconnect between recognizing a leader’s incapacity and allowing them to remain in power reflects a combination of political strategy, power dynamics, and concerns about stability. While logic would suggest that an unfit leader should be replaced for the good of the country, parties often prioritize maintaining control, avoiding internal conflict, or managing public perception, even if it means allowing ineffective leadership to continue.

“Now former President Biden” lol I love this man

Please answer this: Are we voters that ignorant to believe that HARRIS had no chance to implement her "new policies" during these past 3.7 years. Then why elect her to 4 more years?

Kammie is a genius and when it comes to economics ............. Thomas Sowell step aside. This is what Kammie told the fine folks when asked how she would solve the minor inflation problem we have: "In terms of both rightly having the right to have aspirations and dreams and ambitions for your family and working hard and finding that the American Dream is, for this generation & so many recently, far more elusive than it's been, and we need to deal with that." Amazing, and Kammie does everything with JOY in her heart.

Senator Kennedy again proves his worth to the Senate and the country.

Separation of church and state meant for the govt to stay out of the church. Not the church to stay out of the govt. One nation under God....remember?????

What all Senator's should aspire to be.

Kennedy should be elevated to a higher position.

I think the appointment of judges, by the parties, individually, poses a problem.

GOD bless you SEN KENNEDY!!!! We need thousands more of you and your wisdom !❤.

Politicians are loyal to there parties not the people 13th ammendment 14th ammendment an 17th ammendment was the icing on the cake. States power became obsolete. Why do u think you have state an federal taxes? Lol taxation without representation indeed. 🤣

LOL 😂❤ democrats realizing The Military has Forsakened democrats & God Bless The USA 🇺🇸 & Everyone Who Loves Jesus Christ Who Wants to Save ❤

Election INTERFERENCE to the core!!!He Lsp had freedom of to say what ever he wanted!

Trump❤❤❤❤❤❤

Mandatory drug testing and term limits ffs!!! This country is a clown show

The phrase " separation of church and state" appears in the RUSSIAN constitution , not in the American constitution. We have that concept , but it's not in the constitution. George Washington wanted the constitution to be preached from the pulpit.

Mr Kennedy is a modern day Socratis,great stuff

MR TRUMP. DO SAME TO CLINTONS, OBAMA, BIDEN

“Many people say that it does” with regard to forum shopping! Are you kidding me? We just sat through a trial on Mr. Trump in New York with a judge and a jury and a jurisdiction that was hand selected for bias in order to produce an outcome with the highest probability of being in the prosecution favor.

Very good Senators Durban and Kennedy. A very important issue to establish indeed.

Professor Mascott?…. She sure is 😂

I love this man

But there was agreement that a president should and did have immunity regarding core functions. So whether ex-president Trump has immunity depends on whether the function(s ) in question is/are core. So what was Senator Kennedy's point?

No Trump, no Jan 6th insurrection, case closed. Jail!

Senator Kennedy is the best!

Forum shopping = social media.

Separation of Powers is a "description" of how the 3 branches of government each have their own, unique function. The Legislative branch, Congress, writes the laws. The Executive branch, the President, enforces the laws. The Judicial branch, the Supreme Court, interprets the law. The idea was that no one person or branch would have complete power. The Constitution doesn't need to say "Separation of Powers" if you have enough brains to figure out that it is what having 3 separate branches with individual powers creates.

The word women doesn't appearing in the Constitution either.

Who gets to pick which laws were violated and whether it was justified to do so. Can you see how this sort of behavior will be misused?

Social Security doesn't need immigration Corporations do

Does the constitution say that it applies to all nations, or that it is a private document and the federal government is a private entity.

You know what other word isn't mentioned in the constitution,God😒🐘

Atleast she already seem smarter ..well in general answers questions quicker then kamala with speaking in a round as repeating herself..😂😂

There are many really mean spirited Congressmen but very few take the cake more profoundly than Senator John Kennedy. His personality is everything that is wrong with America today. I don't know why anyone would have themselves represented by such a sub human.

Let's get expedited decision on the opioid lawsuit!!! Let the actual victims have the $6,000,000,000 and the police, hospitals and their healthcare networks that employed the doctors unions that prescribed the poison to my deceased wife get their own damn lawsuit!!! $6 billion dollars into the economy that has been wrecked by the Biden rejiem would be a much needed and overdue bump to the economy. Joy A. Noel 05-04-1963 03-07-2016 Rest in peace my one and only love. 😢😢😢😢😢

Bernie Sanders, another favorite if mine! NOT!!!

Kennedy you should hide your head in the bag

Rodriguez Shirley Robinson Kimberly Hall Kevin

“now former president biden”

Former President Biden???

8 of the top 10 states with the highest poverty rate? The Republican-led states of Mississippi, Arkansas, Alabama, South Carolina, Georgia, West Virginia, Tennessee and Kentucky.

THIS HILLBILLY IS TALKING AND TALKING AND TALKING BUTNEVER ASK A REAL QUESTION!! THE HILLBILLY IS IN THE CLAN OF THE ORANGE 🍊 MAN 😂😂😂😂😂

Kennedy is a clown 🤡

Kennedy is all blow and no go

Louisiana is among the worst states for health care, education, crime, obesity and regressive taxation and if it keeps electing people like Kennedy it’s going to remain on the bottom.

04:25 - The thing that bothers me most is the fact that Prof. Mascott seems to make light of the whole questioning by Sen. Kennedy while it is a very serious topic! It actually reaches the level of being contemptuous.

Some people really are BAD trying to interrogate anyone🤮🐍🐀

@6:16 Well, pal your "opinion" means jack squat against the scotus ruling. Do you understand that.?