Тёмный

Does Abortion Violate Rights? 

◢ Objective Standard Institute
Подписаться 6 тыс.
Просмотров 159
50% 1

Learn more about LevelUp-the most life-enhancing conference of the year: objectivestand...
Connect with OSI
X: x.com/ObjStdIn...
Facebook: / objectivestandard
Instagram: / objectivestandardinsti...
LinkedIn: / objectivestandardinsti...
TikTok: / objectivestandard

Опубликовано:

 

13 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 20   
@justifiably_stupid4998
@justifiably_stupid4998 25 дней назад
6:01 "Now, it is not always moral for a woman to have an abortion." This is where this video parts ways with Ayn Rand. Ayn Rand believed it is ALWAYS moral to act on an individual's rational self interest. Listing contrivances is unecessary. There is no requirement for special pleading for any exception to a principle. Abortion is always moral regardless of circumstance. It does not depend on receiving permission from a doctor who is personally concerned about risk factors.
@TheWorldTeacher
@TheWorldTeacher 25 дней назад
Why would any thinking person care what some BITCHY dead Russian woman say about any important topic? Incidentally, OSI, you may now block this account of mine, as you have already done to another RU-vid account of mine. We all know that you cannot bear to hear the truth about your esteemed goddess, Mrs. O'Connor.
25 дней назад
Did you ever consider that the baby has rights, too? You people are killing innocent humans, by labelling them as "non-humans". On which basis? Because the body is not fully developed? This is not any better than eugenics. Murdering unborn babies while boldly thinking you are in the right. SICK. SICK. SICK.
@Fictionosophy_Angel
@Fictionosophy_Angel 25 дней назад
Rand believed it should always be *legal,* not that it's always *moral.* As you correctly point out, Rand believed it's always moral to act on your rational self-interest. We don't need contrivances to think of cases where it wouldn't be in one's self-interest; a woman waiting longer than needed leaps to mind
@TheVeganVicar
@TheVeganVicar 25 дней назад
Why would any thinking person care what some BITCHY dead Russian woman say about any important topic? Incidentally, OSI, you may now block this account of mine, as you have already done to two other RU-vid accounts of mine. We all know that you fools cannot bear to hear the truth about your esteemed goddess, Mrs. O'Connor.
@justifiably_stupid4998
@justifiably_stupid4998 25 дней назад
@Fictionosophy_Angel According to Rand, politics is just an extension of ethics into a social context. If it is sometimes immoral then it is also sometimes illegal.
@justifiably_stupid4998
@justifiably_stupid4998 25 дней назад
You are correct to begin with defining the terms. "Liberties" are required actions for a self-directed means of survival. "Rights" are permissions of action given by an authority. In secular political societies, Rights are established when legitimate governments promise to use force to protect an individual's liberties. Having Rights begs the question, "by whose authority?" If government protects liberty, then Rights begin at personhood (political acknologment usually through birth certificate). If God protects liberty, then Rights begin at conception. If in a state of anarchy, then Rights do not exist whatsoever. Since there is no evidence that a God will intervene to protect individual liberties, it is correct to say that only governments grant Rights; protections of individual liberty.
@justifiably_stupid4998
@justifiably_stupid4998 25 дней назад
It is the anarchist position to argue that Rights pre-exist governments. Governments are established for the purpose of instituting Rights. Ayn Rand failed to make the distinction between liberties and rights, which is why Libertarians today see government as superfluous and unnecessary. Libertarians believe Rights are intrinsic to each individual by their own authority to weild force in the protection of their own liberty. This is Rand's definition of anarchy. Intrinsic Rights are the philosophical antecedent of "Might Makes Right." Protection of Individual liberties through the monopolization of force is the antecedent to Capitalism.
@TheWorldTeacher
@TheWorldTeacher 25 дней назад
Your username says it all, SILLIEST of my Silly Sinful Slaves. 🙄
@TheVeganVicar
@TheVeganVicar 25 дней назад
​@@justifiably_stupid4998 Your username says it all, Silly Sinner. 🙄
@mikeb5372
@mikeb5372 25 дней назад
You should probably work on understanding right better than you have explained here
@mikeb5372
@mikeb5372 25 дней назад
​@@justifiably_stupid4998Rand didn't fail that at all. It is you who failed to comprehend it from her writings