Does China Pose a Threat to Freedom Around The World? I Robert Wright and John Mearsheimer I Nonzero 

Are you serious? Do you even know what arbitration means? The meaning of life is that arbitration can be conducted with only one party present. Mearsheimer's action is that when he talks about the state of affairs between China and the US, the English language is anarchic. These two violated almost everything, including the law and the English language. For example, two of them violated the English word "arbitration". In which language can arbitration be conducted with only one party present? In which law can arbitration be conducted with only one party present? So, John works for the CIA. He steals, he lies, he kills the English language, etc.

You have no meaning of life when John does not believe it wrong for America to be the only aggressor and bully in this Space Age!!!!

Americans need to learn a more important word: Sovereignty & taking care of your own country first Oh, that it is a whole sentence, sorry.

These two a**holes violated almost everything, including the law. For example, two of them violated the English word "arbitration". In which language can arbitration be conducted with only one party present? In which law can arbitration be conducted with only one party present?

199.989.9% Inclusive of some Taxes! Countries that Abstain are non issues, Complicit Countries that were Against can't be Leaders in Humanity! Said by a Professor from CA, and She said there's No Math in Simplicity, and being Female is like being nobody in the eyes of Power Hungry Colonizers. Lemme go see if the link still exists! BRB 😮

US always assume others the same rule-less mindset as them.

Are you familiar with the South China Sea?

🤣 keep pushing the Western narrative!!

@@patrickfitzpatrick1600 Let me sum up your analysis China good, American Bad.

@@georgemagoo Are you familiar with the meeting between Obama and Xi about SCS issue and how Xi offered to demilitarized SCS and how Obama rejected the offer since U.S. had superior navy and dominated the region? Now things have changed eh!

Don't forget the Vietnam war.

Don't forget the Gaza genocide. The US has disqualified itself from lecturing others on international law, human rights, and even simple right and wrong.

My post saying don't forget about US complicity in G a z a was swiftly censored by the guardian of free speech.

U. S. The most hypocrite country.

Dont forget Libya and syria

The US tries hard to comply with international law? Wrigjt is delusional. He can't be taken seriously.

The dude RW was full of BS about US following international laws unless he meant that America regularly ignored, threatened or vetoed UN laws/international organisations like ICC, WHO etc. Btw China, from the very beginning opposed the US orchestrated non UN mandated arbitration circus, hence China has no obligation to accept the arbitration decision period.

Is America a democracy or oligarchy moneyocracy? The fundamental systemic differences between USA and China are: 1 There's no slaughter, loot and genocide against natives and ethnic minorities in China, the 'I Can't Breathe' incident never happened in China. 2. There's no forced labouring,, no child pornography, not even a forced tipping in China. 3. The US per capita income is 6.4 times ahead of China's, why we see the homeless everywhere on street in the US but couldn't find such scene anywhere in China? 4. China does not allow 1% of the population to own more than 95% of the population's total wealth. 5. China does not allow its people to die in mass shootings, let alone let school children get massacred by guns. 6. China does not allow the drug problem to plague the country and kill more than 100,000 people every year. 7. China has never invaded other countries or engaged in colonial expansion. 8. China never interferes in the internal affairs of other countries and never seeks and fosters agents abroad. 9. China has never based its foreign policies on 'We lied, we cheated, we stole. It reminds you of the glory of the American experiment(Pompeo)'. 10. China has never sought to dominate the world, nor deprived any country (region) of its right of development. On the contrary, China shares development and prosperity with all trading partners. 11. China will never do anything to weaken or eliminate an opponent in order to win. Instead, China is focused on bettering itself. 12. China never fires missiles at wandering balloons, but heavily invests in better infrastructures so Chinese people can enjoy better life, safety and health. 13. China advocates and practices in 'Unite and Prosper', the US pursues and believes in 'Divide and Rule', one is constructive and one is destructive. 14. China always follows Confucius philosophy 'Seek common interest and reserve difference', the US prefers 'Either at the table or on the menu (Blinken)'. 15. Chinese Communist Party members never act as brokers for the military industrial complex in abroad. 16. China walks the talk with a moral compass, the US talks the walk without any moral compass. Conclusion: China's system truly reflects 'of the people, by the people, for the people', the US system betrayed Abraham Lincoln's idea, it truly manifested 'of the 1% people, by the 1% people, for the 1% people'.

So true.

USA was breaking international law so frequently when it was the most powerful nation and even now.

The old fox Professor John Meirsheimer is an insane fanatic of US imperialism is lying like no tomorrow

He's not accusing China of anything, he's explaining that we can predict China will do what they need to do to protect their interests within their sphere of hegemony, regardless of whether not it abides "international law." If you think USA is guilty of doing the same, it merely strengthens the argument. When "international law" contravenes the interests of a hegemonic nation, adherence to international law is of secondary importance at best.

@henrymac. The loud, arrogant, self-righteous hypocrisy of Wright takes your breath away.

@@katong1953 Exactly a century ago - on September 7, 1901, the invading troops sent by Britain, Germany, The United States, France, Tsarist Russia, Japan, Italy and Austria forced the Chinese Qing government to sign the humiliating Protocol of 1901.

@@AnacreonSchoolbagsJr A military coalition known as the eight-nation-alliance invaded China in order to suppress the anti-imperialist Yihetuan movement. Subsequently, extensive looting took place in imperial palaces, temples, shops, and private homes in Beijing and Northern China. Who gave these moral authority t in talk about intrinsic laws when your country looting China, killing Chinese and raped. Chinese women ?

@@AnacreonSchoolbagsJr come on, did you even watch the whole video? The talk show host accused China break the so called national laws? That is a lie, that origination is bias against China and is not a traditional kind of court with zero enforcement power. It is a joke. Typical double standard

Long arm of U_S Jurisdiction.. Remember J.As.sange being in prison waiting extradition to face the Jurisdiction laws..🙄

These two a**holes violated almost everything, including the law. For example, two of them violated the English word "arbitration". In which language can arbitration be conducted with only one party present? In which law can arbitration be conducted with only one party present?

UNCLOS doesnt have authority over sovereign issue. No one in the world, including USA has given it rights to rule over sovereign disputes. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Convention_on_the_Law_of_the_Sea#:~:text=UNCLOS%20does%20not%20deal%20with,acquisition%20and%20loss%20of%20territory. Imagine they just tell the Britains that Falkland island belongs to Argentina

Agreed.

You certainly don't obey it..

These two a**holes violated almost everything, including the law. For example, two of them violated the English word "arbitration". In which language can arbitration be conducted with only one party present? In which law can arbitration be conducted with only one party present?

When it suits your dad

mearsheimer is the ultimate neocon, evil to the core.

I don't know why anyone takes this guy seriously.

​@pbworld7858 I do take him seriously to see what his country will do when She felt threatened.

He is part of the reason US is behaving the way it is.

⁠@@Steve-pq7cbor he’s part of the result of US running the world. The world will never find peace with US leading with such mindset.

This John just a white liar who tried to appear as a "balance" expert on China😢😢😢

mearsheimer is the ultimate neocon, evil to the core.

Paying attention to international laws by working around them? US even used washing powder to go to UN general assembly to ask for invasion order so that it can criminalize Saddam Hussein!!!

SET in a Superiority Hubris mindset, he thinks that’s what I’ll would, so why wouldn’t they do unto me like I would unto them.. ! 🤨

Mearsheimer's action is that when he talks about the state of affairs between China and the US, the English language is anarchic. These two violated almost everything, including the law and the English language. For example, two of them violated the English word "arbitration". In which language can arbitration be conducted with only one party present? In which law can arbitration be conducted with only one party present? So, John works for the CIA. He steals, he lies, he kills, etc.

and these ppl are so used to using sweeping statements to make their claims or narratives as long as in their favor; so we gotta be more Assertive to challenge them esp. ppl like JM who likely assumes he's a professor and he's a Mr Know All?

Agree.US has already violated international law hundreds of times

TELL US HOW YOU KNOW SO MUCH ABOUT CHINA

He is on a mission to paint China as the greatest threat to America at every opportunity. He is only interested in America being the sole hegemon

John is basically an Anglo American chauvinist

John is a supporter of American hegemonic in the world. They just want to be no. 1 in everything. I think he is racist againts China/Asian. Full stop.

JM probably thinks he's superior and can't stand to share anything with anyone deemed inferior?

Meaningless discussion

mearsheimer is the ultimate neocon, evil to the core.

The guy openly advocates to "contain China", except that's an idiotic suggestion.

@@Steve-pq7cb No other countries advocate to contain USA when the built military bases everywhere. Why China, it's only their economy rise and for the better of humanity and the developing world.

it's likely a white superiority or white savior complex?

John works for cia. These two a**holes violated almost everything, including the law. For example, two of them violated the English word "arbitration". In which language can arbitration be conducted with only one party present? In which law can arbitration be conducted with only one party present?

And Xi Jinping is the chameleon

@@johndorilag4129 Dragon. :)

Hmmm I wonder why it couldn’t because they’d be held accountable for the war crimes they committed huh 🤔

@@lordhe11iaon95 So what are these two clowns on about.?

These two a**holes violated almost everything, including the law. For example, two of them violated the English word "arbitration". In which language can arbitration be conducted with only one party present? In which law can arbitration be conducted with only one party present?

probably cannot think any other way becoz these ppl could feel that's adulterating their mental faculty? 😛😛

when they talk about Intl Law, that equates to their way? They seldom fathom it as beyond that?

How do you mean?

​@@AnacreonSchoolbagsJrOne stupido asking a narrow minded racist professor lots of open ended questions on subjects he is expected to know the answers but instead he gave questionable bias narrative with superficial if not incorrect answers and examples.

@@AnacreonSchoolbagsJr These two a**holes violated almost everything, including the law. For example, two of them violated the English word "arbitration". In which language can arbitration be conducted with only one party present? In which law can arbitration be conducted with only one party present?

And this country, the USA, is not even a signatory to the ICC and ICJ ! Hypocrite.

These two a**holes violated almost everything, including the law. For example, two of them violated the English word "arbitration". In which language can arbitration be conducted with only one party present? In which law can arbitration be conducted with only one party present?

That is Mearsheimer's position, that the state of affairs between hegemonic powers is anarchic.

@@AnacreonSchoolbagsJr Mearsheimer's action is that when he talks about the state of affairs between China and the US, the English language is anarchic. These two violated almost everything, including the law and the English language. For example, two of them violated the English word "arbitration". In which language can arbitration be conducted with only one party present? In which law can arbitration be conducted with only one party present? So, John works for the CIA. He steals, he lies, he kills, etc.

He has lost it long ago lol

In John's mind, America should be the ONLY bully in this world! He is just a neocon!

America is the one behaving like a schoolyard bully.

Competent diplomats and domestic policymakers, rather than military containment and encirclement or appeals to fundamentally lame "international law" and use of coercive force

But even before coming up with a mechanism, America should at least first consider setting examples by following international laws. The US has NEVER EVER followed international laws unless when those laws suit them.