@@notagain2856 The case of Deadmau5 was about trademark infringement, it had nothing to do modifications. He was the guilty party, as he copied and modified the Ferrari trademarked badge which was Ferrari's property.
@@DxModel219 No it isn't the same thing. Trademark infringement is a legitimate case for filing a lawsuit and it has nothing to do with ownership of cars.
Right? They're such a cringe company. If humans had any couth, or good character, they'd stop buying this shit brand. Or just modify it and dont post it on social media 😂
Sadly to spend 500k on anew ferrari you need to have already spent over a million on used ferraris over the span of years before they see you as good enough to own a new one.
This is every car brand other than Ferrari. Cause it’s your car, you paid for it and now it is your property, with which you can do whatever you please.
Using a junkyard Ferrari engine won’t get you in any trouble either even if you twin turbo it. It’s anything in-situ in an actual Ferrari vehicle that gets them upset. Only the big custom modifiers like Mansory and Novitec can do so because they have big contracts with Modena
this is so simple to circumvent... Step 1 - Get someone like me (poor asf to buy the ferrari for you) Step 2 - I will sign the deal where I am liable for the modifications - Step 3 - I will sell you the car without any further agreement and keep a fee on that... Now you can modify whatever you like and I am not responsible for it either...
@@Trikipum Actually in Europe, if the Ferrari is exposed in a dealership, they cant prevent me from buying it or they might face legal discriminatory actions
@@SlicedBrainin Europe they solve it by "higher demand than supply" so they will not tell you that you are too poor to buy it, but they will tell you that you are on waiting list...
Naw…. It’s a way to keep the brand and your vehicle valuable. It’s yours but you have to respect the name. They don’t take your car from you like the government takes your home.
This is why i wont ever buy a Ferrari and id rather buy a Lamborghini at least Lamborghini arnt assholes like Ferrari is im working toward a aventador SVJ
@@moist_iguanaEnzo was a real douchbag. Hell, tractor maker Lamborghini made an off-the-cuff remark on how his tractor’s clutches were better than anything that Ferrari could produce and the feud was on and Lambos were born.
@@lukazupie7220 most people don't buy apartments they rent them. But if you have the funds to buy apartment or a condo you can do whatever you want inside the apartment.
STILL NOT TRUE. You will only get a cease and desist one of two ways: 1. You deface the emblem. Like make it say “purrari” or something stupid. You can delete badges, color them, etc. They just don’t want you wrecking their logos. 2. You bought a brand new, special order car that’s by invitation only, and then you sign paperwork saying you will not make body or engine modifications within x years of ownership, nor will you “flip” the car (resell it right away). This is to protect the image of their special vehicles for a period of time while they are still new. Otherwise, you can modify the engine, color the car, modify the body… they don’t care. How do I know? I’ve modified all my cars AND I’ve taken them to Ferrari. If anything, anyone I’ve spoken with at dealerships likes my modifications, and they have even offered to work on and service my car. I do it myself, so I don’t need that, but I think it’s a testament to how false this myth is. The two rules I stated above are totally reasonable limitations as long as you understand marketing and understand how brand power works. In fact, they’re so good with their brand, that even this myth has you talking about Ferrari right now. Lastly, the punishment for #2 in most cases isn’t a lawsuit, Ferrari just won’t sell you a special order car again… so you just wind up having to buy them through someone else. Easy.
@TwinShards If you're a US citizen, it's as easy as just ignoring Ferrari and doing whatever you want with your property. Their lawyers are toothless in the US, worst they can is write you an angry letter 😆
I agree it’s a dogshit company and policy, but they sign a legal agreement when buying them. They’re bound to that contract from that moment on. Again it’s absurd and I wish people had never given in to their terms. But it is what it is now.
I don’t think that’s necessarily true anymore because they can go after people for crazy paint jobs and trying to like sell shoes or other other products with the Ferrari in the background regardless, if they’re the first owner or not
@@globalautobahn1132In the US maybe, but good luck to Ferrari trying to do that against someone who buys a second hand Ferrari in any of the EU countries. There are far stricter rules here to protect consumers from idiotic practices like this. And no company is too big to escape these rules, just look at Apple who have just gotten a 2 billion dollar fine for abusive appstore rules.
@@ChristianSTOKES-e8bthey should take pride in the fact that they could own it in the first place. Most people won’t be able to own a supercar at all in their lifetime
@@owenlealeven if someone who is able to afford not one but many Ferraris, the company won't just let any rich stranger buy the car. They do a background check. Someone who is famous and respected and many more things. So yea.
If you've ever had the displeasure of working on a ferrrari, they have exactly two engineers, who have a collective IQ of 7, are inbred, and constantly drunk when doing the designs of anything non bodywork
You are free to do anything with the car , Ferrari claimed defamation and copyright infringement because Deadmouse played with their trademark which is unlawful
@@patrik5543 if you think about it, it's like changing the colors in a movie along with the movie title and character names while everything else in the movie is the same, sounds weird, but it's defacing a brand type thing.
@@dodoz44Yes sir he is, and a damn great man, comedian, and car collector at that. I still watch his movie Collision Course with Pat Morita (Mr. Mayagi). It's a really funny movie if you haven't seen it.
At that point, do you even own the car? You might as well trade it in for a Lamborghini or a McLaren. At least those manufacturers understand that when the customer buys the car out right, it's no longer the company's.
When you buy a ferrari from an official retailer you sign a sale contract where you agree not to modify the car in such ways. And this is if you manage to purchase a ferrari from an official retailer in the first place cause there's a pretty long waiting line (for exemple if you manage to get in line now for a ferrari purosangue you'll get it in 2026). If you purchase your ferrari second hand and you never signed any sale contract with Ferrari then you can modify it like you want!
Why would you want to modify a Ferrari it's perfection y'know, Lamborghinis are ugly as hell so its understandable why no one takes those cars seriously and just do whatever... Ferrari is more like an influential people's toy, it's not even supposed to be on the market, they're mainly a F1 Team. Even if it was selling 0 cars to the common rich it doesn't matter because they're supposed to just make exclusive few units for the people that financially support it. They only sell to get easy money from wannabes. Thats why you dont modify it, you're just buying a dream that you're from the group
@@-.369.- yes and people often fail to mention that certain bugatti, mercedes, and aston martin like the Valkyrie also require the buyer to sign a sales contract on the fact that he will not modify the car! Certain contracts also forbid the buyer to sell the car as second hand cause it can only be sold back to the brand. It's a pretty standard procedure among really exclusive cars with very low production count and a lot of demand
@@maxbobbigamesjust to add, Ferrari's XX program is even more demanding for buyers contracts. If you own one of their XX vehicles (not the new SF90 XX, the real XX cars) you can decide the price of what the car will be sold at, but Ferrari are the decision makers in who will have the option, and eventually buy the car. The owners have no say in who the car is sold to.
@@-.369.- I modify them for a living, custom rebuilds / bc the engines are junk, turbo set ups full race prep for hill climb, time attack and circuit racing. They are largely thrown together junk cars from factory. We do a lot or re-engineering to make them work for a season. The quality of block casting from mb and Lamborghini is substantially better. Also since Lamborghini is now a product of vag the manufacturing quality control is better. Largely the supercars market ( Ferraris) is full of lavish looking slow junk. Raw data shows this at events constantly like world time attack, for example, hill climbing events etc. no supercars finish in the top 20. Ever. It’s evos, lotus exiges, wrc built golf’s/polos, Lancia deltas, factory backed sti cars, focus wrc cars, Audi Quattro 5 cylinder cars, Nissan gtrs, radical sr3 and radical sr8s . The exceptions are the 918, Vulcan , Valkyrie amr pro, zonda r .
I'm assuming it's a clause in the sales contract, since that's the only way I could possibly imagine them having any grounds whatsoever to sue. So if that's the case, when a customer gets sued by Ferrari for 'unapproved' modifications, they are literally getting what they paid for.
@@jic1 I'd imagine this would apply to a lease or if he was otherwise making payments on it, in which case he doesn't fully own the car yet and if the car was repossessed Ferrari would have better chance selling a virgin car. If he signed something that said he can't modified the car even after he owns it that's getting into a grey area. How long? What happens if he sells that car and then buys it back? I don't think Ferrari has a reasonable case to dictate to others how they use their property since the car no longer belongs to them. In other words, I don't think that part of the contract holds up under scrutiny.
@@177SCmaro You seem to be saying that if a clause in a contract doesn't cover all possible circumstances, it can't be enforceable in *any* circumstance. I'm not a lawyer, but I can't see how that could possibly be the case.
@@jic1 No, I'm saying this one aspect of this contract is unreasonable and thus invalid. It's irrational to dictate the use of property after it's no longer your property. That conflicts with the very concept of "property" i.e. the right to the exclusive use and disposal of something. If I sold you my house and put in the contact you can never paint it white it's a meaningless stipulation since it's not my right to dictate the use of your property.
@@captain_context9991 Uhm, u do realize when those fat bastard know and CAN and are capable of making jewels for dirt cheap if they WANT? Like the new C8 Z06? That think is a monster for the money you pay out of the box.
@captain_context9991 Would you like to start putting this all into context, Captain? America is the land of Size Matters. Go big, or enjoy your tiny train in Europe. Yes, the Ford Focus sucks. Have you tried our V8? We also have V10’s - not like you’d ever see it, because going big breaks the poor bank of any European. Hell, we still have our trucks from the 80’s rolling on stock engines in a few pockets. And if it stopped working @ 400,000 miles, we could always do an LS swap to keep our V8 vehicle a-vrooming. USA is THE land of excess.
@@flyingturret208thecannon5 Yeah I do marketing and I have given several talks on these things. How America is GREAT only in size. But not in any other aspect of greatness. Its not just supercars and GT cars America cant make, its every aspect of the mass market manufacturing industry. America is about cater-for-all, use-and-throw, easily forgettable, instantly replaceable, squeaky plastic, third world built consumer commodities for the ever impoverished, frantically flag-waving bewildered masses. Built by uneducated, unskilled, untrained workers, bottlefed on conspiracies and patriotism. Because educated, skilled people cost money. You want them willing to work minimum wage without healthcare, overtime, unions, paid leave, guaranteed pension, the list goes on... People whos only shot at the American dreeeeeeam is to get hurt at work so they can sue for a billion. When Americans get money, they will never again drive, wear, eat, or buy any American product. When Americans get money, its 100% European top-end quality and luxury products all the way. MURCAAAA, F YEAH!!
A cease & desist means absolutely nothing. It is their way of saying: "We really have no grounds for a lawsuit...but we would appreciate it if you stopped." If you responded to the cease & desist with: "No. I will see you in court." I guarantee they would just drop it. Zero chance they would win that case.
owner of lambo wasn't in ferrari. he was making tractors back then, and bought ferraris with the money he was making. got angry at the garbage clutch, and made his own super cars.
Lamborghini casually ripping the V12 out of a GTO and using it to power a heavier, worse handling, terrible looking Miura, but then making their AWD snap-oversteer wedge-shaped machines for the next 60 years, make the Aventador which gets popular among rappers but gets raped by Ferraris at trackdays, then seeing another failed attempt they go borrowing a V10 from parent company VW Audi, throw it into an ugly and terribly balanced Gallardo, realize they fucked that up but it sold well so they make the Huracan and on the side make an entire car out of Carbon Fiber for no reason and put the motor into their GT3 racing homologation car... and lose to Ferrari- but they take one record with the Performante (respect), and then stealing aspects from all manufacturers in 2021 to develop their LMDh vomit green endurance racer and .. lose in the 2023 and 2024 season, to Ferrari, Cadillac, and Porsche. Yeah, i think lamborghini is way better than ferrari. Ferrari did improve their clutches, though. So i guess his plan worked out in the end. "We're like Ferrari but we're fat cows and suck at racing!" No wonder they dont care if you destroy their cars.
Zero motorcycles already does this. Pay us a monthly charge and we will unlock all the bikes features you stop and you have an overweight overpriced scooter.
Some bodywork that are too extreme are sued, though. Ferrari ordered The F40 Barchetta and Pininfarina P4/5 to have the badges removed. They changed their mind on the latter after seeing the car in real life. And apparently Ferrari removed the F40 LB from the official registry of F40s, still just a rumor though.
Ferrari litterally created Lamborghini because he was a stuck up dousche who didn't trust the insight of a tractor manufacturer. Ford's racing division was also created through a similar exchange. You'd think they'd learn, only a matter of time till they get owned once again, can't wait to see what crazy crap that'll create m
@@AndrewF321 Yeah and that logic may work for when someone’s coming in to buy a car, but it should never go past that once they already own it. That works just as much for the buyer because if they’re spending all that money to give to Ferrari, it’s theirs to have and to change. Which plays a big part in why their revenue statistics have gone down the past few years when it comes to actual car sales. But don’t get me wrong, I agree with you, but the people have spoken, based on the revenue statistics.
When you buy a Ferrari you must read terms and conditions of the sale. It clearly states what modifications are allowed. It also explains how certain modifications void the warranty.
@@MetalGearBronyaThe other comment was, “Why do I have to buy one of their crappy cars so that I can buy the one that I want later?” If you were a billionaire and wanted to buy their top car, they would say no. You have to buy a lower car, prove that you are worthy and then apply for one of the rare cars later. To be fair, Ford does this with the GT. However, this was mostly, so that you didn’t flip it, but all manufacturers want their halo cars owned by responsible adults.
Recently, Forza Motorsport removed a bodykit upgrade for one of the Ferraris in the game. Looks like Ferrari is now going after Game Studios for offering customization options for Ferrari cars in games.
There a reason why you can't find Ferrari in NFS most wanted, beside other famous car in same class like Lamborghini, Porsche, Corvette, Aston Martin, and etc, 15 years ago I didn't have a clue why that's happen, but now everything is make sense.
Sgt is right. A guy crashed his 3m+ enzo (only like 4 or 5 hundred produced) when he reported it. Ferrari built a new 1 to replace it with the same vin # as the wrecked one and kept the production number at 500 like the crash never happened. This has become common practice for Ferrari over the years following. Also done with other rare models of Ferrari. Do some research before calling people liars.
The car is beautiful as is, I highly doubt you would come up with any modifications that would improve on the aesthetics, and California is a thousand times better than whatever BS Red state you come from. 5th largest economy in the world! Highest GDP out of any state!
ERRR WRONG. You start a partnership with Ferrari. You become part of the family when you sign that contract. They're italians, dude, its about respect.
One does not simply buy a Ferrari. For starters, most Ferraris are initially leased with an option to buy. But to get to either, you enter into a contractual relationship with Ferrari under which you agree to abide by a set of terms that include not modifying the car without permission, or reselling the car. Ferrari owners are expected to be partners and brand ambassadors. Ferraris typically escape this trap in a few years, but then good luck getting repair parts or service from Ferrari or one of their authorized aftermarket manufacturers. I have a neighbor with a 1984 308 GTB who ran into this issue when he needed a replacement vacuum line. Surprisingly, Ferrari was extremely accommodating once he proved the car wasn't stolen or otherwise modified, and not only did they establish a relationship with him to keep his car in good running order, they sent him some free schwag. Bottom line, if you want to roll with the boys from Maranello, you need to roll with the boys form Maranello.
@@andrewakrause As a certain agriculturalist from Santa Agata, Bolognese figured out, the place you need to look into for Ferrari parts is a tractor spare parts shop.
@@David-lm7ownot like it’s a secret…. Ferrari is well aware as they’ve brought it to the dealer trying to get a recall done and published it all over RU-vid
They can't do shit to those outside of their country unless it's law compliant So yeah, pretty much anywhere in the world you can do whatever you want with ya car
@@BB_deez And there is Emelia Hartford's widebody 458. And that one has also been back to Ferrari for work, without any hissy fits. The video is just full of bullshit internet myths.
@@narrativeless404usually what would actually happen is ferrari blacklists these people from buying more of their cars from official dealers or try to buy back the car from them. If its the former, unless you want another ferrari you can just ignore it, and even then, theres always second hand dealers and auctioners, even for high luxury stuff, you might have to overpay though, but depending on how rich you are you dont care if thats the only way to get it. Funny thing, other manufacturers do similar deals with some of their more exclusive cars, like the contract where you agree not to heavily modify it or sell it second hand, the latter usually has an expiration because this measure exists to prevent scalpers selling such exclusive cars on a proffit to another rich guy that just didnt get selected for the program or missed the queu for whathever reason but is still rich enough to have such a thing.
Do work to your home without a permit and let me know what happens. Think you own your home? Don't pay taxes and see what happens. Making a payment on pretty much anything and miss a few. It's clear people don't realize they do not own as much as they think.
@DioOdinson Also the comparison is thinking you own something when you do not. Trying to say it's a bad comparison makes no sense as that is the whole point of the video and people's responses. The government has confiscated homes that have been modified for illegal activities. But stay within the narrow scope of a bank only and ignore the ways it can be done using other laws and means. People lost homes by simply setting up some mylar, lights, watering systems, and lining the floors for a draining system.
@patchesohoulihan9826 wrong, If the car(any car) is paid off in full ie you are not leasing it or have a loan on it. You can modify it however you see fit that does not infringe on any trademarks like Deadmaus did with with Purrari emblem. That was the only issie there was TM issues with the nameplate mods
Back on the day this rich guy my dad knew had a 308 that broke down constantly. He had the car crushed and hired a local metal sculptor artist made it into a coffee table. He would tell guests look how He made something useful out of a pile of junk.
So somebody crushed a car that was $80,000 when new and that's going for up to $200,000 at auction these days to make a table just because it broke down a few times and he wanted to be an ass. One I don't believe it two if he did he's maybe dumber than forest gump.
They can sue for any reason they like, doesn’t mean they have a chance to win. In America, you have the right to do with your personal property whatever you wish.
@@jairox75, contacts can not hold up in court. You sound like the people after the 13th amendment who were like "I'll just get them to sign a contract legalizing owning them as slaves". Illegal terms on contract, don't hold up.
Yes and no. They can suit you and it's on the air if you win or not, but what would you chooses?. Spend years on the court paying legal fees to beat Ferrari on it or just remove what they ask to remove and move on with your life?. Is not about proving you're right, is about dealing with the nuisances of a legal case. For Ferrari is whatever they are giga billion rich, but do you?. Their tactics is just strong arm you and mentality fatigue you into say "Whatever man. Here. Take the car and reverse it"
Id litterally just ignore the lawsuits bro. In this scenario. im an American who owns a car and they are just some angry dudes in Italy. Got no say here. @@RomnysGonzalez
They don't, unless the Car in question was somehow leased/Rented out Which they do have certain methods to prevent quick flip sales on limited editions. But if you bought a regular Ferrari, at sticker price, bought it out right? You can do to it whatever you want.. They have NO legal means (But you'll never buy another Ferrari from any dealer.. but that's not a legal issue)
The guy who made this video doesn't know enough about the topic. The cease and desist is basically saying, if you stop whatever you're doing, we'll let you continue to buy from ferrari dealerships. If you ignore the cease and desist, you're not going to be sued, you're just going to be banned from buying anything from a ferrari dealership.
This reminds me of the hit 1980's T.V. show Miami Vice, when Ferrari reached out to the Producers of the Hit T.V. show and told them, if they would promise to destroy the fake Daytona's they were using in the show permanently, then Ferrari would send them two brand new black Testarossa's. The Producers agreed, and upon receiving the new black Ferrari's, it was determined that they did not show well on T.V., so they were painted white.
@@fadyeltamimi nope, that would be Volkswagen, which owns Audi, Porsche and Bugatti. Also, How are you going to compare cars that avg low-to-mid six figures and are produced in higher number to a company that makes one model at a time, in low numbers at $4-5 million per car? Ferrari doesn't care about shoving 8 turbos on a 30 cylinder engine, sorry.
You don't pay 250,000 on a car, you pay 250,000 on a motorsports dream, even rich people should feel lucky to drive one because Ferrari was never meant to make road cars
Not really. If u buy it brand new youre signing a contract that u cant, otherwise u cant buy the car. Reason why they act such way is because there is a huge waiting list for their cars; ie new purosangue has a waiting list of like 2 years lmao. Its stupid yes, I agree, but Ferrari gets away with it because its Ferrari.
U can add a widebody it just can't alter it in a way that it doesnt look like a ferrari anymore and ur not allowed to swap the engine u can mod the engine
Imagine selling something to someone then telling them what they can do with it. It’s no wonder there are supercar buyers out there who specifically don’t buy Ferrari.
Lesson two - "Dont buy a FERRARI if you don't understand what FERRARI means, at its core." Ferrari is a racing team that allows humble albeit wealthy average drivers to enjoy their automotive masterpieces, fully outfitted with the best racing technology while still being road legal. When you want to buy a ferrari, you want a piece of racing history in your driveway. You dont want a flashy, show-car to parade around in in a retarded internet meme vinyl wrap. It's bastardization of the artwork that they ALLOW you to purchase. One thing is for sure though, your buff racehorse is going to be the fastest thing on the road. It's an angry bull vs a thoroughbred racehorse, really, if you wanna say Lamborghini is better.
I'd do whatever I please to it. After it's bought, it's MINE. Ferrari is the car dealer equivalent of Apple. Expensive and trying to tell you what you can and can't do to their products after you rightfully purchased it as yours.
This guy didnt comprehend well.. any body can buy apple products. You could be rich af and still not allowed to buy a Ferrari. When you do buy a Ferrari you sign a contract agreeing to these stupid rules of ownership and compliance. But that's why Lamborghini has been blowing rari out the water for years.. in sales and performance.
@@JohnSmith-rw8uh 🤷 it is what it is.. they still sell more than Ferrari. They still more popular than Ferrari. They still look better than Ferrari. They still are better for the drag strip/tuning than Ferrari. I can keep goin.. best part of all lambo owners arent being sued for mods.
Completely and utterly wrong. They have the contract you signed if they deemed you worthy of buying one, and on that basis they will successfully sue you and win. You will not only have to remove the mods you made, you will have to pay all the court costs, given that you blatantly breached the contract.
Cease and desist does not mean lawsuit nor does one require any legal grounds to be sent. You could be totally in the wrong like Ferrari is and still send them out. If I buy a car and it's all paid for its my car. No cease and desist would make me stop
@@1eyepauland then all the judge has to do is follow the law and, imagine my shock when Ferrari losses the case and laughed out of court in the vast majority of countries it’s tried to pull this bullshit😉
@@keepout2268 I bet it happened to every child whos only experience with Ferrari is to drive one on X-Box and Playstation. Has anyone ever SEEN one of these mysterious letters? You think the guys at the Ferrari factory over in Italy knows or gives a shit what you do in your own garage? Give me a break. EVERYTHING is a conspiracy to Americans.
@@samdawson55 No. Jay Leno doesnt own ANY supercars. Except a couple of Mclarens. The Lamborghinis hes got, were practically for free. And that's the whole list.
They can. Ferrari doesnt care if u TT kit ur car, or if u put an LB Works body on it. They only dont want their name to refer to any other brand or it being directly used as publicity for another product. Ferrari suing customers all the time is just a lie.
@@TUDORMARCU16 because you are consciously agreeing to it by signing it. It is your responsibility to read it, or in rich ppl cases, their lawyer, and if they object they simply will not be able to purchase the vehicle. Similar to how NDA contracts work.
@chiefhere1968 can you sell the car? easy to get around. Sell the car to someone, for $1, they didn't sign the unenforceable contract, they sell it back to you for that same dollar. Ferrari is out of the loop.
Ok, so someone has a modified Ferrari that looks amazing and unique because they changed the bodywork, and goes 300mph because they shoved twin turbos on it, but it's not on some list that only Ferrari and anal-retentive jerks care about. I reckon they'll still find a buyer for it....
@@thcbeatscostarica3655 the person who is selling it will take a massive hit in resale, and the person buying it will have a hard time getting it serviced at a Ferrari dealership
Their registry is a joke anyways. There's at least 100 more of every model than they claim. There's plenty of lawsuits against Ferrari right now and it's not looking good for them.
Ferrari: Here’s the keys to your car. You have to replace anything that is broken and pay for it, but we still own it despite the fact that you paid for it.
True but there were people who actually got sued😂one of them got sued for promoting his sneakers on his green Ferrari hood.. let's not forget Ferrari once sued a charity for wanting to use a name or something that they owned or wanted to use on a car
@@gamersquadlifestylethat’s completely different from modifying a car you own. Using their products illegally (without permission) is illegal anywhere.
If that's the case then why didn't Novitec or Liberty walk get sued for making widebody kits? And then there's DDE with their twin turbo F12. Why didn't Ferrari go after them for breaking the rules?
Probably because it's a more level playing field going up against a corporation with a similar level of wealth. In other words, ferrari knows they would take an L if they even tried.
most of the reason I would never own a ferrari, is that kind of HOA kinda tell you what you can and cant do with your own fucking property bullshit. The rest of the reason is because I dont got Ferrari money.
The most exclusive and most expensive Ferrari's are only sold to their most loyal and best customers. People who already own several Ferrari's. Even if you would win the lottery tommorow, you can't buy an exclusive million dollar Ferrari from Ferrari itsself. Because you're not on their "Best and most loyal"-customer list. The only way to get such a car would be 2nd hand. But you'll be paying way more than the original price of the car. An exclusive million dollar Ferrari could easily cost you 3-5 million if you manage to find one 2nd hand. And even when you make it onto "Ferrari's best customer"-list, you'll need to obey to Ferrari's unwritten rules....If you sell your new exclusive million dollar Ferrari within 3 years of owning it, you'll get thrown of the list. Same for modifying certain aspects of the car, than they will also throw you of the list. Ones you've been thrown of their list, you can never get back on that list and buy exclusive Ferrari's from Ferrari itsself. So, unless you're a royalty or a Ferrari collector with an extensive collection of Ferrari's...Ferrari won't sell you an exclusive and super expensive Ferrari.
It’s exactly how Lamborghini started making supercars. Ferrari had such a huge stick up his ass that he couldn’t accept constructive criticism from someone who knew what he was talking about.
