Does Light Tire and Does It Prove the Big Bang Wrong? | News of the Day | Hugh Ross 

God bless you and your family, Hugh. You changed my life and helped me find my Saviour. I can’t wait to thank you in person in heaven someday ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

May God bless Hugh Ross and his family. Thank God for him. He is not only a genius but also a wonderful Christian man and an example of what a Christian should be. He has helped me to be a better Christian and also to understand the universe much more. Thank you High.

Thanks Hugh. I enjoyed your scientific insight and appreciate your Biblical view supporting God's magnificent creation. The James Webb Telescope will only reveal more understanding as new discoveries are unfolding in our time.

Great stuff. Keep on it. Thankyou

Thank you!

Thank you.

So from direct observation it 'looks' like we are situated at the center of a universe where everything distant is expanding directly away from us (?). However, as I understand it, cosmologists assume the Milky Way is not in a special location and propose the ever expanding balloon model to explain how every point is expanding away from every other point in the universe (therefore no special locations). My question: is there any observational evidence that the proposed expanding balloon universe model is correct? Is it possible that things are exactly as they appear, ergo we may be at the physical center of Gods creation after all? Thank you, and God Bless

Has the spectral analysis of the old galaxies been conducted? If the spectra contain only light elements this would be a strong argument in favor of Big Bang.

What about galaxies whose rotation is perpendicular to ours?

Now that we know, that the number of supermassive stars are much higher than previously thought, does that change anything with regards to the dark matter? Do we know how many super massive black holes exists, and do they explain the effects of the dark matter? God Bless!

Tired light? Zero mechanism, zero evidence. Next.

Hugh

A deeper understanding of gravity gives you a deeper understanding of the universe. The earth is flat locally the same as the speed of light is the same locally but not on a larger scale. The earth is round on larger scales and the speed of light depends on the measures of time and distance which change depending on the amount of gravity in the surrounding area. This means that distant starlight arrives instantaneously from distant galaxies which aren’t as far away as they appear to us to be with our measures of time and distance and the time is also passing by at a much faster rate since there’s no matter between us and distant galaxies to slow down time or shorten distance according to general relativity which is now an observation and not just a theory. …and the converse of things approaching a black hole look stopped to us because of how slow they are moving. So causation is faster outside of a galaxy and things happen slower inside of a galaxy. The changes in time and distance compound the changes in the speed of light as observed from our frame of reference. The measured speed can’t change. When time and distance used to measure the speed change the actual speed changes. Do the following thought experiment. Hold your hands a foot apart representing 186,000 miles saying “one thousand and one” representing one second while pretending to see an imaginary photon going from one hand to the other. Now expand the distance between your hands saying “one thousand and one” as fast as you can. You should notice that the speed of the imaginary photon increases the more distance expands and the more time speeds up just same as the farther away from the center of the galaxy it is. The opposite is also true. Someone moving in the direction of a black hole will seem to us to be stopped. *If you change the size of a cubit you will change the size of the house that you build with it.*

you seem statistically overly fond of the word statistically.... Does it make you feel like you sound smart like the people who use the reflexive incorrectly because they erroneously believe it makes them sound more intelligent? askin fer a friend...

When are scientists going to figure out that the changes in the measures of time and distance due to the amount of gravity in the vicinity change the speed of light relative to our measures of time and distance where we are inside of a galaxy? Scientists can’t seem to figure out that where gravity changes time and distance it changes the speed of light and the rate of causation. Space is not flat in the measures of time and distance on larger scales just like the Earth is not flat on larger scales. Light MUST indeed *always* travel 186,000 miles per second at the speed of light C. When distance is stretched from having less gravity, light must still complete traveling that distance in the time determined by C. That means the light is traveling faster as perceived by us in a more contracted frame of reference where there is more gravity. Add to that the fact that a second passes by faster away from the center of mass which increases the speed light MUST travel even more. It’s really not complicated. It’s so simple. It’s the very reason things appear to be moving faster than the speed of light moving away from the center of the galaxy because they are moving faster away from the center of the galaxy yet without exceeding the speed of light. I don’t know why that is so hard to understand. Don’t even try to put an age on the universe when time itself is a creation. There are three rates to consider. 1. The diminishing effect or draw of gravity away from the center of mass. 2. The increasing rate of time away from the center of mass. 3. The increasing measure of distance away from the center of mass. Speed is measured by time and distance which both change and that changes the speed of light and causation. Things happen faster. Distance gets longer without gravity and time goes by faster, both of which combine to speed up causation. The light has to arrive at a farther distance faster when distance is stretched *and* time also goes by faster. *Then* there is the first thing to consider and that is the diminishing draw of gravity the farther away it is from the center of the galaxy which means things eventually slow down the farther away they are from the center mass of a galaxy. (It's not complicated. No dark matter is needed.) 😎 Redshift happens when light leaves a galaxy. Blueshift happens as light enters a galaxy. All things being equal, the light will be redshifted as it leaves a galaxy and then blueshifted back again as it enters our galaxy. Except we already know galaxies are different sizes. The distant galaxies that we can see are very large and the distances between here and there is excessive causing more redshift than our small galaxy can blueshift back to its original spectrum. The more distant a galaxy is the more accumulated gravity there is from nearby masses causing more redshift.

Jason Lisle paper came earlier and was better.

Oh you Americans. You’ll go to whatever lengths required to support belief.

Thank you.