And in another universe Simon takes over every RU-vid channel and run the Monopoly on RU-vid and is a billionaire and found a way to upload his conscience into a cybernetic body and has became immortal running RU-vid for all times for his minions
in one other universe Simon has very long hair on his head and is shaved…. imagine that weird universe… pigs fly probably in it and cows give chocolate milk and we are all slaves of the crab people also his last name is Shouter, Simon Shouter… also hes a communist and likes Lord of the Rings lets call the long haired and shaved Simon the evil Simon Shouter…
I love how Simon can get savage at times, but also not take himself too serious. Also, his reactions to some of the script given him. Love all of your content, man. Always feel like I get entertained and learn something. Win win.
There is a multiverse where Simon has hair and let Danny out of the basement? No...statistically that's still as much of a likelihood as the Scarlett Johansson chance.
It is my estimation that if a traversable infinite multiverse did exist, we wouldn't have to worry about it, because in at least one of them, some horrible despot would have already crossed through to all the other multiverses and destroyed them so his could be the only one.
Very interesting video. I love all of your channels. It’s not often that you someone can both entertain and educate.. you do both perfectly! Well done Simon and team 😊👏🏻💯🙌🏻
although I want to believe in a multiverse, when does a dream become just a dream, one could argue that fiction and science fiction are portals to other dimensions and multiverses, but aren't they just dreams. but then again we don't understand the brain enough to discount that if we can dream it, it may exist somewhere.
This channel is wild I like it, since BB got it’s nuts chopped off this is my new real blaze zone 😂. The OG BB is just like a podcast now and Simon sits down and just reads not true blazing
There may never be a way to prove if other universes exist, but the best clues may be in Quantum Mechanics. I have always believed in the Infinite Earths Theory even before I know a name for it as I believe that every discission branches to a different reality and all of these happen simultaneously. I am also sure there is an Earth that is still ruled by dinosaurs because Earth was never hit by an asteroid that devastated life. I also believe there is a universe where Simon and Scarlett are in an alley sharing a needle.
Here, animated Simon runs from the one eyed tentacle monster, in another he's married to it, and in a third he is the tentacle monster, sharing a needle with Scarlett Johansen.
In the multiverse who is me? Or nature vs nurture? The closest one might expect is, of course, identical twins, but even with the same inherited trait and learned behaviors, they are still different. Thus should a me, from a different universe, is not me, but is more, a weird identical twin?
Год назад
Your BEST channel, man. Keep it up! & big thank you :-)
what about a serial multiverse? What I mean is, what if there is only 1 universe at a time, but it is alternating - there is a big bang, the universe expands but starts to slow down until gravity pulls it all back into a a single point which then explodes into a new big bang which creates a new universe that might be different from the last one.
I think the sensation of Deja Vu is caused by the brief synchronization in time of an action performed by an individual and their alternate self from another universe
I would love to see a piece on the Three Laws of Robotics, Asimov "rules". Mainly because they keep getting brought up after the robot broke that kid's finger in a chess match, as if they are actual "laws", not something created by a science fiction writer as a basis for many of his books and stories.
It's a nice idea, but even in Asimov's work it only applied to sapient robots that think for themselves as opposed to just running through a programmed tree of options, a built-in safety to prevent the things shown in Terminator and The Matrix and Westworld &c. Current robots, it's on the human writing the code.
Ah, but sapient robots or androids- what if they began writing their own code? Robots improving their own AI, using pure logic, with no human unput? Would they still follow Asimov's Three Laws (which are flawed, as it is)? Or would they ditch them and create their own laws? Would we have Data or T-800?
@@striker8961 This video shows it- the chess playing robot grabbed a 7-year old kid's finger while they were playing chess. Broke the kid's finger: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-fixQWq3HNZg.html
Human organs are now a thing. Star Trek teleportation could kind of work. We just need to remove the ban for experiments on human clones to work out the memory and habits transfer.
The multiverse concept is fascinating. The Mandela Effect, the people who lost their minds when they fired up the Hadron at Cern....thanks for the script Kevin, great writing as usual!!! Im a big sci fi and fantasy fiction fan, the "hard science" theories are a bit harder for my small brain are fascinating but mind bending, but the more fantasy rewrites of history are just plain fun sometimes, like the Whatif Machine in Futurama, or an "alternate history" series...
FWIW, It doesn't have anything to do with the Mandela effect; there is no way to end up in the "wrong" universe, there is no way one could possibly know which universe one's in, and the number of total universes is beyond anything we could possibly comprehend. To be clear: A given universe "splits" every time there is a quantum event (any interaction between subatomic particles, including a measurement). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Event_(particle_physics) I don't think Simon gave it a fair shake. Does it really make any more sense to propose that a given subatomic particle doesn't have an actual location until it's measured?
Simon, I hope you see this. You’re my favorite RU-vid personality. I know you work lots of channels but you are just so enjoyable to watch on all of them.
I think it's ok for 'we don't know and can't prove this one way or the other yet' to be a valid scientific stance. It's a good way to avoid rampant scepticism which in my opinion is incredibly unscientific in itself. Also as a side note I was interested while watching this video to realise that the multiple universe theory is entirely separate from the idea of additional spatial dimensions. It's so great to live in a world (perhaps one of many worlds even) so full of possibilities.
3:20 - Chapter 1 - 4 levels of multiverse 3:45 - 1st level 6:00 - 2nd level 6:55 - 3rd level 9:05 - 4th level 9:55 - Chapter 2 - Why does anyone believe this ? 12:35 - Chapter 3 - Doing science backwards 14:40 - Chapter 4 - Dangerous for science ? 17:10 - Wrap up PS: Knowing the Whistlerverse and the many personas Simon employs, i can definitively affirm that it exists
13:00 a big smile slowly creeps across my face as Simon begins to reacquaint us all with paradigm shifts in science. The one that's coming is a big'n !:-)
I am offended SIR!!!! I am neither dumb or very young lol, it's not outside the realms of possibility. A few weeks ago many people thought that galaxies take billions of years to form, but that has now been reduced to millions of years. Thanks to JWST, imagine what we will know in another 1000 years ( thank you dark ages ) BTW I love your videos 😀
Ahhh the age old rivalry between science and philosophy, or as I call it: the battle between Eggheads and Thinkers. Also, I could *realllllly* start a flame-war on this with...other topics...but I’m not in the mood today.
And that's the beauty of Stience. never satisfied that we've figured it all out, even our understanding of gravity isn't completely off the table, as far as at the Macro and Quantum levels.
Another thing that a multiverse could allow is Faster than Light travel without the risk of causing causal loops (aka paradoxes), because if you travelled back in time and altered the timeline the alteration would merely be swallowed by another universe, instead of making the main one inconsistent.
Sometimes i watch and then i will think "but what about THIS theory?"... and then I remember I'm watching a fun science channel, and not one of the field specific physics lectures I watch lol. But god do I miss Star Trek's dedication to putting in real effort when it came to the science. The new stuff hurts my fucking soul. It isn't the only part of the older trek series that they left behind, but it feels so empty without.
I think that the multiverses aren’t off at some infinite distance, I think they’re right here with life forms and everything but they have more or less dimensions and we can’t perceive them.
Technically we “could” find evidence if, and only if, another universe impacted our own. The result would likely (speculation at best) leave a so-called “cold spot” where no matter is found cause it was pushed out of the way. This is extremely unlikely and only possible in “certain” types of multiverse so it may as well be impossible to test. On top of that even IF we were to find such a “cold-spot” it’s not even necessarily from such an event as it could be explained away as large quantum fluctuations being exponentially expressed in matter spread as the universe expanded.
I saw some physicist, maybe Michio Kaku, talking about how it is possible there is a univers where 1+1=3. So if that is true, then other universes could actually have vastly different laws of physics...and then maybe "superheros" could be a thing. Seems unlikey but still...
...I wouldn't doubt there is a universe where English evolved so that two equals (***) things and three equals (**) things. Wow. That is actually really hard to describe.
@@ravenwraith1017language would definitley be possible to have changes…but this physicist was literally talking math. I can’t even wrap my head around how that would work. I understand string theory before I can understand that. Lol.
There are types of multiverse where it would be possible to observe the effects of another “universe” forces like gravity could leak across from other dimensions (a possible cause of dark matter), edge effects from other “universes” which share some coordinates in say spacial dimensions with our observable universe have been proposed a lot of them would be visible with gamma ray astronomy. One way of looking at it is we could be in the same position as someone proposing a heliocentric solar system with stars being other suns before the invention of the telescope. We can’t just look up and see the moons of Jupiter orbiting it, we can’t measure angles in the sky finely enough to observe parallax and get an idea of the distance to the sun etc etc.
When it comes to the question of if there are multiple universes, I think about it like this name anything in our universe that there is only one of lol. It's definitely not a definite answer I do believe if you see one of something there are probably more than one of them.
If you want an interesting multiverse show there is an old 90's one called Sliders where they go to a different multiverse in almost every eppisode. I don't know if any of the streaming services is showing it though.
Ah, yes, I see my choices of always ordering the Eggs Benedict for brunch and being the designated driver for the club's dancers were indeed the best ones - I had a hunch, what with the exceedingly polite, heavily tattooed suits always tipping me 2 bags of fishscale for the lot of us to get home safely, and then another when they found out I was ACTUALLY sober and was crashing on their favorite dancer's couch, lol.
i loved the "writers, philosophers, and alcoholics" line genius you mentioned Tyson so i'm going to put this back in my comment.....he did an episode of Star Talk with Max on the multiverse. It was good. If you liked this Simon episode I would suggest it....and i wonder if the writer of THIS would consider writing a script for a interview with Max perhaps on another Simon channel like Brain Blaze...or one of his big channels, for Max. Simon gets more views than Tyson...kinda saying something. "Imagine if a giant comet hit Uranus and blew off 1/3 in the collision of it to create a ring. Would we have to change its name, and comment about how a Huge Impact on Uranus it lost 1/3 of its mass and made it into an Anus with a Ring?" - Iroxinping
I can't imagine Brain Blaze is the place to have an interview with a real scientist. I'm not sure how to reallyw rite a script for an interview either; I mean I could write potential questions, but the interviewer is going to have to do a lot of responding and ad libbing making a script borderline pointless
That would have to be one hell of a comet Uranus is pretty big.😐 I think I remember seeing someone messing around with universe simulator or something and attempting to blow up Uranus (it seems to be a popular target) by crashing things into it. At only the sun’s escape velocity the rogue body has to be ~ as big as the earth to do much damage. And temporarily putting a hole in it took a tungsten rod as heavy as a mountain range moving at close to light speed
