DogCamSport flies to the edge of space 110,000ft on a balloon! 

But this video did use a fish eye lens.

@@msidc1238 It uses two lenses I think. Since later in the video, you can't observe a concave horizon or a convex one. While earlier in the vid you can.

@@learningagain4094 it uses one. The earth is not flat. Who the fuck is stupid enough to that.

still has fisheye lens can see it bending up and down 45m to 50m is human eye

Fisheye lense? So? Wide angle lenses do not distort the lines at the center of the pic/ frame. This video shows the curve. Anything you disagrew, doesn't change that fact

lol great idea

I'm sure the military would have it shot down down

Great idea but im more interested in the north pole.

@Christogenea dot Org alot of ancient stories and mythologies about the north pole and a giant mountain that acts as a magnetic May pole for the sun and moon. And surrounding that mountain is a large whirlpool. Might have something to do with the tides. Look up eric dubays videos on the subject. Hes covered it quite a bit.

Maybe we'll get a drone to do that for us one day.

Who?

@@jnishar I believe that they are talking about God.

That was written by people who at the time didn’t know better, He didn’t come to earth to write the bible. People did, and people also thousands of years later discovered the shape of the earth. The entire bible is not 100% fact because of human error. If Jesus had rewritten the entire thing when he came, then we could take it for fact. Sadly because of human error and poor translations, we can’t.

@@bcameron0074 people knew the shape of the earth long before year 0..

@@jnishar 200 BC Approx I’m not saying Jesus told us all the shape of the earth that part of the bible was written earlier than 200 BC before a round earth was common knowledge. What I was saying is that If Jesus wrote the bible it would be trustworthy because he knows everything sorry for the misunderstanding. Have a great day!

hahah yeah

The Earth is Flat

@Cosmic Explorer that is a logical fallacy to just insult. In 1500 globe believers would have been ridiculed as well. Think about it

@@powerpc7336 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-edsUrLXrlLg.html It proves🌍 Into is satire

y'all niggas blind if you you see it as flat on this video xd

word!

Alex Gurren it wouldn't catch the eclipse perfectly because of the ratio of the size of the moon and the distance of both objects to the surface of the Earth, but you might be able to get a partial eclipse

@Mick Ronson then why is the moon slightly smaller than the sun from our viewpoint?

@Mick Ronson have you ever seen an eclipse...

@Mick Ronson then you would know the moon looks smaller than the sun

Flat? Check at 2:17, it's distinctly concave At 2:45 it's distinctly convex. Concave again at 2:50 Flat at 3:02 3:15 very convex And so on throughout the video. Do you really see only flat? BTW how are you measuring the horizon compared to eye-level? There doesn't seem to be anyway to establish that from this video, maybe you've found a way.

@@hasmaldawn1611 the important thing is you tried. You failed but you gave it your best shot.

@@pat2430 Really? How so? The video shows the horizon going from a curve in one direction to a curve in the other. Yes that passes through flat, but it most definitely isn't evidence that the earth is flat. It's evidence that the type of camera used here is not good for such things. Of course that was never the purpose! Maybe you can show how the horizon rising to eye-level is measured here?

@@hasmaldawn1611 There are two cameras being used. One is a fish eye lens (which artificially adds curvature as you explained it does) but the important part is the other camera is *not* a fish eye lens. The footage switches back and forth between the two. Pay attention to how it looks when the normal lens is used. This is the only footage I've seen this high without a fish eye lens. And it's perfectly flat when the normal lens is used, even at 110,000 feet. Plus the horizon rising to eye level, which is impossible on a sphere. We should be forced to look further and further down as the altitude rises to see the horizon as it's supposed to be curving down away from us as it gets farther away.

@@lightbeforethetunnel From both cameras you can see curvature in both directions and also flat. One seems to be less wide-angle than the other but I doubt either are actually fisheye lenses. Maybe you know the exact focal lengths used? You keep saying that the horizon is rising to eye-level here but you have nothing by which to measure that. My personal experience looking through a HUD shows distinct horizon drop even at 40,000 feet and provides the means of measurement. It's somewhere between 3 and 4 degrees of drop. Calculation from the sphere tells us it would be 3.5 degrees. In other words, what I actually measure from 40,000 feet is exactly the drop we should see on the globe. Interestingly the drop from 110,000 feet is still less than 6 degrees, but then there is no method by which to measure that in this video.

@Mick Ronson Jumped off? Where? The edge of The Earth?🤣

It PROVES the earth is NOT flat... with the camer on the left, which is NOT fish-eye

Why is this one different that all the other amateur balloon videos on RU-vid.....every other one shows curve

@@yanke3s1 The others use a fisheye lens.....

​​@@YHWHSTRUTH885:09 He has this too. Or do you think this is normal?

I'll sure try if you are able to provide a definition of "hotspot".

As we now know the Earth is a Plane surface and our Sun is not a star but a divine light. So sad to have been a child lied to : (

@@secureinformation4098 Are you one of these deluded and brain-dead flat earth believing fools? Do you actually know much about the flat earth model?

It's a reflection off the water between clouds... not a Hotspot

Flat earthers are perplexed by reflections.

that is not the low orbit that is the stratosphere, some planes fly there

Low earth orbit? You know that "orbit" has not even to do with the altitude? This is not even "space" by any definition (of course not, it is a balloon!).

@@sebastiannolte1201orbit implies Globe, dont be trolled

@@secureinformation4098 But the earth is spherical (a globe) of course.

@@sailorman8668 you sure?

Amen, I'm wondering if there is a direction connection between those who believe in the globe and atheism and this who believe that the earth was created by God and the flat earth model.

@@JohnSmith-uu5ov this ppl is scary AF

It is flat zero curvature and no rotation

@@JohnSmith-uu5ov I would not be surprised at the correlation! But sadly, all too many church goers trust science over the Bible.

Yep, and it's flat ...

No, the simple fact that the angular size of the Sun on the sky does not change over a day makes it clear that it is not closer than what we've been told, there is not one single evidence for that and your mere ignorance or opinion is no argument to support that.

​@FreezeFire hey idjit, did you not notice the HOT SPOT? How do you explain that from a light source "93 million " miles away? Go back to sleep, adults are talking.

​@@msrodrigues2000😂😂😂 , yeah keep telling yourself that

​@@msrodrigues2000Keep the faith bro!

"Hotspot" You mean the Sun being reflected ? Just a reflection and some people throw away more than 2500 of science. This comment is just uneducated.

@@daddy3982 you mean un-indoctrinated

@@EnergyShifting No, no, indoctrinated and uneducated.

@@EnergyShifting Actually, it's the deluded flat earth believing fools that are indoctrinated. Do you know much about the flat earth model?

@@daddy3982 How is a sun supposedly 93 million miles away producing a hot spot like that over one area? You can clearly see the sun is literally right there, above the clouds. Open you eyes. You choose to believe the words of magicians from a cult of pseudo science than your own senses, sight and logic. WAKE UP.

So who measured it, and how?

Then you get the same foolish answer because it is the same NASA lie that they brainwashed us with at school. You should trust your own eyes instead of an institution founded by Nazis (Project Paperclip). How do you know where the torch is? Just follow the rays. www.mad4tools.com/ekmps/shops/madsupplies/images/nightsearcher-uv395-utra-violet-beam-led-flashlight-torch-[2]-16191-p.jpg So, how do you know where the sun is? www.froot.nl/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Zonnestraal-201.jpg It is that simple!

But if they lie about the sun, lie about the moon, lie about our earth, how true would the Venus story be then?

And that's where your big mistake is. Astronomy text books are full of assumings, all based on the fantasy of Copernicus. Take the globe he never could prove, because people would fall off at the bottom of that globe. Then Isaac Newton jumped in and fantasized his gravity theory to make Copernicus's heliocentric universe possible. It is proven that gravity does NOT exist! Check the bible and you will see that it contains more thruth about this than your astronomy book. The heliocentric model is invented to make mankind humble, while we are in reality the "chosen ones". The universe revolves around earth/people! WE are the "Master of the Universe"! More and more scientist are finding this out at the moment. Ergo: These are all THEORIES!!! And a theory is no proof! Just use your own sense and eyes. Then one day all the pieces start to form the puzzle.

Well, show us the proof of your round earth then. We all here are dying to see it after all these years! So please, show!

The Earth is round and if the Sun was close then it would drastically change size over the course of a day.

If you can’t see the curve then you’re fuckin blind

Good question 😢

@elyjahstark7549 You never answered these questions: If the Earth is flat then why do objects disappear beneath the horizon? Why is the horizon visibly below eye level at the cruising altitude of major airliners? How does the Sun and Moon set? (If they were local then they would still never set and would change size drastically over the course of a day) How can somebody in Africa look south and see the same exact stars as someone in South America looking south? How are there two celestial poles? Why does the MESOS amateur rocket launch which went way higher than any weather balloon show curvature? How does gravity work? (Buoyancy and density can't just replace gravity) How does navigation on an extremely distorted Southern hemisphere work? There's your proof.

@elyjahstark7549 I have used a telescope which is better than the P900 (which really isn't that good compared to even cheap telescopes) to clearly observe a ship sail over the horizon.

I had the same thought.

you have no idea what youre talking about

You don't see the curve? It's right there.

@elyjahstark7549 at that altitude you would definitely see curvature. Something's wrong.

​@elyjahstark7549NASA says you can see curvature at 35k feet

@BLNK BLNKRSN To bad millions of people all around the globe see the sun slowly sinking bottom first over the curve of the earth at sunset everyday, makes your childish flat pancake world sound rather silly, doesn't it kid, grow the fuck up.

Oh shut it Mike, you're drunk!

you need to go much higher to see the curvature of the earth , dum dums like you with your smol brains wouldnt understand the simple logic that if something is very massive and round and you stand on it you will feeel like its flat

Regarding Spheres in Space 🌍 and Comets: A11 CGI showing spherical 🌝🌍⚽ BAAL object nonsense to delude the viewer into Heliocentrism, again. The Earth is a Plane of existence made of fossilized, mineralized Biology, mainly ancient Titanic Dragons hundreds of mile long turned to stone (mostly Limestone) 🗻 Mountains. The Titanic fish 🐟🐠 give us most of the (Si) Silicon Dioxide, and Silica Dessert sands. LOL ... you still here ? The Space "Rocks" ie. Asteroids, Meteors (meat🥩) and of course Comets are the tough fossil remains of these Titans (mostly Dragons🐉🐲) ... lol. The Void of Space and Earth are called the "Raqia" in Hebrew (Latin-Firmament), and "the Expanse" is so massive we get Hyperbolic, Intersteller Comets etc. When these space fossils get near Earth's (magnetic force) dipole the Anode is discharging electrons into the "Comet" and taking on protons from it. The Comet is becoming a cathode (CCD) from a cold state (far away) and Sublimates (a Type 2 Comet) discharging Carbonaceous Dust and microbes by the hundreds of Tons an hour (example) www.google.com/search?sxsrf=A... near the Earth. The 3600 yrs. ago Thera Eruption marked last cycle of energetic Comets, and it's called the Shar (Sumerian "completion of the Circuit") the electrical Shar may be an intentionally induced 👽Cosmic Cycle, which adds raw material (Proton Density, charge etc.) to the outer magnetic field of the Toroidal Vortex above the Plane of Earth. I figured A11 this out, at far less than NASA $23 Billion a Year budget. 😎 I want a raise 💲

@BLNK BLNKRSN Try using a curvature calculator for 110,000 feet. You can easily find them online and they use the data according to your own worldview. The curvature for the earth at this height - 110,000 feet - should be very easily visible. It isn't. I don't see any curvature, actually. You've got to admit the curvature in this video does not align with what we're told it should be. That is, unless your own indoctrination prevents you from evaluating evidence objectively.

Notice the concentrated hotspot right beneath it several times during the video. One of the best observational truth vids on youtube.

notice how the sun cant be seen at the beginning? Thats because it's behind the horizon, behind the curvature of the earth. Damn you guys really are so willfully ignorant.

@@heofonfyr5089 lol, no. flatearthinsanity.blogspot.com/2017/10/analysis-dogcam-footage-does-hotspot.html?m=1

So hundreds or thousands of people observe the sky and the sun for centuries, independent from each other. The observations became better, the tools became better, the methods became better, the calculations became better... finally we came to about 150 millions kilometer for the distance of the sun. And now you really want to tell me, that based on a short amateur video made at an altitude of 33 km you say the sun is close? Are you serious?

Yes. It is very clearly just sitting there, not far at all, not as large as people say it is. @@sebastiannolte1201 Listen man. It's simple. Every single government on planet earth has lied about every single thing, ever. Can you honestly point to a single instance where they didn't? Other than, "Crime go up = bad"? Here's a fun one. In the last 70 years, not a single country, despite being at war with one another, has violated the Antarctic treaty. Seems like an easy think to gain/lose yet not a single country ever played it, despite killing each other's civilians & assets to some degree. Everything we were ever taught is fake & gay.

true sir

Te dirán que falta más altura, nunca será suficiente altura cuando no se observé nada de lo que ellos dicen que supuestamente hay o debería verse en un mundo globo

Satellites are strung up on hot air balloons and the space station is bullshit. Do you want to see what a woman’s hair looks like in zero gravity jump on one of those planes and people don’t hold their belts to hide the cables

inside your brain oh wait you dont have a brain

@@delayedcreator4783 on your mother’s life?

@@alexjackson7727 joe ? candice ? ligma ?

@@delayedcreator4783 go get the jab and the toilet roll.

@@alexjackson7727 i was right ..you dont have a brain , your meaningless comments proves it

@Pacem Terris Read the bible

@Pacem Terris that is look like satan in his avatar, black wings....

Yep only a close sun could make a hotspot

Yep, and if by chance the cam hit the sun we will maybe live in darkness for eternity...the sun is a 12V or 5V?

@Benson Davis so How Big the sun and moon in FE version?

There are curvature.

Can you see every continent like we should see at that altitude? No? Globe confirmed 💯🌎

@@awatt good point

@@jeez323lol how is that a good point? It’s covered by clouds and you still wouldn’t even if it was clear.

@@earthpond8043 damn flat earthers and round earthers they both seems right at the same time it's crazy

Most people don’t know Satan is the god of this world - and he controls all the religions - from Judaism, Islam, Catholicism, and he’s even infiltrated Protestantism. The Holy Bible is the Word of God and Jesus is our only way back to Paradise with God - after we from from grace through Adam and Eve.

NO IT's NOT

@@alexf962 lolllll

100% FLAT.. they'll get over it...

@@ExposePuppets You Wish kid huh

@@alexf962 it's ok bud haha

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-edsUrLXrlLg.html

The ISS is 220 miles above us orbiting the Earth. This balloon went 20 miles up above the Earth. Scale the Earth down to the size of a basketball and the ISS is approx half an inch off basketball Earth. Same scale, that balloon isn't quite a 1/16th of an inch above basketball Earth. No wonder it still looks pretty flat...

It really is guys hahah look at that! the horizon rises to the hieght of observer 100% of the time and without the use of fish eye lenses ect is a geometric impossibility on a sphere, oblate sphere or any other pear shaped like thing 😂 those that still havnt or dont know more look into Alexander Euclid. We use Euclidean plane princples to which we build and construct everything plumb and level come one guys wake up sextants for navigation works from the horizon base line. If you see that footage and still beleive the world is a ball spinning at 1000mph at equator your off your head 😂.

@Mick Ronson common sense and objective truth will win in the end bro or we dont deserve it. Glad you are awake nice to meet you 😉😁

J Kaner very poor argument ! Just 100 miles would have to curve down 1.26 miles from any point as an mean average of course That curvature would easily be visible over the seas & oceans But it is Not observable anywhere

Are you one of these deluded and brain-dead flat earth believing fools? Do you actually know much about the flat earth model?

@@sailorman8668 you don’t know shit but what they told your fat ass at school. The Big Bang is a theory so is evolution you can’t observe it so it goes against the scientific method.

True, science has an agenda and it's to show that we all got here by accident, that there IS no Creator God, and so we humans are expendable, like animals--no better!

where is the sun at 1:03 , another simple experiment to debunk the flat earth

@@delayedcreator4783 Clearly, it's night time where the camera is being pointed, and so no sun. Just stars.

It's your Level Earth, we are all on the same level here ...

The Lord Jesus created this earth.

@Jason Shearin You shall see the Lord in all of His glory, And shall bow to Him, And confess, that He is Lord, To the glory of God the Father.

hey , pay attention how water keeps in level , ever , in any place. try to understand this , and believe in your feelings

Are you one of these deluded and brain-dead flat earth believing fools? Do you actually know much about the flat earth model?

From another comment I made: puu.sh/oJOET/a31efdc40d.png www.reddit.com/r/flatearthsociety/comments/3bsduw/how_is_this_explained_by_the_round_earth_theory/? Consider the fact that if it were as close as flat Earth retards proposed, the suns angular size should change a lot more than it does (which, visually, it doesn't). Get a solar filter and take pictures throughout the day and you'll see that its size does not change.

@@AnaseSkyrider We are talking about the hot spot.

Blake Lewis Because 110k feet is not that high. If it we're a hot spot like you say it would be burning people, trees, and buildings up like a loupe to ants.

@jas crilly I live in the dessert. Theyre very much inhabitable. Theres even aircond malls and all.

It's NOT 93 million miles away. That's the explanation.

In the brains of the globetrotters.

​@@planewandererNo, in your mom body

The horizon.

ru-vid.com

Earth is definitely spherical

@@sailorman8668 fed

@@EnergyShifting Yeah dudes a rat.

It's a fact that earth is a sphere and flat earthers are uneducated high school dropouts

+Richard John 4:09, Cam 2, no fish eye. Definite curve of the Earth right there.

Good luck brother

Alex Harrington smh. you want to see a curve bro. peace

Richard John ... I can see a curve... It's right there on the video.

@@alexharringtonmusic Try making it to 4:38 before cutting it off... It curves upwards... So is it a fishbowl shape, then? lol Nice mental gymnastics, though.

Space is amazingly big. Not a lot happens.

You have to search for it: www.space.com/4515-amateur-sleuths-spot-satellites.html

And no stars either!

Robin Poe good luck with the earth being so freaking bright .

its called exposure you heard of this lol

Oh please, where's the evidence of the core of the earth? The deepest we've went down is only 7-8 miles...

@@tatoforever The magma that comes out of volcanoes, duh.

​@@azazel166volcanos apere here and there so this "molten core" is uneven . It may be some hot spots not a core.

No one's been so no one knows stop pretending like you do ​@@azazel166

20 miles is nothing for observing the curve. The curve is very less at just 20 miles above the earth. In comparison, the earth has a diameter of 24000 km.

At 7:04 you can see the curve. Take a ruler and try to align it. It won't

The Best High Altitude video showing barrel lens error from two different cameras ! What is lens distortion or Barrel Distortion ? In summary, it’s when a lens produces curved lines where straight lines should be. Tilt the lens upward to achieve a concave horizon. Tilt the lens downward for a convex horizon. Fish Eye lenses produces this effect all the time. Wide Angle lenses will negate this effect somewhat, so when you point your fisheye lens below the horizon (in most NASA or Drone photography) the ends of the horizon are bent down. But, if you point your lens above the horizon, the effect will be reversed and the ends of the horizon line will be bent up. If this does not occur within a Video then the image is computer generated or PhotoShop. It's 2021 and I've been calculating altitude of Sun for years, I use pic. of Sun shadow line on a N - S wall (meridian line) at high noon, from a very level surface line (like Eaves), with a virtual Protractor overlay to acquire Angle A. I then use the Aaron Dover Astrolabe www.apk4now.com/apk/205981/su​... to get current Sun Latitude, use it with Google Earth (Ruler/miles) for the long. distance from Your "GPS" location to the Sun Latitude, for Side B. Any Right Angle Trigonometry Calculator will do the hard stuff, here www.carbidedepot.com/formulas-​... you'll be entering Angle A, and Side B (in miles), The height of the Sun is Side A (miles). This works from anywhere on Earth plane, any day of year. The calculations I've made from 2018-2021 show "Sun" Altitude changing throughout the year, from 1700 - 3000 (plus+++) miles above the level Earth. 😎 Please share this Sun Altitude Formula. My Recent 🌞 Sun Altitude Calculations: (Formula at my Community Section) 05 06 2020 - Sun at 2989 miles above level Earth 05 29 2020 - Sun at 3084 miles above level Earth 06 18 2020 - Sun at 4819 miles above level Earth (highest I've recorded, at Solstice !) 08 14 2020 - Sun at 4752 miles above level Earth 09 06 2020 - Sun at 4305 miles above level Earth 10 02 2020 - Sun at 4111 miles above level Earth 11 08 2020 - Sun at 2510 miles above level Earth 12 02 2020 - Sun at 1993 miles above level Earth 12 22 2020 - Sun at 1738 miles above level Earth (lowest I've recorded at Solstice !) 02 07 2021 - Sun at 1974 miles above level Earth 03 03 2021 - Sun at 2447 miles above level Earth 04 11 2021 - Sun at 2588 miles above level Earth 05 11 2021 - Sun at 2877 miles above level Earth

@@aaryajain6396 bullshit ...

@@aaryajain6396 more bullshit ...

Its actually not, its a few degrees below eye level. And there is a slight curve

@@Spurrrthere is no curve please use the one brain cell you have left to focus really hard.

*"There should be a curvature of 5.7 degrees on both sides of the horizon at 33,500 meters up if the earth were a ball"* Proof? *"Not to mention how big the sun looks,"* Ever heard of this thing called *_GLARE_*? *"the how is moves with the earth as the camera tilts,"* Are you implying that if the Sun were only a few thousand miles up, it should move all fucking over the place as the camera rotates? Do... Do you think that a rotating camera should have significant parallax compared to if it just changed position? HOW FUCKING STONED ARE YOU? It would look exactly the same regardless of the actual size and distance (until you get really close, like a scale model the size of a small room kind of thing, because at that point, the dimensions of the camera start to factor in). A rotating camera will rotate all objects in view equally. They will all move the same. *"and the hotspot, all of which doesn't make sense on a spinning ball with the sun 93 million miles away."* From another comment I made elsewhere on this video: puu.sh/oJOET/a31efdc40d.png www.reddit.com/r/flatearthsociety/comments/3bsduw/how_is_this_explained_by_the_round_earth_theory/?

Anase no persons has observed or has demonstrated any scientific proof of earth curving 8 inches per mile squared. Lets rewind and start from the beginning. Where does the earth actually start to curve?

"Anase no persons has observed or has demonstrated any scientific proof of earth curving 8 inches per mile squared." Then what is this: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-RX2m_NfrJD4.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-fQFOxh-vBoU.html www.reddit.com/r/woahdude/comments/3elgrk/earths_curvature_demonstrated_by_some_tankers/ qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-a399b8beea7ec061c7b050de7ec0d402-c ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dKF7D7XsyTA.html m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-BVauOGCzvIs.html m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-WOZd6t9uzhY.html m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-gUwvu0WPq8U.html The list goes on. "Where does the earth actually start to curve?" where youre standing.

well considering the lens used doesn't create a flat plane go above c enter and it curves up below center and down I mean look at the straight frame work holding the camera its curved so they used this to offset the curve and trick you its all there if you look this video is either made by someone trying to trick you or didn't research lens distortion and used the wrong type either way anyone who uses this as evidence as flat earth are dumb too get a telescope and tell me why other planets and our sun are round and we somehow are the weird planet and are flat and everything rotates around us get the fuck outta here with that shit

@elyjahstark7549 At 4:01 you see the sun, the camera even points directly into it. How often have you seen the sun and the stars at the same time on a picture or video? Have you ever try to take a portrait of somebody against the sun? Do you know how cameras work, and why many modern cameras have an HDR option, and do you know what this option does?

​@@sebastiannolte1201the sun is only a star by your Zionist scientist standards

Are you one of these deluded and brain-dead flat earth believing fools? Do you actually know much about the flat earth model?

@@sailorman8668 are you a federal agent

p-brane yeah, earth is flat, not moving... science is a joke

***** its a dog cam, you stupid fuck... go look it up

***** fake numbers, 93million 1,050 trillions of light-years.

p-brane The earth is flat with a dome over it and the sun and moon go in a circle above it. The sun and moon are inside the dome whereas the stars and other planets are just a projection on the surface of the dome.

***** No. Up until a month ago I thought the Earth was round. I looked into the flat earth theory to try to disprove it and I couldn't.

because your blind?

Pretty fat to me. Fat Earth for the win

@@awatt use a ruler, you also seem blind

@@FiryaFYI Wouldn't a bathroom scales be more appropriate? You can't measure fat with a ruler. Just saying.

@@awatt the fk you talking about. There are obvius curves in the video. If you cant see that, use a ruler.

The sun spot isn't actually 'right under the sun' of course, but is due to the angle of reflection off the water from the very distant sun.

@@sailorman8668 sure pal

@@r_starchild2157 I suppose you actually think the earth is flat, right? LOL.

@@sailorman8668 it looks flat to me

@@sailorman8668 it’s definitely stationary

why? they keep trying, saying that, amazing..."the Earth is Flat"...last time I answer this BS

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-edsUrLXrlLg.html

The earth looks so... flat ?

You choose the wrong god

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-edsUrLXrlLg.html

To bad millions of people all around the globe see the sun slowly sinking bottom first over the curve of the earth at sunset everyday, makes your childish flat pancake world sound rather silly, doesn't it kid, grow the fuck up.

@@Poseidon6363 It’s actually not going down it is actually going farther away from you. It is all about perspective and what you can see. If you look at a long hallway it looks like it’s getting smaller and narrower but if you measure both ends it’s actually the same height and width. Again it’s all what you can see & can’t see!

@@truckbros35 Nope, it's not going farther away from you, if that was the case it would look smaller and and it doesn't, have you never seen a sunset over a pin sharp horizon across the ocean, it's a flat earth killer.

That stuff is FAT! LOL

Nope. Certainly not.

+Gifted Human Well, first of all, the motion of the sun required by the flat Earth hypothesis breaks Newton's laws of physics, the flat Earth would have an edge or a bottom, and they haven't been found, every other planet, star or moon we observe is round - there is no reason to think the Earth is special there, the flat Earth would crumple under its own weight, the flat Earth would not have the magnetic poles we know exist, the gravitational field strength would not vary depending on position between the geographic poles, ships wouldn't be seen coming over the horizon... There are so many obvious reasons. It's ridiculous to think the Earth is flat.

+Gifted Human Oh yeh, sorry, perhaps instead of what I said, the planets are CGI and there's advanced tech holding the flat Earth together, because that is much more plausible... give me a break!

Gifted Human I'm perfectly happy to trust NASA, thanks. I'm not a conspiracy theorist.

blah..blah theory after theory. This is empirical evidence.

Lana Is The New Orange what are you talking about you can see it

@@PoIarism Look at it when it's in the center of the screen. It's flat. There is distortion when the horizon is anywhere but the center of the screen, making it warp in a convex or concave way. But I just did the calculation for the predicted curvature of the Earth at that height and it should be clearly visible and noticable at that height. It's not. It looks flat when the horizon is at the center of the screen. It definitely should not look flat like that according to the info we're given. It's strange.

Dwayne Kellum's footage without a fish eye lens has shown a very slight but definite curvature.

Butthurt flerf.

There is curve to be seen, but it seems the camera is using a fish eye lens, so there is no conclusive evidence that the Earth is flat or round.

There's plenty of evidence to justify the spherical Earth model. Cameras sent to space are just the nail in the coffin, but they are not a necessary part of it. Fun fact: puu.sh/qJBT8/155c19f774.png That's a fish-eye lens put up to a grid. Notice that the horizontal axis, when centered in frame, is unchanged. So find a frame in the video where the horizon is centered. If you still see curvature, even if it's centered like it is in the image, then you're seeing real curvature and not curvature that exists only because of camera distortions. Here's an example frame: puu.sh/qJCp7/81fd3f535f.jpg

Anase Skyrider I had totally overlooked that - good point. However, whenever evidence is discussed, the conspiracy theorists don't seem to think pictures and images have any significance. There are still lots of other ways to show that the Earth is roughly spherical, anyway.

maybe the world is like a fish eye lens...maybe because nasa took it with a fish eye lens...lmfao! duhhh!!! no curve and if it had a curve it would be a illusion due to the earth having mountains n shit but in reality if there was a bend the water would over flow into the land...since land is only 60-70 percent ...according to the GOv and school books ....lmfao....yeahh there is really much more to be explored in this world! if we never stopped we would always find something new every day! but the gov controls who gets to do those types of finds.....dirty mfs!

Sean Mendoza I'm in a hangout with some guys. Do you want to come to the hangout and prove your shit? I promise we won't gang up on you. Send me a PM and I'll send you the link.

Lol quite the opposite actually.

@@KorbinX no! shut up, noob

@@Pravdolub evidence to support your claim.

Are you one of these deluded and brain-dead flat earth believing fools? Do you actually know much about the flat earth model?

A shout out to the John Butler trio as well; great music to accompany this amazing video!

Because it is close.

@Jason Lee its the suns hotspot !!! yes its close !!!

@Jason Lee for someone who don't now how a reflection ore a hotspot works on a camcorder I can understand.

@Jason Lee I now you don't understand what your eyes are seeing!!!

@Jason Lee if I was yeling I used CAPSLOCK 🤣

US） The images from the ISS (408 km altitude) that appear on Instagram are so crooked! Even though it's so crooked😂

​because iss uses a fisheye lens

@@mikesmith4334 in the right bible version so which on is right?

Where in the bible should I look? What verse? I’m sure since you are right you will be getting right back to me with the information I requested. Looking forward to it!!

If your proof is a book written by people barely out of caves, you are a silly person.

All that flat earthers would have to do would be to show us a flat earth map that has every point on earth at its correct distance but they can't because every map made during the last two thousand years is a globe map.

All flat earthers would have to do to convince us is to make their own satellite (easy and cheap to do these days) that shows us the duet pizza and the turtles. Till then its globe confirmed

Nury Haqim I’m not a flat earther but the ‘logical’ explanation for this (IF using a flat earth model) would be that the sun is just coming into perspective by entering the visible horizon. You can even watch a video by vsauce that explains this phenomenon. I believe the title is “how much of the earth can we see?” Or something like that. It explains that even at high distances we are still limited to a visible horizon distance. Thus further away objects can appear to ‘suddenly pop into view’ at the horizon. Although it’s greater than on the ground ofcourse. This phenomenon even works on a flat disc earth which Michael shows in the video

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Hmwg4kKDhec.html Here is an actual flat earther explaining in depth their take on the phenomenon ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-mxhxL1LzKww.html And here is the Vsauce video explaining horizon distances

@@briancooley8777 Hmm... that Phuket Word was a nice illustration of mirroring and a nice try pushing the FE from him, although the sun part is provably wrong easily. The top part isn't mirrored only a tiny bit below and as the guy shows, the "horizon" can still be identified quite easily (not true horizon, as the mirroring occurs in the air afaik, but let's run with what he claims): 1) It can't account for a significant difference of the sunrise/sunset times with different altitudes. When on the sea level the sun just dissapears, 75m (~25ft) high (using Globe model) it should be about halfway through the horizon and from 300m altitude it should barely start touching the horizon. 2) The unmirrored top part shouldn't shrink and it doesn't look like it does really (at least not horizontally). Besides, on the FE the sun should shrink noticeably way before going that low in the sky. On an equinox over Equator, 4h after noon (and ~2h before the sunset) it should be half its angular size already (quarter the area) which should be the maximum angular size the sun has in Stokholm that day (at noon, 30° over the horizon). Surely, there's refraction at such angles, but a) it acts mostly vertically b) it's minuscule upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/06/BennettAtmRefractVsAlt.png - the difference between 29.75° and 30.25° is way below 1 arcminute, the Sun being about 31.5 - 32.5 arcminutes across for any observer. So nope, the flat earthers are clueless with that. Not to mention the sun path on their models doesn't resemble even remotely the 15°/h movement along a plane that's inclined at (90°-your_longitude) to the horizon and that's roughly what we can observe every day from any location except for from where there's a polar night.

lol and why would that not literally be what is going on here ? Oh because u assume it should be higher up because u think a Sun circling above should be 93 million miles away lol

The sun is small and close, problem solved 😎💪

Fish eyed lenses

flat earth has curvatures now?

@@ChRis6i Where you see curvature?

@@wizkhalife1 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-edsUrLXrlLg.html

​@@ChRis6i Hmm. Wonder why on red bull space jump, what was filmed at 38 km height, earth curved like a pear :D on every camera, except one. The interior camera, that was showing very similar to dogcam footage here. And mainstream claims that You should be able to see earths curvature from 10km. But You cant, not even from 33 km or 38 km or whatever height, bcz it's just not there. There are even individuals claiming that they seen curve watching over the ocean into the horizon :D

ARMIS M even though they cant see any curvature in this ballon flight, and if they saw all the evidences that support the claim that earth is flat they’ll still not believe us. Only those who really want to find it and seek the truth find it otherwise you’re just wasting ur time explaining this to people believe everything they see on main stream media

Considering the narrow field of view and the height that this footage is being taken from, there wouldn't actually be that much curvature to see. However, a small degree of curvature is CLEARLY visible in the footage. The earth is a spherical planet - 100% FACT. Just out of interest, do you know much about the flat earth model?

@@sailorman8668 I looked into it and the evidence is overwhelming. I can't find any real evidence for it being a sphere. The fact that we can see WAY too far really did it. Our navy can laser-target another ship 100 miles away. IMPOSSIBLE with a spherical planet with a circumference of ~24,000 miles. According to a calculator for the curvature of the earth a ship a 100 miles away should be 6,667+ feet below the horizon. And then when I saw flat earth maps on SO MANY flags of BIG organizations (like the UN; the International Maritime Org; World Meteorological Org; and International Civil Aviation Org) I'm like "WTF?!😳🤔🧐"

@@AmeKeaka ok lets test your claims, who's navy did 100 mile laser test and when?

@@AmeKeaka dont run away flat boy stand by your claims.

They had one...the one on the left

Sorry, a sunset just proved you wrong. Get a brain.

Nice religious belief.

+James Bondage That makes about as much sense as a screen door on a submarine.

+kyzer cube Pseudo-scientists claim that the sun is 300 times bigger than the Earth, & that it is 93 million miles away...

James Bondage A 32 mile wide sun would disappear beyond the so-called vanishing point from 3000 miles way. The flat earther's own "Law of Perspective" disproves the flat earth.

Look at the sunspot. (4:24)

Thats not a sunspot, lol. It's the only spot where the cloud cover is missing and sunlight is reflecting off the water. Look at any other space balloon video and you'll see what I'm talking about.

The moon is made of plasma and is not made of stone, I could show you a video where it is explained in detail

​@@marc-gp7wtlink please

​@@marc-gp7wtI'm in my journey of seeing through the bullshit right now. Need all the help I can get

can you send me this video? :) please :)@@marc-gp7wt

@@marc-gp7wt sorry to barge into the conversation, Where can I see that video?

Not local

It might make no sense to you!

@@hasmaldawn1611 maybe it's just beyond your level of comprehension 🤷‍♂️

@@showker28 No, I can quite easily comprehend a spinning ball floating endlessly through space. Not the terms I'd use of course, but no problem comprehending.

So 1 the sky is dark because of the light just like a normal day. 2 the curve is visible. 3 what pictures was the sun not reflected in?

+Brendan Callow The atmosphere is a part of our planet, it is not a separate entity even though we have a specific name for it. The atmosphere behaves exactly as it should be doing in the scientific model. There is NO contradiction here. The planet spins together with everything in its atmosphere, it has to or something would be way off in our understanding of the world. The huge cyclones proves that the earth is spinning, since they always rotate in one direction in the northern hemisphere and the other way in the southern hemisphere. So at large scale you can actually see the effect of earths rotation. But small scale things isnt affected. Earth does rotate rather slow. Imagine spinning a soccerball one revolution every 24 hours, quite boring huh. The centripetal force from earths rotation is also very small, but actually it is measureble. The gravity is lower by the equator than by the poles. That is a fact that cannot be explained in the flat earth model, like many other things. Nah, stop fooling yourself and start QUESTIONING your OWN thoughts. Until then you will not come any closer to understanding the world.

Franky Olivas Well yes, question everything. Science itself is being questioned all the time or it wouldnt be called science. And remember the scientific method. Any hypothesis you have about the nature and that you do experiments on has to be repeatable by anyone else or else your hypothesis may just be a fantasy.

Franky Olivas Go to the equator with a weight and a scale. Weigh the weight. Now go to any pole and do the same thing there. If your scale is precise enough (and not a counter weight scale) you will see different results. The weight difference isnt all due to the centripetal force, the bulge around the equator also means you are further from the center of the earth there which also means you will get a lower gravity from that factor also. The gravity on earth is actually quite deformed even compared to earth itself due to different densities within the earth. The lowest gravity on land you will find in Mexico and the highest gravity you will find in Scandinavia,

Franky Olivas Nah, I havent done it. I had no need to. But if I ever question the scientific earth is a globe model I would probably do it. Do you believe in oxygen? Have you seen oxygen? Do you believe that in every breath you take there is 78% of a another gas (nitrogen) that would actually suffocate you? What do you believe about the matter and why?

Franky Olivas Well, what ever works for you. Science has so far worked for me, I have never encountered anything that contradicts science, so I will continue to trust science till proven otherwise.

To bad millions of people all around the globe see the sun slowly sinking bottom first over the curve of the earth at sunset everyday, makes your childish flat pancake world sound rather silly, doesn't it kid, grow the fuck up.

nice joke kid

Then why does it remain the same exact size throughout the day?

@elyjahstark7549 That's not even true. Also if it was local then the exact opposite should happen.

@elyjahstark7549 You can prove it for yourself just by going outside for apparently the first time.

@elyjahstark7549 These supposed sun spots are just reflections and will change size and position depending on where you view them from. If it was local it should change size drastically throughout the day. I'd like to see how you determined that the horizon should be at the bottom of the screen in this video. Seems to me like you pulled that statement right out of your ass. At the height of the Burj Khalifa the difference between eye level and the horizon would be way too small to see. But the channel Wolfie6020 has shown that the horizon is below eye level at 40k feet.

@elyjahstark7549 Nowhere in there did you do use any math or physics despite what you continuously claimed.

I wonder if with that amount of logic you would be able to even able to send an email.

@elyjahstark7549 LOL Someone can't even write a decent retort. Pathetic.

I'm curious: why didn't you send it up with cameras facing up and down, in addition to outward?

Because the earth is flat and the sun is local

@@princeb_5922 lol.

@@princeb_5922 facts

@@princeb_5922 Are you one of these deluded and brain-dead flat earth believing fools? Do you actually know much about the flat earth model?

@Benson Davis To bad millions of people all around the globe see the sun slowly sinking bottom first over the curve of the earth at sunset everyday, makes your childish flat pancake world sound rather silly, doesn't it kid, grow the fuck up.

It's called perspective

Mate, this was only 20 miles up... use your brain a little bit

​@@tripwire3992 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-0pliyY5S11w.html.

Maybe instead of making assumptions, actually put it into a photoeditor and throw straight lines across the horizon. You'll instantly be able to see that the horizon is curved.

It's curved. Globe confirmed 💯🌎

You should care. The elites are lying and taking our tax Money for a hoax. This would show that we indeed live under a firmament and NASA is a fraudulent organization. That would make the elites illegitimate and prove the other conspiracies are more likely to be true.

Nautical: The term 'Nautical' originates from the Greek word 'nauti' meaning sailor. Astro- comes from the Greek ástron, meaning “star.”

@Brian Allen why do crazy people such as yourself get to create RU-vid accounts?

@@bucketmouthinc2937 why are the elites lying to us? And dont come to tell me you dont know, if you are going to discredit one thing, you must hace something to replace it, if you dont, you are just another foolish foil head

PLanet does not derive from "plane", what you said is embarrassingly stupid.