DON BRADMAN HOW TO PLAY CRICKET - SOUND 

Still not good enough, maybe after finishing U19 WC

Hehe

R u mad or what...he was the best cricket player ever....and he is no more...

😂

@@Indian2.5 r/wooooosh

No bro they used pad that days

@@srikantvalte4424 bruh

Farmer bowlers

@@yashjain5189 no matter who the bowlers are ....he scored 22k+ runs in first-class with 95+ avg and 99+ in international that's just outrageous... don't be just another salty Indian mate try to accept others greatness

@@arvind_lenin see u can't call him simply the greatest bcoz that time quality of bowling and int'l competition was very less.. Cricket is english game that time other countries and even England too don't knew how to play cricket.. I admit that he was the best at that time but being best in 10 good players and being best nowadays in crores good players is very very difficult..... I admit that if he was born in this era he might have even better career than that but Also believes that who knows he couldn't get selected in his school team... Who knows???? So stop comparing generations.... Bcoz cricket is an involving game every new generation player will have. More skils than the older.... For ex:- today players have more shots and time than sachin but it don't make them better than sachin bcoz sachin have unbelievable better record than them.. Mean skills wise today generation players are even better than sachin bcoz cricket evolves but record wise the better or best is sachin, what does it means now, it means never ever try to compare two generation players bcoz skills are not records , skills are shots, ability to finish the game See today player shot sweep, reverse sweep, reverse slap, paddle scoop that are shots which shows how much time these cricketer have to play a shot and u see in 2050 these shots will be no shots bcoz these will be played on almost every over, yes they have the finishing ability to bcoz of t20.... But former generation players are also goats... So, we can't compare different generation players.

Yes actually! No one noticed it 👍👍👍

Man*

Chow-darrrii

Yes mam

😆😆

Typical 30s music😂

HORRIBLE to watch! Looks like a kid playing cricket. He's technique is TERRIBLE. Would be found out in an over by modern bowlers.

@@pacus123 hw can u say that

@@pacus123 play without helmet and say

@Sushma Sharma bodyline???larwood larwood was 97 mph , 155 kmph bowler it was measured by using modern technology by analyzing video there is a documentary as well ,constatine,grifeth both were 145 kmph or may be even 150 ,Allen was 145kmph ,voce was 135 but very accurate and lefty,only 2 percent population in earth were lefty in 1930s now its 12 percent and voce ,larwood both bowled bodyline with 7 fielders in leg side ,the great west indies team never bowled bodyline with 7 fielders in leg side,the rule was changed in 1936.so nobody except bradmans team of 1932 has never faced true bodyline.bradman still averaged 57 .

@Sushma Sharma salty Indians, can't appreciate anyone other than their own favorites, get a life

Bowlers bowled slow but yeah who am i to judge

Bowlers were slow, bouncers weren't a thing back then. There was no reverse swing back then.

@@abhishekphand4789 So why did not more batsman have very high averages if you are correct?

www.cricketcountry.com/articles/busting-myths-about-the-bradman-era-the-don-s-average-on-sticky-wickets-was-20-29-19492 Do read this. How he was not that great as he is portrayed

@@charlick2 he had average of 20 on sticky wickets. And others had better on sticky wickets.

kyle mils like action

He drops his front arm too soon makes him off balance

Fidel Edwards like action

Similar to drug addict Shoaib lol

@@prashantsahu530 yeah that drug addict wrecked the whole toilet less nation 🤣

You are correct

Well said

Well said but truth is there will never be a batsman as great as Don

He wasn't the first mobile phone but an advanced IPHONE 20 and the current gen can't still catch upto him

Absolutely correct.

@The mOOON Inc. Thanks I'LL EDIT

that's 'average', not 'strike-rate', sixes don't matter lol

@@abhish1tiwari bhai mera yehi point hai ki un ho ne atish baazi se nahi toh pure cricketing shots khelkar ye records aur run banaye he. lol you didn't understand

Yeah back in the good old days people used to get more runs between the wickets than people do now... I guess main reason is because people don't really get entertained by that we all like 4s and 6s cricket has become a money making buissness anyways

yes he said the difference between six and four is only two runs,but the chance of a wicket fall is much more....also it's test cricket!!some people will even say It takes more talent to find a gap for a boundary than a over-boundary!

Maxi

Dravid had this capability but he does not use the bat move towards the area like swipe a carpet to do so, rather than he used to slap.

Batsman bro not batman 😂😂😂

@@shailesh30051970 😂

That'd be Christian Bale.

Sorry mate, Tendulkar for me

@@robhastings333 Tendulkar will not qualify as the best batsman of India let alone the greatest batsman of all time best batsman produced by India was Gavaskar

modern mean present

2050 when humans see your comment from mars - Every generation thinks they are modern

they are modern for their time

@@youtubesfinest9151 lmao assholes not understandingthat sm1 is just trying to show an observation which is true indeed and mistaking it for criticism

True to the core

I always thought he'd be quite average if he played today.

@@kbqwert no he was ahead of his time. He ran fast between the wickets and had a widw range of unorthodox shots. Here he is only showing orthodox.

So is Steve Smith's technique.

That was the era of racism dude

@@dhruvgarg7194 now is the time with reverse racism.

@@soundlessbird9181 i dont think so

@@dhruvgarg7194 look the what WHO had done, you will know what I mean.

You're talking about T20s, right?

@@dibyadipankarroy yes

@@dibyadipankarroy he's talking about the music and intro in this video.

Is there something going on the the sweaters? Do the various stripes indicate positions? Why would anyone wear knitted sweaters during a sports activity? Why no gloves for the fielders? The unis and equipment seem ridiculous, the bat is like a canoe paddle. Is this just tradition from this being a gentleman's lawn game? I'm learning to appreciate it and it is fun to watch and very interesting, just figuring out the rules lately but still wonder about the silly hats and baggy outifts.

Very good technique, I think he will average around 100 per game

His timing is very ,very good

No one is god, stop using this word Michael phelps the greatest swimmer ever born even never called as God how can someone could be god. It's really redicule

No buddy, the only parallel Steve Smith draws with Bradman is concentration, nothing else! He doesn't have technique, he's unorthodox in batting style and he never plays straight

Don't compare the third guy with the above two🤔

Everything to you is God !! There is no comparison Tendulkar played for himself and Kohli doesn't have good enough bowlers .. Bradman averages more than tendulkar and Kohli combined after his full career

No one outshines kohli.. Neither Bradman, nor Tendulkar and definitely not Smith

@@anandsingh7366 lmao this isn't India where you live in fairyland ...here stats matter .your brave indian side doesn't even tour New Zealand for the reason they are on their knees there

@@hardtalkbbc lol.. talking about stats.. Go and see kohli's.. THE GOAT!!

29 test tonnes and only 13 half-centuries. The guy was impossible to get out once he got his eye in.

@@MrBen51309 It seems like once he got set it was shut the gate, and a nightmare for the other team. So many scoring avalanches.

No like gavaskar

Absolutely wrong! Mate

Me

@@akashnegi8536 me to!

@@SushilKumar-oh1vf Or perhaps he has his own technique(quite weird or rare but comfortable for him), which he's mastered over the years.

@@amarpratap3102 actually smith has a kind of techniques which will get ineffective as he turn old.

@@SushilKumar-oh1vf Mate, why do you bring Virat into this? He's nowhere in the league, he's a good batsman, but lacks the range of shots, these great batsman have such as Dravid, Bradman, Tendulkar and Smith

Viv is the greatest ever

@@soumendunandy6536 maybe the second best, the don is the don.

@@srimantamaity3314 Don Bradman is the best batsman of all-time. Viv Richards second best for me.

I don't think so.

he definitely would...

Agree with you 100%....He would have taught these bowlers how not to teach daddy how to fuck.

viv,barry,sobers can also be very successful

@@abhishekphand4789 he is the most aggresive batsman cricket ever produced ( striked 70+ in that time when others scored at a rate between 20-30)

Nah,sachin is.

@@yotubepavit4544 😂😂😂 good joke!

@@ThankYouGoogle4 stfu,I ain't joking,sachin =all.

O bhai maaro mujhe maaro😂😂😂😂😂

he does not need to look at him when he moves to the leg side and slogs it on the off it is normal now but it was revolutionary then , Bradman , viv richards and sachin are three revolutionary batsmen who changed the way next generations batted, and that is probably why they are so highly regarded.

@Narendra Balapa I don't know about that dude. Sachin seemed to pioneer the attacking backfooted technique more than anyone else. Usually attack was on the front foot. But not Tendulkar. He was more dangerous on the back foot. And then De Villiers and others seemed to follow.

@@lonestar6709 how someone can give a statement on cricket without have a acknowledge of chandrpaul, when bradman was playing there were no body who had that achievement and still a big no. But when sachin was playing there were many legends dravid, Brian lara, Ricky, chandrpaul SANGAKARA, and there average and skill was awesome and it's shows sachin was great but not greatest of his generation.

A true batsman is the one who plays ground shots.

Don't get me wrong buddy, you need to do some work on cricket basics! Bradman is about Technique, watching the ball and loads and loads of patience and concentration

@@manivisu 🤣🤣🤣

Such a goddamn chutya u are

Mate, that's because they don't know cricket basics, most of them! They grew up in the T20 era

Possibly because they want to promote their man Sachin as number 1. But in my way of thinking where Bradman was born has nothing to do with it, who cares if he was born in Australia. He could have just as easily been born on the sub continent, in the UK, or anywhere else. He was just a freak, an anomaly, never to be seen again. Easily the greatest and any test captain in history from any country would pick him first if he was available for their team. All the subjective arguments are put forward, 'was easier then' 'bowlers weren't as fast' 'this reason that reason' etc etc, but it never stands up when you look at the averages through the history of the game, which have generally been the same all the way through from the next best down. Most test cricketers throughout the history of the game would see Bradman's average as an impossibility, to have it up that high throughout a career, except the fact he did it.

Bowls weren't that fast plus not much use of bouncers. And even Gavaskar and viv didn't use it

@@abhishekphand4789 yes..

@@prakashsuresh838 do read this www.cricketcountry.com/articles/busting-myths-about-the-bradman-era-the-don-s-average-on-sticky-wickets-was-20-29-19492

@@abhishekphand4789 oh really? So bodyline series was a joke?

@@talibhassan652 Talib Hassan did you read the article? It said back then pitches were batting friendly and fast bowlers were miserable back then it was a failure except bodyline series. Most of the attacks had 2-3 spinners and if you check bowlers with good average, most of them were spinners