The probability game here is incredible, because the entire structure of the routine is tied to spectators' decisions, which Dani works very well. And as they were worked on so well, the result was even better. Incredible, great work Dani. Thanks for the inspiration.
I think part of what you feel is due to the audio. You only hear Dani, and not in the best quality, and nothing else. You don't hear the other guys or the ambient. And since it's outdoor and surrounded by green, your brain expect a noticeable soundscape, but gets a bad Zoom audio quality instead.
It's the "I don't wanna touch it" moments, when he actually does a little touching. The 1st of the 4 who put the cards on the table, he took that piece of cards (while doing so, nicely put extra card(s) on top). After that he just has to make sure those cards stay on top when shuffling the other 3 parts (which he manifests sometimes by saying "very few cards, let ME do it for the camera, so he's 100% certain the correct cards stay on top)
@@rivenwhimsupongo que le enseña la carta que él quiere, pero es muy arriesgado, luego solo tiene que tener unas cuantas cartas iguales en top, no sé si será si, me da lo mismo, es increíblemente bueno
If somebody told me this was "just" a force I'd be like excuse me??? All three forces successfully performed at the same time for an audience that would absolutely suffer from cross forcing??? And even if which is a big if but anyway if that's true at all it doesn't even begin to explain how he draws the right cards from the top or where he draws them from. I think the only way to fully understand this trick would be to pause and peek at the entire deck hundreds of times over the course of a single presentation like you do when debugging something on a computer.
this trick can only be accomplished with special cards that can transform on the spot or accomplices… 🤔 otherwise it’s impossible, there is no sleight of hands, and the card is not known until the very end….. weird.
This trick uses subconsciously agreed accomplices, otherwise 1 in 52 times the second card would be the one already found, and not only that never happens, magicians are very aware of such probabilities, and this trick not preventing that occurrence from ruining it by giving people a big reason to think there are accomplices, is evidence of the magician's tranquility, knowing that that 1 in 52 will never happen. There are other combinations of cards that would ruin this trick by suggesting accomplices, like two aces, two figures, or consecutive cards of the same suit, but that never happens. Again, by supposedly letting people think of a card at the beginning of the trick, and only sharing it at the end, those ugly 1 in 52 occurrences are not prevented; because those people are accomplices.
@@danidaortiz_oficial igual sé que para que aparezcan arriba del mazo hiciste magia en serio. Sos el mejor de todos los tiempos, deberías eliminar ese pequeño detalle, tu habilidad ya no necesita engañar.
@@enriquesanchezhernandez5577 me acaba de salir este vídeo en utube, yo creo que el mago lo que hace es obligar al 10 de picas enseñándoselo al espectador (podría ser otra mientras él lo tenga controlado ), además debe tener ordenada la baraja para que dé igual el número de cartas que le da al otro espectador que si cuenta 3 pues el tres quedará arriba ( es decir si Elías en este caso le da tres cartas, el taquito del otro señor luce tal que 3,2,1 del palo que ha elegido el otro señor), ya que este montón no se baraja, lo demás todo sencillo. Lo que no logro descifrar muy bien es el orden en la baraja para que dé igual el palo que diga el espectador que pueda dejar ese orden de palos encima del mazo. Lo demás genial. Lo que daría por pasar un día con este señor... Al menos eso he sacado en claro viéndolo una vez. Como debe ser la magia
