Elon musk is responsisble for all the problems in the world, spreading dissinformation. NOT tony blair "weopons of mass destruction" causing the deaths of millions.....
Israel is such a bit$ch, you just can't trust a woman like that, can you? Are Zionists useful idiots of the Rothchild's “It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal.” ― Henry Kissinger what does friends of Israel mean, is it a euphemism for sycophants of Rothchild's? with friends like Israel, who, needs enemies.? Is the male Circumcised penis, the mark of the slave, the mark of the beast the slave mark of Yahweh? Three rules of life.. 1) You don't ask a man his salary. 2) You don't ask a woman her age. 3) You don't ask Israel for evidence. I don't suppose this comment will get any love. lol
Mind Begs the Question: ▪︎If those once Dehumanized as Rats/Human Animals ▪︎Dehumanize others as Human Animals ▪︎Following footsteps of their Oppressors,no?
Should Douglas Murray, Elon Musk & Donald Trump stop being Netanyahu's little bit$ch and grow a pair.? Neither Israel nor the USA care about international law, unless they can use it for their own benefit.
Douglas Murray- Smart, well spoken, knowledged, well read, well traveled, experienced, common sensed, fair minded, are just some of his attributes, and as many of his fellow countrymen, ashamed to see the country of his birth be treated with such distain from its ELECTED LEADERS. What more could anyone want? Men like Murray would be a man worth listening to and following. The world needs men like Douglas to be leaders. Fair, honest people. Oh if only. The politicians of today are self serving, hypocrites. Mind you in Canada we have Pierre P. running against our very Corrupt Trudeau govt. We're all counting the days to the next election. Hang in UK were all fighting the same bizarre corruption in our govts. ????????? Makes no sense.😮
GK Chesterton too: a prophetic fighter against big finance that is the real enemy, controls everything (politicians, judges, police, media, star system, culture, ...) and wants to destroy Christian identity and traditional family because they are the greatest obstacle to full control over people. Muslim immigrants are part of the plan (also to exploit the resulting riots in order to impose a de facto dictatorship). Read GK Chesterton. Some quotes: The crimes of England, 1916: "The libel law [is] now used, not to crush lies about private life, but to crush truths about public life." What's wrong with the world, 1910: "In the quarrel earlier alluded to between the energetic Progressive and the obstinate Conservative (or, to talk a tenderer language, between Hudge and Gudge), the state of cross-purposes is at the present moment acute. The Tory says he wants to preserve family life in Cindertown; the Socialist very reasonably points out to him that in Cindertown at present there isn't any family life to preserve. But Hudge, the Socialist, in his turn, is highly vague and mysterious about whether he would preserve the family life if there were any; or whether he will try to restore it where it has disappeared. It is all very confusing. The Tory sometimes talks as if he wanted to tighten the domestic bonds that do not exist; the Socialist as if he wanted to loosen the bonds that do not bind anybody. The question we all want to ask of both of them is the original ideal question, "Do you want to keep the family at all?" If Hudge, the Socialist, does want the family he must be prepared for the natural restraints, distinctions and divisions of labor in the family. He must brace himself up to bear the idea of the woman having a preference for the private house and a man for the public house. He must manage to endure somehow the idea of a woman being womanly, which does not mean soft and yielding, but handy, thrifty, rather hard, and very humorous. He must confront without a quiver the notion of a child who shall be childish, that is, full of energy, but without an idea of independence; fundamentally as eager for authority as for information and butter-scotch. If a man, a woman and a child live together any more in free and sovereign households, these ancient relations will recur; and Hudge must put up with it. He can only avoid it by destroying the family, driving both sexes into sexless hives and hordes, and bringing up all children as the children of the state--like Oliver Twist. But if these stern words must be addressed to Hudge, neither shall Gudge escape a somewhat severe admonition. For the plain truth to be told pretty sharply to the Tory is this, that if he wants the family to remain, if he wants to be strong enough to resist the rending forces of our essentially savage commerce, he must make some very big sacrifices and try to equalize property. The overwhelming mass of the English people at this particular instant are simply too poor to be domestic. They are as domestic as they can manage; they are much more domestic than the governing class; but they cannot get what good there was originally meant to be in this institution, simply because they have not got enough money. The man ought to stand for a certain magnanimity, quite lawfully expressed in throwing money away: but if under given circumstances he can only do it by throwing the week's food away, then he is not magnanimous, but mean. The woman ought to stand for a certain wisdom which is well expressed in valuing things rightly and guarding money sensibly; but how is she to guard money if there is no money to guard? The child ought to look on his mother as a fountain of natural fun and poetry; but how can he unless the fountain, like other fountains, is allowed to play? What chance have any of these ancient arts and functions in a house so hideously topsy-turvy; a house where the woman is out working and the man isn't; and the child is forced by law to think his schoolmaster's requirements more important than his mother's? No, Gudge and his friends in the House of Lords and the Carlton Club must make up their minds on this matter, and that very quickly. If they are content to have England turned into a beehive and an ant-hill, decorated here and there with a few faded butterflies playing at an old game called domesticity in the intervals of the divorce court, then let them have their empire of insects; they will find plenty of Socialists who will give it to them. But if they want a domestic England, they must "shell out," as the phrase goes, to a vastly greater extent than any Radical politician has yet dared to suggest; they must endure burdens much heavier than the Budget and strokes much deadlier than the death duties; for the thing to be done is nothing more nor less than the distribution of the great fortunes and the great estates. We can now only avoid Socialism by a change as vast as Socialism. If we are to save property, we must distribute property, almost as sternly and sweepingly as did the French Revolution. If we are to preserve the family we must revolutionize the nation. ... The superstition of divorce, 1920: "It is exceedingly characteristic of the dreary decades before the War that the forms of freedom in which they seemed to specialise were suicide and divorce. I am not at the moment pronouncing on the moral problem of either; I am merely noting, as signs of those times, those two true or false counsels of despair; the end of life and the end of love. Other forms of freedom were being increasingly curtailed. Freedom indeed was the one thing that progressives and conservatives alike contemned. Socialists were largely concerned to prevent strikes, by State arbitration; that is, by adding another rich man to give the casting vote between rich and poor. Even in claiming what they called the right to work they tacitly surrendered the right to leave off working. Tories were preaching conscription, not so much to defend the independence of England as to destroy the independence of Englishmen. Liberals, of course, were chiefly interested in eliminating liberty, especially touching beer and betting. It was wicked to fight, and unsafe even to argue; for citing any certain and contemporary fact might land one in a libel action. As all these doors were successfully shut in our faces along the chilly and cheerless corridor of progress (with its glazed tiles) the doors of death and divorce alone stood open, or rather opened wider and wider. ... As we have already seen papers and public men to-day make a vast parade of the necessity of setting the poor man free to get a divorce. Now why are they so mortally anxious that he should be free to get a divorce, and not in the least anxious that he should be free to get anything else? ... The answer is, I regret to say, that this social campaign, in most though by no means all of its most prominent campaigners, relies in this matter on a very smug and pestilent piece of chalk. There are some advocates of democratic divorce who are really advocates of general democratic freedom; but they are the exceptions; I might say, with all respect, that they are the dupes. The omnipresence of the thing in the press and in political society is due to a motive precisely opposite to the motive professed. The modern rulers, who are simply the rich men, are really quite consistent in their attitude to the poor man. It is the same spirit which takes away his children under the pretence of order, which takes away his wife under the pretence of liberty. That which wishes, in the words of the comic song, to break up the happy home, is primarily anxious not to break up the much more unhappy factory. Capitalism, of course, is at war with the family, for the same reason which has led to its being at war with the Trade Union. This indeed is the only sense in which it is true that capitalism is connected with individualism. Capitalism believes in collectivism for itself and individualism for its enemies. It desires its victims to be individuals, or (in other words) to be atoms. For the word atom, in its clearest meaning (which is none too clear) might be translated as "individual." If there be any bond, if there be any brotherhood, if there be any class loyalty or domestic discipline, by which the poor can help the poor, these emancipators will certainly strive to loosen that bond or lift that discipline in the most liberal fashion. If there be such a brotherhood, these individualists will redistribute it in the form of individuals; or in other words smash it to atoms. The masters of modern plutocracy know what they are about. They are making no mistake; they can be cleared of the slander of inconsistency. A very profound and precise instinct has let them to single out the human household as the chief obstacle to their inhuman progress. Without the family we are helpless before the State, which in our modern case is the Servile State. To use a military metaphor, the family is the only formation in which the charge of the rich can be repulsed. It is a force that forms twos as soldiers form fours; and, in every peasant country, has stood in the square house or the square plot of land as infantry have stood in squares against cavalry. How this force operates this, and why, I will try to explain in the last of these articles. But it is when it is most nearly ridden down by the horsemen of pride and privilege, as in Poland or Ireland, when the battle grows most desperate and the hope most dark, that men begin to understand why that wild oath in its beginnings was flung beyond the bonds of the world; and what would seem as passing as a vision is made permanent as a vow."
Mind Begs the Question: ▪︎If Douglas Murray argues ▪︎Attacking Mosques/Synagogues wrong ▪︎But Citizens rightly concerned about Muslim/Jewish Immigrants ▪︎Douglas Murray is more - Jewish or Nazi?
Should Douglas Murray, Elon Musk & Donald Trump stop being Netanyahu's little bit$ch and grow a pair.? Neither Israel nor the USA care about international law, unless they can use it for their own benefit.
@HumanBeingsRThinkingBeings What the hell is even that? When was there a call that AirStripOne slaves were concerned about Jewish immigrants?????????????
Mind Begs the Question: ▪︎Hitler diverted blame for Govts Failures/Corruption on Immigrants ▪︎If Politicians,Media divert blame for Govts Failures/Corruption on Immigrants/Muslims ▪︎Hitlers strategies reuse,no?
I'm always impressed by individuals who can convey ideas and topics in a clear and concise way as Murray does in his interviews. If I could go back in time to my school years, knowing what I do now, I would probably do well to study both history and current affairs more thoroughly, along with joining a debating society or similar.
@@nafs53I'm from Northern Ireland and studied history to a masters level. I decided to read Douglas book on the topic of NI, absolute garbage. He's a bit of a snake oil salesman, says the soundbites of what people of a certain political ideology want to hear. Mainly because he conveys his message in an eloquent English accent he comes across well. Doesn't take much scratching of the surface to see his arguments are built on shaky foundations, to put it politely.
@michael37377 this is England and he's 100% correct....he has the evidence and we see the truth all around us...read his other books. You remind me of a man I know who is dead jealous of Alan Titchmarsh's gardening prowess and insults him for no good reason.
@@valeriegrimshaw1365 not at all, I acknowledged his eloquence and speaking skills. His one book on NI is not the only source I have analysed. I also find his take on Palestine extremely problematic and misinformed, or worse, directly complicit with Israel.
Judges don't have time to look through papers. 98% goes on what is said in court on the day. All the papers are a waste of time - the more papers the better - they can charge more! Generally it's a debate based on lies with the referee [Judge] dishing out the sentences. Its no good protesting or trying to have any further discussion his mind has already been made up. Deepest pockets biggest money wins more money you bigger lies. The police are not much better - well if they don't twist what is said then nobody would go to jail.
Mind Begs the Question: ▪︎If Judiciary,Police are too weak ▪︎To arrest clearly Criminal Politicians ▪︎Who support Starvation,Death Camps,Gassing (White Phosphorus),Ethnic Cleansing,etc ▪︎Judiciary,Police serving - Nation or Elites/Criminals?
The UK needs hundreds of prominent brave people like Douglas Murray to stand up for the people of the UK and give the people a VOICE... they are being silenced in the New Dystopia.
True danger from the right comes from likes of Douglas Murray George Kerevan More importantly, the alt-right needs to forge a new political and social narrative if it is to successfully destroy the old social democratic consensus or even kill off One-Nation Tory liberalism. And for this it needs a new breed of right-wing intellectuals with a sophisticated suite of ideas. These are the folk to worry about. They include the suave, slightly manic Douglas Murray, who is Londonborn but whose mother hails from the Isle of Lewis and speaks Gaelic. Murray has emerged as perhaps the leading alt-right ideologue of the younger generation.
Should Douglas Murray stop being Netanyahu's little bitch and grow a pair. Labelling people who criticize Israel as "anti-Semitic" is like labelling anyone who criticizes Obama as racist. Totally ridiculous.
EU human rights cannot be applied to the UK after Brexit as far as I'm concerned, this is what the UK voted for. They call it independence and freedom.
Remember, actor / commentator Lawrence Fox was arrested in the UK a few months ago, reportedly for arguing against additional cameras on the street and their (mis)use. Rowan Atkinson is right, and especially Douglas Murray.
It's it terrible how bit by bit, corrosion in govt. is allowed to chipped away at the fabric of traditions and commonality, that makes a country unique unto its self. I would say that the whole of the UK is stepped in its rich traditions of its Britishness. It's the reason I loved visiting there. Always loved the UK, and I am very very sad to see this insanity play out in such a destructive way. Harrods in London was world-renowned. It's been a long time since being there, but I have a feeling maybe I'll just remember the good old times.
Another free country that untill last 10 yrs or so was doing well, NOW NOT SO MUCH. Maybe the REAL PANDEMIC is-??????? What is happening in the free-ist, most welcoming country's on this planet? Why have all these country's govts. seem to be ignoring the people that voted them into power? Its just very odd. We all seem to have leaders that are not doing what the majority wants? Ok, did these leaders actually get voted in? Was the voting run legally?? I mean all free country's seem to be suffering the same problems. Asylum seekers, overtaking legal immigration, running ruffshot over the indigenous peoples rights and getting away with it, with little reprimand from govt or police. Huge inflex of 3rd world people in our city's, screaming and protesting their rights, while our rights are ignored. Prices so high many ,many people struggle. Asylum seekers struggle too butnl they have their own kind of survival. Steal from anyone they come in contact with. Steal purses, steal cars, squatt in homes, steal from anyone you can. Not all are these people, but too many are. So why is this happening all over the world, to free democracy country's. Seems weird happening all over the globe at the same time. Something smells off.
The glee from that prat as he says "you may be 2 or 3 hundred miles from home" is disgusting. He knows exactly what he is saying,you won't be getting prison visits. What a vile animal!
It's bad enough to be putting ppl in prison for such ridiculous reasons but it's cruel and unusual to put them hundreds of miles away. This would make it very hard for their families to visit them.
Some homeless people might think that a heated prison cell with TV and 3 meals a day with change of clothes and bedding an improvement on their current living conditions.
Freedom of speech should include the right to say whatever you believe. Even those with whom you disagree, should have that right. We choose to be offended, but being offended does not make you right, or allowed to become violent. Nobody has the right to injure or kill.
Every time I hear a UK politician say "full forceoftheLAW...!" it sounds like a magical incantation by cultists, as if saying it over and over will restore order to the world.
In canada it's, Everything is on the table, yup, well the table looks pretty empty to us. Lol just catch phrases. Means nothing just sounds good. Lol imbeciles speak catch phases.
@@Steve_the_lion1075 fair enough, I suppose it depends on how well you know it and being very careful with wording as it's a minefield. I studied it a fair bit a few years back and after watching quite a few cases, it was never successful. I'm all for common law and will die before accepting Sharia which is coming with this 😡😡 fkin government
Charge the PM. He is clearly breaking the law. Two tier policing should not just be a slogan. It should be an offence. If one abuse the law to use it against those who object to his policies at the expence defending the citizens from actual crimes, it must be unlawful
Every nation has elements in it who will happily act like thugs, especially if they are doing so with the approval of the State. Individuals with a high profile may well escape as Douglas recognises, but overall it is very dangerous for the country to behave as it is doing because although the average citizen is largely powerless, these actions create forces government cannot withstand.
These poor people need a good lawyer. A human rights lawyer. And not just any old human rights lawyer. A top shelf one. One totally dedicated to all human rights, including freedom of expression. One so dedicated to the justice of the cause he has been rewarded at the highest level. For example by being given a knighthood by the King. Oh, wait a minute…….
Meanwhile: Parliamentary privilege grants certain LEGAL IMMUNITIES for Members of both Houses to allow them to perform their duties WITHOUT INTERFERENCE from outside of the House. Parliamentary privilege includes FREEDOM OF SPEECH and the right of both Houses to regulate their own affairs.
All country's are taking notice of just how far out of country we have been voting in some maybe not so good people to small power positions. Go to India any foreigners in their govt. 😅 no way. Terrorists rule Palistianians (Hamas) we kind, unexspecting country's have to wake up. We're setting ourselves up to be taken over in our own country's. Last laugh is on us. Accommodation gets us removed, replaced, taken over. No matter how you put it, its a scary scenario. With a very sad ending. Not sure if it's real, but evidence is pointing in those unnerving directions.
Douglas Murray is fantastic - we need people like him , and others speaking out against this ridiculous government, police and judicial - i have never known anything like it. Its heartbreaking.
Just recently hooked up with X and have posted a petition to get the new stalin out, it's had 133,000, & looking for 150,000, 🎉😂 Keep up the grand work 👏 👌 👍
Can listen to Douglas all day I would love him to be are prime minister labour government are a disgrace the king needs to deslove we must protect freedom of speech at all Cost thank you Elon ✊
The most important thing about Rowan Atkinson isn't that he's a "great comedian" - but that he's a good bloke. (Unlike Graham Linehan's or JK Rowling's colleagues who all pushed them under the bus and ran away, when they also put basic decency and truthfulness ahead of Woke lies and cowardly conformism.)
You are right Rita, the UK has a two tier justice system and it's quite frightening for us but we all watched from afar, the treatment your State officials dished out during the Convid Lockdowns. That was also very frightening to citizens of any country. It appears that we have a lot in common in regards over-reach from the elected officials!
Douglas Murray and Jordan Peterson for PM of their respective countries! Imagine how much better off everyone in these countries would be... one can dream.
