@@AniMatrix0101 yeah just have a human being on payroll checking the theoretically thousands of games or even hundreds of games happening. That's totally going to happen. Companies totally care enough to hire employees specifically to be GMs for their games.
@@AniMatrix0101 People are good actors and will pretend to not have cheats. An overwatch system could possibly work for the blatant cheaters but what if people are using walls and can hide it well. With that in mind replays are not hard evidence. We've seen so many FPS players with controversial replays who are legit. I'm not saying a replay system isn't a good idea but that it's not that simple to catch cheaters.
Bro the anti-cheat system would literally need to be a psychical entity that break's the cheaters knee caps whenever they are caught using mods in order for this to even remotely work out.
Nah imagine the anti-cheat is a hyper-intelligent AI a la Jarvis that watches every player in every match and acts as a director, causing special events to trigger, rare items to spawn and all kinds of shit when it deems appropriate, and can instantly detect when someone is using cheats and instantly bans them whenever they do. The technology isn't there unless Doc is from the year 2323 but it would be hype.
After watching this, it crossed my mind that Dr. D might not fully comprehend how life-changing $100,000 can be, especially for someone from a third-world country. A ton of people would be willing to commit actual crimes in the real world for that kind of money, let alone cheat in a game.
@@chriswilson9748 yh but most in the 1st world wouldn’t commit a crime for a one time payment of 100k. It might be different in the 3rd world because things are a lot cheaper so that kind of money might set you up for life…
@@insidescuffI mean unless you are filthy rich people probably would. You spend time and money earning crypto based items that add up to 100k then someone just takes it from you. I could see that either leading to some real psychotic individuals or weirdos finding ways to get that stuff from people.
@@insidescuffyeah I would😂 I have, I’ve done it for less. I know 2 killers that did it for nothing but a little bit of drugs🤷♂️ I myself have no issue selling weed and acid to highschool kids, I won’t sell em no bad shit and won’t fuck em over, but I hardly care for their well being if I’m selling em drugs I’m pretty sure, I love drugs, but society says they are very bad, so I must not care, is what I’ve come to😂 I had 20k and weight in meth, shrooms, weed/wax Just tryna get out a damn motel 6. Id do sum shit for 100k bruh, I HATED selling meth. Watch best friends from kindergarten lose their minds in the parking lot… And I know I helped their plug get that cheap, and I didn’t se to my best friend, but helping his plug get a deal, helping him get a deal…. Also, I know I cared cuz that shit still breaks my heart…. Acid ain’t nearly as bad as some people say… you’ll survive. Meth isn’t either, but it’s all true about not sleeping…. And it’s heart breaking… That’s a lot of people’s kids that addicted to drugs versus like,,, just offing 1 person🤷♂️🤷♂️ Desperation makes people do crazy shit, they didn’t even think they would do… like survivor stories where people turn cannibals… It’s not comparable, but watching your family starve and hurt for generation, you’ll do sum shit bro… to take care of your mom and your daughter, you’ll do sum shit 100k ain’t a whole lot, but atleast you’ll be safe for a bit.
He's been out of touch for a long long time. He was interesting to watch for a brief period, but it's clear how desperate he is these days to try and chase trends and not really create anything of value, just make a quick buck off his gullible younger viewers, since most of the older ones left.
@@yurilopes420 Yes, but he also makes them seem like a representative of all nfts. They would never cover a project that showed actual promise or they would get drug through the mud like Lazy Peon did for having a sponsored NFT game.
I just imagine playing this with an online buddy you’ve been gaming with for several years and you’re like “oh my god I found a $500k nft!” Then he teamkills you and you never hear from him again
@@Stupidhead17 I might just play it for the rage I want the toxic Community I got back in Modern Warfare 2 the one that turned boys into men and if anything this game is at least marketing that for me and that's a definite Buy in my book as long as it doesn't come out as a scam or anything which I agree with Charlie I don't think he would commit die on his career like that.
Anything is only worth as much as someone is willing to pay for it. He can also come out and say: "Imagine finding an item that's worth 500 Billion!!11!" If no one pays for it, it won't be worth sh1t
What's truly baffling is even doctor disrespect himself experienced hackers against him while playing tournaments that were anywhere from five thousand to ten thousand dollars. And that was in War zone right when it came out.The fact that he doesn't believe that there is going to be cheaters in either his game or tournaments is mind blowing
when you're involved with NFTs/crypto, the amount of money is so large that there's no way he would ever be allowed to say anything remotely critical of it like that
@TheSuperappelflap exactly. Now don't get me wrong, I love Doc and what he is doing, but maybe his ambitions are a little bit too high for what he wants to achieve. And on the flip side, if there are in fact cheaters, and they do indeed cheat and win, there better be some damn great auditing for the win. I do think it would be hilarious to imagine if they did catch someone cheating, the run the tournament again but minus out the cheaters.
i fear the negative implications of losing a 100k item in a game, imagine losing life changing money like that, some dudes gonna go ghost if he loses that.
@@OrphansCorpse Except that this game is linked to real money, money that could (Theoretically) change someone and their whole families lives. It's honestly some black mirror shit, trying to extract in a game in order to feed your family. If you think it will be casual players trying to have fun, it won't be. It simply cannot be, if there is any sort of money involved. Even if items are $50 there would be an industry built around farming those items. It's not a game anymore if the items can change your real life. If you don't think people will kill themselves after being denied life changing money, you don't really understand the real world.
@@frankguy6843 read my comment again. It's not the games fault if some loser offs themselves over it. Edit: People need to take accountability for their actions. " trying to extract in a game in order to feed your family" I've never read such stupidness in my life. If someone needs to feed their family, and they choose to solve that playing a video game, then that family has bigger problems. How about selling the PC they are playing on huh ? the irony of you telling someone about living in the real world lol I can't deal with logic that low, so this conversations has ended. Reply if you wish, just know I won't read it, or reply back. You're just factually wrong.
Imagine extracting with a team and winning a 100,000$ item. And now your fighting with you buddies to receive the fair share of earnings. That would literally destroy friendships
The idea that there will be no cheaters is just adorable. Just him saying that will draw in cheaters just to spite him, regardless of the financial motivation.
invasive hardware/software check before cashing out an item. real world identification. background checking process that takes a few days and is run by real people, etc. many solutions to this. doc has been playing games longer than most here have been alive, hes aware of cheaters.
Yeah but Charlie is spouting regurgitated info about NFTs, like its only the fox news bad version of NFTs. If we didnt like it when people called us morons with laptops, smart phones, and the internet, why are we doing the same and not examining the good sides of NFT? Clearly the internet is both good and bad, its not just for human trafficking and stealing bank info. edit: literally I wouldnt be surprised if Charlie has no IDEA what NFT, crypto, blockchains are positively capable of and why the concept was brought up in the first place. FTX and scams is 20% of this genre but is talked about like it's 100% of its potential. But researching this concept isn't good content I guess.
The original Baldur's Gate came out in 1998, you could import your character and their items into the sequel in 2001 and also one of the expansions, in fact there was an easter egg questline spanning all three that required an item from each game to complete. You 100% don't need NFTs or the blockchain to transfer your items or skins between games, it's a unwanted "solution" to a problem that has never existed.
You could do it in freaking Quest For Glory! That was on the DOS back when computers couldn't even get 256 colors, IT'S THAT OLD. And for QFG you not only could bring items up but if they weren't in the next game the intro explained why you didn't have the items. Also Champions of Norrath (that Everquest spinoff), that was cool, first PS2 game I had that did save transferring AND you could also transfer your character and inventory to a new game+ OR to and from a co-op save file, on top of the transfer to the sequel. And Dragon Age did it for your playthrough's decisions shaping the sequels' worlds so it would remember who died, what you did, and who your heroes were. It was wonky though because Bioware can't debug their stuff ugh. You 200% don't need NFTs or blockchains. Just a few flags set to on or off.
the idea behind NFTs though is the fact that if you own x item in this game, you will own it in any other game, it's a bit different from just importing a character while it would be cool to own a legendary item across different games, you're gonna need the games to implement that item, which is the main problem with this entire idea of NFT items in games
I CANNOT wait for this to release, its going to the biggest honey trap for cheaters from every other game on the market, it will clear them out so we can finally have some fun.
that’s not how cheating works 😂 if i get banned for cheating on one game, it quite literally doesn’t effect my status on ANY OTHER GAME (even games by the same company)
@@deagle2yadome696 hes saying there will be a little bit of time that people will stop cheating in say rust or day z and will go play dead drop instead. Nothing about them getting banned. Its a good lure away from other games for a little while
Dr. Disrespect has failed to realize that his 100k item is only worth a 100k if someone is willing to pay 100k for it. Which will never happen, for the reasons Charlie mentioned, and also because it just won't.
Yeah, that was my immediate reaction, too. Where is this money supposed to come from? An item isn't actually worth 100k just because the game slaps that price tag on it.
nah, they will, people dump shit loads of money on vtubers and such, some of them go as far as to dumping 10k$ daily. There will 100% be someone who buys them, an idiot. Than this idiot won't be able to sell it any further. PPL bought fuckin ape pictures for milions of dollars.
EXACLTY. I think he's realize he can't be doing this shit forever, so he's gonna try to milk his audience for everything and then bail eventually. If his audience doesn't care they got fked over, then he'll move on to his next scheme.
@Frank so true. It’s really the main ingredient in crypto scams of this type having a large trusting loyal following built in. Not many are launched saying “this guy/gal wouldn’t not scam their scam their audience!”. Now I will say most of them are transparently scams and all of us outside looking in can see it for what it is and those behind it for what they are- and it’s really hard to imagine Dr Disrespect being one of those scumbags.. but on the other hand when has ANY project that’s not a scam hype up it’s use of NFT’s? It’s literally yet to be seen!
Even if you assume there will be zero cheaters, no one is gonna have fun with this game. It would be the most high stress toxic inducing game there is... The rage and toxic behavior would be on a new level.
Yeah, this was my immediate thought. People will optimize the fun out of games that have no real-life reward. People will say the most horribly racist and toxic shit they can think of in a casual non-ranked League match. The idea that people won't play as scummy and toxic as possible when real money is on the line is ludicrous.
This is actually good news for gamers! All of the hackers will be busy fighting each other in this sesspool of a game while we all can enjoy our normal games again
"He wouldn't scam anyone, that would be career suicide!" -every scam victim ever. I've heard too many versions of that line too many times before. I don't know Dr. Disrespect, I don't even watch him. But from the outside looking on, no matter how little sense it makes for these creators to do this, it's always the same story every time. I can't imagine that the pattern would start changing now.
And claims like “finding items worth $100k” just add fuel to the fire! Who pays for these? Why would it be worth that much? How is it worth that much? It just seems so badly thought out that every red flag goes off in my head
This is 100% true. I honestly can't see how anyone in the world, even if they have no experience of videogames, could see it any other way. There is either another way that he is thinking he can earn a massive amount of money from this that he hasn't disclosed yet (charges for NFT resale? Charges for different character profiles? etc.), Or he is unbelievably disillusioned. There are farms, millions of people that earn a (admittedly shitty ) amount of money to exploit games for others. This is a magnet. It's going to fail straight out the door.
i think he's realize he can't be doing this shit forever, so he's gonna try to milk his audience for everything and then bail eventually. If his audience doesn't care they got fked over, then he'll move on to his next scheme.
I see serious flaws in the critique of this game. DR disrespect isnt the one setting the prices, the secondary market is making those valuations. Its no different than the current secondary markets for games like CS Rocket League. Certain items are high in demand because of that they can command a premium. In the hypothetical put forth by Dr Disrepect, he is just saying there could be an item thats worth a lot on the secondary. In order for that item to be worth a lot, the market has to see the value. They wont see value if no one is playing the game for fun and nobody cares about the game. So if the game isnt fun, there wont be anyone investing their time in playing the game. If people arent willing to exchange their time for fun, then you wont have a secondary market for the in game items. Cheating is a problem is all competitive games, Play to Earn mechanics does nothing to change that dynamic. Players will stop playing a game if its competitively unbalanced, or if it has rampant cheating. There is no competitive game coming out, that doesn't have to commit serious resources to anti-cheat systems. Just like they also have to spend a lot of time balancing the gameplay, weapons, map...etc. The only thing the blockchain introduces is it provides the user to custody their own items and not have to rely on the game publisher as a gatekeeper. In order for this game to work, it has to be fun and not a job. Games like Axie Infinity were not fun, they were just ponzis dressed up around a "game". No one was playing Axie because they were having a good time. They were only playing the game to breed more axies which they could dump on the secondary. At a certain point the secondary market dried up because no one actually wanted to play the agme for fun. It was just people breeding axies and selling them for cheaper and cheaper prices. If Dead Drop is just a generic FPS with bad hit detection, poorly designed maps, unbalanced weapons...etc the game will fail. Tacking on blockchain or Play 2 Earn does nothing to address the fundamentals of the actual game.
Because he is the highest skilled video game player. Dude makes thousands doing so. So he will continue to be up in the ranks till its his time to come down. So keep crying 🤣
Dr. Disrespect needs a miracle to actually have absolutely no cheaters. If in another universe he actually creates a foolproof anti-cheat software that actually works, that'd be world breaking in the gaming community
You can 100% restrict the item to be sold until x happens and take it back at will. If you try to sell a high value item you could go through a vod review process to prove you didn't cheat.
The closest way I could see it working is if once you got an item, it entered a profile wallet, like steam's inventory system, and it couldn't be stolen from someone. Idk how this could happen or would work.
If this game defies all logic and indeed becomes a success then it's highly possible that every major gaming companies will try to shove NFTs down our throats once again.
The average gamer won’t have the resources to dump into something like this that literally works off nfts we already know that those in themselves are just a waste so for him to center the game around it is just asking for the game to fail remember the other game that tried to do the nft thing they shit down so damn quick
Add a mutant hunting segment where you've got an unholy hybrid mess to capture, and have to use real-world logic to find where it'd be living before your time runs out. THAT actually sounds neat ngl.
Only way i can think of to somewhat **Combat** the cheaters would be to implement some sort of Time Lock on the NFT's you extract with. If the cheater was detected within that Time Frame, the NFT's either get deleted/gifted or returned to the players they killed for it. But this in itself im sure would have other side effects too.
@@user-ym1xj1qy8e Guess you didn't hear the news.. live services have been dying left and right due to market saturation. Most of the upcoming live services are being canceled. Majority of gamers really don't like live services, they have huge update packages which suck for anyone who doesn't have unlimited data, you have to have internet to play them.. so if your internet goes down, you can't enjoy the damn game you paid for, and the worst thing of all... the predatory monetization. They build in unfun gameplay loops to drive players towards monetization. Just look at Warzone.. they change the damn gun meta every time they want you to buy something.
The best thing to do for this game's longevity is to split it into two game modes: a "for fun" game mode that is entirely f2p and is essentially tarkov/vigor in a different setting, and a "for stakes" game mode to participate in the Ethereum mining sweat-swamp that requires a linked up account to play. At least that way it would coalesce the problems there into an area possible to focus on.
“You can’t funge the un-fungible, goddamit! The non-fungible will stay non-funged!” Probably the greatest statement that has ever spurted from someone’s meat masher. Kudos
Bro got caught cheating on his wife; so im guessing he figures the mass public will never see him as a good guy anyways LOL. Not to mention his streaming career is def falling since pubg so nows the perfect time to scam everyone and retire lol. I cant believe he thinks everyone wont think this.
Imagine if this game becomes the first to require a social security number and other forms of personal ID just to make an account. Then again, maybe that would just encourage identity theft and account hacking which just creates a different security problem 🤔
The only way I could see a system like this working is if it were setup thru a proper esports league. No actual big money gains or very little gains on low level, but at higher levels of play (say in a live-streamed esports tournament where people are literally flown out and are playing on LAN) people are competing for those super rare big money items. Even then, there are still loopholes and with cheaters it seems like it will just be too much of a risk
Linus Tech Tips has a rule: NEVER insult your audience. Instead of calling the naysayers idiots, he should have said something to acknowledge the justified skepticism and explain what he's gonna do to win our trust.
Charlie's got some great points, the only way i can picture this working is if there was a team monitering everyones screens when a game has actual money on the line. But then thats people being paid to watch so... Hope Doc figures this one out
Dr disrespect is going to learn just how difficult it is, not only create a game, but also to keep it sustainable for years. It needs to be his life. I hope he doesn't think it's non hackable. When real money is involved people will find a way to break the game and once again ruin it for legit players.
Dr. Disrespect worked at Sledgehammer Games as a map designer for COD Advanced Warfare. He hired a dev from Halo Infinite to lead the project. I don't doubt he and his team can make the game, but this NFT stuff is bad news. But yeah, like Charlie said, this game will be full of the cheatiest of the cheaters and attract the wrong attention/audience and just be full of problems from top to bottom.
Until the next time of course. Humans don't actually learn. It takes generations. We aren't a smart lot on the whole & love to repeat ourselves over & over again, typically in blood.
as long as the cheating can be handled, its an incredible idea. also im 99% sure dr. disrespect, the man who has been gaming for longer than most people here have been alive, is welll aware of cheaters and has something in plan. its years down the line.
i almost have to assume once you get an item its kept on death? clearly people arent going to run around risking a 100,000 dollar item. so 1 of 2 things would happen, it would be permanently kept in some safety storage deposit box till it would be sold to someone else who would do the same thing with it or 2 the game will make it so you keep your stuff on death and then it doesnt matter if you die to a cheater? the idea of just having you lose items worth money to other players, especially cheaters.... its not a viable or even remotely sane business model.
Dr. Devs: "Imagine finding an item worth $100,000" Me: "Wow, so you just create items, drop them into the game, and you'll give people $100,000 if they cash it in? You're gonna put your own money into the system to generate hype?" Dr. Devs: "...um..."
Yes, imagine seeing a streamer trying to extract with a $100k NFT and getting sniped. I'm sure nothing bad would happen and that streamer's chat would cheer them right up, or a "good effort" from their wife will cool them down.
People use them to attempt to be on trend. They want to push crypto so bad due to their distrust for the government and we'll for selfish purposes. But either way you go there's taxes and you gotta pay up front for crypto so it's basically a stock but instead of helping another useful company and it's many employees..it's all pretty much self serving. The risk is higher and people are using unknown amounts of energy just so these crypto places riding a trend can grift off of desperation and fear from our society.
To be fair charlie knows nothing about NFTs. He's not keeping an open mind ironically as we didnt like it when boomers had no open mind to the internet and just wanted to watch tv and read newspapers. Charlie is the same.
@liamsteam walsh Enter the whole reason the ORIGINAL people brought up crypto. People are tired of the market. But instead of glorifying the good sides we regurgitate "scams" and keep it from progressing, as if FTX and Dr. Disrespect represents the entire concept. These youtubers including that coffee guy that exposed logan paul aren't stupid. The views and money are in controversy, not in dissecting concepts such as crypto with absolute fairness to good and bad.
I have this rule where I never give a content creators money for any reason, only on a few occasions and under very specific circumstances, because of the amount of scams and stuff that are so rampant these days. I just don't trust anyone over the internet with stuff like that in general
The only way I see this work and even that’s a maybe is after every extraction it stays pending in between the 2 players and after a admin or maybe a AI algorithm review the extraction it either confirms or denies the extraction. Problem with this is that extraction would probably take up to days to even weeks to extract. And i don’t even know if AI can review replays to determine if their cheating or not. And if AI don’t work like that, u cannot hire enough people to monitor millions of extractions a day.
Like in GTA online when you're delivering cargo around a map and a hacker blows everyone up out of nowhere and you lose all your money - I always thought "man, I wish that was real money I just lost"
If they make the game on consoles only it would severley limit cheating. Don't really see any hackers on console in comparison to pc where they are in every multi-player game
Just cuz a project involves NFTs doesnt mean it a scam. It is a scam only when people (like Logan Paul) make money by lying to investors. For example Logan made crazy promises and then abandoned the project after he got paid. What Dr D is doing here is completely different.
It honestly would be kind of cool to have a 2B2T situation where the entire game is literally just hackers seeing who's hacks work better and the game is just pure anarchy.
If there's a game lobby with an item worth 100 grand in it, there would have to be an employee in that match as well watching for cheating in realtime. The only way they can dream of this working is if they have an active digital security team constantly watching their game for cheaters and banning them in realtime so people don't experience being robbed by them constantly, like Charlie's example. They need the agents from The Matrix jumping from match to match. lol
Very good point, and whilst watching this video I thought the best and only way this would actually work is by doing tournaments every now and again like an ESPORTS tournament. Where the best players in the game attend are all on a LAN and compete for said 100k NFT, with spectators watching and staff there What he is suggesting cannot happen in every game, it’s just not possible
@@DKHarris96 you'd be surprised what they could probably manage to do if they marketed it as a "privilege" to be a 'referee' for their games. They could totally get volunteers to do it for free; I know companies have done things like that before. (i'm not saying they _should_ do that, it's a really predatory thing to do. But they could)
@@idontwantahandlethough I mean they could make it non-predatory where the referee agrees to watch for a certain timeframe of a day, and in return they get something like an undiscovered NFT worth over a minimum of some set amount. Or, if their dishing out the money for said 100k NFT, than I'm sure they could pay a few people a good amount of money to watch the servers as a career. That's too optimistic though I bet
Even with real time banishment, it would still be messy, just think of the amount of players a certain cheater could take out in the downtime between suspecting and actually indentifying the player as a confirmed cheater.
@@molin1310 I mean, I agree with what you are saying, but I wonder if with the proposition of making money, if legal action could be taken against cheaters? Where you need go verify your ID before playing and cheating maliciously could bring fraud chsrges or something similar
Let's not forget about the sheer amount of people that will end up getting royally fucked by disconnects and power failures during matches. It's one thing to lose a match when it's simply just a game for entertainment. It's a wholly separate thing when suddenly you've lost out on something with real-world value tied to it. Imagine the rage.
Someone needs to create a platform like this where you can win by any means necessary. Like legalising doping in cycling and just see how far those hulking behemoths go
The doctor is a genius low key. Hear me out. His plan is to get all the cheaters off COD by making this game and incentivizing them making the switch to this new game. This way he can play his games with much less cheating bc they’re all playing his new one.
@@Bajanprince67 well lets take a look at playstation 5 console, there are 0 hackers, there might be cheaters who use glitches but there are no physical hackers using things like aimbots and mod menu because it is not possible to do that on a playstation 5 console, maybe xbox, im not sure, but its not possible to aimbot on ps5
NFTbros and peddlers never say "Oh, you got your wallet hacked and your NFT stolen? We can help!" They *always* say "Oh, that sucks, but change your fucking display pic, it's not yours anymore" I expect Disrespect's Dev Team to take a very similar approach if someone were to report a hacking/account theft
Do you realize how many how incompetent this comment is?? for security reasons, which is one of the pros of Blockchain is there’s no moderator or admin that magically take it from one persons wallet. Meaning how could they help? Also, change your profile pic is literally a meme. Just say you don’t get the technology like a normal person
Unless they don't tell the user what they've got until they're out of the match, but from the wording of the statement that makes it seem like the player will know what they've picked up.
Pretty much every time one of these starts with an "as I'm sure you already know" or "as all of you have heard about already," I am immediately blasted with a new random bit of information I have never heard about in my life
"If I want to transfer my skins 2 which comes out 7 years later or whatever" Gabe watching this video decided to troll Charlie by releasing CS2 couple of weeks later
I'm not someone who really believes in hacking in games especially competitive ones, but with 100,000$ on the line I'd fucking snort up cheat codes like a damn fiend. That amount of money would change my life. Can't say I'd be above it, but I'd like to be. I hope Dr.Disrespects game works out.
nothing in this game will be worth 100k unless the game itself becomes as popular as WZ, which is unlikely. an item will only be worth what players are willing to pay for it, for anything to be worth that much this game would have to have the playerbase of CSGO. even in a game like Diablo 3, which had a real money auction house when it came out and the items increased your power significantly, nothing was ever worth 100k.
Yeah even if the most valuable thing in there is $100 it would draw a lot of cheating interest. People cheat in Warzone and other free to play games where you can't earn anything from the game,
This issue brings to mind the insane lengths Casinos go through to prevent cheating. And they have the advantage of completely controlling a real world space with very narrowly defined games.
@@Salisky counting cards isn't cheating. You're literally just playing the game better than everyone else. Just because it's against the rules of casinos doesn't mean you're actually cheating in blackjack, the casinos just refuse to allow people to have better odds than them. Counting cards is 100% skill based so it is far from cheating.
@@bruhngl certain States in the US are even making it illegal for casinos to stop card counters from playing because it is a skill thing. They aren't violating any rules, they're just playing the game really good.
@@bruhnglI don't think he was referring to card counting. There's a million dollar underground market of people that continuously develop devices to try and hack machines within casinos.
@@bruhngl i don’t know if the comment was even implying anything about card counting lol. Casinos will still kick you out if the think you are counting. There are plenty of ways to cheat at casino games.
D3 RMAH had this issue. On launch the Chinese gold farmers and botter inflated the price of gold which inflated the cost of items. At one point a Flawless Star ruby or emerald cost 45mil gold. And this was vanilla, so if something dropped it was few and far between good.
You could make a system where if you extract items that it takes a week (or less idk) to redeem it and cash out, in that time they inspect that game session for any cheating.
EVEN IF there's no cheaters, my genuine first thought when Charlie said "most obvious issue" was, where is the money going to come from? You can't just whim it into existence, after all
It's an NFT. The idea is you sell it to other people and they purchase it as a future investment. In this case, Dr. Disrespect and his game dev crew aren't going to be making payouts.
it will basically be the csgo skin market. He is hoping that his game will pop off and that some items/skins will be worth 100k. Very unlikely in my opinion.
Is Doc so feared that every person and every level of management agreed with him and no one brought up the negatives of this game? Blows my damn mind….
Most influencers just hire yesmen who’s only job is to OK their bosses plans, and whose only skillset is kissing ass. It’s part of the influencer ego. They all think they’re some Golden God whose brilliance can barely be contained. When in reality, they made their money off impressing 12 year olds on the internet and probably fuck kids.
@@Noooiiiissseee True, that's why it's more important for projects like games and movies to have a team that actually cares. So what if the director or whatever won the grammy or some shit but if he doesn't give a fuck about the artistry behind the IP, it's just wasted money. We keep seeing things fail cause the root of the problem is that we have haphazardly formed teams that just wants the paycheck. Yeah, they'll do "a" job just not one they're fond of. Like several shows for some reason have writers that publicly admit they hate the source material, where the hell is the logic in that?
i just wanna know how the values are set and where the money is coming from. if you win a "100k" NFT, can you convert it to USD through them or do you have to wait for someone else to buy it off you??? what makes it worth that much???
Even without cheating, I'm sure teaming would occur. If you get a large group of people to go into the game at the same time. There's a good chance of being in the same lobby (depending on region, and whatnot, etc). Then, you just safely exit after getting the loot.
@@kwaitefuni9152 just keep the 100k in mind, in tarkov the person who discussed how cheats work was more affraid of getting recognize by cheaters firm (bad people) then tarkov themselves
Now that godslap issue 3 is out, Charlie might finally fix the Godslap poster on his wall that slid down within its frame and hasn't been centered in the frame for a couple months now.
I have an idea, it would be a lot of dev work though. So every item acquired is placed on a hold for X amount of hours/days. It cannot be traded or sold until a time of investigation has happened. The investigation would consist of devs reviewing the game where the item was acquired to review and deem that the item was acquired through play fair with no cheating. And if they deem it was acquired with obvious cheating the account is banned and the item is deleted or placed back into the loot pool. Thoughts?
Sounds like a lot of money to be paid for devs and the item moderators you'll need to determine if there was fair play. And I'll bet those moderators won't wanna be paid in volatile shit like NFTs. The value of what you got would also literally fluctuate massively in this waiting period.
There is probably no better and faster way to immediately utterly destroy and erase any semblance of trust your project could ever possibly hope to achieve than starting its pitch with the claim that "everyone who thinks this won't work out is an idiot".
Dear god, I get tilted and facepalm myself after dying in Tarkov. The thought of adding the potential of losing hundreds or thousands of dollars possibly to not just cheaters but just the random bullshittery that happens is a rage I can’t imagine.
@@NOU-iw3gb you wouldn’t, but if you found an extremely valuable item and tried to extract and got killed, the rage would be insane. that’s what he was saying
Tarkov is riddled with cheaters and it's pretty expensive to buy the game every time you get banned, and there's not even money to earn in Tarkov. You're absolutely right and I think even if the game was incredible, it'll be completely ruined by cheater and by extension ruined by its biggest gimmick.
@@xiMvP Not really possible anymore, they removed barters and you can't drop items in raid. You could pay for a carry but then they have logs of both accounts and both get banned.
The thing I love about this game is the fact that on all my online games I’m about to run into less cheaters cause they will just go over there to hack and make money 😂
TBH depending on how the NFT's are tied to the account the risk of cheating, requirement of participating in high value PvP situations. Simply may not financially viable with the a ban rate
I saw someone say in another video, if you can make 100k in a game from a single Tarkov-like extraction, you're going to need damn NSA level anti-cheat to stop the cheaters.
Could just have a ranked reward system where the reward is based on match performance but that would have to be implemented into a different style of game
i guarantee you even if the company was like “an innocent person will die the next time we catch a cheater” ppl would cheat specifically to se if they’re deadass
love how charlie always introduces a video with "I'm sure all of you already know", but i literally never know because he is my only source of news LMAO
I bet the people who developed this game with him just assumed he was doing a scam. Like whenever he’d talk about how excited he was about the concept they just thought he was doing a bit.
@@akselbentsen3683 Yeah I mean there's not an incalculable amount of examples of this exact same thing consistently playing out as a scam before now or anything, while you could likely count on one hand the examples of these things that resulted in an actual game. A crap game, probably, at that.
The accounts would need to be very high value, you can't have it where accounts are being bought and sold for $5 like a lot of games. If there is high value for the accounts, the barrier for entry would at least help dissuade some cheaters. Not all, but some. The major problem with this is that it would create a high barrier for regions that cant afford it, and before anyone sugggests region locking... That doesn't work now, why would it work later?
