Dr John Hlophe's appointment to the JSC a surprise - Prof. Bohler-Muller 

They cry constitutionalism until it allows something they don't like, then they want to change the constitution but when others advocate for the changing of the constitution in different areas, they call them anti-constitutionalists.....The law is the law

The problem in SA are Zuma laws. What applies to Zuma does not to apply everyone. Hlope was just impeached because he was perceived to be proZuma. Not because of any law

Rule of Law, the law is above everything

Constitution allows him to be in parliament to make law like any lawmakers of parliament,why do you choose where he must be ,he was elected by us for parliament for everything

Those ethics just an excuses and bullying of umuntu omnyama if is about that it has to applied to everyone not only Judge hlophe

After listening to this I understand why MK put Hlope forward

Black child you are alone 😢😢

Dr John Hlope's Appointment. They didn't see it coming, there you are, headline corrected

Very biased analysis

You didn’t expect this to happen. Because you were against it… so predictable 😂😅😅…

What about your own integrity Prof when you shower Breytenbag with flowers with her own history and yet Julius has cause trouble. Jokes are waiting themselves

The same parliament that impeached Hlophe 😂has chosen him to represent it at the jsc 😂what does it say about the impeachment 😂kafka of the kafka

Capture is the most likely road to evolve.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣GWAZA MKHONTO GWAZA

These bunch of hypocrites beneficiaries of crime against humanity are amazing. They voted for Ramaphosa as the President despite section 89 Independent panel report on Phala Phala Farmgate. No body screamed "morals and ethics", the constitution they used to praise is against them today, so we must ignore it.. Niyanya zinja😂😂

Only fools are surprised, Hlophe is more qualified than anyone participating there!

Incase appointed aplliçants request Hlope's recusal, he must do it the Zondo way on Zondo commission

This lady is talking nonsense and very biased we don’t need such commentators on our TV

She is now speaking for judges 👨‍⚖️

Is he going to free the previous speaker? The 21 accused in KZN. Let’s watch this saga arise……..

It means here in SA no one is fit and proper except for "those"!

What a surprising surprise, Hlophe is most law scholar qualified them all in that committee 😂😂😂!

The Law is the Law…

Hi is your husband or any of your family members been judged improperly

We should reconsider it… why now? You are ridiculous Prof.

Anc very clever who impeach him DA not AnC

only white racist civil organisations and this racist channel are opposed to Hlophe and not Black South Africans hence they are not given a platform by this channel whose content is influenced by racism.

Hlophe does not deserve to be at parliament ... he must respect people of SA

For a start: a. The JSC consists of TWENTYTHREE(23) members. That in and of itself reduces the impact of a vote of any sole member; b. secondly the JSC is by definition an ADVISORY commission to the national government in matters relating to the Judiciary or administration of justice; c. THIRTEEN(13) members of the JSC, interview candidates for judicial posts and makes recommendations for possible appointments. s. and so the opinion of Dr John Hlophe, in case him being selected to participate in these interviews ONLY constitute 1/13th of the COLLECTIVE of interviewers; d. as far as 'dealing with complaints about judges is concerned: well, it's up to the president of the JSC to decide if HE deems it wise to permit Dr. Hlophe in these kinds of deliberations. My final conclusion: VERY MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING!!!

Double standards detected

Sqwiza ❤ .. Afrika Borwa is unethical so is the rest of the world but re worse 😢 Ke Gopola dinako tšeo re bego re tla dumelela malapa go tšea dinku bjalo ka tefo ya go katwa

We cannot be told by these racists what entails morals

Thank you prof. Our voices are NEVER heard. I hope people listen and understand topics like this. Come SA people lets change our mindsets

All NewzAfrika Analysts are bias…😂😅😅

Hlope will never be able to remain objective

But brytenbach was found guilty and suspended by the npa which followed her dismissal. So what do you call that?

He's phakathi inside

ANC in parliament fails on this one. Weak decision, wrong in principle, strategically misguided.

Imagine Europeans being moralistic 😂after all the atrocities and continuing beneficiation from atrocities

You are not representing our interest, please, Mam😮😮

Dr Hlophe is the best choice, and most qualified. You talking racist rubbish

CJ Zondo is Ramaphosa 's boy.

Prof must brush her teeth

Please interview people that are not take sides please

They afraid of best former black judge we ever had, intelligent,smart and educated

Double standards on ethics. Where is this ethics when it comes to the cloud hanging over President Ramaphosa? DA must go and fly a kite. Let the law take its course.

Shame on this so-called professor. And the same goes for the journalist. Please go read the constitution which we claiming to defend. Bunch of irrational people

Some people keep on saying Hlophe should do the ethical or right thing, if he doesn’t believe in his whole impeachment, certainly the right thing for him would be to avail himself to serve in JSC. What is ethical to one, might not be ethical to another person, it depends on certain groups interests ( think of inequalities and economic differences due to others benefiting from the gains of apartheid and see if ethics are seen by All from the same angle). The constitution is not a book written by Almighty creator of heavens and earth, it might be respected around the globe, but why can it not be legally changed within the parameters of the law? It makes provisions of amendments itself, which means it can be changed following specific processes. The reality is that there are South Africans who believe that the same constitution of their country is not addressing the injustices of the past. The question is, must they not talk about their views of challenging the status-quo? The comments just depend on which side of the table you are, in terms of life you are living. The reality is that some are happy with certain parts of the constitution and some are unhappy and it is not being an unconstitutional individual if you voice your opinion otherwise that is trying to silence people. If the parliament was to agree in constitutionally addressing the “Hlophe issue” to avoid from happening in the future, would that be unconstitutional to add/amend the constitution because our constitution is respected globally? Our constitution should work for us, not us working for it. It needs to address our realities not to please people out of South Africa at the expense of the voters who have not yet gained the freedom which they dream of in their country.

All the members of MK are all former AnC members they should call themselves REVENGE PARTY 😂😂😂😂😂

This So called professor is a ridicule 😅 A very stupid analysis

It cnt be that a normal person without a qualification is a ryt person to be in JSC n an impeached judge is not a ryt person....Dr Hlophe is not going to JSC as a Judge , but he's going there as a normal MP...its a bonus that he was a judge

This woman is evil!

The black law society have already put it clear that nothing can prevent John hlophe to hold this position. Some people and media keeps using ethics cards if they pulled same cards out on phala phala maybe the public will understand 😂

I see Zondo going to parliament after retiring.

Not all members of JSC agreed to impeachment, may be Malema was one of those. If one does not agree with certain groups, he is labelled as causing trouble, but the vise versa is not true to the very same group. Inconsistency. Talking about morals, where are the morals of those who are still benefitting today from the deeds of the then legalised apartheid? What are their morals saying in undoing injustices for past, in order to close the gap of living conditions?

Simply invite JP Hlophe to speak for himself rather than soliciting advice from professors with shady teeth. The mainstream media enjoys talking about JP Hlophe but avoids interacting with him. How about giving us an opportunity to hear his side of the story?

Talk about Karma

Unbelievable idiocy!!! Can you imagine for a moment those prospective morally upright people will subject themselves to John..... I dont think so....i won't!!!

Eff didn't vote In favor 😂😂😂this professor must wash her lying teeths 😂

Hands off Judge Hlophe

She is talking rubbish

Remember Hlophe is not a judge now,so what you want,he is doing other job,you thought he will suffer and became a poor man😂, forget we blacks see you

Hlophe belongs in jail along with his comrade, Jacob Zuma. NOT IN PARLIAMENT!

I forgive you black presenters you doing for feeding your families

whitens comment

You talking a lot of racist nonsense